Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Lyapunov exponents and phase transition of charged Ads black hole in quintessence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Lyapunov exponents of unstable circular orbits in quintessence-RN-AdS black holes jump at the small/large phase transition, with the jump scaling as the square root of the temperature gap.

desk verdict The finite-cutoff observation is genuinely new, but the advertised δ=1/2 scaling is unsupported because Eq. (28) contradicts the paper's own criticality condition Eq. (11). read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03519 v1 pith:2VUNJKYC submitted 2025-08-05 gr-qc

Xiaobo Guo , Rui Yang , Yizhi Liang , Jun Tao This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords LyapunovexponentblackholethermodynamicsphasetransitionquintessenceRN-AdScriticalgeodesicchaosphotonsphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper attempts to establish that a purely dynamical quantity--the Lyapunov exponent measuring how quickly nearby geodesics diverge around a black hole--can act as an order parameter for thermodynamic phase transitions. For charged AdS black holes surrounded by a quintessence field, it argues that the Lyapunov exponent of unstable circular photon and massive-particle orbits becomes multivalued below the critical point, jumps discontinuously at the first-order transition temperature, and has a jump $\Delta\lambda$ that vanishes at the critical point as $|T_p - T_c|^{1/2}$, matching the van der Waals exponent. It further argues that quintessence suppresses geodesic chaos and, unlike pure RN-AdS, imposes a finite cutoff at which unstable circular orbits cease to exist and $\lambda$ drops to zero. If correct, this connects geodesic instability to black hole thermodynamics and to the presence of dark energy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda$ of unstable circular geodesic orbits, defined from the second derivative of the effective potential $V_{\mathrm{eff}}(r)$ at the unstable radius $r_c$: for null geodesics $\lambda = \sqrt{-r_c^2 f(r_c) V_{\mathrm{eff}}''(r_c)/(2L^2)}$, with an analogous expression for timelike geodesics. The paper uses this exponent as a dynamical mirror of the black hole's thermodynamic phases, with the jump $\Delta\lambda = \lambda_l - \lambda_s$ between the small- and large-black-hole branches serving as the order parameter. The metric ingredient is the quintessence-deformed Reissner-Nordström-AdS metric function $f(\tilde r) = 1 - 2\tilde M/\tilde r + \tilde Q^2/\tilde r^2 + \tilde r^2/l^2 - \tilde b/\tilde r^{3\omega+1}$, whose normalization factor $\tilde b$ suppresses $\lambda$ and eventually removes the unstable circular orbit altogether.

What would settle it

Numerically compute the coexisting small- and large-black-hole branches from the equal-free-energy condition for $b$ close to $b_c$, evaluate $\Delta\lambda = \lambda_l - \lambda_s$ on those branches, and fit $\log \Delta\lambda$ against $\log |T_p - T_c|$; if the fitted slope is not $1/2$, the claimed critical exponent is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for the Reissner-Nordström-AdS black hole enveloped by quintessence (RN-qAdS), the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda$ of unstable circular orbits--both null (photon) and timelike (massive particle) geodesics--reproduces the thermodynamic phase structure of the black hole. Below the critical quintessence parameter $b_c$ or charge $Q_c$, the $\lambda$ versus Hawking temperature $T$ curves show three branches (small, intermediate, large black holes), and at the phase transition temperature $T_p$ where free energies of small and large black holes are equal, $\lambda$ jumps discontinuously. At criticality the jump $\Delta\lambda = \lambda_l - \lambda_s$ vanishes, and the paper derives $\Delta\lambda \sim |T_p - T_c|^{1/2}$, identifying the jump as an order parameter with critical exponent $1/2$, consistent with the van der Waals fluid. A second claim is that quintessence introduces a finite cutoff: for sufficiently large $b$ or $r_+$, the effective potential no longer has an unstable circular-orbit extremum, so $\lambda$ vanishes identically, a behavior that does not occur in pure RN-AdS spacetimes.

