Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 3 cited by

EP260321a/SN 2026gzf: The Faintest Shock Breakout Associated with a Broad-Lined Supernova

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A low-redshift fast X-ray transient is the shock breakout from a broad-lined Type Ic supernova driven by a choked mildly relativistic outflow.

desk verdict The paper adds a new low-redshift shock-breakout X-ray transient tied to a broad-lined Ic SN, but the choked-outflow claim depends on a wind-density threshold that is stated without strong justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09992 v2 pith:2UFGUWLD submitted 2026-06-08 astro-ph.HE

Brendan O'Connor , Xander J. Hall , Malte Busmann , Daniel Gruen , Alberto Floris , Tomas Cabrera , Ziyuan Zhu , Antonella Palmese
show 28 more authors
Dylan Green John Banovetz Julius Gassert Christopher L. Fryer Roberto Ricci Eleonora Troja Surya Shivaprasad Gregory R. Zeimann Ariel J. Amsellem Stephen Bailey Segev BenZvi Simone Dichiara Hendrik van Eerten Jeremy Hare Lei Hu Christopher M. Irwin Keerthi Kunnumkai Konstantin Malanchev Mitra Maleki Michael J. Moss Adam D. Myers Dheeraj Pasham Christoph Ries Geoffrey Ryan David Schlegel Michael Schmidt Silona Wilke Yu-Han Yang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords shockbreakoutbroad-linedTypeIcsupernovachokedoutflowfastX-raytransientgamma-rayburststripped-envelopeafterglowlimits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents multi-wavelength data on EP260321a at redshift 0.0344, whose thermal X-ray properties match a shock breakout. The event coincides with SN 2026gzf, whose spectra, light curve, and velocities resemble those of energetic stripped-envelope supernovae that accompany gamma-ray bursts. Chandra observations yield deep non-detections that rule out afterglows of known GRBs or fast X-ray transients. Any successful relativistic jet must therefore satisfy Gamma_0 less than 30 and kinetic energy below 10^49 erg for typical stellar-wind densities. The authors conclude that the source is instead a weak, mildly relativistic outflow that was choked inside the star, explaining both the faint X-ray signal and the absence of prompt gamma rays while placing the event between SN 2008D and low-luminosity GRBs.

What carries the argument

A mildly relativistic weak outflow choked by the progenitor star, which produces the observed thermal X-ray breakout while preventing a successful jet and afterglow.

What would settle it

An X-ray afterglow detection whose luminosity and decay match standard GRB afterglow models at the observed redshift, or a direct measurement showing kinetic energy above 10^49 erg, would falsify the choked-outflow interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

EP260321a is the faintest observed shock breakout tied to a broad-lined Type Ic supernova. The supernova properties are typical of GRB-associated events, yet the lack of an X-ray afterglow requires that any jet have low Lorentz factor and low kinetic energy. The favored interpretation is that the explosion launched a mildly relativistic weak outflow that remained choked within the progenitor, naturally accounting for the low luminosity and missing gamma-ray emission.

Load-bearing premise

The Chandra non-detection rules out afterglows of known GRBs and fast X-ray transients once a stellar wind density A star greater than or equal to 1 is assumed, permitting the derived upper limits on Lorentz factor and kinetic energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • EP260321a fills the observational gap between the shock breakout of SN 2008D and low-luminosity GRBs.
  • Terminal collapse of stripped stars can produce a wider range of outflow energies and Lorentz factors than previously sampled.
  • Mildly relativistic choked outflows can generate detectable shock breakouts without producing prompt gamma-ray emission or bright afterglows.
  • The same progenitor class can yield either successful jets or choked outflows depending on small differences in launch conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The true fraction of broad-lined supernovae that launch relativistic material may be higher if many outflows remain choked and therefore undetected in gamma rays.
  • Targeted searches for thermal X-ray transients in the local universe could reveal additional intermediate events and refine the distribution of jet-launching conditions.
  • If choked outflows are common, they may contribute to the population of fast blue optical transients or other fast-evolving transients without high-energy counterparts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports multi-wavelength observations of the Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient EP260321a at z=0.0344, identifying its thermal X-ray emission (kT=130 eV, L_peak=1.0e45 erg/s) as shock breakout. It is associated with broad-lined Type Ic SN 2026gzf whose spectral and photometric properties match those of energetic stripped-envelope SNe linked to GRBs. Chandra non-detections are used to exclude standard GRB/FXT afterglows and, assuming A_* ≳1, to derive Γ0<30 and E_kin<1e49 erg, leading to the proposal that the event arose from a mildly relativistic choked outflow rather than a successful jet.

Significance. If the choked-outflow scenario holds, the event bridges SN 2008D-like shock breakouts and low-luminosity GRBs, illustrating diversity in the terminal explosions of stripped stars. The thermal X-ray spectrum identification and secure SN association constitute clear observational strengths; the paper also supplies falsifiable upper limits on jet parameters that can be tested with future events.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / afterglow constraints paragraph] Abstract and afterglow-exclusion discussion: the upper limits Γ0<30 and E_kin<10^49 erg are stated only for A_*≳1, yet no justification is given for adopting this wind-density threshold nor is the sensitivity of the limits to lower A_* (plausible for some stripped progenitors) explored. If A_* can be ≪1 the same Chandra non-detection permits Γ0~100 and E_kin~10^50 erg, removing the requirement for a choked jet.
  2. [X-ray upper limits and afterglow modeling] Chandra non-detection section: the assertion that the 3σ upper limit excludes afterglows of all known GRBs and FXTs is not accompanied by an explicit overlay of the observed limit onto the afterglow library light curves or the precise forward-shock synchrotron parameters (microphysical efficiencies, viewing angle) used in the exclusion. Without this comparison the exclusion step remains unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the symbol A_* is introduced without an explicit definition or reference to the standard wind-density parameterization (e.g., A_* = (Ṁ/10^{-5} M_⊙ yr^{-1}) / (v_w/1000 km s^{-1})).
  2. [Figure 2] Figure clarity: the multi-band light-curve panel would benefit from an inset showing the Chandra 3σ upper limit converted to the same flux units as the plotted data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our afterglow constraints and exclusion arguments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / afterglow constraints paragraph] Abstract and afterglow-exclusion discussion: the upper limits Γ0<30 and E_kin<10^49 erg are stated only for A_*≳1, yet no justification is given for adopting this wind-density threshold nor is the sensitivity of the limits to lower A_* (plausible for some stripped progenitors) explored. If A_* can be ≪1 the same Chandra non-detection permits Γ0~100 and E_kin~10^50 erg, removing the requirement for a choked jet.

