Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Vacuum configuration of winding superstrings from non-standard semiclassical quantization

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the one-loop Green-Schwarz superstring partition function can be made finite in any type-IIA background, and that the Hagedorn temperature corresponds to the degeneration of an off-shell vacuum worldsheet metric.

desk verdict Solid finiteness proof for general IIA backgrounds, but the Hagedorn half rests on an unproven linear mass-matching condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14532 v3 pith:2XRXHSCU submitted 2025-01-24 hep-th

Tommaso Canneti , Federico Castellani , Wolfgang Mück This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T3083E30
keywords Green-Schwarzsuperstringsemiclassicalquantizationone-loopfinitenessHagedorntemperatureoff-shellauxiliarymetricconfininggaugetheoriesheatkernel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the standard semiclassical one-loop quantization of the Green-Schwarz superstring is well defined for arbitrary on-shell type-IIA supergravity backgrounds: with a specific choice of integration measures for the fluctuation fields, every ultraviolet divergence in the one-loop partition function cancels, for any classical worldsheet. It then introduces a non-standard scheme in which the auxiliary worldsheet metric is kept classically off-shell, so that quantum corrections can be captured when fluctuations are not parametrically small, as near the Hagedorn temperature. For a string winding once around a compact thermal circle at the tip of a cigar geometry, the scheme determines the vacuum configuration of the string metric. The Hagedorn temperature is identified as the temperature at which this vacuum metric degenerates, which for flat space gives $T_H = 1/\sqrt{8\pi\alpha'}$. If the argument is right, the one-loop effective action is finite in general IIA backgrounds and the next-to-leading-order Hagedorn-temperature correction in confining holographic gauge theories is reproduced, with new next-to-next-to-leading-order predictions.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by four linked objects. First, the heat-kernel Seeley coefficients of the scalar and squared-Dirac operators: their cancellation fixes the preferred integration measures and is the mechanism behind the finiteness proof. Second, the off-shell auxiliary metric $h_{\alpha\beta}$, parameterized by constants $h_1$ and $h_2$ with $H=\sqrt{1-h_1^2+h_2^2}$, which is kept independent of the induced metric so that quantum-backreaction effects are not suppressed. Third, the mass-matching relations $\sum_b m_b^2=\sum_f m_f^2$ and $\sum_b \mu_b^2=\sum_f \mu_f^2$, which are assumed and render the zeta-regularized sums $\Delta$ and $\tilde{\Delta}$ finite. Fourth, the degeneration condition $h_1=1$, which identifies the Hagedorn temperature through the massless-winding-string picture and turns the vacuum equation into the formula $\Delta=\beta_H^2/(8\pi^2\alpha')$ with $\tilde{m}^2=\beta_H^2 m^2/(8\pi^2)$.

