Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis and Social Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that wealth inequality is the Rayleigh-Jeans condensate of a conserved total wealth: a huge poor majority plus a small oligarchic fraction.

desk verdict The Rayleigh-Jeans wealth story is a clean hypothesis and the network simulations are real evidence, but the Lorenz-curve fits are in-sample curve fitting; the paper deserves refereeing, not desk rejection. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17720 v3 pith:2X76KR7X submitted 2025-06-21 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.soc-phq-fin.ST

Klaus M. Frahm , Dima L. Shepelyansky This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.soc-phq-fin.ST PACS 89.65.Gh05.20.-y
keywords WealthThermalizationHypothesisRayleigh-JeansdistributioncondensateLorenzcurveGinicoefficientinequalitydynamicalsocialnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis: the wealth distribution of a society is the Rayleigh-Jeans thermal distribution $\rho_m = T/(E_m-\mu)$ of a system with two conserved quantities, total wealth (energy) and total population (norm). At low rescaled energy $\varepsilon=E/B$, the chemical potential sits near the bottom of the spectrum and most of the population condenses into low-wealth levels, which the authors identify with a large poor majority and a small oligarchic fraction. They report that this equilibrium form fits the Lorenz curves for the US, the UK, France, Germany, the world, and the NYSE, London and Hong Kong stock exchanges, and that nonlinear social networks thermalize to the same distribution above a chaos border. A sympathetic reader would care because, if correct, inequality is not a policy accident but the thermodynamic equilibrium of a conserved 'wealth energy,' with a single parameter controlling the Gini coefficient.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Rayleigh-Jeans occupation $\rho_m = T/(E_m-\mu)$ together with the two conservation laws $\sum_m \rho_m=1$ and $\sum_m E_m\rho_m=E$. At low rescaled energy $\varepsilon=E/B$ the chemical potential approaches the lowest level from below, creating an RJ condensate in which most probability piles into low-wealth states; in a Lorenz curve this is the flat poor tail plus a small oligarchic top. The comparison machinery is the Lorenz curve $w(h)$ and the Gini coefficient $G$, with the single free fit parameter $\varepsilon$ and an effective wealth spectrum $E_m$ that can be uniform, semicircular (random matrix), or exponential ($E_m = (e^{am/N}-1)/a$, the RJE model). The second part uses nonlinear oscillator dynamics on social networks: above a critical nonlinearity (chaos border) the system diffuses over eigenmodes and reaches the same RJ equilibrium with a monotonically growing thermodynamic entropy.