    Authors: We agree that the choice of A_* ≳1 requires explicit justification and that the sensitivity of the derived limits to lower A_* values should be quantified. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph justifying A_* ≳1 on the basis of mass-loss rates inferred from the broad-lined Ic SN properties and typical values reported for stripped-envelope progenitors in the literature. We will also include a new figure or table showing the allowed (Γ0, E_kin) parameter space as a continuous function of A_*, explicitly indicating the region permitted for A_* ≪1 and discussing the implications for the choked-outflow interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [X-ray upper limits and afterglow modeling] Chandra non-detection section: the assertion that the 3σ upper limit excludes afterglows of all known GRBs and FXTs is not accompanied by an explicit overlay of the observed limit onto the afterglow library light curves or the precise forward-shock synchrotron parameters (microphysical efficiencies, viewing angle) used in the exclusion. Without this comparison the exclusion step remains unverifiable.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the afterglow exclusion claim would be more transparent with a direct comparison. In the revision we will add a figure that overlays the Chandra 3σ upper limit on a representative sample of published GRB and FXT afterglow light curves. The accompanying text will specify the forward-shock synchrotron parameters adopted (ε_e = 0.1, ε_B = 0.01, p = 2.2) and the range of viewing angles considered, allowing readers to verify the exclusion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; choked-outflow interpretation is model overlay on independent observations

full rationale

The paper reports direct observational results (thermal X-ray spectrum, optical SN light curve and spectra, Chandra non-detection) and applies standard external afterglow synchrotron models to place conditional upper limits on Gamma_0 and E_kin. No derivation step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on self-citation. The choked-outflow scenario is presented as one possible explanation consistent with the data under stated assumptions, not as a quantity derived from the paper's equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The interpretation rests on standard supernova shock-breakout and relativistic-jet models plus three parameter limits chosen to match the non-detection; no new entities are postulated beyond the descriptive scenario.

free parameters (3)
  • Lorentz factor upper limit Gamma_0 = <30
    Upper bound required to suppress afterglow for the assumed wind density.
  • Kinetic energy upper limit E_kin = <10^49 erg
    Upper bound required to suppress afterglow for the assumed wind density.
  • Wind density lower limit A_* = >=1
    Minimum value adopted to derive the Gamma_0 and E_kin bounds.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Thermal spectrum with kT=130 eV indicates shock-breakout origin
    Standard identification used in supernova literature; invoked to classify the X-ray emission.
  • standard math Standard flat Lambda-CDM cosmology for luminosity distance at z=0.0344
    Required to convert observed flux to the stated peak luminosity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf: The Faintest Shock Breakout Associated with a Broad-Lined Supernova." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2UFGUWLD

@misc{pith2026260609992,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EP260321a/SN 2026gzf: The Faintest Shock Breakout Associated with a Broad-Lined Supernova},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2UFGUWLD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09992}
}
abstract