What would settle it

Compute the fermion mass eigenvalues for one of the cigar backgrounds, such as Witten-Yang-Mills or the $\mathrm{AdS}_5\times S^5$ soliton, directly from the 32-component Green-Schwarz action including all Ramond-Ramond couplings, and check the two mass-matching sums (4.8). If either sum fails, the finite-one-loop result and the Hagedorn-temperature formula (4.21) are wrong for that background.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-loop effective action of the type-II Green-Schwarz superstring, expanded around an arbitrary classical worldsheet in an on-shell type-IIA supergravity background, can be made finite by choosing the norms $\lVert\chi\rVert^2 = \int d^2\sigma\, g^{1/4} e^{-\phi} \chi^i\chi_i$ and $\lVert\theta\rVert^2 = \int d^2\sigma\, g^{3/8} e^{-\phi/2} \bar{\theta}\theta$ for the eight scalar and eight two-dimensional spinor fluctuations. With these measures, the quadratic, linear, and logarithmic divergences cancel through degree-of-freedom counting, the supergravity field equations, and the measure choice. For the Hagedorn problem, the paper keeps the Polyakov auxiliary metric off-shell and solves for its vacuum configuration, showing that the string metric is generically not conformal to the classical induced metric, except at low temperature. The Hagedorn temperature is then defined by the degeneration $h_1=1$ of this vacuum metric, reproducing the known next-to-leading-order correction in confining backgrounds and producing new next-to-next-to-leading-order terms for the soliton and twisted Klebanov-Witten examples.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the mass-matching condition between bosonic and fermionic fluctuations, $\sum_b m_b^2=\sum_f m_f^2$ and $\sum_b \mu_b^2=\sum_f \mu_f^2$, which the paper asserts without deriving the fermion eigenvalues; if these sums fail to match, the divergences do not cancel and the Hagedorn-temperature predictions shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any on-shell type-IIA background, the one-loop superstring partition function is finite with the prescribed measures, and the semiclassical Nambu-Goto and Polyakov quantizations remain equivalent.
  • The finite one-loop effective action depends on the dilaton and the induced metric through the preferred norms, so the finite part of Wilson-loop-type computations changes accordingly.
  • In the cigar class, the vacuum string metric is conformal to the classical induced metric only in the low-temperature limit; as the compact cycle shrinks, the auxiliary metric degenerates at the Hagedorn temperature.
  • The Hagedorn-temperature formula (4.21) reproduces the known next-to-leading-order correction and supplies the next-to-next-to-leading-order input for the effective-model comparison in the Witten-Yang-Mills, wrapped D5-brane, $\mathrm{AdS}_5\times S^5$ soliton, and twisted Klebanov-Witten examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test beyond the paper is to derive the mass-matching relations (4.8) from the explicit fermion spectrum of the IIA/IIB equations of motion; proving them would turn the finiteness statement into a theorem, while a counter-example would delimit where the construction applies.
  • The degeneration-condition view of the Hagedorn temperature may extend to other one-cycle wrappings, such as strings in global AdS or thermal AdS, whenever a regular classical worldsheet exists; the worldsheet metric would then define $T_H$ without relying on a cigar limit.
  • Because the off-shell action is ambiguous under second-order redefinitions of the auxiliary metric, a selection principle is missing; a concrete check is whether all allowed shifts of $h_{\alpha\beta}$ leave the degeneration temperature invariant while changing only the finite part of the effective action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a non-standard semiclassical treatment of Green-Schwarz superstrings in which the auxiliary worldsheet metric is kept classically off-shell, and applies it to strings at the tip of cigar geometries to compute Hagedorn temperatures. Section 2 derives the one-loop effective action for fluctuations around a classical worldsheet in an arbitrary type-IIA supergravity background and shows that its UV divergences can be cancelled by local choices of integration measure. Section 3 establishes equivalence of the Polyakov and Nambu-Goto formulations in the standard treatment and then identifies the obstacles of the off-shell treatment, including an ambiguity in the quadratic action and the failure of the usual kappa-symmetry projector. Section 4 formulates a self-consistency equation for a constant auxiliary metric, identifies the Hagedorn temperature with its degeneration, and Section 5 applies the formalism to flat space, Witten-Yang-Mills, wrapped D5-branes, the AdS5 x S5 soliton, and the twisted Klebanov-Witten compactification. The flat-space Hagedorn result is reproduced and NLO corrections are matched to earlier effective-model results, while NNLO terms are given as new predictions.