What would settle it

Take an economy or exchange with detailed Lorenz data during a year of large one-way external wealth flows, such as a major central-bank asset purchase, hyperinflation, or wartime destruction. If the Lorenz curve shifts abruptly and tracks the external flow instead of relaxing back to the same Rayleigh-Jeans family at fixed $\varepsilon$, the quasi-isolation premise fails; equivalently, a large-population dataset whose fitted spectrum is uniform and whose Gini falls below $1/3$ in the positive-temperature range $0\le\varepsilon\le1/2$ would contradict the RJS model directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the distribution of wealth in a quasi-isolated society is given by the Rayleigh-Jeans law $\rho_m = T/(E_m-\mu)$, with temperature $T$ and chemical potential $\mu$ fixed by conserving total wealth $\sum_m E_m\rho_m=E$ and total population $\sum_m \rho_m=1$. When the rescaled energy is small the chemical potential approaches the ground level from below, and the resulting Rayleigh-Jeans condensate places a large fraction of the population at negligible wealth while a tiny fraction occupies the upper tail; the authors take this as the origin of observed inequality. They compare the resulting Lorenz curves with real data for countries and stock exchanges, finding that a one-parameter uniform-spectrum model (RJS) already captures the main shape and an exponential-spectrum extension (RJE) improves the fit, and they show numerically that above a chaos border the same distribution is reached dynamically in social networks.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a country, the world, or a stock exchange behaves as a quasi-isolated Hamiltonian system on a one-year time scale, with total wealth and total population as the only conserved quantities and no significant external driving or dissipation; if that isolation fails, the Rayleigh-Jeans form and its condensation are not implied and the Lorenz fits become purely phenomenological curve fitting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equilibrium, not accident: at fixed conserved wealth and population, the entire shape of inequality follows from the effective spectrum and the rescaled energy $\varepsilon$, so a poor-majority/oligarchic structure emerges from low $\varepsilon$ rather than from particular policy choices.
  • Universality: the same RJ family fits household wealth for the US, the UK, France, Germany and the world, and company capitalization for the NYSE, London and Hong Kong exchanges.
  • A lever on inequality: increasing $\varepsilon$ (for instance by compressing the wealth band $B$ through high taxation of high revenues) lowers the Gini coefficient.
  • No external bath required: above a chaos border, nonlinear social networks thermalize dynamically to the same distribution, with the thermodynamic entropy increasing monotonically toward the thermal value.
  • Limits of the uniform model: for a uniform spectrum the Gini coefficient has the floor $G=1/3$ at $\varepsilon=1/2$, so lower inequality requires a non-uniform spectrum or a nonzero ground-state offset.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that inequality should have a relaxation time: after a wealth-conserving shock (a broad repricing of assets), the Lorenz curve should return to the same one-parameter family; measuring that relaxation on an exchange would test the hypothesis directly.
  • The one-year quasi-isolation assumption suggests a disconfirming case: economies with large one-way wealth flows (foreign aid, remittances, quantitative easing, wartime destruction) should show systematic deviations from the equilibrium fit if those flows break the conservation laws.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same fitting machinery to income rather than wealth; the theory predicts a different effective spectrum, and the fitted exponent $a$ would quantify how income differs from conserved wealth.
  • If the reconstructed-spectrum procedure is stable, it converts any Lorenz curve into an effective wealth ladder, offering a structural diagnostic: comparing the fitted ladder with actual wealth brackets would show whether the 'energy levels' carry economic meaning.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes the Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis (WTH): the wealth distribution of a country, the world, or a stock exchange is described by the grand-canonical Rayleigh-Jeans distribution ρ_m = T/(E_m − μ), with total wealth and total population playing the roles of conserved energy and norm. Part I constructs Lorenz curves from several spectral models—RJS (linear spectrum), RMT (semicircle spectrum), DL (double-linear spectrum), and RJE (exponential spectrum)—and compares them with real Lorenz curves for the US, UK, the world, and stock exchanges in New York, London, and Hong Kong. Part II studies dynamical thermalization in two real social networks (netscience and politician) under a nonlinear Schrödinger-type dynamics, showing that above a chaos border the mode occupations converge toward the RJ distribution and that the associated Lorenz curves exhibit strong inequality. The paper concludes that RJ thermalization gives a universal description of wealth inequality.

