Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Spin-wave softening across the uniform-to-stripe domain transition in iron garnet film

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-wave softening freezes into a stripe pattern at a matching wavevector in a garnet film.

desk verdict Real thermal μ-BLS softening data in a PMA garnet, worth refereeing; the quantitative finite-k match is model-dependent and the manuscript has an inconsistency in Ku that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19993 v1 pith:2YRTLX3L submitted 2026-07-22 cond-mat.mes-hall

Titiksha Srivastava , Victor Leroy , Nessrine Benaziz , Nathaniel Findling , Ludovic Largeau , Jamal Ben Youssef , Jean-Paul Adam , Thibaut Devolder
show 1 more author
Joo-Von Kim
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords spin-wavesofteningstripedomainsDamon-EshbachmodeperpendicularmagneticanisotropyBrillouinlightscatteringfreezingmagnonicsBiYIG
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the transition from a uniformly magnetized state to a stripe-domain state in a perpendicularly magnetized BiYIG film is driven by the softening of a spin-wave mode at a finite wavevector, and that the wavevector of this soft mode selects the period of the stripe pattern that forms. Using thermal micro-focused Brillouin light scattering, the authors observe a low-frequency branch that softens as the in-plane field approaches the transition, followed by a reorganization of the spectrum into a pinned low-frequency branch and additional modes in the stripe state. A calculated dispersion relation shows a finite-wavevector minimum in the Damon-Eshbach geometry at kc ≈ 21 rad/µm, which matches the stripe periodicity measured by magnetic force microscopy near the transition. Micromagnetic simulations reproduce both the field-driven formation of the stripes and the measured thermal spectra. If correct, this work establishes BiYIG as a model low-damping platform for studying spin-wave freezing and self-organized magnonic bands.

What carries the argument

The central object is the finite-wavevector softening of the Damon–Eshbach spin-wave dispersion in a perpendicularly anisotropic film. Near the transition, perpendicular magnetic anisotropy partially compensates the restoring torques, making the dispersion nearly isotropic and creating a minimum at a finite wavevector; as the field is reduced, this minimum falls toward zero frequency. The wavevector of this minimum sets the periodicity of the stripe domains that freeze in below the transition. Supporting this, the paper uses a linearized Landau-Lifshitz dynamical-matrix calculation to compute dispersions, a phase-weighted optical model for the BLS spectral intensities that accounts for optic

What would settle it

Measure the spin-wave dispersion directly as a function of in-plane field (e.g., by BLS at multiple wavevectors) and check whether the minimum of the lowest Damon–Eshbach branch reaches zero at the saturation field and at a wavevector equal to 2π divided by the stripe period. Separately, independently determine the exchange stiffness and uniaxial anisotropy using a technique such as ferromagnetic resonance on the same film, recompute the softening wavevector, and compare to the stripe period observed by MFM; a discrepancy larger than the reported ~10% would undermine the freezing claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the lowest spin-wave branch in the Damon–Eshbach geometry (wavevector perpendicular to the in-plane magnetization) softens at a finite wavevector kc ≈ 21 rad/µm as the in-plane field approaches the saturation-to-stripe transition. This wavevector matches the stripe periodicity measured by MFM near the transition (≈19.6 rad/µm), providing experimental evidence for spin-wave freezing: the critical finite-k mode selects the period of the stripe modulation below the transition. In the stripe state, the spectrum reorganizes with a low-frequency branch pinned at the experimental cutoff and a branch that rises in frequency, resembling the phase- and amplitude-like excitati