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the Section 2 finiteness theorem is a useful gap-filling result: it shows, with a detailed heat-kernel calculation, that the standard semiclassical one-loop partition function of the Green-Schwarz superstring can be made finite in general type-IIA supergravity backgrounds by choosing preferred integration measures. The non-standard scheme also gives a systematic derivation of the NLO Hagedorn correction previously obtained by ad hoc mass-parameter shifts, and it produces concrete new NNLO predictions for the AdS5 x S5 soliton and Klebanov-Witten backgrounds. The strengths are the explicit divergence-cancellation computation in Section 2.3 and the exact flat-space check in Section 5.1. However, the Hagedorn strand rests on spectral and fermion-reduction assumptions that are asserted rather than proved, so the significance of the Hagedorn results is conditional on those assumptions being supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.8) and Eqs. (4.15)-(4.16)] The mass-matching conditions (4.8) are asserted without derivation or explicit fermionic mass eigenvalues. They are load-bearing: the zeta-regularized expressions (4.15) and (4.16) use these conditions to render the quadratic mass terms finite, but the physical NLO Hagedorn correction is controlled by the linear term -1/2 sum_b tilde m_b in (4.15). Equal squared sums do not imply equal linear sums for a generic spectrum, so the linear relation must be established separately from (4.8). Since (4.21), (5.12), (5.24), (5.38), and (5.47) all inherit this input, the authors should provide the fermionic eigenvalues of the matrix S-tilde for at least the cigar class, or give a symmetry argument that fixes the linear sums.
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.36)-(3.39), and §4, Eq. (4.6)] The fermionic action used in the Hagedorn computation is obtained by the formal replacement (3.36), which the authors themselves state is not a first-principle kappa-symmetry fixing. This replacement is what reduces the fermions to sixteen components and determines the eigenvalues m_f that enter the mass-matching condition (4.8). The manuscript explicitly concedes, at the start of Section 3.2, that 'we are not able to provide a first-principle treatment of this programme'. That limitation is central rather than peripheral, because the Hagedorn predictions in Section 5 are derived from this fermionic action. A justification of (3.36), or an independent derivation of the fermionic spectrum in the cigar class, is needed before the Hagedorn results can be regarded as consequences of the original Green-Schwarz path integral.
  3. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.22)-(3.23), and §4, Eq. (4.17)] The ambiguity of the quadratic action under the shifts (3.22) and (3.23) is not resolved by the geometric triviality conditions (4.1). When K_{i alpha beta}=0, the first-order term (3.16) vanishes, but the allowed shifts with arbitrary second-order A_{alpha beta} and B do not vanish and would modify the scalar and fermion mass terms. The paper does not show that the gap equation (4.17) is invariant under these field redefinitions. Since the whole non-standard scheme is defined by a particular choice among ambiguous quadratic actions, an argument fixing the measure and the Jacobian is required before (4.17) can be identified as the physical vacuum condition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, Eq. (5.4)] The displayed Hagedorn temperature T_H = 1/sqrt(8 alpha' pi) appears to have a typo: the standard value following from (5.3) and h_1=1 is T_H = 1/(2 sqrt(2) pi sqrt(alpha')), which is 1/sqrt(8 pi^2 alpha'), not 1/sqrt(8 pi alpha').
  2. [§2.3, Eq. (2.48)] The boundary metric notations hat gamma and check gamma are introduced without definition; it would help the reader to state explicitly that they are the induced metrics on the worldsheet boundary corresponding to hat g and check g.
  3. [§1, after Eq. (1.1)] The sentence 'We will not be more specific about the integration measures knowingly ignoring possible subtleties that may arise along the way' is in tension with the paper's later claim that a suitable choice of measures is a main result; consider rephrasing to distinguish the formal partition function from the semiclassical fluctuation measures fixed in Section 2.3.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (3.36)] The replacement E_m^alpha -> bar E_m^alpha is written in a compressed notation; specifying the frame-index contractions and the conformal factor explicitly would make the subsequent gamma-matrix algebra in (3.37)-(3.39) easier to check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: gap equation is a self-consistency condition, flat-space limit and external NLO checks anchor the derivation.