Significance. If the WTH were established, it would connect a major social-science phenomenon to a well-understood equilibrium condensation mechanism and would be of wide interdisciplinary interest. The paper has genuine technical strengths: the grand canonical derivation in Appendix A.1 is clean; the analytic continuous-limit formulas for the RJS Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and small-ε approximations in Appendix A.3 are explicit and carefully checked against numerics; the symplectic integration and entropy diagnostics in Part II are methodologically sound; and the paper is unusually candid about the limitations of its own evidence. However, the empirical core of the paper is not yet a test: the central validation consists of visually comparing model Lorenz curves with data after fixing the model parameters from the same curves. The quantitative support for universality is therefore substantially weaker than the abstract's conclusion suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section I.3 and Figs. I.3, I.4, I.7–I.11] The RJE model, which produces the closest fits, is a two-parameter per-dataset model: ε is fixed by matching the Gini coefficient, and a is obtained by fitting a spectrum reconstructed from the same Lorenz curve (Appendix A.5, Fig. A.13). With two free parameters per dataset, standard two-parameter distributions such as lognormal or Pareto would very likely fit the same smooth Lorenz curves to comparable accuracy, so the visual agreement does not single out Rayleigh-Jeans thermalization. The paper should compare against at least one equally flexible standard distribution using a common criterion (e.g., AIC, BIC, or cross-validated quantile error), and should report the fitted a values with uncertainties. The near-perfect Hong Kong 2025 fit is striking, but its evidential weight depends on whether the same two-parameter family would perform comparably on data not used to set the parameters.
  2. [Section I.1, 'We suppose...'] The physical premise of WTH is asserted rather than derived or tested. The paper states that a country or the world can be considered quasi-isolated on a one-year time scale with two conserved quantities, total wealth and total population, and that dynamical thermalization is the appropriate mechanism. This premise is load-bearing: without isolation and conservation of an energy-like extensive quantity, the Rayleigh-Jeans form (I.1) does not follow and the Lorenz-curve fits become purely phenomenological curve fitting. Since the manuscript is a hypothesis paper, the premise need not be proven, but it needs a concrete, falsifiable consequence that can be checked against data. For example, the theory predicts a specific relationship between the Gini coefficient and the upper-tail share, and it predicts that a single fitted spectrum should describe a given country across time or across subpopulations. Adding such a test, or explicitly listing the observable signatures that would distinguish WTH from a generic two-parameter fit, would substantially strengthen the central claim.
  3. [Section II.5 and Section II.8] The dynamical evidence in Part II is partial and is somewhat overstated in the conclusion. For the politician network, the paper states that the states are 'clearly not yet thermalized' at the longest simulated times (Fig. II.7), and Section II.7 explicitly leaves open the question of how typical the large energy gaps of the two studied networks are. The entropy data in Fig. B.10 show a tendency toward convergence, which is encouraging, but the claim in Section II.8 that the results provide 'a confirmation of WTH origin' goes beyond what is currently demonstrated. The authors should either soften this conclusion or provide additional evidence, such as a scaling analysis of the thermalization time with N that supports the extrapolation to the politician network and to real societies.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section I.1] There are several typos and historical name inconsistencies: 'happend' in the abstract, 'systen' in Section I.1, and 'Tsingou' is written inconsistently with the usual 'Tsingou' spelling used elsewhere. These should be corrected.
  2. [Caption of Fig. II.8] The listed Gini coefficients are non-monotonic in ε: the caption gives G=0.5336 for ε=0.15 and then G=0.6502 for ε=0.2, which contradicts the expected monotone decrease visible in Fig. I.5 and in the other Lorenz-curve sequences. This appears to be a typographical error and should be fixed.
  3. [Section I.3 and Fig. I.10 caption] The text says the FTSE 2024 agreement is slightly imperfect 'since S&P500 captures only about 80% of NYSE', but the dataset under discussion is the London stock exchange. The intended remark is presumably that the quoted capitalization data capture only part of the full exchange; the sentence should be reworded to avoid confusion.
  4. [Throughout] The term 'Lorenz curve' is misspelled as 'Lorentz curve' in several places (e.g., Section I.2 and Section II.7). A global spelling check is recommended.
  5. [Appendix A.5] The spectral reconstruction procedure is described as sensitive to interpolation choices and data quality, and the paper notes that the resulting spectra can differ substantially near x close to 1. Since the fitted parameter a for the RJE model depends on this reconstruction, it would be helpful to state explicitly how the uncertainty in the reconstruction propagates to a and to the claimed improvement over the RJS model.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Part I validates WTH with Lorenz curves whose model parameters (ε and RJE's a) are fit to the same curves; the resulting agreement is in-sample, though Part II's dynamical thermalization test remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section I.3 and Appendix A.5; Figs. I.7–I.11 captions]
    "To determine optimal values for the parameter a, we compute a reconstructed spectrum from a given Lorenz curve of some given data set (see Appendix Section 5 for a description and more detailed discussion of this spectral reconstruction with Figure A.13) and fit the reconstructed spectrum to the function E_m≈C(e^{a(m/N)}−1)/a with two parameters C and a."

    The reconstructed spectrum is not independent data: Appendix A.5 builds it by inverting the same Lorenz curve (E_m/E ≈ w'(h_m), ρ_m from (A.16)) and states that the resulting Lorenz curve 'matches typically ... very well the original data with numerical errors below 10^{-3}'. Fitting a to this reconstructed spectrum and then showing the RJE curve against the original Lorenz curve is therefore an in-sample reconstruction, not a prediction of WTH. The per-dataset values a=2.18–6.83 also mean the exponential spectrum is a flexible fitting family rather than a universal parameter-free consequence of RJ thermalization.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section I.2, Fig. I.3 caption]
    "For the three referenced curves Gini coefficients are G=0.852, 0.626, G=0.842 respectively and the rescaled energies ε=E/B of RJS model are respectively fixed as ε=0.07420, ε=0.1996, ε=0.07911 so that the corresponding Gini coefficients match the referenced data."

