Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Multilingual Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11072 v2 pith:2SJQLOXT submitted 2024-11-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords mllmsmultilinguallanguagemodelssurveydiscussacrossalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the latest research on multilingual large language models (MLLMs). MLLMs not only are able to understand and generate language across linguistic boundaries, but also represent an important advancement in artificial intelligence. We first discuss the architecture and pre-training objectives of MLLMs, highlighting the key components and methodologies that contribute to their multilingual capabilities. We then discuss the construction of multilingual pre-training and alignment datasets, underscoring the importance of data quality and diversity in enhancing MLLM performance. An important focus of this survey is on the evaluation of MLLMs. We present a detailed taxonomy and roadmap covering the assessment of MLLMs' cross-lingual knowledge, reasoning, alignment with human values, safety, interpretability and specialized applications. Specifically, we extensively discuss multilingual evaluation benchmarks and datasets, and explore the use of LLMs themselves as multilingual evaluators. To enhance MLLMs from black to white boxes, we also address the interpretability of multilingual capabilities, cross-lingual transfer and language bias within these models. Finally, we provide a comprehensive review of real-world applications of MLLMs across diverse domains, including biology, medicine, computer science, mathematics and law. We showcase how these models have driven innovation and improvements in these specialized fields while also highlighting the challenges and opportunities in deploying MLLMs within diverse language communities and application scenarios. We listed the paper related in this survey and publicly available at https://github.com/tjunlp-lab/Awesome-Multilingual-LLMs-Papers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VisR-Bench: An Empirical Study on Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multilingual Long Document Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multilingual, multi-page document retrieval benchmark with 35K+ QA pairs shows MLLM retrievers lead but still fail on tables and low-resource languages.

  2. A quantitative analysis of semantic information in deep representations of text and images

    cs.CL 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using an asymmetric rank-based measure, the paper maps which layers of large language and vision models carry shared semantic information, finding central-layer peaks for translations and cross-modal pairs, and system...

  3. HKGAI-V1: Towards Regional Sovereign Large Language Model for Hong Kong

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DeepSeek-based model fine-tuned for Hong Kong outperforms general models on Hong Kong benchmarks, but most of those benchmarks are self-authored and unreleased.

  4. FuxiMT: Sparsifying Large Language Models for Chinese-Centric Multilingual Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    FuxiMT combines a frozen BLOOMz model with sparse mixture-of-experts layers, Chinese-first pretraining, and curriculum learning to translate into Chinese from 65 languages, with claimed low-resource gains that the pap...

Pith tools