Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 65 references

Source Component Shift Adaptation via Offline Decomposition and Online Mixing Approach

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that source component shift adaptation splits cleanly into an offline decomposition step and an online mixing step, and that the resulting method cuts cumulative test loss by up to 67.4% on real-world regression streams.

desk verdict The abstract is about online learning under source-component shift, but the supplied body is an unrelated robotics paper; there is nothing to review yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10257 v1 pith:2YJZDNT5 submitted 2025-08-14 cs.LG

Ryuta Matsuno This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords sourcecomponentshiftonlinelearningconceptdriftmixtureofexpertsEMalgorithmconvexoptimizationdatastreamsregression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that adapting to source component shift — where an incoming data stream is a changing mixture of a fixed set of underlying patterns — can be cleanly separated into two problems: learning one predictor per component offline from past data, and learning only the mixing weights online. It proves this split theoretically, then implements it with an EM algorithm for the offline part and online convex optimization for the online part. On real-world regression streams the method beats existing baselines, reducing cumulative test loss by up to 67.4%. A sympathetic reader would take away that recurring shift structure is a resource, not a nuisance, if the mixture assumption holds.

What carries the argument

Source components: recurring latent patterns in the data-generating process, each with its own predictor. The load-bearing machinery is the pair (EM algorithm, online convex optimization): EM decomposes past training data into a small number of component predictors offline, and an online convex optimizer (a standard mixture-weight learner) adapts the convex combination of those predictors to the current stream. The factorization result is what licenses running these two in sequence rather than learning everything online.

What would settle it

Generate a synthetic regression stream with known component predictors and known mixing weights, then run the method and compare the recovered mixing weights against ground truth at each time step. If the EM step cannot recover the true components — for instance because two components are nearly collinear — the online weights cannot compensate, and the method should lose to a baseline that relearns everything. A second check: make one component vanish permanently and introduce a new one; if the cumulative loss does not degrade, the decomposition is doing more than the mixture assumption allows

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a factorization: the source-component-shift adaptation problem admits a two-stage solution in which the component models are estimated once, offline, from historical training data, and only the mixing weights are updated as the stream arrives. The paper states this as a theoretical identification, not merely a heuristic. The offline stage uses the EM algorithm to fit prediction models, each responsible for a single source component; the online stage treats weight updating as online convex optimization. The empirical claim is that this division of labor — components fixed, mixture adaptive — exploits the recurring nature of shifts and reduces cumulative test loss by up to