Load-bearing premise

The 1/2 exponent rests on assuming the quadratic term in the expansion of $T(r_+)$ dominates near the critical point, yet the paper's criticality conditions set the coefficient of that quadratic term to zero.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The multivalued $\lambda$--$T$ curves mirror the free-energy swallowtail, so a purely dynamical measurement of geodesic instability can locate the first-order small/large black hole transition and the second-order critical point.
  • The exponent $1/2$ ties the Lyapunov jump to van der Waals universality, extending the same critical behavior already reported for RN-AdS, Gauss-Bonnet AdS, and Born-Infeld AdS black holes to the quintessence case.
  • For $b > b_c$ or $Q > Q_c$ the $\lambda$--$T$ curve is monotonic and single-valued, giving a dynamical signature that the black hole is in a single stable phase with no transition.
  • The finite cutoff where $\lambda$ vanishes provides a testable distinction between quintessence and pure RN-AdS black holes, since the latter retains nonzero photon-sphere Lyapunov exponents asymptotically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension beyond the paper: if the cutoff is confirmed, black hole shadow or photon-ring instability measurements could in principle constrain the quintessence normalization factor $b$, because the temperature or horizon radius at which $\lambda$ vanishes depends on $b$.
  • Extension beyond the paper: the same $\Delta\lambda$ order-parameter construction could be applied to other dark-energy or dark-matter modified black hole spacetimes, such as perfect fluid dark matter backgrounds, to test whether the critical exponent is universal or model-dependent.
  • Extension beyond the paper: a two-variable expansion in $(r_+ - r_{+,c})$ and $(b - b_c)$, rather than the paper's one-variable expansion, would clarify whether the $1/2$ exponent survives at the true critical point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies four-dimensional Reissner-Nordström-AdS black holes surrounded by a quintessence field and analyzes their thermodynamic phase structure and geodesic Lyapunov exponents. It derives thermodynamic quantities, locates critical points, computes Lyapunov exponents for null and timelike circular orbits, and observes that increasing the quintessence parameter suppresses the exponents and introduces a finite cutoff absent in RN-AdS. It then defines the discontinuity Δλ at the first-order transition as an order parameter and claims it scales as |T_p − T_c|^{1/2}, i.e., critical exponent 1/2.

Significance. If the central scaling claim were fully supported, the paper would provide an interesting dynamical probe of black-hole phase transitions and a dark-energy-dependent cutoff. The qualitative sections are based on standard geodesic equations and contain useful numerical surveys. However, the derivation of the headline critical exponent rests on an inconsistent Taylor expansion, and the analytic formula for the critical charge is not valid for the plotted case. The finite-cutoff observation is the most credible novel part, but it is qualitative. Overall the paper does not yet substantiate its main quantitative claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (28)] The expansion T(r_+) = T_c + (1/2)(∂²T/∂r_+²)_c (r_+ − r_{+,c})² + O(r_+ − r_{+,c})³ assumes (∂²T/∂r_+²)_c ≠ 0. This is contradicted by the paper's own criticality condition in Eq. (11), which states ∂T/∂r_+ = 0 and ∂²T/∂r_+² = 0 at the critical point. The quadratic coefficient in Eq. (28) therefore vanishes, the denominator in Eq. (29) is zero, and Eqs. (30)–(31) do not follow. A valid derivation would require a joint expansion in r_+ − r_{+,c} and b − b_c (or T − T_c) with the Maxwell construction; the manuscript provides no such argument.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (14)] For the case ω = −1/2 used throughout the numerical analysis, the factor √(−3 + 9ω) is imaginary, yet Fig. 1 displays real critical values. Either the formula contains a typographical or algebraic error or the plotted curve is not generated from Eq. (14). Since the critical parameters underpin the phase diagram and the subsequent critical-exponent analysis, this error needs to be fixed.
  3. [Section IV, Fig. 14 and Eq. (32)] The numerical fit Δλ̃ = k√(T̃−1) is presented without the underlying data points, error bars, or the values of b and Q used; the caption only says 'points near the critical point.' This fit cannot serve as independent evidence for δ = 1/2, especially when the analytical derivation is invalid.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Abstract] The title and abstract contain typos: 'Ads' should be 'AdS' and 'These work suggest' should be 'These works suggest'.
  2. [Section III.A] The sentence 'where where L = L/l is scaled...' contains a duplicated 'where' and should be corrected.
  3. [Section III.A] The statement in Fig. 5b that 'for larger b exceeding 1.2, λ vanishes entirely' is made without a quantitative criterion for the disappearance of unstable circular orbits; the threshold should be defined precisely.
  4. [References] References [48] and [51] are identical, and reference [47] lacks publication details; check and consolidate the bibliography.
  5. [Section V] The conclusion repeats the claim that Δλ yields a critical exponent of 1/2, but this claim depends on the invalid derivation in Section IV and should be revisited.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central δ=1/2 scaling is partly circular: the numerical fit preselects a square-root form and then reports that exponent; the analytic derivation is invalid because Eq. (28) contradicts the paper's own criticality condition, Eq. (11).