Load-bearing premise

The predicted softening wavevector and the stripe-period match rely on magnetic parameters — exchange stiffness A = 4.4 pJ/m and anisotropy Ku = 15,259 J/m³ — that are not independently measured on this specific film; if either is off by about 10%, the softening wavevector shifts and the match to the measured stripe period could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, the stripe period in such films is not an independent material property but a consequence of the softening wavevector of the Damon–Eshbach mode, making the period predictable from saturated-state dispersion measurements.
  • The same spin-wave-freezing mechanism should apply to other low-damping perpendicular-anisotropy insulators, providing a route to field-reconfigurable magnonic band structures without lithography.
  • The experimental observation of a pinned low-frequency branch and a hardening branch in the stripe state offers a candidate signature of Goldstone/Higgs-like modes, though the paper notes a definitive assignment requires mode-profile analysis.
  • The quantitative agreement between the computed softening wavevector and the measured stripe period provides a predictive tool for designing textured magnetic films.
  • The work establishes BiYIG as a model platform for studying symmetry-breaking magnetic phase transitions via thermal spin-wave spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the freezing scenario would be to measure the lowest spin-wave branch at several fixed wavevectors around 20 rad/µm as a function of field; the minimum should approach zero exactly at the saturation field, pinning the transition.
  • The paper reports an internally inconsistent uniaxial anisotropy value (120 ± 0.11 kJ/m³ in Section II.B versus 15,259 J/m³ used in simulations); if the true anisotropy is larger, the Q-factor and softening wavevector would change, potentially breaking the match with the stripe period.
  • The same finite-k softening mechanism could govern the periodicity of other self-organized spin textures, such as skyrmion lattices or helical states, where a similar 'freezing wavevector' might set the emergent length scale.
  • The need for an effective refractive index in the BLS intensity model suggests that quantitative spectral interpretation in transparent films requires careful treatment of optical phase accumulation; direct measurement of the film's optical constants could refine the analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined MFM, thermal micro-Brillouin light scattering (μ-BLS), dispersion-calculation, and micromagnetic-simulation study of a 120-nm BiYIG film with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. The central claim is that, as an in-plane magnetic field is lowered toward the saturation-to-stripe transition, the lowest spin-wave branch in the Damon–Eschbach geometry (k⊥M) softens at a finite wavevector kc ≈ 21 rad/µm, and that this wavevector matches the stripe-domain periodicity measured by MFM near the transition (≈19.6 rad/µm). In the stripe state the spectrum reorganizes into a low-frequency pinned branch plus additional modes, reminiscent of Goldstone/Higgs-like excitations. The authors support this picture with dispersion relations from a dynamical-matrix calculation, a μ-BLS spectral model for mode intensities, and Mumax3 simulations that reproduce the field-dependent spectra.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would provide rare experimental evidence for finite-wavevector spin-wave softening ('spin-wave freezing') in a low-damping insulating film, quantitatively linking the softening wavevector to the self-organized stripe period. The combination of real-space imaging, reciprocal-space spectroscopy, analytic dispersion calculations, and micromagnetic simulations is compelling in principle, and the observation of a low-frequency branch softening near 110 mT is read directly from the experimental spectra. The main strength is that the qualitative spectral evolution across the transition is reproduced by simulations without fine-tuning of the transition field. However, the quantitative centerpiece — the match between kc and the stripe period — rests on magnetic parameters that are not fully consistent within the manuscript, and the measurement does not directly resolve the finite-k minimum because it lies at the detection edge. These issues must be resolved before the central claim can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II.B vs §II.E] Section II.B reports Ku = 120 ± 0.11 kJ/m³ from FMR, while Section II.E uses Ku = 15,259 J/m³ (≈15.26 kJ/m³) in the simulations and dispersion calculations. These differ by a factor of ≈7.9. With the Section II.B value and Ms ≈ 160 kA/m, 2Ku/Ms ≈ 1.5 T, giving μ0Meff ≈ −1.3 T rather than the measured −7.2 mT. Such a large PMA would prevent the uniform-to-stripe transition at the stated fields. The simulation value is consistent with the measured Meff, suggesting a typographical error, but the manuscript never acknowledges or resolves the contradiction. This is load-bearing: the dispersion calculation that yields kc ≈ 21 rad/µm uses one Ku value while the text reports another. The authors must correct the reported Ku and confirm that the FMR fit and the simulation parameters are mutually consistent.
  2. [§II.C, §II.D, §III] The quantitative match between the calculated finite-k softening minimum (kc ≈ 21 rad/µm) and the MFM stripe period (≈19.6 rad/µm) is the central result, but the experiment cannot directly resolve this minimum. The μ-BLS numerical aperture limits the probed wavevector to |k| ≲ 20 rad/µm, so kc lies at or above the detection edge. The observed low-frequency branch is a k-integrated signal; it cannot by itself distinguish a finite-k instability from a k ≈ 0 mode softening, and kc is a model output. The authors should show explicitly how kc shifts under reasonable variations of the input parameters (e.g., A and Ku by ±10%) and, if possible, provide wavevector-resolved data or a larger numerical aperture to confirm the finite-k minimum. Without this, the 'match' between kc and the stripe period is not experimentally demonstrated at the claimed precision.
  3. [§II.D, §II.E] The dispersion calculation and simulations use exchange stiffness A = 4.4 pJ/m and Ku = 15,259 J/m³, but no uncertainty is quoted for A, and A is not independently measured on this specific film. Since kc depends on the exchange length and anisotropy balance, a ~10% change in A or Ku would shift kc and compromise the claimed match to the stripe period. The authors should either provide an independent determination of A (e.g., from PSSW mode spacings or literature values with error bars) or perform a sensitivity analysis showing the range of kc consistent with the uncertainty in the magnetic parameters. The present statement that the parameters 'give an effective anisotropy field of μ0Meff = −7.2 mT' fixes only the combination of Ms and Ku, not each separately, and A is completely unconstrained by the FMR data.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption and §II.D] The main text states the μ-BLS model uses N = 5.28 + 0.16i, but the Fig. 5 caption reports N = 2.65 + 0.09i. The Supplemental Material indicates that N = 2.65 + 0.09i underestimates the first peak and that N = 5.28 + 0.16i is the effective value. The caption should match the text.
  2. [§II.C] The text says the detection limit is around 20 rad/µm while later kc ≈ 21 rad/µm. This proximity should be stated explicitly; the current phrasing leaves the reader unclear whether the softening minimum is inside or outside the measured window.
  3. [Supplemental Eq. S4] Equation S4 writes exp(iz 4πN/λ). The symbol N is used for the complex refractive index, but the exponential should be dimensionless; please define the argument precisely (e.g., using the real part n and imaginary part κ) and check the factor of 4π for consistency with the optical path in backscattering geometry.
  4. [§II.B] The reported value 'Ku = 120 ± 0.11 kJ/m³' has an implausibly small uncertainty (0.1% relative) compared with the field-dependent measurements. This likely reflects a typographical error (perhaps 15.2 ± 0.11 kJ/m³ is intended), but as written it is internally inconsistent with the rest of the paper. Please correct.
  5. [§III] The phrase 'k_DE ≃ 20–21 rad/µm' in the Discussion suggests a range, while Section II.D quotes kc ≈ 21 rad/µm. Please clarify whether the calculation gives a single value or a range, and how the range arises.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central finite-k softening and stripe-period match are not circular; the only fitted element is a transparently disclosed refractive index used in a non-central intensity sub-claim.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section II.D, µ-BLS model; Supplementary Material SIII]
    "To account for this effect, we introduce an effective refractive index n_eff as a phenomenological fitting parameter. It should not be interpreted as a physical material constant, but rather as a modification of the optical phase accumulation within the model."

