pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23620 · v1 · pith:2UWHUJ2Unew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.app-ph

From Optical Breakdown to Bubble Inception: A Coupled Plasma-Thermal Framework for Nanosecond Laser-Induced Cavitation in Water

Shuqi Zhou , Abdol Hadi Mokarizadeh , Ben Xu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.app-ph
keywords laser-induced cavitationoptical breakdownplasma-thermal couplingthermoelastic acoustic relaxationbubble inceptionnanosecond lasercavitation in water
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bubble inception in nanosecond laser cavitation arises from plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation that creates transient tensile pressures, with the initial cavity inheriting the plasma shape rather than starting spherical.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that bubble inception during nanosecond optical breakdown in water is driven primarily by thermoelastic acoustic relaxation from the plasma, which produces short-lived negative pressures strong enough to pull the liquid apart on nanosecond timescales. Residual heat retained after the plasma phase then supports the bubble's continued expansion. This matters for applications such as microsurgery and microfluidic actuation because it supplies a direct physical link between the breakdown event and the resulting cavity, allowing better prediction of when and where the bubble appears. The framework also shows that the first cavity takes on the elongated form of the moving plasma region instead of forming as a round nucleus. Time-resolved experiments confirm that the combined description matches observed early formation and later growth more closely than models that treat plasma mechanics or thermal nucleation in isolation.

Core claim

The model shows that bubble inception is governed primarily by plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation, which generates transient tensile rarefaction pressures sufficient for cavitation on nanosecond timescales, while residual thermal energy sustains subsequent bubble growth. Because energy deposition is spatially anisotropic under moving breakdown conditions, the initial cavity inherits the plasma morphology rather than emerging as a spherical nucleus. Comparison with time-resolved experiments demonstrates that the coupled framework captures both early time cavity formation and longtime bubble expansion more accurately than plasma-only or thermal-only models.

What carries the argument

coupled plasma-thermal framework that unifies free-electron dynamics, plasma absorption, thermoelastic acoustic response, residual thermal energy retention, and post-inception bubble evolution

If this is right

  • Transient tensile rarefaction pressures from plasma acoustic relaxation enable cavitation on nanosecond timescales.
  • Residual thermal energy from the plasma sustains bubble growth after the initial cavity forms.
  • The initial cavity shape matches the anisotropic morphology of the moving plasma region.
  • The unified description matches experimental cavity formation and expansion timing more closely than plasma-only or thermal-only models.
  • The framework supplies physically grounded initial conditions for multiscale simulations of laser-driven material transport.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Controlling laser parameters to alter plasma shape could allow deliberate control over the geometry of the starting cavity in applications.
  • The same plasma-thermal coupling may predict cavitation behavior in other transparent liquids under comparable laser conditions.
  • Direct linkage of breakdown-scale deposition to continuum dynamics could simplify initial conditions in larger-scale models of laser processing.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that spatially anisotropic energy deposition under moving breakdown directly sets the initial cavity shape and that thermoelastic acoustic relaxation alone produces tensile pressures sufficient for cavitation without extra nucleation sites or thresholds.