    ε is calibrated so that the model Gini equals the data Gini; hence the headline inequality measure is matched by construction. The remaining shape comparison is a nontrivial test and the paper is transparent about the calibration, so this is partial rather than complete circularity. The same Gini-matching is reused in the RJE fits, compounding the in-sample character of the Part I empirical confirmation.

full rationale

The formal derivation of the Rayleigh-Jeans distribution from the grand-canonical ensemble with conserved norm and energy (Eqs. (I.1), (II.14)–(II.16), Appendix A.1) is self-contained and standard, and Part II provides an independent dynamical check: the nonlinear social-network simulations are compared with the RJ curve using only the measured mean energy ⟨E⟩ to fix T and μ, which is a legitimate constraint rather than a circular fit. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found: refs. [17,27] supply context, but the Part II numerics stand on their own. The circularity is concentrated in Part I's empirical validation. The RJS parameter ε is fixed by matching the Gini coefficient of the same Lorenz curve, and the RJE parameter a is fit to a spectrum reconstructed from that same curve (Appendix A.5), so the excellent agreement in Figs. I.7–I.11 is in-sample and does not independently confirm the WTH. The paper itself flags the open typicality of social-network spectral gaps and the incomplete thermalization of the politician network, further limiting the claim. Overall score 6: one central empirical 'confirmation' reduces largely to fitting, but the dynamical thermalization result and the RJ formalism retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Beyond standard statistical mechanics, the central claim rests on mapping society onto a conserving Hamiltonian system, on the choice of representative network spectra, and on parameters epsilon and a fitted to the same Lorenz data. The quasi-isolation assumption (Section I.1) and the representativeness of the two networks (Section II.7) are the most fragile inputs. The fitted parameters carry most of the empirical burden.

free parameters (6)
  • epsilon (rescaled energy E/B) in RJS, RJE, RMT, and DL models = e.g., 0.07420 (US 2019), 0.1996 (UK), 0.07911 (World), 0.1582 (NYSE), 0.04387 (FTSE), 0.02651 (Hong Kong)
    Fixed by matching the Gini coefficient of each real Lorenz curve, so the model's condensation strength is not predicted independently.
  • a (RJE exponential spectrum) = 4.42 (US), 2.18 (UK), 5.34 (World), 3.13 (FTSE), 6.83 (Hong Kong)
    Fitted to a spectrum reconstructed from the same Lorenz curve (Appendix A.5), then used to generate the RJE model curve, making the agreement partly self-consistent.
  • a (DL double-linear spectrum) = 16 (US and World), 3 (UK)
    Chosen by hand for best possible visual fit of the model to the same Lorenz curves (Fig I.4b).
  • kappa (GOE perturbation strength) = 0.5 (main results); 0, 0.1, and 6 explored
    Chosen because at kappa = 0 many netscience modes do not thermalize; this random-links term is needed for the claimed dynamical thermalization in Part II.
  • beta (nonlinearity strength) = 10 (main simulations), 4, 1, 0.2, 0.05 explored
    Set above the estimated chaos border beta_c ~ 1 so that thermalization is observed; lower values stay in the KAM regime and do not thermalize.
  • E0 (EQI model energy offset) = 0.1 or 1 (explored)
    Used in the equipartition model to generate low-Gini Lorenz curves; this model is a side comparison and not used for the main WTH fits.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A country, the world, or a stock exchange is quasi-isolated, conserving total wealth and total population on the one-year scale.
    Stated as a supposition in Section I.1; the grand canonical Rayleigh-Jeans form depends on these two conservation laws.
  • ad hoc to paper Wealth is represented by eigenenergies E_m of a Hamiltonian and households by mode occupations rho_m.
    This is the Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis itself (Eq. I.1), an interpretive mapping rather than a derivation from economic dynamics.
  • standard math A grand canonical ensemble with Gaussian amplitudes P ~ exp(-sum (E_m - mu)/T |C_m|^2) describes the microcanonical dynamics after thermalization.
    Standard classical statistical mechanics (Section II.3), but its applicability to small non-ergodic networks is assumed; the paper itself reports boundary and non-thermalizing modes.
  • domain assumption The netscience and politician network spectra are representative of real human societies and their wealth stratification.
    The paper questions this in Section II.7: "The question of how typical such energy gaps are for social networks requires further studies."
  • ad hoc to paper A small GOE perturbation kappa H_GOE models random social links such as those from global media.
    Introduced in Eq. (II.1) because at kappa = 0 many modes do not thermalize; the justification is qualitative and the parameter value is chosen to make the thermalization claim work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis and Social Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2X76KR7X

