Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Robust Single-Stage Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection via Detachable Latent Diffusion

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The abstract claims RSDNet, a single-step fully sparse 3D detector, but the attached full text is a different paper on video diffusion distillation, so the claimed method and evidence are absent from this file.

desk verdict The abstract promises a fully sparse 3D detector with detachable latent diffusion, but the manuscript body is an unrelated video-distillation paper; there is nothing here to referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03252 v2 pith:2SCC76VP submitted 2025-08-05 cs.CV

Wentao Qu , Guofeng Mei , Jing Wang , Yujiao Wu , Xiaoshui Huang , Liang Xiao This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords single-stage3Dobjectdetectionfullysparsedenoisingdiffusionlatentfeaturespacedetachableframeworkvideodistillationpreferenceoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The submission's abstract announces RSDNet, a single-stage fully sparse 3D object detector that learns a denoising diffusion process in a latent feature space and performs detection in one inference step. The full text supplied immediately after the abstract, however, is a different manuscript about iterative online preference distillation for efficient text-to-video diffusion models; it contains no RSDNet architecture, no sparse 3D detection experiments, and no benchmark comparisons. The body text's actual insight concerns using preference optimization instead of supervised imitation to distill pruned video diffusion models, but that is not the contribution named in the title and abstract. A fair reading is that the stated pith is the RSDNet proposal while the supporting content is missing from this file.

What carries the argument

The abstract's central machinery is the Detachable Latent Framework (DLF): a set of lightweight denoising networks, such as multi-level denoising autoencoders, that learn to reverse perturbations applied to latent object features. The framework reformulates standard DDPM noising and denoising so that both multi-type and multi-level noise samples and prediction targets can be constructed, and it pairs them with semantic-geometric conditional guidance meant to recover object boundaries and compensate for missing center features in sparse point-cloud representations. The detachable design is what allows the denoising network to be removed at inference, leaving a single-step fully sparse detector. The supplied full text does not describe any of these components.

What would settle it

Search the supplied full text for the terms RSDNet, Detachable Latent Framework, and the 3D detection benchmarks named in the abstract; if none appear, the central claim as submitted has no evidence in this file. The body text itself, which describes video diffusion distillation instead of sparse 3D detection, is the concrete observation that settles the mismatch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that a fully sparse 3D detector can incorporate DDPM-style denoising inside its latent feature space, so that at inference the denoising network can be detached and detection runs in a single step. The claimed mechanism is a Detachable Latent Framework that reformulates the noising and denoising processes to create multi-type and multi-level noise samples and targets, uses lightweight multi-level denoising autoencoders to absorb perturbations, and adds semantic-geometric conditional guidance to perceive object boundaries and avoid the missing-center-feature problem of sparse representations. The abstract asserts state-of-the-art results on public benchmarks. None of this architecture, training procedure, or experimental evidence appears in the supplied full text, which is devoted to a video-distillation method.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the attached full text actually contains RSDNet's architecture and experiments; the provided text does not, so the central claim currently has no supporting content.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the abstract's claim is correct, 3D object detection from point clouds would no longer need multi-step diffusion sampling at inference, removing the main efficiency bottleneck of diffusion-based detectors.
  • A fully sparse pipeline with center-feature recovery could operate directly on raw sparse representations, avoiding dense pillar or voxel densification in the detection backbone.
  • The detachable denoising network could be trained separately and dropped at test time, making the detector a single-step model whose robustness to perturbations is inherited from diffusion-style training.
  • State-of-the-art numbers on public benchmarks would mean latent-feature-space denoising is a viable alternative to box-level or prior-level diffusion for 3D detection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If RSDNet is realized as the abstract describes, the detachable latent framework could transfer to other sparse perception tasks, such as 3D semantic segmentation or streaming detection, because the denoising operates on features rather than on bounding boxes.
  • The abstract-to-body mismatch means the stated performance claims cannot currently be checked against any experimental table; obtaining the RSDNet full text is a precondition for evaluating the scientific claim.
  • A natural ablation to test the central mechanism would be removing the semantic-geometric conditional guidance and measuring whether the fully sparse detection accuracy drops, isolating whether center-feature recovery is what carries the gain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript submitted under arXiv:2508.03252 presents an abstract claiming a new single-stage fully sparse 3D object detector, RSDNet, built on a Detachable Latent Framework (DLF) of DDPMs, with single-step inference and state-of-the-art performance on 3D detection benchmarks. The full text, however, is a different paper, "V.I.P.: Iterative Online Preference Distillation for Efficient Video Diffusion Models," which describes preference-based distillation of text-to-video diffusion models. No section of the body defines RSDNet, the DLF, the multi-level denoising autoencoders, the semantic-geometric conditional guidance, or any 3D detection experiment. The abstract's claims are therefore unsupported by the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed method would address a real efficiency/robustness trade-off in fully sparse 3D detection: single-step inference with detachable latent denoising, multi-level perturbation modeling, and conditional guidance for sparse features. However, none of the machinery needed to evaluate these claims is present. The submitted body is an unrelated video-diffusion-distillation paper with its own title, contributions, and experiments. As a consequence, the manuscript in its current form has no verifiable scientific content relevant to the claimed topic, and the state-of-the-art claim is unfalsifiable. I can credit the submission with no reproducible method, experiments, or derivations for the claimed system, because none are included.