The explosion of a star is first marked by the shock wave breaking out of the stellar surface, producing a burst of ultraviolet and X-ray radiation. These events are observationally rare, despite likely accompanying the majority of supernovae. Here, we report on our multi-wavelength observing campaign of the closest Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient EP260321a at $z=0.0344$. The thermal ($kT=130$ eV) X-ray emission with peak luminosity $1.0\times10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$ points to a shock breakout origin. We demonstrate that EP260321a is accompanied by a broad-lined Type Ic supernova, SN 2026gzf. The supernova properties, including its spectral evolution, lightcurve evolution, and expansion velocities, are all typical of the energetic stripped-envelope supernovae associated with gamma-ray bursts. However, deep X-ray upper limits obtained with the \textit{Chandra X-ray Observatory} do not detect an X-ray afterglow, and instead exclude the afterglow of known gamma-ray bursts or fast X-ray transients. If the stellar explosion launched a successful relativistic jet, we require that it had both a low Lorentz factor $\Gamma_0$\,$<$\,$30$ and a kinetic energy $E_\textrm{kin}$\,$<$\,$10^{49}$ erg for a stellar wind density of $A_*$\,$\gtrsim$\,$1$. We propose that EP260321a originated from a mildly relativistic, weak outflow that was choked by the progenitor star. This scenario is capable of naturally explaining its low X-ray luminosity and lack of prompt gamma-ray emission. EP260321a bridges the gap between SN 2008D and low-luminosity GRBs, suggesting a greater diversity in the physical parameters of stripped stars as they undergo terminal collapse.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09992 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Finding chart of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf using DECam imaging in the g and i filters. Archival pre-explo￾sion DECam images from 2013 (13 years before discovery) are shown in the top panels, while the bottom panels show imaging obtained on 2026-03-25 (T0 + 3.6 d). A blue point source (g−i ≈ −1.3 mag) is visible at the location of transient in archival imaging, likely representing pre-explosion activity of the progenitor … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lightcurve shape relative to peak brightness for SN 2026gzf (black) versus GRB-SNe (SNe 1998bw, 2006aj, 2010bh, and 2017iuk; T. J. Galama et al. 1998; S. Campana et al. 2006b; J. Sollerman et al. 2006; R. L. C. Starling et al. 2011; V. D’Elia et al. 2018; L. Izzo et al. 2019) and FXT-SNe (SNe 2008D, 2025kg and 2025wkm; A. M. Soderberg et al. 2008; R. A. J. Eyles-Ferris et al. 2025; J. C. Rastinejad et al. 2025; G. P… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lightcurve shape relative to peak brightness for SN 2026gzf (black) versus GRB-SNe (SNe 1998bw, 2006aj, 2010bh, and 2017iuk; T. J. Galama et al. 1998; S. Campana et al. 2006b; J. Sollerman et al. 2006; R. L. C. Starling et al. 2011; V. D’Elia et al. 2018; L. Izzo et al. 2019) and FXT-SNe (SNe 2008D, 2025kg and 2025wkm; A. M. Soderberg et al. 2008; R. A. J. Eyles-Ferris et al. 2025; J. C. Rastinejad et al. 2025; G. P… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (25 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A comparison of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf to other Ic-BL SNe both associated with GRBs and identified independently through optical surveys. The left panel shows the peak absolute magnitude versus the rest-frame peak time, and the right panel shows the absolute magnitude ve…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A comparison of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf to other Ic-BL SNe both associated with GRBs and identified independently through optical surveys. The left panel shows the peak absolute magnitude versus the rest-frame peak time, and the right panel shows the absolute magnitude ve…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the inferred photospheric radius, temperature and bolometric luminosity of SN 2026gzf. Given the lack of UV data, the inferences at < 1 d are less secure. Our first spectra ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the inferred photospheric radius, temperature and bolometric luminosity of SN 2026gzf. Given the lack of UV data, the inferences at < 1 d are less secure and are excluded. refer to measured wavelengths in the rest-frame of SN 2026gzf. Our first spectra ( …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral sequence of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf obtained with SALT, HET, and DESI between 3.3 and 53.6 d after the EP trigger. Emission lines have been clipped from the spectra for clarity. Some spectra are smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay filter (thick lines) for visualizatio…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral sequence of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf obtained with SALT, HET, and DESI between 3.3 and 53.6 d after the EP trigger. Blueshifted absorption features of Fe ii, Si ii, and Ca ii that are used for our analysis in §3.2.1 and 3.2.2 are marked for clarity. Emission lines…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the DESI spectra (R ∼ 2000−5500) of SN 2026gzf obtained at 17.7, 32.6, and 53.6 d. Nebular emission lines have been clipped from each spectrum for vi￾sualization purposes. Spectra have not been smoothed and are in their native binning. 0 10 20 30 40 50 Pha…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the DESI spectra (R ∼ 2000−5500) of SN 2026gzf obtained at 17.7, 32.6, and 53.6 d. Blueshifted absorption features of Fe ii, Si ii, and Ca ii that are used for our analysis in §3.2.1 and 3.2.2 are marked for clarity. Nebular emission lines have been clippe…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of the expansion velocity of different absorption features identified in the spectral sequence of SN 2026gzf ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of the expansion velocity of different absorption features identified in the spectral sequence of SN 2026gzf ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the DESI spectra of SN 2026gzf obtained at 17.7 d after discovery versus other Ic-BL super￾novae at a similar phase. Nebular emission lines have been clipped from each spectrum for visualization purposes. Spec￾tra have not been smoothed and are in their n…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the DESI spectra of SN 2026gzf obtained at 17.7 d after discovery versus other Ic-BL super￾novae at a similar phase. Nebular emission lines have been clipped from each spectrum for visualization purposes. Spec￾tra have not been smoothed and are in their n…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Velocity evolution of Ic-BL SNe (gray) and Ic-BL GRB-SNe (black) from G. Finneran et al. (2025a) to SN 2026gzf (red). The left panel shows the evolution of Fe ii λ5169 and the right panel shows Si ii λ6355. Velocities for SN 2008D are reproduced from P. A. Mazzali et …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Velocity evolution of Ic-BL SNe (gray) and Ic-BL GRB-SNe (black) from G. Finneran et al. (2025a) to SN 2026gzf (red). The left panel shows the evolution of Fe ii λ5169 and the right panel shows Si ii λ6355. Velocities for SN 2008D are reproduced from P. A. Mazzali et …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spatially resolved [N ii]-BPT diagram from HET IFU spectroscopy. Each point represents an individual galaxy spaxel, with emission-line ratios following the BPT diagnostics of J. A. Baldwin et al. (1981). Points are col￾or-coded by projected distance from the transient…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spatially resolved [N ii]-BPT diagram from HET IFU spectroscopy. Each point represents an individual galaxy spaxel, with emission-line ratios following the BPT diagnostics of J. A. Baldwin et al. (1981). Points are col￾or-coded by projected distance from the transient…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: X-ray luminosity versus peak absolute mag￾nitude of supernova shock breakout candidates detected by Swift (GRB 980425/SN 1998bw; GRB 060218/SN 2006aj; XRF 080109/SN 2008D; GRB 100316D/SN 2010bh; GRB 171205A/SN 2017iuk) and EP (EP 250108a/SN 2025kg; EP250827b/SN 2025wk…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: X-ray lightcurves of shock breakout candi￾dates detected by Swift and EP. The EP events are based on time-averaged spectra, and the initial datapoint for each event is in the 0.5 − 4 keV band while all other points (and all Swift events) are in the 0.3 − 10 keV band. …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Observer-frame X-ray afterglow (0.3 − 10 keV) lightcurves of gamma-ray bursts and fast X-ray transients. The X-ray upper limits from Chandra for EP260321a are shown as downward red triangles. For comparison, we show both long GRBs (gray) and short GRBs (light purple) …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison between the radio upper limits for EP260321a (downward red triangles) versus the radio lumi￾nosity of multiple classes of energetic transients, including GRBs (A. M. Soderberg et al. 2006; P. Chandra & D. A. Frail 2012; T. Laskar et al. 2022; D. A. Perley e…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Cumulative distribution of oxygen abundances for low redshift (z < 0.2) broad-lined Type Ic supernovae without detected GRBs (blue) and GRB-SNe/Ic-BL events (red), compiled from the PP04 O3N2 (M. Pettini & B. E. J. Pagel 2004) measurements from J. Japelj et al. (2018)…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Cumulative distribution of oxygen abundances for low redshift (z < 0.2) broad-lined Type Ic supernovae without detected GRBs (blue) and GRB-SNe/Ic-BL events (red), compiled from the PP04 O3N2 (M. Pettini & B. E. J. Pagel 2004) measurements from J. Japelj et al. (2018)…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Allowed parameter space (shaded regions) for afterglow non-detection, assuming a Gaussian structured jet, at 158 Mpc (z = 0.0344). Left: Allowed values of the density A∗ versus the isotropic-equivalent kinetic energy at the jet’s core Ekin for different viewing angles…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Allowed parameter space (shaded regions) for afterglow non-detection, assuming a Gaussian structured jet, at 158 Mpc (z = 0.0344). Left: Allowed values of the density A∗ versus the isotropic-equivalent kinetic energy at the jet’s core Ekin for different viewing angles…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Archival DECam lightcurve of the pre-explosion source ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_19.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 183 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Shock breakout from mildly relativistic ejecta in a dense wind: the case of EP260321a/SN~2026gzf

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The X-ray burst EP260321a is best explained as a supernova shock breaking out of a dense wind, implying fast outer ejecta (≈3.5×10^49 erg) and a ≈10^-5 solar-mass circumstellar cloud.

  2. Multi-wavelength Constraints on the Transient EP250905a

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EP250905a is best explained as a mildly off-axis structured-jet afterglow at z=2.714, possibly weakly magnified by a foreground galaxy at z=0.374.

  3. Pinning Down the Geometry of the Type Ic Broad-Line Supernova 2026gzf

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Spectropolarimetry of SN 2026gzf indicates mostly spherical ejecta with axisymmetric Ca distribution viewed at ~40° from symmetry axis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

238 extracted references · 238 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    R., Khatami, D

    Afsariardchi, N., Drout, M. R., Khatami, D. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0aeb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0aeb 2021

  3. [3]

    2001 , volume =

    Ahumada, T., Hall, X. J., Perley, D. A., & Zwicky Transient Facility. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44084, 1 Allende Prieto, C., Lambert, D. L., & Asplund, M. 2001, ApJL, 556, L63, doi: 10.1086/322874

    work page doi:10.1086/322874 2026

  4. [4]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba

    Alp, D., & Larsson, J. 2020, ApJ, 896, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba 2020

  5. [5]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11df

    Anand, S., Barnes, J., Yang, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11df

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad11df 2024

  6. [6]

    W., Perley, D

    Andreoni, I., Coughlin, M. W., Perley, D. A., et al. 2022, Nature, 612, 430, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 2022

  7. [7]

    2020, ApJ, 890, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab64f8

    Andrews, S., Fryer, C., Even, W., Jones, S., & Pignatari, M. 2020, ApJ, 890, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab64f8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab64f8 2020

  8. [8]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    work page 1996

Show all 238 references
  1. [9]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785, doi: 10.1086/159681

    1982 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Allende Prieto, C., & Kiselman, D

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., Allende Prieto, C., & Kiselman, D. 2004, A&A, 417, 751, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034328

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A....