full rationale

The paper's main Hagedorn chain is derived, not assumed. Section 2 computes the one-loop divergence from heat-kernel Seeley coefficients and shows that the residual term (2.55) can be cancelled by an explicit local choice of measure factor K; this is a constructive proof of the finiteness claim, not a parameter fitted to the later Hagedorn result. Section 4 sets up the auxiliary-metric vacuum via the gap equation (4.17), which is a genuine self-consistency equation solved for h1; equation (4.21) follows by demanding h1 = 1, the Atick-Witten degeneracy criterion, and is then solved in the examples. The flat-space case (5.4) reproduces the known Hagedorn value with no free parameters, and the WYM NLO term is checked against the external effective-approach result [55], not against the paper's own output. The paper does rely on the asserted mass matching (4.8) and on the formal fermionic replacement (3.36), which the authors themselves describe as not a first-principle treatment; but these are unproven assumptions or correctness risks, not circular reductions. No quoted equation is defined in terms of the target prediction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations [42,43] motivate and are reformulated by the present derivation, but the load-bearing algebra is carried out in this paper, so they are not used as circular evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central Hagedorn results rest on the background supergravity equations, a fixed worldsheet topology, a constant auxiliary metric ansatz, the mass matching between bosonic and fermionic spectra, the Atick-Witten identification of the Hagedorn temperature, and a formal kappa-symmetry reduction. Of these, the mass matching and the constant metric ansatz are stated without derivation in this paper, and the kappa reduction is explicitly formal. The finiteness proof in Section 2.3 uses standard heat kernel technology and the supergravity field equations.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The background satisfies the type-IIA supergravity field equations.
    The finiteness proof and examples assume the spacetime fields are on-shell; the field equations (B.2), (B.6), (B.8) are used in the divergence cancellation of Section 2.3.
  • domain assumption Worldsheet topology is fixed (cylinder) and the sum over worldsheet topologies is ignored.
    Stated in footnote 1 on page 3; the partition function (1.1) is considered at fixed topology.
  • ad hoc to paper The mass matching conditions (4.8), sum_b m_b^2 = sum_f m_f^2 and sum_b mu_b^2 = sum_f mu_f^2, hold for the fluctuation spectra of the examples.
    Assumed in Section 4 after Eq. (4.7); the fermion mass eigenvalues are not derived or listed in this paper, and these conditions are essential for the finite expressions (4.15)-(4.16) and hence for all Hagedorn temperature results.
  • ad hoc to paper The auxiliary metric background is constant.
    Assumed in Section 4: 'Assuming that the background value of the auxiliary metric h_alpha_beta is constant, which is reasonable for a flat induced metric'; this restricts the solution space of the gap equation (4.17).
  • domain assumption The Hagedorn temperature corresponds to the degeneration h1=1 of the auxiliary metric.
    External criterion from Atick-Witten [51] adopted in Section 4; the massless winding string at the Hagedorn temperature has a null worldsheet.
  • ad hoc to paper The formal replacement (3.36) of the string vielbein resolves the off-shell kappa-symmetry problem, reducing the fermions to 16 components.
    Proposed in Section 3.2; the authors note it is formal and that ambiguities may depend on the RR field content.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vacuum configuration of winding superstrings from non-standard semiclassical quantization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2XRXHSCU

@misc{pith2026250114532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vacuum configuration of winding superstrings from non-standard semiclassical quantization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2XRXHSCU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14532}
}
read the original abstract

Semiclassical quantization techniques are unreliable, if the magnitude of the quantum fluctuations becomes comparable with a classical background scale. This is the case, for example, for superstrings at temperatures close to the Hagedorn temperature. Here, we propose a non-standard treatment which aims to extend the semiclassical approach for type-II superstrings to such cases. This allows us to provide a well-posed reformulation of recent computations of the Hagedorn temperature in a large class of confining gauge theories. Along the way, we fill a gap in the literature by proving that the standard semiclassical one-loop partition function of the Green-Schwarz superstring can be made finite, by means of a suitable choice of integration measures, for any background worldsheet in a target spacetime satisfying the (type-IIA) supergravity field equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,

    N. Beisertet al., “Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,”Lett. Math. Phys. 99(2012) 3–32,arXiv:1012.3982 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    An integrability primer for the gauge-gravity correspondence: An introduction,

    D. Bombardelli, A. Cagnazzo, R. Frassek, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, F. Loebbert, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, A. Sfondrini, S. J. van Tongeren, and A. Torrielli, “An integrability primer for the gauge-gravity correspondence: An introduction,”J. Phys. A49no. 32, (2016) 320301,arXiv:1606.02945 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333–380

    1984

  7. [7]

    TheN= 4 Superconformal Bootstrap,

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “TheN= 4 Superconformal Bootstrap,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 071601,arXiv:1304.1803 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Topological Sigma Models,

    E. Witten, “Topological Sigma Models,”Commun. Math. Phys.118(1988) 411

    1988

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops,

    V. Pestun, “Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops,”Commun. Math. Phys.313(2012) 71–129,arXiv:0712.2824 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Green-Schwarz string in AdS(5) x S**5: Semiclassical partition function,

    N. Drukker, D. J. Gross, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Green-Schwarz string in AdS(5) x S**5: Semiclassical partition function,”JHEP04(2000) 021,arXiv:hep-th/0001204

    2000 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Generalized quark-antiquark potential at weak and strong coupling,

    N. Drukker and V. Forini, “Generalized quark-antiquark potential at weak and strong coupling,”JHEP06(2011) 131,arXiv:1105.5144 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Generalized quark-antiquark potential in AdS/CFT,