    The paper's abstract and conclusions state that the µ-BLS spectral model 'reproduces the measured mode frequencies and relative intensities at selected fixed fields.' The relative-intensity agreement at 200 mT is achieved by adjusting the complex refractive index N to the same intensity pattern, so this part of the 'reproduction' is a fit rather than an independent prediction. Frequencies and line shapes are explicitly unaffected by N, so the circularity is limited to the intensity sub-claim and does not feed into the central softening-wavevector/stripe-period comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular by construction. The softening is directly observed as the lowest µ-BLS branch moving toward the detection cutoff near 110 mT (Fig. 3). The finite-k minimum kc ≈ 21 rad/µm is obtained from a dynamical-matrix dispersion calculation (Fig. 4) using parameters anchored to independent measurements: Ms = 153–160 kA/m from VSM, µ0Meff = −7.2 mT from FMR, and an assumed A = 4.4 pJ/m. The MFM stripe wavevector near saturation, ≈ 19.6 rad/µm, is an independent real-space measurement, so the agreement with the calculated kc is a genuine comparison rather than a renamed input. The use of the authors' own µ-BLS model [32] is not load-bearing for the central claim, since the operative formula is given in Eq. S4 and the model is compared against measured spectra. The Goldstone/Higgs-like assignment is explicitly qualified ('a definitive assignment would require direct mode-profile analysis'), so no unsupported claim is being forced. Two issues affect confidence but not logical circularity: Section II.B reports Ku = 120 ± 0.11 kJ/m3 while Section II.E uses Ku = 15,259 J/m3, an unresolved factor ≈ 7.9 inconsistency; and the µ-BLS numerical aperture (~20 rad/µm) places kc ≈ 21 rad/µm at the detection edge, making the finite-k assignment model-dependent. The phrase 'parameters optimized using micromagnetic simulations' is vague, but without a demonstrated fitting target it is insufficient to establish that kc was tuned to the compared data.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on several chosen inputs. Observed mode frequencies and the softening field come from measured spectra, but the predicted kc and simulation spectra depend on the micromagnetic parameter set (A, Ku, Ms), and the μ-BLS intensity agreement uses a fitted effective refractive index. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective refractive index N in μ-BLS model = 5.28 + 0.16i
    Phenomenological parameter introduced to reproduce the first-peak intensity at 200 mT; authors explicitly state it should not be interpreted as a physical material constant (Section II.D and SI SIII).
  • Exchange stiffness A = 4.4 pJ/m
    Taken from literature values rather than measured on this film; used in dispersion calculations and Mumax3 simulations. Directly influences the predicted softening wavevector kc.
  • Uniaxial anisotropy Ku = 15259 J/m³ in simulations; main text also prints 120±0.11 kJ/m³
    The simulated value is consistent with FMR-derived Meff, but the main-text stated value is internally inconsistent. The softening wavevector depends on Ku, so this is effectively a chosen input from FMR/literature.
  • Saturation magnetization Ms = 153 kA/m in simulations
    Chosen within the VSM estimate 160±10 kA/m; used in simulations and dispersion calculations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics with a thermal noise field (stochastic LLG) accurately describes the thermal spin-wave population
    Used in Mumax3 to generate power spectral densities of thermal spin waves at 300 K (Section II.E).
  • domain assumption The film is spatially homogeneous and infinite via periodic boundary conditions; micromagnetic parameters are uniform with no surface, roughness, or edge effects
    Simulations use periodic boundary conditions in-plane and nominal dimensions 512×512×8 cells; the comparison to measured μ-BLS relies on this (Section II.E).
  • domain assumption The μ-BLS optical scattering model of Ref. [32] is applicable to a 115-nm transparent film even though the ultrathin approximation is violated, and an effective refractive index corrects the phase accumulation
    Section II.D and SI SIII; this is the reason N is fitted and the intensity comparison is not fully first-principles.
  • domain assumption Stripe equilibrium is determined by energy minimization over integer stripe configurations with Bloch walls magnetized along x
    Section II.E: for each field, multiple stripe counts are relaxed and the energy minimum gives the equilibrium period.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-wave softening across the uniform-to-stripe domain transition in iron garnet film." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2YRTLX3L