@misc{pith2026250617720,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis and Social Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2X76KR7X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17720}
}
read the original abstract

In 1955 Fermi, Pasta, Ulam and Tsingou performed first numerical studies with the aim to obtain the thermalization in a chain of nonlinear oscillators from dynamical equations of motion. This model happend to have several specific features and the dynamical thermalization was established only later in other studies. In this work we study more generic models based on Random Matrix Theory and social networks with a nonlinear perturbation leading to dynamical thermalization above a certain chaos border. These systems have two integrals of motion being total energy and norm so that the theoretical Rayleigh-Jeans thermal distribution depends on temperature and chemical potential. We introduce the wealth thermalization hypothesis according to which the society wealth is associated with energy in the Rayleigh-Jeans distribution. At relatively small values of total wealth or energy there is a formation of the Rayleigh-Jeans condensate, well studied in physical systems such as multimode optical fibers. This condensation leads to a huge fraction of poor households at low wealth and a small oligarchic fraction which monopolizes a dominant fraction of total wealth thus generating a strong inequality in human society. We show that this thermalization gives a good description of real data of Lorenz curves of US, UK, the whole world and capitalization of companies at Stock Exchange of New York SE (NYSE), London and Hong Kong. It is also shown that above a chaos border the dynamical Rayleigh-Jeans thermalization takes place also in social networks with the Lorenz curves being similar to those of wealth distribution in world countries. Possible actions for inequality reduction are briefly discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamic statistics of given names in USA and France

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Name popularity in the US and France is extremely unequal and has stayed that way for over a century; the authors fit this pattern with a two-parameter Rayleigh-Jeans condensation model borrowed from wealth physics.

  2. Thermodynamic theory of voting and EU elections

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Vote shares in EU and French elections are shown to follow a Rayleigh-Jeans thermal distribution, with the Gini coefficient set by a fitted energy parameter.

  3. Dynamical thermalization and turbulence in social stratification models

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Chaotic nonlinear dynamics on a stratified social-network Hamiltonian thermalizes to Rayleigh-Jeans distributions whose condensation and Lorenz curves match observed wealth inequality, and yields KZ-like turbulence un...

  4. Thermodynamic description of worldwide distribution of energy and carbon emission

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Rayleigh-Jeans thermalization model with two fitted parameters reproduces Lorenz and Pareto curves for country-level energy consumption and CO2 emission distributions over 1974-2024.

  5. Thermodynamic description of wealth inequality in the world

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Wealth inequality follows Rayleigh-Jeans condensation from nonlinear dynamics conserving energy and norm, matching real Lorenz, Pareto, GDP, and trade data as a universal description.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Boltzmann,Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gas- molek¨ ulen, Wiener Berichte66, 275 (1872)

    L. Boltzmann,Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gas- molek¨ ulen, Wiener Berichte66, 275 (1872)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Chicago Press, Chicago IL (1965); see also historical overview in T.Dauxois Fermi, Pasta, Ulam and a mysterious lady, Phys

    E.Fermi, J.Pasta and S.Ulam,Studies of non linear problems, Los Alamos Report LA-1940 (1955); published later in E.FermiCollected papers, E.Serge (Ed.)2, 491, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago IL (1965); see also historical overview in T.Dauxois Fermi, Pasta, Ulam and a mysterious lady, Phys. Today61(1), 55 (2008)

    work page 1955

  3. [3]

    solitons

    N.J. Zabusky and M.D. Kruskal,Interaction of “solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states, Phys. Rev. Lett.15, 240 (1965)

    work page 1965

  4. [4]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal and R. M. Miura,Method for solving the Korteweg - de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1095 (1967)

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Zakharov and A.B

    V.E. Zakharov and A.B. Shabat,Interaction between solitons in a stable medium, Sov. Phys. JETP37(5), 823 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    Toda,Studies of a non-linear lattice, Phys

    M. Toda,Studies of a non-linear lattice, Phys. Reports18(1), 1 (1975)

    work page 1975

  7. [7]