    V. Forini and N. Drukker, “Generalized quark-antiquark potential in AdS/CFT,” Fortsch. Phys.60(2012) 1019–1025,arXiv:1201.6258 [hep-th]. 36

    2012 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Semiclassical partition function for strings dual to Wilson loops with small cusps in ABJM,

    J. Aguilera-Damia, D. H. Correa, and G. A. Silva, “Semiclassical partition function for strings dual to Wilson loops with small cusps in ABJM,”JHEP03(2015) 002, arXiv:1412.4084 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Heat kernels on cone ofAdS 2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,

    R. Bergamin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Heat kernels on cone ofAdS 2 andk-wound circular Wilson loop inAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring,”J. Phys. A49no. 14, (2016) 14LT01, arXiv:1510.06894 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Remarks on the geometrical properties of semiclassically quantized strings,

    V. Forini, V. G. M. Puletti, L. Griguolo, D. Seminara, and E. Vescovi, “Remarks on the geometrical properties of semiclassically quantized strings,”J. Phys. A48no. 47, (2015) 475401,arXiv:1507.01883 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Precision calculation of 1/4-BPS Wilson loops in AdS 5 ×S 5,

    V. Forini, V. Giangreco M. Puletti, L. Griguolo, D. Seminara, and E. Vescovi, “Precision calculation of 1/4-BPS Wilson loops in AdS 5 ×S 5,”JHEP02(2016) 105, arXiv:1512.00841 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Toward precision holography with supersymmetric Wilson loops,

    A. Faraggi, L. A. Pando Zayas, G. A. Silva, and D. Trancanelli, “Toward precision holography with supersymmetric Wilson loops,”JHEP04(2016) 053, arXiv:1601.04708 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    String corrections to circular Wilson loop and anomalies,

    A. Cagnazzo, D. Medina-Rincon, and K. Zarembo, “String corrections to circular Wilson loop and anomalies,”JHEP02(2018) 120,arXiv:1712.07730 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Perturbative computation of string one-loop corrections to Wilson loop minimal surfaces in AdS 5×S 5,

    V. Forini, A. A. Tseytlin, and E. Vescovi, “Perturbative computation of string one-loop corrections to Wilson loop minimal surfaces in AdS 5×S 5,”JHEP03(2017) 003, arXiv:1702.02164 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Toward Precision Holography in Type IIA with Wilson Loops,

    J. Aguilera-Damia, A. Faraggi, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee, and G. A. Silva, “Toward Precision Holography in Type IIA with Wilson Loops,”JHEP08(2018) 044, arXiv:1805.00859 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Functional Determinants of Radial Operators inAdS 2,

    J. Aguilera-Damia, A. Faraggi, L. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee, and G. A. Silva, “Functional Determinants of Radial Operators inAdS 2,”JHEP06(2018) 007,arXiv:1802.06789 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zeta-function Regularization of Holographic Wilson Loops,

    J. Aguilera-Damia, A. Faraggi, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. Rathee, and G. A. Silva, “Zeta-function Regularization of Holographic Wilson Loops,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 4, (2018) 046011,arXiv:1802.03016 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    One-loop holography with strings inAdS 4 ×CP 3,

    M. David, R. De Le´ on Ard´ on, A. Faraggi, L. A. Pando Zayas, and G. A. Silva, “One-loop holography with strings inAdS 4 ×CP 3,”JHEP10(2019) 070,arXiv:1907.08590 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Matching quantum string corrections and circular Wilson loops in AdS4 ×CP 3,

    D. Medina-Rincon, “Matching quantum string corrections and circular Wilson loops in AdS4 ×CP 3,”JHEP08(2019) 158,arXiv:1907.02984 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Precision holography for 5D Super Yang-Mills,

    F. F. Gautason and V. G. M. Puletti, “Precision holography for 5D Super Yang-Mills,” JHEP03(2022) 018,arXiv:2111.15493 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Strong coupling expansion of circular Wilson loops and string theories in AdS 5 ×S 5 and AdS4 ×CP 3,

    S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin, “Strong coupling expansion of circular Wilson loops and string theories in AdS 5 ×S 5 and AdS4 ×CP 3,”JHEP10(2020) 130,arXiv:2007.08512 [hep-th]

    2020

  19. [27]