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    1981 doi

  5. [13]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, SSRv, 120, 143, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3

    2005 doi

  6. [14]

    E., Treister, E., Schawinski, K., et al

    Bauer, F. E., Treister, E., Schawinski, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4841, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx417

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Even, W., Frey, L

    Bayless, A. J., Even, W., Frey, L. H., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/98

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Fryer, C., Brown, P

    Bayless, A. J., Fryer, C., Brown, P. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac674c

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin, E. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ed. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, 112

    2006

  11. [19]

    2010, http://ascl.net/1010.068

    Bertin, E. 2010, http://ascl.net/1010.068

    2010

  12. [20]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  13. [21]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bertin, E., Mellier, Y., Radovich, M., et al. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 281, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI, ed. D. A. Bohlender, D. Durand, & T. H. Handley, 228

    2002

  14. [22]

    2024,, 2.0.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024,, 2.0.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Fragos, T., Salafia, O

    Briel, M. M., Fragos, T., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554120

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Buckley, D. A. H., Swart, G. P., & Meiring, J. G. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6267, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. L. M. Stepp, 62670Z, doi: 10.1117/12.673750

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    N., Hill, J

    Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, SSRv, 120, 165, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

    2005 doi

  18. [26]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14588, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14588

    Busmann, M., O’Connor, B., Sommer, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14588, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14588

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    2024, PhRvD, 110, 123029, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123029 The rare shock breakout event EP260321a31 T able 3.Log of spectroscopic observations of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf

    Cabrera, T., Palmese, A., Hu, L., et al. 2024, PhRvD, 110, 123029, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123029 The rare shock breakout event EP260321a31 T able 3.Log of spectroscopic observations of EP260321a/SN 2026gzf. Start Date (UTC)δt(days) Telescope Instrument Grating Angle (deg) E...

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    J., et al

    Campana, S., Mangano, V., Blustin, A. J., et al. 2006a, Nature, 442, 1008, doi: 10.1038/nature04892

    doi

  21. [29]

    2006b, A&A, 454, 113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064856

    Campana, S., Tagliaferri, G., Lazzati, D., et al. 2006b, A&A, 454, 113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064856

    doi

  22. [30]

    2013, MNRAS, 434, 1098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1048

    Cano, Z. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1048

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    2017a, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, doi: 10.1155/2017/8929054

    Cano, Z., Wang, S.-Q., Dai, Z.-G., & Wu, X.-F. 2017a, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, doi: 10.1155/2017/8929054

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    2011, ApJ, 740, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/41

    Cano, Z., Bersier, D., Guidorzi, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/41

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    2014, A&A, 568, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423920

    Cano, Z., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Pozanenko, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423920

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    2017b, A&A, 605, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731005 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Cano, Z., Izzo, L., de Ugarte Postigo, A., et al. 2017b, A&A, 605, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731005 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  28. [36]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chandra, P., & Frail, D. A. 2012, ApJ, 746, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/156

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10009, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10009

    Chen, T.-W., Aryan, A., Yang, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10009, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10009

    2026 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    A., & Fransson, C

    Chevalier, R. A., & Fransson, C. 2008, ApJL, 683, L135, doi: 10.1086/591522

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    S., Hill, G

    Chonis, T. S., Hill, G. J., Lee, H., Tuttle, S. E., & Vattiat, B. L. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91470A,...

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    S., Hill, G

    Chonis, T. S., Hill, G. J., Lee, H., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 99084C, doi: 10.1117/12.2232209

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    M., et al

    Chornock, R., Berger, E., Levesque, E. M., et al. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1004.2262, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1004.2262

    2010 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    M., Sollerman, J., et al

    Christensen, L., Vreeswijk, P. M., Sollerman, J., et al. 2008, A&A, 490, 45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809896

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    C., Brotherton, M

    Clocchiatti, A., Wheeler, J. C., Brotherton, M. S., et al. 1996, ApJ, 462, 462, doi: 10.1086/177165

    1996 doi

  37. [45]

    Colgate, S. A. 1974, ApJ, 187, 333, doi: 10.1086/152632

    1974 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Fox, D

    Colosimo, J. M., Fox, D. B., Falcone, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f8b

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    L., Margutti, R., Terreran, G., et al

    Coppejans, D. L., Margutti, R., Terreran, G., et al. 2020, ApJL, 895, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44105, 1

    Corcoran, G., Martin-Carrillo, A., Izzo, L., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44105, 1

    2026

  41. [49]

    Corsi, A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd3f2

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Cotter, L., Martin-Carrillo, A., Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.06213. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06213 Crosato Menegazzi, L., Fujibayashi, S., Takahashi, K., &

    2026 arXiv

  43. [51]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 178, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae544 de Ugarte Postigo, A., Garc´ ıa Garc´ ıa, L., Becerra, R

    Ishii, A. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 178, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae544 de Ugarte Postigo, A., Garc´ ıa Garc´ ıa, L., Becerra, R. L., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44091, 1

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 083010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083010 D’Elia, V., Pian, E., Melandri, A., et al

    Dean, C., & Fern´ andez, R. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 083010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083010 D’Elia, V., Pian, E., Melandri, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425381 32O’Connor et al. D’Elia, V., Campana, S., D’A` ı, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A66, doi: 10.1...

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    J., Li, C., & Woosley, S

    Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Li, C., & Woosley, S. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2139, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21374.x

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    2025, A&A, 703, A288, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554569

    Disberg, P., Lankreijer, A., Chru´ sli´ nska, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A288, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554569

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    A., Beardmore, A

    Evans, P. A., Beardmore, A. P., Page, K. L., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 379, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077530

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Beardmore, A

    Evans, P. A., Beardmore, A. P., Page, K. L., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x

    2009 doi

  49. [57]

    Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J., Jonker, P. G., Levan, A. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08886. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08886

    2025

  50. [58]

    D., Colosimo, J

    Falcone, A. D., Colosimo, J. M., Wages, M., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13093, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, & K. Nakazawa, 1309317,...