What would settle it

High-speed imaging that shows the initial cavity forming as a sphere even when the plasma breakdown path is elongated, or direct pressure measurements indicating that acoustic rarefaction waves remain above the cavitation threshold throughout the nanosecond window.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23620 by Abdol Hadi Mokarizadeh, Ben Xu, Shuqi Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of laser-induced cavitation and its role in LIFT printing. (a) In bulk liquid, focused pulsed irradiation can produce plasma formation, localized heating, thermoelastic loading, and cavity inception, a possible thermal nucleation pathway indicated for comparison. (b) In LIFT printing, bubble expansion within the ink coating drives jet formation and droplet transfer toward the receiving substrate.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conceptual structure of the coupled plasma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Staged physical sequence represented in the coupled plasma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal evolution of free electron density for representative laser pulse durations. Simulated total electron density and MPI only contribution is compared with benchmark calculations for (a) 𝜏𝐿 = 100fs, 𝐼 = 7.7 × 1012W/cm2 , (b) 𝜏𝐿 = 30ps, 𝐼 = 1.2 × 1011W/cm2 , and (c) 𝜏𝐿 = 6ns, 𝐼 = 3.4 × 1010W/cm2 . Time is normalized by the pulse duration, with 𝑡/𝜏𝐿 = 0 corresponding to the pulse peak. The deviation be… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plasma localization and moving-breakdown-induced morphology under nanosecond irradiation. Simulated plasma distribution (a) without plasma shielding and (b) with shielding and moving breakdown included. (c) Comparison with experimental ICCD emission images from Jia et al. [4], showing that shielding-driven upstream energy deposition produces the elongated plasma morphology observed experimentally [PITH_FU… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Thermoelastic fields generated by plasma-mediated energy deposition. Spatial distributions of (a) temperature rise and (b) compressive thermoelastic source pressure for the 10 mJ case. The white contour marks the plasma-shaped absorption region, showing that both thermal and mechanical fields inherit the elongated morphology of the breakdown region rather than forming around a spherical heat source. The pr… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Compressive-to-tensile evolution of the dynamic thermoelastic pressure response. The pressure trace is obtained from acoustic relaxation of the plasma-generated thermoelastic source pressure at the location of maximum source strength. The initially compressive response evolves into a tensile rarefaction phase; cavity inception occurs when the dynamic tensile pressure satisfies the mechanical cavitation cri… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Predicted non-spherical inception geometry generated by plasma-mediated tensile loading. Initial cavity shapes are shown for input laser energies of 2, 10, and 30 mJ. The cavity becomes increasingly elongated along the laser propagation direction as the energy increases, reflecting stronger shielding driven plasma localization. The aspect ratio is defined as 𝐴𝑅 = 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ/𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ; the equivalent spherical radi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Initial bubble size predicted by the three formulations at the earliest resolved time. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Error metrics for the initial bubble-size comparison. (a) Root-mean-square error (RMSE) and (b) normalized RMSE (NRMSE) for the plasma-mediated, thermal-only, and coupled plasma-thermal models evaluated at t=5 ns across the three laser energies. Because only three energy levels are used, the metrics are interpreted as comparative indicators of model performance rather than statistically converged uncertai… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Laser-induced cavitation under nanosecond optical breakdown is central to applications such as laser-induced forward transfer, microsurgery, and microfluidic actuation, yet the physical origin of the earliest cavity and its connection to subsequent bubble growth remain unresolved. Existing models typically describe bubble formation either as a plasma-driven mechanical response or as a thermally driven nucleation process, without resolving how these mechanisms interact during inception. Here, we developed a coupled plasma-thermal framework that unifies free-electron dynamics, plasma absorption, thermoelastic acoustic response, residual thermal energy retention, and post-inception bubble evolution within a single description. The model shows that bubble inception is governed primarily by plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation, which generates transient tensile rarefaction pressures sufficient for cavitation on nanosecond timescales, while residual thermal energy sustains subsequent bubble growth. Because energy deposition is spatially anisotropic under moving breakdown conditions, the initial cavity inherits the plasma morphology rather than emerging as a spherical nucleus. Comparison with time-resolved experiments demonstrates that the coupled framework captures both early time cavity formation and longtime bubble expansion more accurately than plasma-only or thermal-only models. These results establish a predictive link between breakdown-scale energy deposition and continuum bubble dynamics, providing physically grounded initial conditions for multiscale modeling and improved control of laser driven material transport processes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a coupled plasma-thermal framework integrating free-electron dynamics, plasma absorption, thermoelastic acoustic response, residual thermal energy, and post-inception bubble evolution for nanosecond laser-induced cavitation in water. It claims that bubble inception is governed primarily by plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation generating transient tensile rarefaction pressures sufficient for cavitation on nanosecond timescales, with residual thermal energy sustaining later growth; the initial cavity inherits the spatially anisotropic plasma morphology under moving breakdown rather than forming as a spherical nucleus. The coupled model is asserted to match time-resolved experiments more accurately than plasma-only or thermal-only models, establishing a predictive link between breakdown-scale deposition and continuum bubble dynamics.