    Benettin, H

    G. Benettin, H. Christodoulidi and A. Ponno,The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem and its underlying integrable dynamics, J. Stat. Phys.152, 195 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Chirikov and F.M

    B.V. Chirikov and F.M. Izrailev,Statistical properties of a non-linear string, Sov. Phys. Doklady11(1), 30 (1966)

    work page 1966

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    B.V.Chirikov, F.M.Izrailev and V.A.Tayursky,Numerical experiments on statis- tical behavior of dynamical systems with a few degrees of freedoms, Comp. Comm. Phys.5, 11 (1973)

    1973

  2. [10]

    R. Livi, M. Pettini, S. Ruffo and A. Vulpiani,Chaotic behavior in nonlinear Hamiltonian systems and equilibrium statistical mechanics, J. Stat. Phys.48, 539 (1987)

    1987

  3. [11]

    Shepelyansky,Low energy chaos in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem, Nonlin- earity10, 1331 (1997)

    D.L. Shepelyansky,Low energy chaos in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem, Nonlin- earity10, 1331 (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    Arnold, A

    V. Arnold, A. Avez,Ergodic problems of classical mechanics, Benjamin, N.Y. (1968)

    1968

  5. [13]

    I. P. Cornfeld, S. V. Fomin and Ya. G. Sinai,Ergodic theory, Springer-Verlag, N.Y. (1982)

    1982

  6. [14]

    B. V. Chirikov,A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems, Phys. Rep.52, 263 (1979). 67

    1979

  7. [15]

    Lichtenberg and M

    A. Lichtenberg and M. Lieberman,Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Springer, N.Y. (1992)

    1992

  8. [16]

    Notes Phys.728, Springer, Berlin (2008)

    G.Gallavotti (Ed.),The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem: a status report, Lect. Notes Phys.728, Springer, Berlin (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Frahm and D.L

    K.M. Frahm and D.L. Shepelyansky,Nonlinear perturbation of Random Matrix Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 077201 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Wigner,Random matrices in physics, SIAM Review9(1), 1 (1967)

    E.P. Wigner,Random matrices in physics, SIAM Review9(1), 1 (1967)

    1967

  11. [19]

    Mehta,Random matrices, Elsvier, Amsterdam (2004)

    M.L. Mehta,Random matrices, Elsvier, Amsterdam (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    T. Guhr, A. M¨ uller-Groeling and H.A. Weidenm¨ uller,Random Matrix Theories in quantum physics: common concepts, Phys.Rep.299, 189 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Bohigas, M.-J

    O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni and C. Schmit,Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  14. [22]

    Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos, Springer, Berlin (2010)

    F. Haake,Quantum signatures of chaos, Springer, Berlin (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Landau, and E.M

    L.D. Landau, and E.M. Lifshitz,Statistical physics, Wiley, New York (1976)

    1976

  16. [24]

    Mayer, M

    J.E. Mayer, M. Goeppert-Mayer,Statistical mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. (1977)

    1977

  17. [25]

    Zakharov, V.S

    V.E. Zakharov, V.S. L’vov, and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov spectra of turbulence I, Springer, Berlin, (1992)

    1992

  18. [26]

    Picozzi, J

    A. Picozzi, J. Garnier, T. Hansson, P. Suret, S. Randoux, G. Millot and D.N. Christodoulides,Optical wave turbulence: Towards a unified nonequilibrium thermodynamic formulation of statistical nonlinear optics, Phys. Reports542, 1 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Ermann, A.D

    L. Ermann, A.D. Chepelianskii, and D.L.Shepelyansky,Dynamical thermaliza- tion, Rayleigh-Jeans condensate, vortexes and wave collapse in quantum chaos fibers and fluid of light, arXiv:2506.06534[cond-mat.stat-mech] (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    H, Fr¨ ohlich,Bose condensation of strongly excited longitudinal electric modes, Phys. Lett. A26A(9), 402 (1968)

    1968

  21. [29]

    Fr¨ ohlich,Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems, Int

    H. Fr¨ ohlich,Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems, Int. J. Quantum ChemistryII, 641 (1968)

    1968

  22. [30]

    Dorogovtsev,Lectures in Complex Networks, Oxford University Press, UK (2010)

    S. Dorogovtsev,Lectures in Complex Networks, Oxford University Press, UK (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Newman,Networks, Oxford University Press, UK (2018)