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Falk, S. W. 1978, ApJL, 225, L133, doi: 10.1086/182810

    1978 doi

  52. [60]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e3d

    Faran, T., & Sari, R. 2019, ApJ, 884, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e3d

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    A., Zeh, A., et al

    Ferrero, P., Kann, D. A., Zeh, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 457, 857, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065530

    2006 doi

  54. [62]

    Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 309, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309

    1997 doi

  55. [63]

    2025a, A&A, 700, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453047

    Finneran, G., Cotter, L., & Martin-Carrillo, A. 2025a, A&A, 700, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453047

    doi

  56. [64]

    2025b, Astronomy and Computing, 52, 100954, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2025.100954

    Finneran, G., Cotter, L., & Martin-Carrillo, A. 2025b, Astronomy and Computing, 52, 100954, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2025.100954

    2025 doi

  57. [65]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  58. [66]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  59. [67]

    L., Burns, E., Colosimo, J

    Fryer, C. L., Burns, E., Colosimo, J. M., Negro, M., & O’Connor, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.00820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.00820

    2026 doi

  60. [68]

    L., Burns, E., Ho, A

    Fryer, C. L., Burns, E., Ho, A. Y. Q., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add474

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    L., Fontes, C

    Fryer, C. L., Fontes, C. J., Warsa, J. S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab99a7 Gaia Collaboration. 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/350 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    J., Vreeswijk, P

    Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670, doi: 10.1038/27150

    1998 doi

  63. [71]

    L., Sansom, A

    Ganss, R., Pledger, J. L., Sansom, A. E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac625

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    L., Sansom, A

    Ganss, R., Pledger, J. L., Sansom, A. E., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 2374, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1496

    2025 doi

  65. [73]

    2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    2004 doi

  66. [74]

    2008, ApJL, 683, L131, doi: 10.1086/591647

    Gezari, S., Dessart, L., Basa, S., et al. 2008, ApJL, 683, L131, doi: 10.1086/591647

    2008 doi

  67. [75]

    2006, MNRAS, 372, 1699, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10972.x

    Ghisellini, G., Ghirlanda, G., Mereghetti, S., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1699, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10972.x

    2006 doi

  68. [76]

    Pretorius, M. L. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3765, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv801

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    A., Jiang, Y.-F., & Bildsten, L

    Goldberg, J. A., Jiang, Y.-F., & Bildsten, L. 2022, ApJ, 933, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75e3 G¨ ossl, C. A., & Riffeser, A. 2002, A&A, 381, 1095, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011522

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 078001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    2002, ApJ, 568, 820, doi: 10.1086/338966

    Granot, J., & Sari, R. 2002, ApJ, 568, 820, doi: 10.1086/338966

    2002 doi

  72. [80]

    2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    Guy, J., Bailey, S., Kremin, A., et al. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    2023 doi

  73. [81]

    J., Palmese, A., BenZvi, S., et al

    Hall, X. J., Palmese, A., BenZvi, S., et al. 2026a, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19653826

    doi

  74. [82]

    J., Palmese, A., O’Connor, B., et al

    Hall, X. J., Palmese, A., O’Connor, B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.23723, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.23723

    2025 doi

  75. [83]

    J., Palmese, A., BenZvi, S., et al

    Hall, X. J., Palmese, A., BenZvi, S., et al. 2026c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.12611, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.12611 The rare shock breakout event EP260321a33

    doi

  76. [84]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16243, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16243

    Hamidani, H., Sato, Y., Kashiyama, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16243, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16243

    2025 doi

  77. [85]

    H., Hammer, F., Liang, Y

    Han, X. H., Hammer, F., Liang, Y. C., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912475

    2010 doi

  78. [86]

    J., Lee, H., MacQueen, P

    Hill, G. J., Lee, H., MacQueen, P. J., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 298, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2c02

    2021 doi

  79. [87]

    Hjorth, J., & Bloom, J. S. 2012, in Chapter 9 in ”Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. C. Kouveliotou, R. A. M. J. Wijers, & S. Woosley, 169–190, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1104.2274

    2012 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Phinney, E. S., Ravi, V., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf473

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Perley, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf

    2020 doi

  82. [90]

    2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Hopp, U., Bender, R., Grupp, F., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9145, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V, ed. L. M. Stepp, R. Gilmozzi, & H. J. Hall, 91452D, doi: 10.1117/12.2054498

    2014 doi

  83. [91]

    2022, ApJ, 936, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7394

    Hu, L., Wang, L., Chen, X., & Yang, J. 2022, ApJ, 936, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7394

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    2025, ApJL, 990, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfd49

    Hu, L., Cabrera, T., Palmese, A., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfd49

    2025 doi

  85. [93]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.08593, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.08593

    Hu, L., Cabrera, T., Palmese, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.08593, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.08593

    2026 doi

  86. [94]

    J., Zou, Z.-C., Li, D

    Huang, Q. J., Zou, Z.-C., Li, D. Y., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44075, 1

    2026

  87. [95]

    M., & Chevalier, R

    Irwin, C. M., & Chevalier, R. A. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1680, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1058

    2016 doi

  88. [96]

    M., & Hotokezaka, K

    Irwin, C. M., & Hotokezaka, K. 2025a, MNRAS, 541, L85, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf057

    doi

  89. [97]

    M., & Hotokezaka, K

    Irwin, C. M., & Hotokezaka, K. 2025b, MNRAS, 542, 1269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1309

    doi

  90. [98]

    M., & Hotokezaka, K

    Irwin, C. M., & Hotokezaka, K. 2025c, MNRAS, 543, 2917, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1618

    doi

  91. [99]

    M., Linial, I., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Sari, R

    Irwin, C. M., Linial, I., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Sari, R. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2705 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    2021 doi

  92. [100]

    C., Schulze, S., et al

    Izzo, L., Th¨ one, C. C., Schulze, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 4480, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2244

    2017 doi

  93. [101]

    2019, Nature, 565, 324, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3

    Izzo, L., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Maeda, K., et al. 2019, Nature, 565, 324, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    D., Salvaterra, R., et al

    Japelj, J., Vergani, S. D., Salvaterra, R., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833209 Jegou du Laz, T., Coughlin, M. W., Bachant, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.00164, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.00164

    2018 doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    G., Glennie, A., Heida, M., et al

    Jonker, P. G., Glennie, A., Heida, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/14

    2013 doi

  96. [104]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    Kasen, D. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    2010 doi

  97. [105]

    L., van Dyk, D

    Kashyap, V. L., van Dyk, D. A., Connors, A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 900, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/900

    2010 doi

  98. [106]

    279, Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed

    Symposium, Vol. 279, Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. P. Roming, N. Kawai, & E. Pian, 274–281, doi: 10.1017/S174392131201304X

    doi

  99. [107]

    2012b, ApJ, 747, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/147

    Katz, B., Sapir, N., & Waxman, E. 2012b, ApJ, 747, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/147

    doi

  100. [108]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003 doi

  101. [109]

    1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    1998 doi

  102. [110]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    2001 doi

  103. [111]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    2006 doi

  104. [112]

    I., & Chevalier, R

    Klein, R. I., & Chevalier, R. A. 1978, ApJL, 223, L109, doi: 10.1086/182740

    1978 doi

  105. [113]

    S., Szczygiel, D

    Kochanek, C. S., Szczygiel, D. M., & Stanek, K. Z. 2011, ApJ, 737, 76, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/76

    2011 doi

  106. [114]

    E., Patel, S

    Kouveliotou, C., Woosley, S. E., Patel, S. K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 872, doi: 10.1086/420878 Kr¨ uhler, T., Kuncarayakti, H., Schady, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 602, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630268 Kr¨ uhler, T., Malesani, D., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A125, d...