Significance. If the central claim on the magnitude and sufficiency of thermoelastic tensile pressures holds, the work would provide a unified mechanism linking plasma dynamics directly to cavitation inception and growth, supplying physically grounded initial conditions for multiscale simulations in applications such as microsurgery and microfluidic actuation. The explicit treatment of anisotropic energy deposition under moving breakdown as determining non-spherical cavity morphology would represent a substantive advance over decoupled models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the coupled framework 'captures both early time cavity formation and longtime bubble expansion more accurately than plasma-only or thermal-only models' is unsupported by any quantitative error metrics, description of data exclusion rules, or details on how parameters were chosen and validated; this directly affects the load-bearing assertion of model superiority.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation 'generates transient tensile rarefaction pressures sufficient for cavitation on nanosecond timescales' provides no computed pressure amplitudes, the precise cavitation threshold applied, or the closure of the acoustic wave equation with the plasma absorption term, leaving the central mechanism unverified in magnitude.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation of the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the coupled framework 'captures both early time cavity formation and longtime bubble expansion more accurately than plasma-only or thermal-only models' is unsupported by any quantitative error metrics, description of data exclusion rules, or details on how parameters were chosen and validated; this directly affects the load-bearing assertion of model superiority.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes results whose quantitative support appears in the Results section through direct comparison of simulated and measured bubble radii at multiple time points. We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit reference to these metrics. In revision we will add a concise statement noting the improved agreement (e.g., lower deviation from experimental radii) and will ensure the Methods section explicitly states that all acquired experimental datasets were retained without exclusion and that parameter values were validated against independent breakdown-threshold measurements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that plasma-induced thermoelastic acoustic relaxation 'generates transient tensile rarefaction pressures sufficient for cavitation on nanosecond timescales' provides no computed pressure amplitudes, the precise cavitation threshold applied, or the closure of the acoustic wave equation with the plasma absorption term, leaving the central mechanism unverified in magnitude.

    Authors: The pressure amplitudes, the cavitation threshold employed, and the manner in which the plasma absorption term enters the acoustic source are derived and reported in the main text (thermoelastic model section and associated figures). We acknowledge that these values are not restated in the abstract. In revision we will insert the key magnitudes and a brief indication of the coupling into the abstract so that the central mechanism is quantified at the summary level. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: abstract presents framework claims without equations, fits, or self-citations

full rationale

The provided abstract describes a coupled plasma-thermal model and its conclusions about bubble inception via thermoelastic relaxation and anisotropic energy deposition, but contains no equations, parameter-fitting procedures, self-citations, or derivation steps. Without visible mathematical structure or load-bearing reductions to inputs, no instances of self-definitional claims, fitted inputs called predictions, or ansatz smuggling can be identified. The central claim is stated as an output of the framework rather than shown to reduce to its own assumptions by construction. This matches the expectation that most papers are non-circular when no explicit chain is inspectable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all physical processes are described at the level of named mechanisms without numerical values or derivation steps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5768 in / 1150 out tokens · 18161 ms · 2026-05-25T02:55:21.266049+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Laser-induced plasma formation in water at nanosecond to femtosecond time scales: calculation of thresholds, absorption coefficients, and energy density,

    J. Noack and A. Vogel, “Laser-induced plasma formation in water at nanosecond to femtosecond time scales: calculation of thresholds, absorption coefficients, and energy density,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1156–1167, 1999, doi: 10.1109/3.777215

    work page doi:10.1109/3.777215 1999

  2. [2]

    Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues,

    A. Vogel and V. Venugopalan, “Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues,” Chem. Rev., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 577–644, 2003, doi: 10.1021/cr010379n

    work page doi:10.1021/cr010379n 2003

  3. [3]

    Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues,

    A. Vogel, J. Noack, G. Hüttman, and G. Paltauf, “Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues,” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1015–1047, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s00340-005- 2036-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340-005- 2005

  4. [4]

    Early dynamics of laser-induced plasma and cavitation bubble in water,

    Z. Jia et al., “Early dynamics of laser-induced plasma and cavitation bubble in water,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc., vol. 206, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2023.106713

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sab.2023.106713 2023

  5. [5]

    Lasersonic® LIFT process for large area digital printing,

    G. Hennig et al., “Lasersonic® LIFT process for large area digital printing,” Journal of Laser Micro Nanoengineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 299–305, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.2961/jlmn.2012.03.0012

    work page doi:10.2961/jlmn.2012.03.0012 2012

  6. [6]

    Laser- generated liquid microjets: Correlation between bubble dynamics and liquid ejection,

    A. Patrascioiu, J. M. Fernández-Pradas, A. Palla-Papavlu, J. L. Morenza, and P. Serra, “Laser- generated liquid microjets: Correlation between bubble dynamics and liquid ejection,” Microfluid. Nanofluidics, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 55–63, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10404-013-1218-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10404-013-1218-5 2014

  7. [7]

    Laser-Induced Forward Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications,

    P. Serra and A. Piqué, “Laser-Induced Forward Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications,” Jan. 01, 2019, Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/admt.201800099

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.201800099 2019

  8. [8]

    A State-of-the-Art Review of Laser-Assisted Bioprinting and its Future Research Trends,

