Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison Among Coaxial Microcalorimeter Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.04835 v1 pith:2V252UFK submitted 2021-03-08 physics.ins-det physics.app-ph

Comparison Among Coaxial Microcalorimeter Models

classification physics.ins-det physics.app-ph
keywords modelscoaxialpowerbeenmicrocalorimetersensorsthermoelectricanalyze
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Thermoelectric power sensors used as power transfer standards are promising devices for further enhancements of the microcalorimetric technique in the high frequency field. A coaxial microcalorimeter has been studied, based on thermoelectric power sensors, at Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM). In the literature, several models have been proposed, considering different calibration processes and error sources. Hereby we analyze these models in terms of total uncertainty for the 3.5 mm coaxial line case between 10 MHz and 26.5 GHz. Merits and limits of the models are highlighted.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.