    2004 doi

  107. [115]

    R., Harrison, F

    Kulkarni, S. R., Harrison, F. A., Grefenstette, B. W., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.15608, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.15608

    2021 doi

  108. [116]

    2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Lang-Bardl, F., Bender, R., Goessl, C., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J

    2016

  109. [117]

    Simard, & H

    Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 990844, doi: 10.1117/12.2232039

    doi

  110. [118]

    R., Schroeder, G., et al

    Laskar, T., Escorial, A. R., Schroeder, G., et al. 2022, ApJL, 935, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8421

    2022 doi

  111. [119]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007 doi

  112. [120]

    2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44070, 1 34O’Connor et al

    Lee, M.-H., Aryan, A., Chen, T.-W., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44070, 1 34O’Connor et al

    2026

  113. [121]

    K., Izzo, L., de Colle, F., & Drout, M

    Leung, J. K., Izzo, L., de Colle, F., & Drout, M. R. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44229, 1

    2026

  114. [122]

    M., Berger, E., Kewley, L

    Levesque, E. M., Berger, E., Kewley, L. J., & Bagley, M. M. 2010a, AJ, 139, 694, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/694

    doi

  115. [123]

    M., Berger, E., Soderberg, A

    Levesque, E. M., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., & Chornock, R. 2011, ApJ, 739, 23, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/23

    2011 doi

  116. [124]

    M., Chornock, R., Soderberg, A

    Levesque, E. M., Chornock, R., Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., & Lunnan, R. 2012, ApJ, 758, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/92

    2012 doi

  117. [125]

    M., Kewley, L

    Levesque, E. M., Kewley, L. J., Berger, E., & Zahid, H. J. 2010b, AJ, 140, 1557, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1557

    doi

  118. [126]

    2020, PhR, 866, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.003

    Levinson, A., & Nakar, E. 2020, PhR, 866, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.003

    2020 doi

  119. [127]

    2007, MNRAS, 375, 240, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11286.x

    Li, L.-X. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 240, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11286.x

    2007 doi

  120. [128]

    X., Zhu, Z

    Li, W. X., Zhu, Z. P., Zou, X. Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17034. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17034

    2025

  121. [129]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae41b1

    Liang, R.-D., Li, W.-X., Liu, L.-D., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae41b1

    2026 doi

  122. [130]

    2014, ApJ, 783, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/24

    Lien, A., Sakamoto, T., Gehrels, N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/24

    2014 doi

  123. [131]

    A., Hern´ andez, J., et al

    Lindegren, L., Klioner, S. A., Hern´ andez, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039709

    2021 doi

  124. [132]

    2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44087, 1

    Liu, X., Xu, D., Tinyanont, S., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44087, 1

    2026

  125. [133]

    E., & Zhang, W

    Lovegrove, E., Woosley, S. E., & Zhang, W. 2017, ApJ, 845, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7b7d

    2017 doi

  126. [134]

    I., & Woosley, S

    MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. 1999, ApJ, 524, 262, doi: 10.1086/307790

    1999 doi

  127. [135]

    A., & Deng, J

    Maeda, K., Nomoto, K., Mazzali, P. A., & Deng, J. 2006, ApJ, 640, 854, doi: 10.1086/500187

    2006 doi

  128. [136]

    Malesani, D., Fynbo, J. P. U., Hjorth, J., et al. 2009, ApJL, 692, L84, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/L84

    2009 doi

  129. [137]

    M., Wieringa, M

    Margutti, R., Soderberg, A. M., Wieringa, M. H., et al. 2013a, ApJ, 778, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/18

    doi

  130. [138]

    G., et al

    Margutti, R., Zaninoni, E., Bernardini, M. G., et al. 2013b, MNRAS, 428, 729, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts066

    doi

  131. [139]

    2017, ApJL, 848, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9057

    Margutti, R., Berger, E., Fong, W., et al. 2017, ApJL, 848, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9057

    2017 doi

  132. [140]

    D., Xie, X., et al

    Margutti, R., Alexander, K. D., Xie, X., et al. 2018, ApJL, 856, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ad

    2018 doi

  133. [141]

    D., Chornock, R., et al

    Margutti, R., Metzger, B. D., Chornock, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa01

    2019 doi

  134. [142]

    A., Rosales-Ortega, F

    Marino, R. A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., S´ anchez, S. F., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321956

    2013 doi

  135. [143]

    C., Leung, J

    Martin-Carrillo, A., Th¨ one, C. C., Leung, J. K., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10002, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10002

    2026 doi arXiv

  136. [144]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    2018 doi

  137. [145]

    A., Nomoto, K., Patat, F., & Maeda, K

    Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K., Patat, F., & Maeda, K. 2001, ApJ, 559, 1047, doi: 10.1086/322420

    2001 doi

  138. [146]

    A., Pian, E., Bufano, F., & Ashall, C

    Mazzali, P. A., Pian, E., Bufano, F., & Ashall, C. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 4106, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1594

    2021 doi

  139. [147]

    A., Deng, J., Nomoto, K., et al

    Mazzali, P. A., Deng, J., Nomoto, K., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1018, doi: 10.1038/nature05081

    2006 doi

  140. [148]

    A., Valenti, S., Della Valle, M., et al

    Mazzali, P. A., Valenti, S., Della Valle, M., et al. 2008, Science, 321, 1185, doi: 10.1126/science.1158088

    2008 doi

  141. [149]

    B., Izzo, L., et al

    Melandri, A., Malesani, D. B., Izzo, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 5366, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2900

    2019 doi

  142. [150]

    Meza, N., & Anderson, J. P. 2020, A&A, 641, A177, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937113 Micha lowskI, M. J., Xu, D., Stevens, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629942

    2020 doi

  143. [151]

    N., Doel, P., Gutierrez, G., et al

    Miller, T. N., Doel, P., Gutierrez, G., et al. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad45fe

    2024 doi

  144. [152]

    S., et al

    Modjaz, M., Kewley, L., Bloom, J. S., et al. 2011, ApJL, 731, L4, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/731/1/L4

    2011 doi

  145. [153]