    C. Dou, V. Perez, J. Qu, A. Tsin, B. Xu, and J. Li, “A State-of-the-Art Review of Laser-Assisted Bioprinting and its Future Research Trends,” Oct. 01, 2021, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/cben.202000037

    work page doi:10.1002/cben.202000037 2021

  9. [9]

    Laser-induced forward transfer hydrogel printing: A defined route for highly controlled process,

    V. Yusupov et al., “Laser-induced forward transfer hydrogel printing: A defined route for highly controlled process,” Int. J. Bioprint., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.18063/IJB.V6I3.271

    work page doi:10.18063/ijb.v6i3.271 2020

  10. [10]

    3D printing of conducting polymers,

    H. Yuk et al., “3D printing of conducting polymers,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15316-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15316-7 2020

  11. [11]

    Printing quality improvement for laser-induced forward transfer bioprinting: Numerical modeling and experimental validation,

    J. Qu, C. Dou, B. Xu, J. Li, Z. Rao, and A. Tsin, “Printing quality improvement for laser-induced forward transfer bioprinting: Numerical modeling and experimental validation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 7, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0054675

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0054675 2021

  12. [12]

    Experimental investigation of various energy-absorbing layer materials and sodium alginate viscosities on the jet formation in laser- induced-forward-transfer (LIFT) bioprinting,

    S. Zhou, C. Dou, J. Li, Q. Zhang, Q. Dai, and B. Xu, “Experimental investigation of various energy-absorbing layer materials and sodium alginate viscosities on the jet formation in laser- induced-forward-transfer (LIFT) bioprinting,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 133, no. 20, May 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0145737

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0145737 2023

  13. [13]

    A CFD study of the Influence of Porous Structure Placement on Jet Formation in Laser-Induced-Forward-Transfer (LIFT) Printing,

    S. Zhou and B. Xu, “A CFD study of the Influence of Porous Structure Placement on Jet Formation in Laser-Induced-Forward-Transfer (LIFT) Printing,” 2025. 32

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Simulation of the inverse bremsstrahlung absorption by plasma plume in laser penetration welding,

    Y. Zhang, F. Wang, J. Liu, and J. Sun, “Simulation of the inverse bremsstrahlung absorption by plasma plume in laser penetration welding,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 793, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139434

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139434 2022

  15. [15]

    Laser induced cavitation: Plasma generation and breakdown shockwave,

    G. Sinibaldi et al., “Laser induced cavitation: Plasma generation and breakdown shockwave,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 31, no. 10, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5119794

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5119794 2019

  16. [16]

    Modeling of Skin Tissue Ablation by Nanosecond Pulses from Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared and Comparison with Experimental Results,

    Q. Fang and X. H. Hu, “Modeling of Skin Tissue Ablation by Nanosecond Pulses from Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared and Comparison with Experimental Results,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 69–77, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1109/JQE.2003.820837

    work page doi:10.1109/jqe.2003.820837 2004

  17. [17]

    Numerical modeling of plasma formation in skin tissues induced by nanosecond pulsed laser,

    H. Delibasic, V. Petrovic, I. Petrovic, C. Molpeceres, and S. Lauzurica, “Numerical modeling of plasma formation in skin tissues induced by nanosecond pulsed laser,” European Physical Journal D, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00170-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00170-z 2021

  18. [18]

    Spatio-temporal evolution of uranium emission in laser-produced plasmas,

    S. S. Harilal, P. K. Diwakar, N. L. Lahaye, and M. C. Phillips, “Spatio-temporal evolution of uranium emission in laser-produced plasmas,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc., vol. 111, pp. 1–7, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2015.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sab.2015.06.003 2015

  19. [19]

    Plasma formation in water by picosecond and nanosecond Nd:YAG laser pulses - Part I: Optical breakdown at threshold and superthreshold irradiance,

    A. Vogel, K. Nahen, D. Theisen, and J. Noack, “Plasma formation in water by picosecond and nanosecond Nd:YAG laser pulses - Part I: Optical breakdown at threshold and superthreshold irradiance,” IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 847–859, 1996, doi: 10.1109/2944.577307

    work page doi:10.1109/2944.577307 1996

  20. [20]

    Bubble formation modeling during laser direct writing of glycerol solutions,

    R. Xiong, Z. Zhang, J. Shen, Y. Lin, Y. Huang, and D. B. Chrisey, “Bubble formation modeling during laser direct writing of glycerol solutions,” J. Micro Nanomanuf., vol. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1115/1.4029264

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4029264 2015

  21. [21]