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, Eq. (32) and Fig. 14]
    "Numerical fits over ˜T yield ∆˜λ = k p ˜T − 1, (32) aligning with δ = 1/2."

    The fitting function k√(T̃−1) has the exponent 1/2 built into its functional form; fitting the amplitude k cannot determine the exponent. Reporting 'aligning with δ=1/2' is a restatement of the assumed fitting ansatz, not an independent measurement of δ. This is load-bearing because the analytic derivation leading to Eq. (31) is invalid: Eq. (28) expands T(r+) with a nonzero quadratic coefficient (∂²T/∂r²₊)_c, while Eq. (11) defines the critical point by ∂²T/∂r²₊ = 0. Thus the only surviving support for the central δ=1/2 claim is the pre-selected square-root fit.

full rationale

The qualitative content of the paper is self-contained and not circular: the Lyapunov exponents are computed from the geodesic effective potentials (Eqs. 17–19 and 21–23) using the metric (4), and the observed monotonic decrease of λ with r+ and b, as well as the finite cutoff where unstable circular orbits disappear, follows from the stated effective-potential analysis. Those results do not presuppose the critical-exponent claim. The central quantitative claim, however, is not independently supported. The analytic derivation in Section IV expands T(r+) as Tc + (1/2)(∂²T/∂r²₊)_c (r+ − r+,c)², but Eq. (11) defines the critical point by exactly the vanishing of that second derivative, so Eqs. (29)–(31) are mathematically unsupported. That is a correctness defect rather than a circularity, but it removes the analytic derivation as independent evidence. What remains is the numerical fit in Eq. (32), where the function k√(T̃−1) already contains δ=1/2; fitting k and then reporting 'aligning with δ=1/2' is a fitted input called a prediction. The references to overlapping-author prior work [42,58,59] are used only as consistency statements, not as the derivation, so they add no independent support but are not the main circular step. Overall, the paper earns a 6: one central prediction reduces by construction to the pre-selected fitting form, while the rest of the dynamical analysis is independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central calculation uses standard 4D RN-AdS black hole thermodynamics with a Kiselev quintessence background and standard circular-orbit Lyapunov formulas. No new entities are introduced. The genuinely fitted numbers are two amplitudes k in Fig. 14; the model parameters b, Q, L, omega are choices for numerical exploration and not fit to data. The fragile premise is Eq. (28), which is inconsistent with Eq. (11).