@misc{pith2026260719993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-wave softening across the uniform-to-stripe domain transition in iron garnet film},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2YRTLX3L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19993}
}
abstract

Spin-wave spectra across transitions between uniform and textured phases can offer deep insight into both symmetry-breaking physics and self-assembled magnonic bands. However, experiments require a material platform that combines low damping, well-defined textures, and spectroscopic access. Here, we study a Bi-doped iron-garnet film with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), which undergoes a uniform-to-stripe-domain transition as a function of in-plane magnetic field. Real-space imaging by magnetic force microscopy reveals field-reorientable stripe domains aligned with the in-plane field, while reciprocal-space measurements using thermal microfocused Brillouin light scattering ($\mu$-BLS) reveal the softening of a low-frequency spin-wave branch near the transition and the appearance of additional modes in the stripe-domain state. Calculated dispersion relations identify finite-$k$ softening in the Damon-Eshbach geometry ($k \perp M$), with the corresponding wavelength matching the stripe periodicity at the transition. In addition, a $\mu$-BLS spectral model reproduces the measured mode frequencies and relative intensities at selected fixed fields. Micromagnetic simulations capture the field-driven formation of the stripe state and reproduce the experimental thermal $\mu$-BLS spectra. Our findings establish BiYIG with PMA as a model low-damping platform for studying spin-wave freezing, stripe-domain modes, and reconfigurable magnonic band structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19993 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematics of Bismuth-doped Yttrium Iron Garnet sam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) MFM images of BiYIG film at remanence and applied in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spin-wave spectrum evolution. (a) Thermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spin wave dispersion relations in the saturated state for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental (red dots) and calculated (solid lines) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Simulated equilibrium stripe domain period, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin, Theory of dipole-exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed ex- change boundary conditions, J. Phys. C19, 7013 (1986)