    P. G. Debenedetti, Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles. 1996

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Kashchiev, Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications

    D. Kashchiev, Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Numerical study of laser-induced cavitation bubble with consideration of chemical reactions,

    C. Wang, H. Yan, R. Zhang, F. Chen, and F. Liu, “Numerical study of laser-induced cavitation bubble with consideration of chemical reactions,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 109, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107007 2024

  24. [24]

    Femtosecond laser-induced optical breakdown and cavitation dynamics in water imaged with an x-ray free-electron laser,

    H. P. Hoeppe et al., “Femtosecond laser-induced optical breakdown and cavitation dynamics in water imaged with an x-ray free-electron laser,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 7, no. 3, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1103/c91c-zrm7

    work page doi:10.1103/c91c-zrm7 2025

  25. [25]

    The Gilmore-NASG model to predict single-bubble cavitation in compressible liquids,

    F. Denner, “The Gilmore-NASG model to predict single-bubble cavitation in compressible liquids,” Ultrason. Sonochem., vol. 70, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105307

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105307 2021

  26. [26]

    The Kirkwood-Bethe hypothesis for bubble dynamics, cavitation and underwater explosions,

    F. Denner, “The Kirkwood-Bethe hypothesis for bubble dynamics, cavitation and underwater explosions,” May 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0209167. 33

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0209167 2024

  27. [27]

    Breakdown threshold and localized electron density in water induced by ultrashort laser pulses,

    C. H. Fan, J. Sun, and J. P. Longtin, “Breakdown threshold and localized electron density in water induced by ultrashort laser pulses,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 2530–2536, 2002, doi: 10.1063/1.1433929

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1433929 2002

  28. [28]

    A First-Order Model for Computation of Laser-Induced Breakdown Thresholds in Ocular and Aqueous Media: Part I-Theory,

    P. K. Kennedy, “A First-Order Model for Computation of Laser-Induced Breakdown Thresholds in Ocular and Aqueous Media: Part I-Theory,” 1995

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    Photoacoustic Monopole Radiation in One, Two, and Three Dimensions

    G. J. Diebold, T. Sun, and M. I. Khan, “Photoacoustic Monopole Radiation in One, Two, and Three Dimensions.”

    work page

  30. [30]

    Influence of inertial confinement on laser-induced bubble generation and shock wave emission

    X.-X. Liang and A. Vogel, “Influence of inertial confinement on laser-induced bubble generation and shock wave emission.” [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8325-1627

    work page

  31. [31]

    International Tables of the Surface Tension of Water

    N. B. Vargaftik, B. N. Volkov, and L. D. Voljak, “International Tables of the Surface Tension of Water.” [Online]. Available: http://jpcrd.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

    work page

  32. [32]

    Dynamics of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation modelling a gas-filled bubble immersed in an incompressible fluid,

    R. A. Van Gorder, “Dynamics of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation modelling a gas-filled bubble immersed in an incompressible fluid,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 807, pp. 478–508, 2016, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.640

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.640 2016

  33. [33]

    The Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles,

    M. S. Plesset and C. Pasadena, “The Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles,” 9AD

    work page

  34. [34]

    C. E. . Brennen, Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Oxford University Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    Laser generation of high-amplitude stress waves in materials,

    B. P. Fairand and A. H. Clauer, “Laser generation of high-amplitude stress waves in materials,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1497–1502, 1979, doi: 10.1063/1.326137

    work page doi:10.1063/1.326137 1979

  36. [36]

    Laser-induced plasma formation and cavitation in water: from nanoeffects to extreme states of matter,

    N. Linz, S. Freidank, X. X. Liang, and A. Vogel, “Laser-induced plasma formation and cavitation in water: from nanoeffects to extreme states of matter,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 88, no. 8, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/adedb3

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adedb3 2025

  37. [37]

    Photoacoustic cavitation in spherical and cylindrical absorbers,

    G. Paltauf and H. Schmidt-Kloiber, “Photoacoustic cavitation in spherical and cylindrical absorbers,” Appl. Phys. A, vol. 68, pp. 525–531, 1999, doi: 10.1007/s003399900033

    work page doi:10.1007/s003399900033 1999

  38. [38]

    Effects of the non-equilibrium condensation of vapour on the pressure wave produced by the collapse of a bubble in a liquid,

    S. Fujikawa and T. Akamatsu, “Effects of the non-equilibrium condensation of vapour on the pressure wave produced by the collapse of a bubble in a liquid,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 481–512, 1980, doi: 10.1017/S0022112080002662

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112080002662 1980