Load-bearing premise

The stream's distribution must be a convex mixture of a fixed set of source components that are learnable from past data alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the factorization holds, practitioners can fit heavy component models once and deploy a lightweight weight-update rule, making adaptation cheap at inference time.
  • The method should track shifts that revisit previously seen components far better than methods that treat each shift as new.
  • The 67.4% cumulative-loss reduction, if reproducible, suggests mixture-structure methods can dominate generic online learners on streams with recurring shift patterns.
  • The theoretical split gives a principled reason to design future shift-adaptation algorithms as offline/online pairs rather than monolithic online updates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the same offline/online split should carry over to classification and to non-parametric component models wherever a convex mixture assumption is plausible, though the paper demonstrates only regression.
  • Extension: the theory likely needs identifiability of components from past data alone; if two components are nearly collinear or a component appears only once, the offline stage cannot recover it and the online mixer becomes a constrained ensemble.
  • Testable extension: benchmark against streams whose mixing weights follow a Markov chain, to see whether the online optimizer's regret translates into tracking error.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to address source component shift adaptation by combining offline source-component decomposition with online mixing-weight adaptation, and reports a theoretical decomposition into two subproblems plus empirical gains of up to 67.4% cumulative test loss reduction on real-world regression datasets. However, the supplied full text is not the paper described in the abstract. The body is arXiv:2508.10259v1, a cs.OS paper titled "Leveraging OS-Level Primitives for Robotic Action Management" by Zheng et al., which concerns OS-level primitives such as action context, exceptions, and replay for robotic action management. It contains no mention of source component shift, expectation-maximization, mixing weights, online convex optimization, regression streams, or cumulative test loss. Consequently, the abstract's central claims are not supported by any verifiable derivation, algorithmic description, or experimental protocol in the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the claimed results are correct, the work would be of interest to the online learning and domain adaptation communities: the two-stage decomposition (offline component identification plus online mixing) is a plausible and potentially principled recipe, and a 67.4% reduction in cumulative test loss would be a strong practical outcome. However, as submitted, none of these contributions can be evaluated. There is no method description, no theoretical statement, no experimental setup, and no data. The significance is therefore entirely conditional on the existence of a proper manuscript that is not present here.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.10259v1, titled "Leveraging OS-Level Primitives for Robotic Action Management" by Wenxin Zheng et al. This is an unrelated paper on robotic action management using OS primitives. No section of this body addresses source component shift, the EM algorithm, online mixing-weight adaptation, online convex optimization, or cumulative test loss on regression streams. The central claims in the abstract are therefore entirely unsupported by the submitted manuscript. This is a load-bearing missing-support issue that cannot be repaired by local revision.
  2. [Abstract (theoretical claim)] The abstract states that the problem "can be divided into two subproblems: offline source component decomposition and online mixing weight adaptation," but no theorem, proof, or precise assumptions are provided. In particular, the underlying generative model (a stream is a convex mixture of fixed recurring source components, each learnable offline from past data) is not formalized, and identifiability of components from past data alone is not discussed. Without this formalization, the claimed decomposition is not established.
  3. [Abstract (empirical claim)] The abstract reports "reducing the cumulative test loss by up to 67.4%" on "various real-world regression datasets," but provides no dataset names, no baseline list, no experimental protocol, no number of runs, and no error bars. Since the body does not contain the corresponding experiments, the empirical claim cannot be checked for validity, reproducibility, or statistical significance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [General submission integrity] The submitted PDF appears to be the wrong paper. The authors should verify that the correct manuscript file was uploaded to arXiv. In the present form, the reference list and figures are entirely from the robotics paper and none relate to source component shift adaptation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detectable: the full text supplied is an unrelated robotics paper, so no derivation chain from the abstract can be inspected or shown to reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The abstract of arXiv:2508.10257 claims a two-stage source-component-shift method: offline EM-based component decomposition and online convex-optimization mixing-weight adaptation, with theoretical justification and a 67.4% cumulative-loss reduction. The full text supplied, however, is arXiv:2508.10259v1, a cs.OS paper by Zheng et al. on OS-level primitives for robotic action management; it contains no mention of source component shift, EM, mixing weights, online convex optimization, regression streams, or the claimed experiments. Consequently, there is no body of equations, derivations, or experiments available against which to test for self-definitional circularity, fitted-input-called-prediction, self-citation load-bearing reasoning, or any of the enumerated circular patterns. The only exhibited issue is therefore missing support: the abstract's central claims are unverifiable from the supplied text. That is a correctness and provenance concern, not a circularity finding. Per the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited, no circular step can be identified here, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no new entities beyond the two-stage decomposition itself. The ledger records the generative-model premise, the convex-mixing premise, and the identifiability premise on which the claimed decomposition rests, plus the two hyperparameter families (component count, OCO tuning) that any implementation would need to set.

free parameters (2)
  • number of source components (pool size of prediction models)
    The abstract describes 'prediction models, each of which learns a source component'; the number of components is a model-selection choice not derived in the abstract, and EM runs also depend on initializations and convergence thresholds.
  • online mixing step size and regularization (OCO parameters)
    The abstract says mixing weights are updated by 'online convex optimization' but gives no step size, projection, or regularization schedule; these affect adaptation speed and final cumulative loss.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The data stream is generated by a finite set of recurring source components, each representable by a fixed prediction model learned offline.
    The entire two-subproblem decomposition in the abstract presumes this generative structure; if components drift or appear once and never return, the offline/online split fails.
  • domain assumption Mixing a fixed set of component models with convex weights can capture the shift at every time step, so online convex optimization has low regret against the best fixed mixture.
    The online part 'updates the mixing weight of the prediction models for precise prediction'; this is only sound if each stream point lies in the convex hull of the component models.
  • domain assumption Source components can be identified from past training data alone (EM identifiability and separation of components).
    The offline step 'determines prediction models... solely based on past training data'; if components are not identifiable from past data, the learned models do not correspond to the true shift sources.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Source Component Shift Adaptation via Offline Decomposition and Online Mixing Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2YJZDNT5