free parameters (6)
  • Quintessence normalization b = b_c approx 0.968; figures use b=0, 0.5, 1
    Central control parameter scanned numerically; not fitted to data.
  • Charge Q = 0.1 in most runs; 0.08, 0.11, 0.1295, 0.15 in charge scans
    Chosen for numerical illustrations; not fitted.
  • Angular momentum L = 20
    Fixed for Lyapunov exponent calculations; not fitted.
  • Equation-of-state parameter omega = -1/2
    All figures and critical values use omega=-1/2; the general omega range is not explored numerically.
  • Amplitude k (null) = 2.1862
    Fitted in Fig. 14b from Delta lambda_tilde = k sqrt(T_tilde - 1).
  • Amplitude k (timelike) = 2.1929
    Fitted in Fig. 14a from Delta lambda_tilde = k sqrt(T_tilde - 1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Kiselev quintessence metric f(r)=1-2M/r+Q^2/r^2+r^2/l^2-b/r^(3omega+1) (Eqs. 3-4) is the correct spacetime background.
    Used throughout Sections II-V without derivation; sourced to Refs. [18,55].
  • domain assumption The first law dM=T dS+Phi dQ (Eq. 6) is valid with b held fixed and no work term for b.
    This determines M, T, F and hence all phase structures; Kiselev parameters can carry a work term in other treatments, so fixing b is a nontrivial modeling choice.
  • standard math Lyapunov exponent formulas for null (Eq. 19) and timelike (Eq. 23) geodesics correctly characterize instability of the circular orbits.
    Standard geodesic stability results, cited to Cardoso et al. [40] and Lyu-Tao-Wang [58].
  • standard math The critical point is defined by dT/dr_+=0 and d^2T/dr_+^2=0 (Eq. 11).
    Standard inflection point condition used to locate second-order criticality.
  • ad hoc to paper T(r+) can be expanded in a nonzero quadratic term around r_{+,c} (Eq. 28).
    Contradicts the previous axiom: the quadratic coefficient is zero at the critical point. This premise is required for the delta=1/2 derivation and is unsupported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lyapunov exponents and phase transition of charged Ads black hole in quintessence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2VUNJKYC

@misc{pith2026250803519,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lyapunov exponents and phase transition of charged Ads black hole in quintessence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2VUNJKYC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03519}
}
abstract

This study investigates the phase transitions of RN-AdS black holes immersed in a quintessence field, employing Lyapunov exponents as a dynamical probe to characterize the thermodynamics of black hole. Incorporating quintessence dark energy into the RN-AdS framework, we find that the Lyapunov exponents for null and timelike geodesics display diminished chaotic behavior with increasing normalization factor of the quintessence field. This feature introduces a finite cutoff to the Lyapunov exponent of unstable circular photon orbits, setting it apart from RN-AdS black hole. At phase transition points, both the free energy and Lyapunov exponents display multivalued branches, reflecting the coexistence of distinct black hole phases. Furthermore, the discontinuity in the Lyapunov exponent can serve as an order parameter with a critical exponent of $1/2$ near the critical point, consistent with the thermodynamic criticality of van der Waals fluids.. These work suggest that Lyapunov exponents provide a framework for probing the thermodynamics of black holes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03519 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The critical curve in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Effect of the quintessence parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: F-T for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: b maps the Lyapunov exponent λ across the r+ −b space, revealing distinct regimes influenced by the quintessence parameter b. For small b below 1.2, λ exists and exhibits non-zero values, starting high at small r+ (indicating strong chaos near the unstable photon spher…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In Fig. 6a which the case for b below the critical value, the heat capacity Cp is 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -40 -20 0 20 40 λ Cp (a) Cp for λ. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -40 -20 0 20 40 r+ Cp (b) Cp for r+. FIG. 6: Isobaric heat capacity Cp for λ and r+, delineating sta…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Isobaric heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Lyapunov exponents plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unifying topological, geometric, and complex classifications of black hole thermodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Three classification schemes for black hole thermodynamics are equivalent, with the count of temperature extrema determining the class in each framework.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971), 1344-1346

    work page 1971

  2. [2]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973), 2333-2346

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature 248 (1974), 30-31

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973), 161-170

    work page 1973

  5. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 231-252

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983), 577

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999), 064018

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999), 104026

    work page 1999

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    G. Guo, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, Quasinormal modes of black holes with multiple photon spheres, JHEP 06 (2022), 060

    2022

  2. [10]

    S. He, L. F. Li and X. X. Zeng, Holographic Van der Waals-like phase transition in the Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017), 243-261

    2017

  3. [11]

    A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998), 1009-1038. 22

    1998

  4. [12]

    Perlmutter et al

    S. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project], Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999), 565-586

    1999

  5. [13]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), 1582-1585

    1998

  6. [14]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006), 1753-1936

    2006

  7. [15]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988), 3406

    1988

  8. [16]

    B. B. Thomas, M. Saleh and T. C. Kofane, Thermodynamics and phase transition of the Reissner-Nordstroem black hole surrounded by quintessence, Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 (2012), 2181- 2189