    Q., Bianco, F

    Modjaz, M., Liu, Y. Q., Bianco, F. B., & Graur, O. 2016, ApJ, 832, 108, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/108

    2016 doi

  146. [154]

    2009, ApJ, 702, 226, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/226

    Modjaz, M., Li, W., Butler, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 226, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/226

    2009 doi

  147. [155]

    B., Siwek, M., et al

    Modjaz, M., Bianco, F. B., Siwek, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4185

    2020 doi

  148. [156]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.03032. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03032

    2026 arXiv

  149. [157]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d94

    Sakamoto, T. 2022, ApJ, 927, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d94

    2022 doi

  150. [158]

    D., Moustakas, J., Bailey, S., et al

    Myers, A. D., Moustakas, J., Bailey, S., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca5f9

    2023 doi

  151. [159]

    2015, ApJ, 807, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/172

    Nakar, E. 2015, ApJ, 807, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/172

    2015 doi

  152. [160]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 904, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/904

    Nakar, E., & Sari, R. 2010, ApJ, 725, 904, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/904

    2010 doi

  153. [161]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/88 Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc)

    Nakar, E., & Sari, R. 2012, ApJ, 747, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/88 Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc). 2014,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1408.004 http://ascl.net/1408.004

    2012 doi

  154. [162]

    E., Fryer, D

    Niblett, A. E., Fryer, D. A., & Fryer, C. L. 2025, ApJ, 994, 259, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1582 O’Connor, B., Beniamini, P., Troja, E., et al. 2025a, ApJL, 993, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae146b The rare shock breakout event EP260321a35 O’Connor, B., Ricci, R., Troja, E., et ...

    2025 doi arXiv

  155. [163]

    A., Ho, A

    Perley, D. A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Fausnaugh, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 1, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf125

    2025 doi

  156. [164]

    Pettini, M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    2004 doi

  157. [165]

    A., et al

    Pian, E., Amati, L., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 1999, A&AS, 138, 463, doi: 10.1051/aas:1999310

    1999 doi

  158. [166]

    A., et al

    Pian, E., Amati, L., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2000, ApJ, 536, 778, doi: 10.1086/308978

    2000 doi

  159. [167]

    2004, Advances in Space Research, 34, 2711, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.072

    Pian, E., Giommi, P., Amati, L., et al. 2004, Advances in Space Research, 34, 2711, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.072

    2004 doi

  160. [168]

    A., Masetti, N., et al

    Pian, E., Mazzali, P. A., Masetti, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1011, doi: 10.1038/nature05082

    2006 doi

  161. [169]

    L., Chang, P., & Weinberg, N

    Piro, A. L., Chang, P., & Weinberg, N. N. 2010, ApJ, 708, 598, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/598 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2010 doi

  162. [170]

    2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 245, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad76a4

    Poppett, C., Tyas, L., Aguilar, J., et al. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 245, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad76a4

    2024 doi

  163. [171]

    J., & Mazzali, P

    Prentice, S. J., & Mazzali, P. A. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 2672, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx980

    2017 doi

  164. [172]

    J., Mazzali, P

    Prentice, S. J., Mazzali, P. A., Pian, E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2973, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw299

    2016 doi

  165. [173]

    J., Ashall, C., James, P

    Prentice, S. J., Ashall, C., James, P. A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1559, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3399 Quirola-V´ asquez, J., Bauer, F. E., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243047 Quirola-V´ asquez, J., Bauer, F. E., Jonker, P. G., et al. 202...

    2019 doi

  166. [174]

    W., Adams, M

    Ramsey, L. W., Adams, M. T., Barnes, T. G., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3352, Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, ed. L. M. Stepp, 34–42, doi: 10.1117/12.319287

    1998 doi

  167. [175]

    2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44107, 1

    Rastinejad, J., Srinivasaragavan, G., & Ahumada, T. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44107, 1

    2026

  168. [176]

    C., Levan, A

    Rastinejad, J. C., Levan, A. J., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08889. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08889

    2025

  169. [177]

    C., Srinivasaragavan, G., Sarin, N., et al

    Rastinejad, J. C., Srinivasaragavan, G., Sarin, N., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10011, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10011

    2026 doi arXiv

  170. [178]

    Rhoads, J. E. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1097, doi: 10.1086/368125

    2003 doi

  171. [179]

    2025, ApJL, 979, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8b3f Rodr´ ıguez,´O., Maoz, D., & Nakar, E

    Ricci, R., Troja, E., Yang, Y.-H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 979, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8b3f Rodr´ ıguez,´O., Maoz, D., & Nakar, E. 2023, ApJ, 955, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace2bd

    2025 doi

  172. [180]

    C., & Dopita, M

    Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A. 1990, ApJS, 74, 93, doi: 10.1086/191494

    1990 doi

  173. [181]

    O., et al

    Sagiv, I., Gal-Yam, A., Ofek, E. O., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/79 Sankar. K, A., Aryan, A., Chen, T.-W., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44089, 1

    2014 doi

  174. [182]

    2011, ApJ, 742, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/36

    Sapir, N., Katz, B., & Waxman, E. 2011, ApJ, 742, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/36

    2011 doi

  175. [183]

    1998, ApJL, 497, L17, doi: 10.1086/311269

    Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. 1998, ApJL, 497, L17, doi: 10.1086/311269

    1998 doi

  176. [184]

    2015, A&A, 579, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526060

    Schady, P., Kr¨ uhler, T., Greiner, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526060

    2015 doi

  177. [185]

    2008, Science, 321, 223, doi: 10.1126/science.1160456

    Schawinski, K., Justham, S., Wolf, C., et al. 2008, Science, 321, 223, doi: 10.1126/science.1160456

    2008 doi

  178. [186]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  179. [187]

    F., Kirkby, D., Schlegel, D

    Schlafly, E. F., Kirkby, D., Schlegel, D. J., et al. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 259, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0832

    2023 doi

  180. [188]

    Schroeder, G., Ho, A. Y. Q., Dastidar, R. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae129b

    2025 doi

  181. [189]

    E., Fowler, J

    Shetrone, M., Cornell, M. E., Fowler, J. R., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 556, doi: 10.1086/519291

    2007 doi

  182. [190]

    2024, ApJ, 964, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2704

    Shvartzvald, Y., Waxman, E., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2704

    2024 doi

  183. [191]

    2015, SSRv, 191, 519, doi: 10.1007/s11214-015-0181-8

    Sironi, L., Keshet, U., & Lemoine, M. 2015, SSRv, 191, 519, doi: 10.1007/s11214-015-0181-8

    2015 doi

  184. [192]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  185. [194]

    2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2, Vol

    Smith, N. 2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 2, Vol. 2, 508–532, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00147-4

    2026 doi

  186. [195]

    E., Filippenko, A

    Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 71, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1669

    2022 doi

  187. [196]

    Filippenko, A. V. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 773, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18763.x