@misc{pith2026250810257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Source Component Shift Adaptation via Offline Decomposition and Online Mixing Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2YJZDNT5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10257}
}
read the original abstract

This paper addresses source component shift adaptation, aiming to update predictions adapting to source component shifts for incoming data streams based on past training data. Existing online learning methods often fail to utilize recurring shifts effectively, while model-pool-based methods struggle to capture individual source components, leading to poor adaptation. In this paper, we propose a source component shift adaptation method via an offline decomposition and online mixing approach. We theoretically identify that the problem can be divided into two subproblems: offline source component decomposition and online mixing weight adaptation. Based on this, our method first determines prediction models, each of which learns a source component solely based on past training data offline through the EM algorithm. Then, it updates the mixing weight of the prediction models for precise prediction through online convex optimization. Thanks to our theoretical derivation, our method fully leverages the characteristics of the shifts, achieving superior adaptation performance over existing methods. Experiments conducted on various real-world regression datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines, reducing the cumulative test loss by up to 67.4%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Hao-Shu Fang, Hongjie Fang, Zhenyu Tang, Jirong Liu, Chenxi Wang, Junbo Wang, Haoyi Zhu, and Cewu Lu. 2024. Rh20t: A comprehensive robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 653–660

    work page 2024

  2. [15]

    Roya Firoozi, Johnathan Tucker, Stephen Tian, Anirudha Majumdar, Jiankai Sun, Weiyu Liu, Yuke Zhu, Shuran Song, Ashish Kapoor, Karol Hausman, et al. 2023. Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future. The International Journal of Robotics Re- search (2023), 02783649241281508

    work page 2023

  3. [16]

    Dayuan Fu, Keqing He, Yejie Wang, Wentao Hong, Zhuoma Gongque, Weihao Zeng, Wei Wang, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, and Weiran Xu. 2025. AgentRefine: Enhancing Agent Generalization through Refinement Tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01702 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  4. [17]

    Zipeng Fu, Tony Z Zhao, and Chelsea Finn. 2024. Mobile aloha: Learn- ing bimanual mobile manipulation with low-cost whole-body teleop- eration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02117 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [18]

    Abraham George and Amir Barati Farimani. 2023. One act play: Single demonstration behavior cloning with action chunking transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10175 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  6. [19]

    Theophile Gervet, Zhou Xian, Nikolaos Gkanatsios, and Katerina Fragkiadaki. 2023. Act3d: 3d feature field transformers for multi-task robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17817 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  7. [20]

    Ankit Goyal, Jie Xu, Yijie Guo, Valts Blukis, Yu-Wei Chao, and Dieter Fox. 2023. Rvt: Robotic view transformer for 3d object manipulation. In Conference on Robot Learning . PMLR, 694–710

    work page 2023

  8. [21]

    Albert Gu and Tri Dao. 2023. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

Show all 65 references
  1. [22]

    Pierre-Louis Guhur, Shizhe Chen, Ricardo Garcia Pinel, Makarand Tapaswi, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. 2023. Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 175–187

    2023

  2. [23]

    Yanjiang Guo, Jianke Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Xiang Ji, Yen-Jen Wang, Yucheng Hu, and Jianyu Chen. 2025. Improving Vision-Language- Action Model with Online Reinforcement Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16664 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  3. [24]

    Huy Ha, Pete Florence, and Shuran Song. 2023. Scaling up and distilling down: Language-guided robot skill acquisition. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 3766–3777

    2023

  4. [25]