    Wilson Loops and Spherical Branes,

    D. Astesiano, P. Bomans, F. F. Gautason, V. G. M. Puletti, and A. Nix, “Wilson Loops and Spherical Branes,”arXiv:2407.07830 [hep-th]. 37

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505–532,arXiv:hep-th/9803131

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    T duality in the Green-Schwarz formalism, and the massless / massive IIA duality map,

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle, “T duality in the Green-Schwarz formalism, and the massless / massive IIA duality map,”Nucl. Phys. B573(2000) 149–176,arXiv:hep-th/9907202

    2000 arXiv

  22. [30]

    On dilaton dependence of type II superstring action,

    A. A. Tseytlin, “On dilaton dependence of type II superstring action,”Class. Quant. Grav.13(1996) L81–L85,arXiv:hep-th/9601109

    1996 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings,”Phys. Lett. B103(1981) 207–210

    1981

  24. [32]

    Quantum Geometry of Fermionic Strings,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Quantum Geometry of Fermionic Strings,”Phys. Lett. B103(1981) 211–213

    1981

  25. [33]

    Evaluation of the One Loop String Path Integral,

    J. Polchinski, “Evaluation of the One Loop String Path Integral,”Commun. Math. Phys. 104(1986) 37

    1986

  26. [34]

    A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Fields and Strings. Harwood Academic Publishers, New York, 1987

    1987

  27. [35]

    Quantum Geometry of Covariant Superstring With N= 1 Global Supersymmetry,

    A. R. Kavalov and A. G. Sedrakian, “Quantum Geometry of Covariant Superstring With N= 1 Global Supersymmetry,”Phys. Lett. B182(1986) 33–36

    1986

  28. [36]

    Quantum String Theory Effective Action,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Quantum String Theory Effective Action,”Nucl. Phys. B261(1985) 1–27. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 745–745 (1986)]

    1985

  29. [37]

    Effective Action Approach to Superstring Theory,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Effective Action Approach to Superstring Theory,” Phys. Lett. B160(1985) 69–76

    1985

  30. [38]

    Extrinsic Geometry of Superstrings,

    P. B. Wiegmann, “Extrinsic Geometry of Superstrings,”Nucl. Phys. B323(1989) 330–336

    1989

  31. [39]

    Bosonic Fluctuations in Semiclassically Quantized Strings,

    D. Singh, “Bosonic Fluctuations in Semiclassically Quantized Strings,” Master’s thesis, University of Iceland, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    The type II superstring to orderθ 4,

    L. Wulff, “The type II superstring to orderθ 4,”JHEP07(2013) 123,arXiv:1304.6422 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    On the Hagedorn temperature in holographic confining gauge theories,

    F. Bigazzi, T. Canneti, and A. L. Cotrone, “On the Hagedorn temperature in holographic confining gauge theories,”JHEP01(2023) 034,arXiv:2210.09893 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Semiclassical quantization of the superstring and Hagedorn temperature,

    F. Bigazzi, T. Canneti, and W. M¨ uck, “Semiclassical quantization of the superstring and Hagedorn temperature,”JHEP08(2023) 185,arXiv:2306.00588 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hagedorn temperature in holography: world-sheet and effective approaches,

    F. Bigazzi, T. Canneti, F. Castellani, A. L. Cotrone, and W. M¨ uck, “Hagedorn temperature in holography: world-sheet and effective approaches,”JHEP09(2024) 193, arXiv:2407.00375 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Exact approaches on the string worldsheet,

    S. Demulder, S. Driezen, B. Knighton, G. Oling, A. L. Retore, F. K. Seibold, A. Sfondrini, and Z. Yan, “Exact approaches on the string worldsheet,”J. Phys. A57 no. 42, (2024) 423001,arXiv:2312.12930 [hep-th]. 38

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The Background Field Method and the Ultraviolet Structure of the Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, D. Z. Freedman, and S. Mukhi, “The Background Field Method and the Ultraviolet Structure of the Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model,”Annals Phys. 134(1981) 85

    1981

  38. [46]

    Normal Coordinates,θExpansion and Strings on Curved Superspace,

    J. J. Atick and A. Dhar, “Normal Coordinates,θExpansion and Strings on Curved Superspace,”Nucl. Phys. B284(1987) 131–145

    1987

  39. [47]