major comments (4)
  1. [Title/Abstract vs. full text] The abstract on page 1 claims that RSDNet learns a denoising process in latent feature spaces via multi-level denoising autoencoders, reformulates the noising and denoising mechanisms of DDPMs, introduces semantic-geometric conditional guidance for fully sparse detection, and achieves state-of-the-art results. The full text from Section 1 onward is "V.I.P.: Iterative Online Preference Distillation for Efficient Video Diffusion Models," with arXiv:2508.03254v1 printed on the first page. There is no passage in the body that defines or evaluates RSDNet, so the central claim of the submission is unsupported by any content in the manuscript.
  2. [Method (absent)] No method description exists for the claimed detector. The reader cannot find equations for the reformulated forward/reverse processes, the training objective of the DLF, the architecture of the multi-level denoising autoencoders, or the construction of the semantic-geometric conditional guidance. These components are named in the abstract but never specified, so the claimed single-step fully sparse pipeline cannot be checked for correctness, reproducibility, or consistency with the stated design goals.
  3. [Experiments (absent)] The experimental content of the body concerns video generation models only: Tables 2–4 report VideoScore and VBench results for VideoCrafter2 and AnimateDiff, and Figures 4–5 show video quality comparisons. There are no 3D object detection benchmarks, no comparisons with prior 3D detectors, and no ablations of the DLF components. The phrase "state-of-the-art detection" in the abstract is therefore unverifiable from the manuscript.
  4. [Contributions and references] The contributions listed in Section 1, the related-work discussion, and the reference list all concern video diffusion distillation, DPO/SFT, pruning, and video quality metrics; none of the cited works support the DDPM-based 3D detection claim in the abstract. This confirms that the body text was not written for the claimed topic and provides no evidential basis for the abstract's assertions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title] The manuscript title, "Robust Single-Stage Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection via Detachable Latent Diffusion," does not match the title of the body text, "V.I.P.: Iterative Online Preference Distillation for Efficient Video Diffusion Models"; the title should be aligned with the actual content if this is an upload error.
  2. [arXiv identifier] The body text prints arXiv:2508.03254v1 as its identifier, whereas the reviewed submission is arXiv:2508.03252; this metadata mismatch should be corrected before any resubmission.
  3. [Cross-referencing] Section and equation numbering in the body has no relation to the abstract's claimed components (DLF, DAEs, semantic-geometric conditional guidance), which makes it impossible to cross-reference any specific claim in the abstract to a supporting paragraph, equation, or table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: the RSDNet abstract has no matching method or experiments in the body, and the body is an unrelated video-distillation paper, but this integrity mismatch is not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The submission's abstract describes RSDNet, a fully sparse 3D object detector with a Detachable Latent Framework, and claims state-of-the-art detection. The full text is instead a completely different paper, 'V.I.P.: Iterative Online Preference Distillation for Efficient Video Diffusion Models' by Jisoo Kim et al., with its own arXiv identifier (2508.03254v1) printed in the body. There is no method section defining RSDNet, no equations for the reformulated noising or denoising mechanism, no multi-level denoising autoencoder, no semantic-geometric conditional guidance, and no 3D detection experiments. A circularity finding requires quoting the paper and exhibiting a specific reduction in which a claimed derivation is equivalent, by construction, to its inputs. Here no derivation chain exists in the submitted text: the abstract's claims are unsupported because the supporting content is absent, not because the supporting content reduces to the claims themselves. Unsupported claims and document-integrity failures are outside the seven enumerated circularity patterns, and the rules explicitly allow an honest non-finding. Therefore the circularity score is 0, with no circular steps identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The technical content for the claimed RSDNet method is absent from the manuscript body, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities for the claimed work can be extracted. The only relevant assumption is that the manuscript text matches the abstract, which is false.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust Single-Stage Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection via Detachable Latent Diffusion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2SCC76VP