    Zhi Hou, Tianyi Zhang, Yuwen Xiong, Haonan Duan, Hengjun Pu, Ronglei Tong, Chengyang Zhao, Xizhou Zhu, Yu Qiao, Jifeng Dai, et al. 2025. Dita: Scaling Diffusion Transformer for Generalist Vision- Language-Action Policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19757 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  5. [26]

    Haoxu Huang, Fanqi Lin, Yingdong Hu, Shengjie Wang, and Yang Gao. 2024. Copa: General robotic manipulation through spatial con- straints of parts with foundation models. In2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 9488–9495

    2024

  6. [27]

    Yutaro Ishida, Yuki Noguchi, Takayuki Kanai, Kazuhiro Shintani, and Hiroshi Bito. 2024. Robust Imitation Learning for Mobile Manipulator Focusing on Task-Related Viewpoints and Regions. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, ...

    2024

  7. [28]

    JAKA. 2025. JAKA Robots. https://www.jaka.com/en/index [Online; accessed 2025-04-18]

    2025

  8. [29]

    Stephen James, Kentaro Wada, Tristan Laidlow, and Andrew J Davi- son. 2022. Coarse-to-fine q-attention: Efficient learning for visual robotic manipulation via discretisation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 13739–13748

    2022

  9. [30]

    Eric Jang, Alex Irpan, Mohi Khansari, Daniel Kappler, Frederik Ebert, Corey Lynch, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. 2022. Bc-z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 991–1002

    2022

  10. [31]

    Michael Janner, Yilun Du, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Sergey Levine

  11. [32]

    Kai Jiang and Jiaxing Huang. 2024. A Survey on Vision Autoregressive Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08666 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [33]

    Joohyung Kim, Dhruv C Mathur, Kazuki Shin, and Sean Taylor

  13. [34]

    Moo Jin Kim, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. 2025. Fine-tuning vision- language-action models: Optimizing speed and success. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19645 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  14. [35]

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. 2024. Openvla: An open-source vision-language- action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [36]

    Qixiu Li, Yaobo Liang, Zeyu Wang, Lin Luo, Xi Chen, Mozheng Liao, Fangyun Wei, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu, Yizhong Zhang, et al . 2024. Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergiz- ing cognition and action in robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [37]

    Xuanlin Li, Kyle Hsu, Jiayuan Gu, Karl Pertsch, Oier Mees, Homer Rich Walke, Chuyuan Fu, Ishikaa Lunawat, Isabel Sieh, Sean Kirmani, Sergey Levine, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Hao Su, Quan Vuong, and Ted Xiao. 2024. Evaluating Real-World Robot Manipulation Policies in Simulation....

    2024 arXiv

  17. [38]

    Xiang Li, Cristina Mata, Jongwoo Park, Kumara Kahatapitiya, Yoo Sung Jang, Jinghuan Shang, Kanchana Ranasinghe, Ryan Burgert, Mu Cai, Yong Jae Lee, et al. 2024. Llara: Supercharging robot learn- ing data for vision-language policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.20095 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [39]

    Yinghui Li, Jinze Wu, Xin Liu, Weizhong Guo, and Yufei Xue. 2024. Experience-Learning Inspired Two-Step Reward Method for Efficient Legged Locomotion Learning Towards Natural and Robust Gaits. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems (IROS)...

    2024

  19. [40]

    Yunfei Li, Ying Yuan, Jingzhi Cui, Haoran Huan, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Zekai Xu, and Yi Wu. 2024. Robot Generating Data for Learning Gen- eralizable Visual Robotic Manipulation. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 5813–5820

    2024

  20. [41]

    Ji Lin, Jiaming Tang, Haotian Tang, Shang Yang, Guangxuan Xiao, and Song Han. 2025. AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for On-Device LLM Compression and Acceleration. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 28, 4 (2025), 12–17

    2025

  21. [42]