    N=2 Superstrings in a Supergravity Background,

    M. T. Grisaru, P. S. Howe, L. Mezincescu, B. Nilsson, and P. K. Townsend, “N=2 Superstrings in a Supergravity Background,”Phys. Lett. B162(1985) 116–120

    1985

  40. [48]

    Invariance theory, the heat equation and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem,

    P. B. Gilkey, “Invariance theory, the heat equation and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem,”

  41. [49]

    Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,

    D. V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,”Phys. Rept.388(2003) 279–360,arXiv:hep-th/0306138

    2003 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Superbranes and superembeddings,

    D. P. Sorokin, “Superbranes and superembeddings,”Phys. Rept.329(2000) 1–101, arXiv:hep-th/9906142

    2000 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The Hagedorn Transition and the Number of Degrees of Freedom of String Theory,

    J. J. Atick and E. Witten, “The Hagedorn Transition and the Number of Degrees of Freedom of String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B310(1988) 291–334

    1988

  44. [52]

    Vortices on the World Sheet and String’s Critical Dynamics,

    Y. I. Kogan, “Vortices on the World Sheet and String’s Critical Dynamics,”JETP Lett. 45(1987) 709–712

    1987

  45. [53]

    Maldacena

    J. Maldacena. Unpublished

  46. [54]

    String stars in anti de Sitter space,

    E. Y. Urbach, “String stars in anti de Sitter space,”JHEP04(2022) 072, arXiv:2202.06966 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    The black hole/string transition in AdS 3 and confining backgrounds,

    E. Y. Urbach, “The black hole/string transition in AdS 3 and confining backgrounds,” arXiv:2303.09567 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    The asymptotic form of the Hagedorn temperature in planar super Yang-Mills,

    S. Ekhammar, J. A. Minahan, and C. Thull, “The asymptotic form of the Hagedorn temperature in planar super Yang-Mills,”J. Phys. A56no. 43, (2023) 435401, arXiv:2306.09883 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Higher order corrections to the Hagedorn temperature at strong coupling,

    F. Bigazzi, T. Canneti, and A. L. Cotrone, “Higher order corrections to the Hagedorn temperature at strong coupling,”JHEP10(2023) 056,arXiv:2306.17126 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    The ABJM Hagedorn Temperature from Integrability,

    S. Ekhammar, J. A. Minahan, and C. Thull, “The ABJM Hagedorn Temperature from Integrability,”JHEP10(2023) 066,arXiv:2307.02350 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Hagedorn temperature from the thermal scalar in AdS and pp-wave backgrounds,

    T. Harmark, “Hagedorn temperature from the thermal scalar in AdS and pp-wave backgrounds,”arXiv:2402.06001 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Selfgravitating fundamental strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “Selfgravitating fundamental strings,”Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 2557–2563,arXiv:hep-th/9707170

    1998 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Hagedorn Temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 via Integrability,

    T. Harmark and M. Wilhelm, “Hagedorn Temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 via Integrability,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 7, (2018) 071605,arXiv:1706.03074 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    The Hagedorn temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 at finite coupling via the Quantum Spectral Curve,

    T. Harmark and M. Wilhelm, “The Hagedorn temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 at finite coupling via the Quantum Spectral Curve,”Phys. Lett. B786(2018) 53–58, arXiv:1803.04416 [hep-th]. 39

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Solving the Hagedorn temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 via the Quantum Spectral Curve: chemical potentials and deformations,

    T. Harmark and M. Wilhelm, “Solving the Hagedorn temperature of AdS 5/CFT4 via the Quantum Spectral Curve: chemical potentials and deformations,”JHEP07(2022) 136, arXiv:2109.09761 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Confinement and D5-branes,

    C. Nu˜ nez, M. Oyarzo, and R. Stuardo, “Confinement and D5-branes,”JHEP03(2024) 080,arXiv:2311.17998 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Supersymmetric solitons and a degeneracy of solutions in AdS/CFT,

    A. Anabalon and S. F. Ross, “Supersymmetric solitons and a degeneracy of solutions in AdS/CFT,”JHEP07(2021) 015,arXiv:2104.14572 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Twisted circle compactification ofN= 4 SYM and its Holographic Dual,