@misc{pith2026250803252,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust Single-Stage Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection via Detachable Latent Diffusion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2SCC76VP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03252}
}
read the original abstract

Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have shown success in robust 3D object detection tasks. Existing methods often rely on the score matching from 3D boxes or pre-trained diffusion priors. However, they typically require multi-step iterations in inference, which limits efficiency. To address this, we propose a Robust single-stage fully Sparse 3D object Detection Network with a Detachable Latent Framework (DLF) of DDPMs, named RSDNet. Specifically, RSDNet learns the denoising process in latent feature spaces through lightweight denoising networks like multi-level denoising autoencoders (DAEs). This enables RSDNet to effectively understand scene distributions under multi-level perturbations, achieving robust and reliable detection. Meanwhile, we reformulate the noising and denoising mechanisms of DDPMs, enabling DLF to construct multi-type and multi-level noise samples and targets, enhancing RSDNet robustness to multiple perturbations. Furthermore, a semantic-geometric conditional guidance is introduced to perceive the object boundaries and shapes, alleviating the center feature missing problem in sparse representations, enabling RSDNet to perform in a fully sparse detection pipeline. Moreover, the detachable denoising network design of DLF enables RSDNet to perform single-step detection in inference, further enhancing detection efficiency. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks show that RSDNet can outperform existing methods, achieving state-of-the-art detection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. B\'ezier Degradation Modeling for LiDAR-based Human Motion Capture

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    BMLiCap models motion with Bézier curves and multi-scale transformers to achieve state-of-the-art LiDAR-based human pose capture on four benchmarks.

  2. GEM: Generating LiDAR World Model via Deformable Mamba

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEM is a new LiDAR world model using deformable Mamba that disentangles dynamic and static features to generate high-fidelity simulations and achieve state-of-the-art results on autonomous driving benchmarks.

  3. Deep Image Clustering Based on Curriculum Learning and Density Information

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    IDCL adds density-based curriculum learning and density-core guidance to deep image clustering, claiming superior robustness, faster convergence, and flexibility on benchmark datasets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A general theoretical paradigm to un- derstand learning from human preferences

    Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Bi- lal Piot, Remi Munos, Mark Rowland, Michal Valko, and Daniele Calandriello. A general theoretical paradigm to un- derstand learning from human preferences. InInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 4447–4455. PMLR, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval

    Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, G ¨ul Varol, and Andrew Zisser- man. Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1728–1738,

  3. [3]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models

    Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dock- horn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanja Fidler, and Karsten Kreis. Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with la- tent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22563–22575, 2023. 2

    2023

  5. [5]

    The perception-distortion tradeoff

    Yochai Blau and Tomer Michaeli. The perception-distortion tradeoff. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6228–6237, 2018. 2, 3

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Edgefusion: on-device text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11925,

    Thibault Castells, Hyoung-Kyu Song, Tairen Piao, Shinkook Choi, Bo-Kyeong Kim, Hanyoung Yim, Changgwun Lee, Jae Gon Kim, and Tae-Ho Kim. Edgefusion: on-device text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11925,

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffu- sion models

    Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffu- sion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7310– 7320, 2024. 2, 6

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Self-play fine-tuning converts weak lan- guage models to strong language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01335, 2024

    Zixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji, and Quanquan Gu. Self-play fine-tuning converts weak lan- guage models to strong language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01335, 2024. 5

    arXiv 2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Vpo: Aligning text-to-video generation models with prompt optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20491,

    Jiale Cheng, Ruiliang Lyu, Xiaotao Gu, Xiao Liu, Jiazheng Xu, Yida Lu, Jiayan Teng, Zhuoyi Yang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, et al. Vpo: Aligning text-to-video generation models with prompt optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20491,

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Rlhf workflow: From reward mod- eling to online rlhf.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07863, 2024

    Hanze Dong, Wei Xiong, Bo Pang, Haoxiang Wang, Han Zhao, Yingbo Zhou, Nan Jiang, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong, and Tong Zhang. Rlhf workflow: From reward mod- eling to online rlhf.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07863, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Kto: Model alignment as prospect theoretic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01306,

    Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Ju- rafsky, and Douwe Kiela. Kto: Model alignment as prospect theoretic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01306,

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Robust preference optimization through reward model distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19316,

    Adam Fisch, Jacob Eisenstein, Vicky Zayats, Alekh Agar- wal, Ahmad Beirami, Chirag Nagpal, Pete Shaw, and Jonathan Berant. Robust preference optimization through reward model distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19316,

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    A theory of the distortion-perception tradeoff in wasserstein space

    Dror Freirich, Tomer Michaeli, and Ron Meir. A theory of the distortion-perception tradeoff in wasserstein space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34: 25661–25672, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  6. [14]

    The devil is in the prompts: Retrieval-augmented prompt optimization for text-to-video generation

    Bingjie Gao, Xinyu Gao, Xiaoxue Wu, Yujie Zhou, Yu Qiao, Li Niu, Xinyuan Chen, and Yaohui Wang. The devil is in the prompts: Retrieval-augmented prompt optimization for text-to-video generation. InProceedings of the Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 3...