    Jiaming Liu, Mengzhen Liu, Zhenyu Wang, Lily Lee, Kaichen Zhou, Pengju An, Senqiao Yang, Renrui Zhang, Yandong Guo, and Shang- hang Zhang. 2024. Robomamba: Multimodal state space model for efficient robot reasoning and manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04339 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [43]

    Yueen Ma, Dafeng Chi, Shiguang Wu, Yuecheng Liu, Yuzheng Zhuang, Jianye Hao, and Irwin King. 2024. Actra: Optimized transformer ar- chitecture for vision-language-action models in robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01147 (2024)

    2024

  23. [44]

    Cheng Pan, Kai Junge, and Josie Hughes. 2024. Vision-language-action model and diffusion policy switching enables dexterous control of an anthropomorphic hand. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14022 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [45]

    J Hyeon Park, Wonhyuk Choi, Sunpyo Hong, Hoseong Seo, Joonmo Ahn, Changsu Ha, Heungwoo Han, and Junghyun Kwon. 2024. Hi- erarchical Action Chunking Transformer: Learning Temporal Multi- modality from Demonstrations with Fast Imitation Behavior. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International C...

    2024

  25. [46]

    Seongmin Park, Hyungmin Kim, Wonseok Jeon, Juyoung Yang, Byeongwook Jeon, Yoonseon Oh, and Jungwook Choi. 2024. Quantization-Aware Imitation-Learning for Resource-Efficient 14 Leveraging OS-Level Primitives for Robotic Action Management Robotic Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:24...

    2024 arXiv

  26. [47]

    Karl Pertsch, Kyle Stachowicz, Brian Ichter, Danny Driess, Suraj Nair, Quan Vuong, Oier Mees, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. 2025. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  27. [48]

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Learn- ing Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv:2103.0...

    2021 arXiv

  28. [49]

    Gernot Riegler, Ali Osman Ulusoy, and Andreas Geiger. 2017. Octnet: Learning deep 3d representations at high resolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 3577– 3586

    2017

  29. [50]

    Trossen Robotics. 2025. Trossen Robotics. https://www. trossenrobotics.com/ [Online; accessed 2025-04-18]

    2025

  30. [51]

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2023. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2023), 8634–8652

    2023

  31. [52]

    Mohit Shridhar, Lucas Manuelli, and Dieter Fox. 2023. Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation. In Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 785–799

    2023

  32. [53]

    Mohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk, Adam Trischler, and Matthew Hausknecht. 2020. Alfworld: Align- ing text and embodied environments for interactive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03768 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  33. [54]

    Wenxuan Song, Jiayi Chen, Pengxiang Ding, Han Zhao, Wei Zhao, Zhide Zhong, Zongyuan Ge, Jun Ma, and Haoang Li. 2025. Accelerating Vision-Language-Action Model Integrated with Action Chunking via Parallel Decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02310 (2025)

    2025

  34. [55]

    Octo Model Team, Dibya Ghosh, Homer Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, Tobias Kreiman, Charles Xu, et al. 2024. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [56]

    Chenxi Wang, Hongjie Fang, Hao-Shu Fang, and Cewu Lu. 2024. Rise: 3d perception makes real-world robot imitation simple and effective. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2870–2877

    2024

  36. [57]

    Junjie Wen, Minjie Zhu, Yichen Zhu, Zhibin Tang, Jinming Li, Zhongyi Zhou, Chengmeng Li, Xiaoyu Liu, Yaxin Peng, Chaomin Shen, et al

  37. [58]

    Junjie Wen, Yichen Zhu, Jinming Li, Minjie Zhu, Zhibin Tang, Kun Wu, Zhiyuan Xu, Ning Liu, Ran Cheng, Chaomin Shen, et al . 2025. Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2025)

    2025

  38. [59]

    Kun Wu, Chengkai Hou, Jiaming Liu, Zhengping Che, Xiaozhu Ju, Zhuqin Yang, Meng Li, Yinuo Zhao, Zhiyuan Xu, Guang Yang, et al

  39. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877 (2024)

    Robomind: Benchmark on multi-embodiment intelligence nor- mative data for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [61]

    Zhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Xin Guo, Wei He, Yiwen Ding, Boyang Hong, Ming Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Senjie Jin, Enyu Zhou, et al. 2025. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. Science China Information Sciences 68, 2 (2025), 121101

    2025

  41. [62]

    Shenghao Xie, Wenqiang Zu, Mingyang Zhao, Duo Su, Shilong Liu, Ruohua Shi, Guoqi Li, Shanghang Zhang, and Lei Ma. 2024. Towards Unifying Understanding and Generation in the Era of Vision Foun- dation Models: A Survey from the Autoregression Perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:24...