    S. P. Kumar and R. Stuardo, “Twisted circle compactification ofN= 4 SYM and its Holographic Dual,”arXiv:2405.03739 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Conformal to confining SQFTs from holography,

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, and P. Weck, “Conformal to confining SQFTs from holography,”JHEP08(2024) 041,arXiv:2405.05563 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons,

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, and P. Weck, “SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons,”arXiv:2406.01685 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Holography for Confined and Deformed Theories: TsT-Generated Solutions in type IIB Supergravity,

    F. Castellani and C. Nunez, “Holography for Confined and Deformed Theories: TsT-Generated Solutions in type IIB Supergravity,”arXiv:2410.00094 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    TsT-Generated Solutions in Type IIB Supergravity from Twisted Compactification of AdS 5×T1,1,

    F. Castellani, “TsT-Generated Solutions in Type IIB Supergravity from Twisted Compactification of AdS 5×T1,1,”arXiv:2411.04199 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    L. P. Eisenhart,Riemannian Geometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1964

    1964

  64. [72]

    Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic Superspace,

    A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, S. Kalitzin, V. Ogievetsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic Superspace,”Class. Quant. Grav.1(1984) 469–498. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 2, 127 (1985)]

    1984

  65. [73]

    Light Cone Harmonic Superspace and Its Applications,

    E. Sokatchev, “Light Cone Harmonic Superspace and Its Applications,”Phys. Lett. B 169(1986) 209–214

    1986

  66. [74]

    HARMONIC SUPERPARTICLE,

    E. Sokatchev, “HARMONIC SUPERPARTICLE,”Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 237–246

    1987

  67. [75]

    Superparticle in Lorentz harmonic superspace. (In Russian),

    I. A. Bandos, “Superparticle in Lorentz harmonic superspace. (In Russian),”Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51(1990) 906–914

    1990

  68. [76]

    Multivalued action functionals, Lorentz harmonics, and spin,

    I. A. Bandos, “Multivalued action functionals, Lorentz harmonics, and spin,”JETP Lett. 52(1990) 205–207

    1990

  69. [77]

    Superstrings and supermembranes in the doubly supersymmetric geometrical approach,

    I. A. Bandos, D. P. Sorokin, M. Tonin, P. Pasti, and D. V. Volkov, “Superstrings and supermembranes in the doubly supersymmetric geometrical approach,”Nucl. Phys. B 446(1995) 79–118,arXiv:hep-th/9501113

    1995 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Dirac and Weyl Fermion Dynamics on Two-dimensional Surface,

    A. R. Kavalov, I. K. Kostov, and A. G. Sedrakian, “Dirac and Weyl Fermion Dynamics on Two-dimensional Surface,”Phys. Lett. B175(1986) 331–334

    1986

  71. [79]

    Dirac and Weyl Fermions Coupled to Two-dimensional Surfaces: Determinants,

    A. G. Sedrakian and R. Stora, “Dirac and Weyl Fermions Coupled to Two-dimensional Surfaces: Determinants,”Phys. Lett. B188(1987) 442–446

    1987

  72. [80]

    WEYL FERMIONS ON STRINGS EMBEDDED IN THREE-DIMENSIONS,

    F. Langouche and H. Leutwyler, “WEYL FERMIONS ON STRINGS EMBEDDED IN THREE-DIMENSIONS,”Z. Phys. C36(1987) 473–478. 40

    1987

  73. [81]

    TWO-DIMENSIONAL FERMION DETERMINANTS AS WESS-ZUMINO ACTIONS,

    F. Langouche and H. Leutwyler, “TWO-DIMENSIONAL FERMION DETERMINANTS AS WESS-ZUMINO ACTIONS,”Phys. Lett. B195(1987) 56–59

    1987

  74. [82]

    ANOMALIES GENERATED BY EXTRINSIC CUR V ATURE,

    F. Langouche and H. Leutwyler, “ANOMALIES GENERATED BY EXTRINSIC CUR V ATURE,”Z. Phys. C36(1987) 479–486

    1987

  75. [83]

    Induced Dirac operator and smooth manifold geometry,

    D. R. Karakhanian, “Induced Dirac operator and smooth manifold geometry,” Tech. Rep. YERPHI-1246-32-90, 3, 1990. 41

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.