  7. [15]

    Generative adversarial networks.Commu- nications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144, 2020

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks.Commu- nications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144, 2020. 2

    2020

  8. [16]

    Direct language model alignment from online ai feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04792, 2024

    Shangmin Guo, Biao Zhang, Tianlin Liu, Tianqi Liu, Misha Khalman, Felipe Llinares, Alexandre Rame, Thomas Mesnard, Yao Zhao, Bilal Piot, et al. Direct language model alignment from online ai feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04792, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023. 2, 6

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Videoscore: Building automatic metrics to simulate fine-grained human feedback for video genera- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15252, 2024

    Xuan He, Dongfu Jiang, Ge Zhang, Max Ku, Achint Soni, Sherman Siu, Haonan Chen, Abhranil Chandra, Ziyan Jiang, Aaran Arulraj, et al. Videoscore: Building automatic metrics to simulate fine-grained human feedback for video genera- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15252, 2024. 4, 5, 1

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks

    Yihui He, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jian Sun. Channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1389–1397, 2017. 1

    2017

  12. [20]

    Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network.arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015

    Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network.arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. 1, 2

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2

    2020

  14. [22]

    Orpo: Mono- lithic preference optimization without reference model

    Jiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, and James Thorne. Orpo: Mono- lithic preference optimization without reference model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07691, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

    2024

  16. [24]

    Unpacking dpo and ppo: Dis- entangling best practices for learning from preference feed- back.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:36602–36633, 2025

    Hamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Jiacheng Liu, Zeqiu Wu, Valentina Pyatkin, Nathan Lambert, Noah A Smith, Yejin Choi, and Hanna Hajishirzi. Unpacking dpo and ppo: Dis- entangling best practices for learning from preference feed- back.Advances in neural information processing syste...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Huvidpo: Enhancing video generation through direct preference optimization for human-centric alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01690, 2025

    Lifan Jiang, Boxi Wu, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaotong Guan, and Shuang Chen. Huvidpo: Enhancing video generation through direct preference optimization for human-centric alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01690, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bk-sdm: A lightweight, fast, and cheap ver- sion of stable diffusion

    Bo-Kyeong Kim, Hyoung-Kyu Song, Thibault Castells, and Shinkook Choi. Bk-sdm: A lightweight, fast, and cheap ver- sion of stable diffusion. InEuropean Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 381–399. Springer, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  19. [27]

    Auto-encoding vari- ational bayes, 2013

    Diederik P Kingma, Max Welling, et al. Auto-encoding vari- ational bayes, 2013. 2

    2013

  20. [28]

    Block pruning for faster transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04838, 2021

    Franc ¸ois Lagunas, Ella Charlaix, Victor Sanh, and Alexan- der M Rush. Block pruning for faster transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04838, 2021. 1

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    T2v- turbo: Breaking the quality bottleneck of video consis- tency model with mixed reward feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18750, 2024

    Jiachen Li, Weixi Feng, Tsu-Jui Fu, Xinyi Wang, Sug- ato Basu, Wenhu Chen, and William Yang Wang. T2v- turbo: Breaking the quality bottleneck of video consis- tency model with mixed reward feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18750, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Snap- fusion: Text-to-image diffusion model on mobile devices within two seconds.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36:20662–20678, 2023

    Yanyu Li, Huan Wang, Qing Jin, Ju Hu, Pavlo Chemerys, Yun Fu, Yanzhi Wang, Sergey Tulyakov, and Jian Ren. Snap- fusion: Text-to-image diffusion model on mobile devices within two seconds.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36:20662–20678, 2023. 2

    2023

  23. [31]

    Evaluation of text-to-video generation models: A dy- namics perspective.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:109790–109816, 2024

    Mingxiang Liao, Qixiang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo, Fang Wan, Tianyu Wang, Yuzhong Zhao, Jingdong Wang, Xinyu Zhang, et al. Evaluation of text-to-video generation models: A dy- namics perspective.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:109790–109816, 2024. 4