    2011 doi

  188. [197]

    C., & Prieto, J

    Smith, N., Mauerhan, J. C., & Prieto, J. L. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1191, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2269

    2014 doi

  189. [198]

    2010, AJ, 139, 1451, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/4/1451

    Smith, N., Miller, A., Li, W., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 1451, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/4/1451

    2010 doi

  190. [199]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 5897, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa061 36O’Connor et al

    Smith, N., E Andrews, J., Moe, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5897, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa061 36O’Connor et al

    2020 doi

  191. [200]

    M., Kulkarni, S

    Soderberg, A. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Nakar, E., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1014, doi: 10.1038/nature05087

    2006 doi

  192. [201]

    M., Berger, E., Page, K

    Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., Page, K. L., et al. 2008, Nature, 453, 469, doi: 10.1038/nature06997

    2008 doi

  193. [202]

    O., Fynbo, J

    Sollerman, J., Jaunsen, A. O., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 503, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065226

    2006 doi

  194. [203]

    P., Yang, S., Anand, S., et al

    Srinivasaragavan, G. P., Yang, S., Anand, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7fde

    2024 doi

  195. [204]

    P., Hamidani, H., Schroeder, G., et al

    Srinivasaragavan, G. P., Hamidani, H., Schroeder, G., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17516. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17516

  196. [205]

    P., Li, D., Hall, X

    Srinivasaragavan, G. P., Li, D., Hall, X. J., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.10239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.10239

    doi arXiv

  197. [206]

    Starling, R. L. C., Wiersema, K., Levan, A. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2792, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17879.x

    2011 doi

  198. [207]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5328

    Sun, H., Liu, H.-Y., Pan, H.-W., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5328

    2022 doi

  199. [208]

    X., Liu, L

    Sun, H., Li, W. X., Liu, L. D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.02315. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02315

    2024

  200. [209]

    2014a, ApJ, 788, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/113

    Svirski, G., & Nakar, E. 2014a, ApJ, 788, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/113

    doi

  201. [210]

    2014b, ApJL, 788, L14, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/788/1/L14

    Svirski, G., & Nakar, E. 2014b, ApJL, 788, L14, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/788/1/L14

    doi

  202. [211]

    D., Bersten, M., et al

    Taddia, F., Stritzinger, M. D., Bersten, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730844

    2018 doi

  203. [212]

    2019, A&A, 621, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834429

    Taddia, F., Sollerman, J., Fremling, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834429

    2019 doi

  204. [213]

    2018, A&A, 615, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731799

    Tanga, M., Kr¨ uhler, T., Schady, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731799

    2018 doi

  205. [214]

    R., Izzo, L., Levan, A

    Tanvir, N. R., Izzo, L., Levan, A. J., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44082, 1 Th¨ one, C. C., Christensen, L., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2034, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu711 Th¨ one, C. C., Micha lowski, M. J., Leloudas, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1307, doi...

    2026 doi

  206. [215]

    2004, A&A, 423, 861, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041027

    Ghirlanda, G. 2004, A&A, 423, 861, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041027

    2004 doi

  207. [216]

    L., Cenko, S

    Toy, V. L., Cenko, S. B., Silverman, J. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 79, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/79

    2016 doi

  208. [217]

    2017, Nature, 551, 71, doi: 10.1038/nature24290

    Troja, E., Piro, L., van Eerten, H., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 71, doi: 10.1038/nature24290

    2017 doi

  209. [218]

    A., Pruzhinskaya, M

    Volnova, A. A., Pruzhinskaya, M. V., Pozanenko, A. S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 3500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3297

    2017 doi

  210. [219]

    P., Xu, D., et al

    Wang, J., Zhu, Z. P., Xu, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 867, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae6c3

    2018 doi

  211. [220]

    2007, ApJ, 664, 1026, doi: 10.1086/519228

    Wang, X.-Y., Li, Z., Waxman, E., & M´ esz´ aros, P. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1026, doi: 10.1086/519228

    2007 doi

  212. [221]

    2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 50, 100490, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100490

    Wang, Y., Chen, C., & Zhang, B. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 50, 100490, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100490

    2026 doi

  213. [222]

    2004, ApJL, 605, L101, doi: 10.1086/420844

    Watson, D., Hjorth, J., Levan, A., et al. 2004, ApJL, 605, L101, doi: 10.1086/420844

    2004 doi

  214. [223]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Waxman, E., & Katz, B. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Murdin, 967, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 33

    2017 doi

  215. [224]

    2007, ApJ, 667, 351, doi: 10.1086/520715

    Waxman, E., M´ esz´ aros, P., & Campana, S. 2007, ApJ, 667, 351, doi: 10.1086/520715

    2007 doi

  216. [225]

    Weaver, T. A. 1976, ApJS, 32, 233, doi: 10.1086/190398

    1976 doi

  217. [226]

    Weis, K., & Bomans, D. J. 2020, Galaxies, 8, 20, doi: 10.3390/galaxies8010020

    2020 doi

  218. [227]

    Willingale, R., Starling, R. L. C., Beardmore, A. P., Tanvir, N. R., & O’Brien, P. T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 394, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt175

    2013 doi

  219. [228]

    2007, MNRAS, 375, 1049, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11373.x

    Wolf, C., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1049, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11373.x

    2007 doi

  220. [229]

    Woosley, S. E. 1993, ApJ, 405, 273, doi: 10.1086/172359

    1993 doi

  221. [230]

    E., & Bloom, J

    Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 507, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150558

    2006 doi

  222. [231]

    2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44092, 1

    Xu, D., Corcoran, G., An, J., et al. 2026, GRB Coordinates Network, 44092, 1

    2026

  223. [232]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfcb4

    Yang, S., & Sollerman, J. 2023, ApJS, 269, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfcb4

    2023 doi

  224. [233]

    2012, PASP, 124, 668, doi: 10.1086/666656

    Yaron, O., & Gal-Yam, A. 2012, PASP, 124, 668, doi: 10.1086/666656

    2012 doi

  225. [234]

    2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, 86, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 151-1

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., & Ling, Z. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, 86, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 151-1

    2022 doi

  226. [235]

    2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1506.07735, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1506.07735

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Feng, H., et al. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1506.07735, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1506.07735

    2015 doi arXiv

  227. [236]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.07362

    Yuan, W., Dai, L., Feng, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.07362. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07362

    2025

  228. [237]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10014, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10014

    Yuan, W., Huang, Q.-J., Zhu, J.-P., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.10014, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10014

    2026 doi arXiv

  229. [238]

    A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A

    Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2011, Nature, 476, 425, doi: 10.1038/nature10366

    2011 doi

  230. [239]

    M., Metzger, B

    Zenati, Y., Siegel, D. M., Metzger, B. D., & Perets, H. B. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 4097, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3002

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.