    2012

  9. [17]

    K. K. J. Rodrigue, M. Saleh, B. B. Thomas and T. C. Kofane, Thermodynamics phase transi- tion and Hawking radiation of the Schwarzschild black hole with quintessence-like matter and a deficit solid angle, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 (2018) no.5, 52

    2018

  10. [18]

    V. V. Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003), 1187-1198

    2003

  11. [19]

    G. Q. Li, Effects of dark energy on P–V criticality of charged AdS black holes, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014), 256-260

    2014

  12. [20]

    Tan, EGUP corrected thermodynamics of RN-AdS black hole with quintessence matter, Phys

    B. Tan, EGUP corrected thermodynamics of RN-AdS black hole with quintessence matter, Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025), 139289

    2025

  13. [21]

    Ghaderi, A

    K. Ghaderi, A. Pradhan, A. Dixit and S. H. Shekh, Phase transition of RN-AdS black hole with dark energy, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 22 (2025) no.05, 2450321

    2025

  14. [22]

    Minazzoli and T

    O. Minazzoli and T. Harko, New derivation of the Lagrangian of a perfect fluid with a barotropic equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 087502

    2012

  15. [23]

    S. Chen, B. Wang and R. Su, Hawking radiation in a d-dimensional static spherically- symmetric black Hole surrounded by quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008), 124011

    2008

  16. [24]

    Y. H. Wei and Z. H. Chu, Thermodynamic properties of a Reissner-Nordstroem quintessence black hole, Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 (2011), 100403

    2011

  17. [25]

    Tharanath and V

    R. Tharanath and V. C. Kuriakose, Thermodynamics and Spectroscopy of Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by Quintessence, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013), 1350003

    2013

  18. [26]

    Casimir effect in the Kerr space- time with quintessence

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchl ´ ık and B. Ahmedov, Comments on “Casimir effect in the Kerr space- time with quintessence”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 (2017) no.21, 1775001. 23

    2017

  19. [27]

    Ghaderi and B

    K. Ghaderi and B. Malakolkalami, Thermodynamics of the Schwarzschild and the Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black holes with quintessence, Nucl. Phys. B903 (2016), 10-18

    2016

  20. [28]

    M. S. Ma, R. Zhao and Y. Q. Ma, Thermodynamic stability of black holes surrounded by quintessence, Gen. Rel. Grav. 49 (2017) no.6, 79

    2017

  21. [29]

    Xu and J

    Z. Xu and J. Wang, Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Hole In Quintessential Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.6, 064015

    2017

  22. [30]

    Saleh, B

    M. Saleh, B. B. Thomas and T. C. Kofane, Thermodynamics and Phase Transition from Regular Bardeen Black Hole Surrounded by Quintessence, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 (2018) no.9, 2640-2647

    2018

  23. [31]

    S. G. Ghosh, S. D. Maharaj, D. Baboolal and T. H. Lee, Lovelock black holes surrounded by quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.2, 90

    2018

  24. [32]

    Ghaffarnejad, E

    H. Ghaffarnejad, E. Yaraie and M. Farsam, Quintessence Reissner Nordstr¨ om Anti de Sitter Black Holes and Joule Thomson effect, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 (2018) no.6, 1671-1682

    2018

  25. [33]

    Xu and Y

    W. Xu and Y. Wu, Exact phase structure of AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence dark energy, EPL 121 (2018) no.4, 40001

    2018

  26. [34]

    C. H. Wu, D. C. Zou and Y. Wang, P-V Criticality of Born-Infeld AdS Black Holes Surrounded by Quintessence, Commun. Theor. Phys. 70 (2018) no.4, 459

    2018

  27. [35]

    J. M. Toledo and V. B. Bezerra, Some remarks on the thermodynamics of charged AdS black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.2, 110

    2019

  28. [36]

    Ndongmo, S

    R. Ndongmo, S. Mahamat, T. B. Bouetou and T. C. Kofane, Thermodynamics of a rotating and non-linear magnetic-charged black hole in the quintessence field, Phys. Scripta 96 (2021) no.9, 095001