    M. Newman,Networks, Oxford University Press, UK (2018). 68

    2018

  24. [32]

    Piketty,Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (2014)

    T. Piketty,Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Chancel, T

    L. Chancel, T. Piketty, E. Saez, G. Zucmanet al. World Inequality Report 2022, World Inequality Lab https://wir2022.wid.world (Accessed on 8 June 2025)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Roach, P

    B. Roach, P. J. Rajkanikar, N. Goodwin, and J.Harris,Social and Economic Inequality, An ECI Teaching Module on Social and Environmental Issues, Eco- nomics in Context Initiative, Global Development Policy Center, Boston Univer- sity (2023), https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2023/05...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Lorenz,Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth, Quarterly Publi- cations of the American Statistical Association,9, (New Series, No

    M.O. Lorenz,Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth, Quarterly Publi- cations of the American Statistical Association,9, (New Series, No. 70), 209–219 (1905); https://doi.org/10.1080/15225437.1905.10503443 (Accessed 8 June 2025)

    1905

  28. [36]

    C. Gini,Sulla misura della concentrazione e della variabilit‘a dei caratteri, Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti,73, 1203–1248 (1914); English translation in Metron - Int. J. Statisrics,63, 3–38 (2005); https://www. dss.uniroma1.it/RePec/mtn/articoli/20...

    1914

  29. [37]

    Wikipedia,List of sovereign states by wealth inequality, (Accessed 8 June 2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Lifshitz and L.P

    E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii,Physical kinetics, Pergamon Press N.Y. (1995)

    1995

  31. [39]

    Angle,The surplus theory of social stratification and the size distribution of personal Wealth, Soc

    J. Angle,The surplus theory of social stratification and the size distribution of personal Wealth, Soc. Forces65, 293 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    Ispolatov, P

    S. Ispolatov, P. L. Krapivsky, and S. Redner,Wealth distributions in asset exchange models, Eur. Phys. J. B.2, 267 (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    Dragulescu, and V

    A. Dragulescu, and V. Yakovenko,Statistical mechanics of money, Eur. Phys. J. B.17, 723 (2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    Bouchaud, and M

    J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Mezard,Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy, Physica A282, 536 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    V. M. Yakovenko, and J. B. Rosser,Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1703 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    B. K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, S.R. Chakravarty, and A. Chatterjee,Econo- physics of income and wealth distributions, Cambridge University Press, N.Y. (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    B. M. Boghosian, A. Devitt-Lee, M. Johnson, J. Li, J. A. Marcq, and H. Wang, Oligarchy as a phase transition: the effect of wealth-attained advantage in a Fokker–Planck description of asset exchange, Physica A476, 15 (2017). 69

    2017

  38. [46]

    B. M. Boghosian,The inescapable casino, Sci. American, November, 71 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    N. V. Von Bibow, and J.L. Perotti,Study of the Extended Yard Sale model of wealth distribution on Erdos-Renyi random networks, arXiv:2505.04032[cond- mat.stat-mech] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Krupa, A

    K. Krupa, A. Tonello, A. Barthelemy, B.M. Shalaby, A. Bendahmane, G. Millot and S. Wabnitz,Observation of geometric parametric instability induced by the periodic spatial self-imaging of multimode waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 183901 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Connaughton, C

    C. Connaughton, C. Josserand, A. Picozzi, Y. Pomeau, and S. Rica,Condensation of classical nonlinear waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 263901 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Baudin, A

    K. Baudin, A. Fusaro, K. Krupa, J. Garnier, S. Rica, G. Millot, and A. Picozzi, Classical Rayleigh-Jeans condensation of light waves: observation and thermody- namic characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 244101 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Podivilov, F

    E.V. Podivilov, F. Mangini, O.S. Sidelnikov, M. Ferraro, M. Gervaziev, D.S. Kharenko, M. Zitelli, M.P. Fedoruk, S.A Babin, and S. Wabnitz,Thermal- ization of orbital angular momentum beams in multimode optical fibers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 243901 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Pourbeyram, P

    H. Pourbeyram, P. Sidorenko, F.O. Wu, N. Bender, L. Wright, D.N. Christodoulides, and F. Wise,Direct observations of thermalization to a Rayleigh–Jeans distribution in multimode optical fibres, Nature Phys.18, 685 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Baudi, J

