pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.06477 · v3 · pith:2TPFU73Mnew · submitted 2023-11-11 · 💻 cs.CY

Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords generativereportworkshopsystemsbeginchallengescomputergenlaw
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw), held in July 2023. A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI, and by Generative AI for law, with an emphasis on U.S. law in particular. We begin the report with a high-level statement about why Generative AI is both immensely significant and immensely challenging for law. To meet these challenges, we conclude that there is an essential need for 1) a shared knowledge base that provides a common conceptual language for experts across disciplines; 2) clarification of the distinctive technical capabilities of generative-AI systems, as compared and contrasted to other computer and AI systems; 3) a logical taxonomy of the legal issues these systems raise; and, 4) a concrete research agenda to promote collaboration and knowledge-sharing on emerging issues at the intersection of Generative AI and law. In this report, we synthesize the key takeaways from the GenLaw workshop that begin to address these needs. All of the listed authors contributed to the workshop upon which this report is based, but they and their organizations do not necessarily endorse all of the specific claims in this report.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extracting memorized pieces of (copyrighted) books from open-weight language models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new extraction technique applied to 200 books and 14 LLMs finds that memorization of full books is rare except in specific high-capacity models where entire texts can be recovered verbatim.

  2. Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption

    cs.CR 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLM watermarking adoption is limited by misaligned stakeholder incentives; incentive-aligned approaches such as in-context watermarking can enable practical use in targeted domains like education and peer review.

  3. Towards the Anonymization of the Language Modeling

    cs.CL 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Authors introduce MLM and CLM specialization methods that avoid memorizing identifiers in sensitive training data while aiming for a privacy-utility tradeoff on medical datasets.