    2021

  29. [37]

    Chabab and S

    M. Chabab and S. Iraoui, Thermodynamic criticality of d-dimensional charged AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence with a cloud of strings background, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) no.8, 75

    2020

  30. [38]

    Wu and W

    Y. Wu and W. Xu, Effect of dark energy on Hawking–Page transition, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020), 100470

    2020

  31. [39]

    LYAPUNOV, and M. A. , The general problem of the stability of motion. International Journal of Control 55.3 (1992), 531-534

    1992

  32. [40]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) no.6, 064016. 24

    2009

  33. [41]

    M. Wang, S. Chen and J. Jing, Chaos in the motion of a test scalar particle coupling to the Einstein tensor in Schwarzschild–Melvin black hole spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.4, 208

    2017

  34. [42]

    X. Guo, Y. Lu, B. Mu and P. Wang, Probing phase structure of black holes with Lyapunov exponents, JHEP 08 (2022), 153

    2022

  35. [43]

    Y. Liu, D. C. Zou and B. Wang, Signature of the Van der Waals like small-large charged AdS black hole phase transition in quasinormal modes, JHEP 09 (2014), 179

    2014

  36. [44]

    Yang, Observational appearance of the spherically symmetric black hole in PFDM, Phys

    X. Yang, Observational appearance of the spherically symmetric black hole in PFDM, Phys. Dark Univ. 44 (2024), 101467

    2024

  37. [45]

    D. V. Singh, S. Upadhyay, Y. Myrzakulov, K. Myrzakulov, B. Singh and M. Kumar, Ther- modynamic behavior and phase transitions of black holes with a cloud of strings and perfect fluid dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 1016 (2025), 116915

    2025

  38. [46]

    Rizwan, M

    M. Rizwan, M. Jamil and M. Z. A. Moughal, Universal thermodynamic topological classes of black holes in a perfect fluid dark matter background, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) no.3, 359

    2025

  39. [47]

    V. V. Kiselev, Quintessential solution of dark matter rotation curves and its simulation by extra dimensions

  40. [49]

    Akiyama et al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) no.1, L6

    2019

  41. [50]

    S. H. Hendi, A. Nemati, K. Lin and M. Jamil, Instability and phase transitions of a rotating black hole in the presence of perfect fluid dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.4, 296

    2020

  42. [51]

    M. H. Li and K. C. Yang, Galactic Dark Matter in the Phantom Field, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 123015

    2012

  43. [52]

    Z. Xu, X. Hou, J. Wang and Y. Liao, Perfect fluid dark matter influence on thermodynamics and phase transition for a Reissner-Nordstrom-anti-de Sitter black hole, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019 (2019), 2434390

    2019

  44. [53]

    Shaymatov, B

    S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov and M. Jamil, Testing the weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a Reissner–Nordstr¨ om–de Sitter black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.7, 588

    2021

  45. [54]

    Y. Cao, H. Feng, W. Hong and J. Tao, Joule–Thomson expansion of RN-AdS black hole 25 immersed in perfect fluid dark matter, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) no.9, 095403

    2021

  46. [55]

    R. B. Alfaia, I. P. Lobo and L. C. T. Brito, Central charge criticality of charged AdS black hole surrounded by different fluids, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) no.3, 402

    2022

  47. [56]

    D. W. Yan, Z. R. Huang and N. Li, Hawking-Page phase transitions of charged AdS black holes surrounded by quintessence, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) no.1, 015104

    2021

  48. [57]

    W. Hong, B. Mu and J. Tao, Thermodynamics and weak cosmic censorship conjecture in the charged RN-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence under the scalar field, Nucl. Phys. B 949 (2019), 114826

    2019

  49. [58]

    X. Lyu, J. Tao and P. Wang, Probing the thermodynamics of charged Gauss Bonnet AdS black holes with the Lyapunov exponent, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.9, 974

    2024

  50. [59]

    S. Yang, J. Tao, B. Mu and A. He, Lyapunov exponents and phase transitions of Born-Infeld AdS black holes, JCAP 07 (2023), 045. 26

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.