    K. Baudi, J. Garnier, A. Fusaro, N. Berti, C. Michel, K. Krupa, G. Millot. and A. Picozzi,Observation of light thermalization to negative-temperature Rayleigh- Jeans equilibrium states in multimode optical fibers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 063801 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Aladangady, and A

    A. Aladangady, and A. Forde,Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap, FEDS Notes Oct 22 (2021); https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/ feds-notes/2021-index.htm, (Accessed 8 June 2025)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Chamberlain,Wealth in Great Britain Wave 4

    E. Chamberlain,Wealth in Great Britain Wave 4. Chapter 2: Total wealth, Wealth in Great Britain, 2012 to 2014, 18 Dec 2015; https://www. ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/ incomeandwealth/compendium/wealthingreatbritainwave4/2012to2014/ chapt...

    2012

  48. [56]

    Cowell, B

    F. Cowell, B. Nolan, J.Olivera, and Ph. Van Kerm,Wealth, Top Incomes and Inequality, p.175, inNational Wealth, Eds. K. Hamilton, and C. Herburn, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford UK (2017), 70

    2017

  49. [57]

    Holdings SPDR S&P500 ETF Trust of June 16 (2025); https://www.ssga.com/ us/en/intermediary/etfs/spdr-sp-500-etf-trust-spy

    2025

  50. [58]

    London stock exchange data of capitalization of companies, December 31 (2024), https://www.londonstockexchange.com/reports?trkcode=lsehomstats& tab=issuers (Accessed 19 June 2025)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Hong Kong stock exchange data of capitalization of companies, June 19 (2025), https://www.hkex.com.hk/Market-Data/Securities-Prices/Equities? sc lang=en (Accessed 19 June 2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    M. E. J. Newman,Network data, http://www.umich.edu/ ∼mejn/netdata, (Accessed 12 September 2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    M. E. J. Newman,Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality, Phys. Rev. E64, 016132 (2001)

    2001

  54. [62]

    M. E. J. Newman,Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvec- tors of matrices, Phys. Rev. E74, 036104 (2006)

    2006

  55. [63]

    M. E. J. Newman,Community Centrality, http://www.umich.edu/ ∼mejn/ centrality (Accessed 12 September 2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    Rozemberczki, R

    B. Rozemberczki, R. Davies, R. Sarkar and C. Sutton,Graph Embedding with Self Clustering, arXiv:1802.03997 (2018);GEMSEC: graph embedding with self clustering, ASONAM ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Con- ference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and M...

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Backstrom, P

    L. Backstrom, P. Boldi, M. Rosa, J. Ugander and S. Vigna,Four degrees of separation, WebSci 2012: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conf., pafe 33, https://doi.org/10.1145/2380718.2380723

    2012

  58. [66]

    Forest and R.D

    E. Forest and R.D. Ruth,Fourth-order symplectic integration. Physica D. 43: 105 (1990); https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt35h9v2k9/ qt35h9v2k9.pdf (Accessed Dec 2022)

    1990

  59. [67]

    McLachlan and G.R.W

    R.I. McLachlan and G.R.W. Quispel,Splitting methods, Acta Numerica11, 341 - 434 (2002)

    2002

  60. [68]

    MacNamara and G

    S. MacNamara and G. Strang,Operator splitting/ In: R. Glowinski, S. Osher, W. Yin (Eds)Splitting methods in Communication, Imaging, Science, and Engi- neering, Scientific Computation. Springer, Cham. pp.95-114 (2016); https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-41589-5 3

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    Ermann L., Frahm K. M. and Shepelyansky D. L.,Google matrix analysis of directed networks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87(2015) 1261. 71

    2015

  62. [70]

    Evers and A.D

    F. Evers and A.D. Mirlin,Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  63. [71]

    Chirikov and D.L

    B.V. Chirikov and D.L. Shepelyanskii,Dynamics of some homogeneous models of classical Yang-Mills fields, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.36(6), 908 (1982)

    1982

  64. [72]

    Mulansky, K

    M. Mulansky, K. Ahnert, A. Pikovsky and D.L. Shepelyansky,Strong and weak chaos in weakly nonintegrable many-body Hamiltonian systems, J. Stat. Phys. 145, 1256 (2011). 72

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.