    2024 arXiv

  42. [63]

    Weimin Xiong, Yifan Song, Xiutian Zhao, Wenhao Wu, Xun Wang, Ke Wang, Cheng Li, Wei Peng, and Sujian Li. 2024. Watch every step! llm agent learning via iterative step-level process refinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11176 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [64]

    Siyu Xu, Yunke Wang, Chenghao Xia, Dihao Zhu, Tao Huang, and Chang Xu. 2025. VLA-Cache: Towards Efficient Vision-Language- Action Model via Adaptive Token Caching in Robotic Manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02175 (2025)

    2025

  44. [65]

    Xinyu Xu, Yizheng Zhang, Yong-Lu Li, Lei Han, and Cewu Lu. 2024. Humanvla: Towards vision-language directed object rearrangement by physical humanoid. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19972 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [66]

    Yang Yue, Yulin Wang, Bingyi Kang, Yizeng Han, Shenzhi Wang, Shiji Song, Jiashi Feng, and Gao Huang. 2024. Deer-vla: Dynamic inference of multimodal large language models for efficient robot execution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 56619– 56643

    2024

  46. [67]

    Yanjie Ze, Zixuan Chen, Wenhao Wang, Tianyi Chen, Xialin He, Ying Yuan, Xue Bin Peng, and Jiajun Wu. 2024. Generalizable humanoid manipulation with improved 3d diffusion policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10803 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  47. [68]

    Jianke Zhang, Yanjiang Guo, Yucheng Hu, Xiaoyu Chen, Xiang Zhu, and Jianyu Chen. 2025. UP-VLA: A Unified Understanding and Pre- diction Model for Embodied Agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18867 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  48. [69]

    Xinyu Zhang, Yuhan Liu, Haonan Chang, Liam Schramm, and Ab- deslam Boularias. 2025. Autoregressive action sequence learning for robotic manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2025)

    2025

  49. [70]

    Yuan Zhang, Chun-Kai Fan, Junpeng Ma, Wenzhao Zheng, Tao Huang, Kuan Cheng, Denis Gudovskiy, Tomoyuki Okuno, Yohei Nakata, Kurt Keutzer, et al. 2024. Sparsevlm: Visual token sparsification for efficient vision-language model inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04417 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  50. [71]

    Qingqing Zhao, Yao Lu, Moo Jin Kim, Zipeng Fu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yecheng Wu, Zhaoshuo Li, Qianli Ma, Song Han, Chelsea Finn, et al

  51. [72]

    Tony Z Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  52. [73]

    Wangbo Zhao, Jiasheng Tang, Yizeng Han, Yibing Song, Kai Wang, Gao Huang, Fan Wang, and Yang You. 2024. Dynamic tuning towards parameter and inference efficiency for vit adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11808 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  53. [74]

    Haoyu Zhen, Xiaowen Qiu, Peihao Chen, Jincheng Yang, Xin Yan, Yilun Du, Yining Hong, and Chuang Gan. 2024. 3d-vla: A 3d vision-language-action generative world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09631 (2024). 15

    2024 arXiv

  54. [2022]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09991 (2022)

    Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09991 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  55. [2023]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09655 (2023)

    Papras: Plug-and-play robotic arm system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09655 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  56. [2024]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03293 (2024)

    Diffusion-VLA: Scaling Robot Foundation Models via Unified Diffusion and Autoregression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03293 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [2025]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22020 (2025)

    CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision- Language-Action Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22020 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.