    2024

  24. [32]

    Evaluation of text-to-video generation models: A dy- namics perspective.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:109790–109816, 2025

    Mingxiang Liao, Qixiang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo, Fang Wan, Tianyu Wang, Yuzhong Zhao, Jingdong Wang, Xinyu Zhang, et al. Evaluation of text-to-video generation models: A dy- namics perspective.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:109790–109816, 2025. 6

    2025

  25. [33]

    Animatediff-lightning: Cross-model diffusion distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12706, 2024

    Shanchuan Lin and Xiao Yang. Animatediff-lightning: Cross-model diffusion distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12706, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Sdxl- lightning: Progressive adversarial diffusion distillation

    Shanchuan Lin, Anran Wang, and Xiao Yang. Sdxl- lightning: Progressive adversarial diffusion distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13929, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Improving video generation with human feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13918, 2025

    Jie Liu, Gongye Liu, Jiajun Liang, Ziyang Yuan, Xiaokun Liu, Mingwu Zheng, Xiele Wu, Qiulin Wang, Wenyu Qin, Menghan Xia, et al. Improving video generation with human feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13918, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Videodpo: Omni- preference alignment for video diffusion generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14167, 2024

    Runtao Liu, Haoyu Wu, Zheng Ziqiang, Chen Wei, Yingqing He, Renjie Pi, and Qifeng Chen. Videodpo: Omni- preference alignment for video diffusion generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14167, 2024. 3, 6

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Learning efficient convolutional networks through network slimming

    Zhuang Liu, Jianguo Li, Zhiqiang Shen, Gao Huang, Shoumeng Yan, and Changshui Zhang. Learning efficient convolutional networks through network slimming. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2736–2744, 2017. 1

    2017

  30. [39]

    Provably mitigating overoptimization in rlhf: Your sft loss is implicitly an adversarial regularizer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16436, 2024

    Zhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu, Hongyi Guo, Yingxiang Yang, Jose Blanchet, and Zhaoran Wang. Provably mitigating overoptimization in rlhf: Your sft loss is implicitly an adversarial regularizer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16436, 2024. 3, 4, 5

    2024 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Simpo: Sim- ple preference optimization with a reference-free reward

    Yu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, and Danqi Chen. Simpo: Sim- ple preference optimization with a reference-free reward. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 124198–124235, 2025. 3

    2025

  32. [41]

    Posterior- mean rectified flow: Towards minimum mse photo-realistic image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00418, 2024

    Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, and Michael Elad. Posterior- mean rectified flow: Towards minimum mse photo-realistic image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00418, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 35:27730– 27744, 2022

    Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Car- roll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 35:2...

    2022

  34. [43]

    Smaug: Fixing failure modes of preference optimisation with dpo-positive.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13228, 2024

    Arka Pal, Deep Karkhanis, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Siddartha Naidu, and Colin White. Smaug: Fixing failure modes of preference optimisation with dpo-positive.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13228, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023

    Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christo- pher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  37. [46]

    Refining alignment framework for diffusion models with intermediate-step preference ranking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01667, 2025

    Jie Ren, Yuhang Zhang, Dongrui Liu, Xiaopeng Zhang, and Qi Tian. Refining alignment framework for diffusion models with intermediate-step preference ranking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01667, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 6 if the prompt conta...

    2022

  39. [48]

    - Excessive mentions of country names (distracts from motion evaluation)

    Assign score 0 if the prompt is unusable due to: - Fragmented, unclear, or incoherent sentences. - Excessive mentions of country names (distracts from motion evaluation)

  40. [49]

    Visual Quality

    Otherwise, analyze the degree of motion and assign a score from 1 to 3: - 1: Static Scene -> No motion or movement (e.g., a still scene, a stationary object). - 2: Minimal Motion -> Slight transitions or small repetitive actions (e.g., a person blinking, tree leaves rustling, ...

  41. [50]

    - Excessive mentions of country names (distracts evaluation)

    Assign score 0 if the prompt is unusable due to: - Fragmented, unclear, or incoherent sentences. - Excessive mentions of country names (distracts evaluation)

  42. [51]

    No mention of visual attributes like lighting, colors, resolution, or atmosphere

    Otherwise, analyze the degree of Visual Quality and assign a score from 1 to 3: - Score 1: Low Visual Quality: Vague or generic descriptions with minimal details. No mention of visual attributes like lighting, colors, resolution, or atmosphere. - Score 2: Moderate Visual Quali...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.