    1986

  2. [2]

    V . V . Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.43, 264001 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Krawczyk and D

    M. Krawczyk and D. Grundler, Review and prospects of magnonic crystals and devices with reprogrammable band structure, J. Condens. Matter Phys.26, 123202 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V . Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17031 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Ivanov and V

    B. Ivanov and V . Stephanovich, Two-dimensional soliton dy- namics in ferromagnets, Physics Letters A141, 89 (1989)

    1989

  6. [6]

    Garnier, M

    L.-C. Garnier, M. Marangolo, M. Eddrief, D. Bisero, S. Fin, F. Casoli, M. G. Pini, A. Rettori, and S. Tacchi, Stripe do- mains reorientation in ferromagnetic films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 024001 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    H. Yu, J. Xiao, and H. Schultheiss, Magnetic texture based magnonics, Phys. Rep.905, 1 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    B. E. Argyle, W. Jantz, and J. C. Slonczewski, Wall oscillations of domain lattices in underdamped garnet films, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3370 (1983)

    1983

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Ebels, L

    U. Ebels, L. Buda, K. Ounadjela, and P. E. Wigen, Ferromag- netic resonance excitation of two-dimensional wall structures in magnetic stripe domains, Phys. Rev. B63, 174437 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Gubbiotti, G

    G. Gubbiotti, G. Carlotti, S. Tacchi, M. Madami, T. Ono, T. Koyama, D. Chiba, F. Casoli, and M. G. Pini, Spin waves in perpendicularly magnetized Co/Ni(111) multilayers in the pres- ence of magnetic domains, Phys. Rev. B86, 014401 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Garst, J

    M. Garst, J. Waizner, and D. Grundler, Collective spin excita- tions of helices and magnetic skyrmions: review and perspec- tives of magnonics in non-centrosymmetric magnets, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.50, 293002 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Mochizuki, Spin-wave modes and their intense excitation effects in skyrmion crystals, Phys

    M. Mochizuki, Spin-wave modes and their intense excitation effects in skyrmion crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 017601 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    S. A. Montoya, S. Couture, J. J. Chess, J. C. T. Lee, N. Kent, M.-Y . Im, S. D. Kevan, P. Fischer, B. J. McMorran, S. Roy, V . Lomakin, and E. E. Fullerton, Resonant properties of dipole skyrmions in amorphous Fe/Gd multilayers, Phys. Rev. B95, 224405 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Mruczkiewicz, P

    M. Mruczkiewicz, P. Gruszecki, M. Zelent, and M. Krawczyk, Collective dynamical skyrmion excitations in a magnonic crys- tal, Phys. Rev. B93, 174429 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Onose, Y

    Y . Onose, Y . Okamura, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura, Ob- servation of magnetic excitations of skyrmion crystal in a he- limagnetic insulator Cu 2OSeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 037603 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Lonsky and A

    M. Lonsky and A. Hoffmann, Dynamic excitations of chiral magnetic textures, APL Mater.8, 100903 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Satywali, V

    B. Satywali, V . P. Kravchuk, L. Pan, M. Raju, S. He, F. Ma, A. P. Petrovic, M. Garst, and C. Panagopoulos, Microwave res- onances of magnetic skyrmions in thin film multilayers, Nat. Commun.12, 1909 (2021)

    1909

  10. [18]

    Schwarze, J

    T. Schwarze, J. Waizner, M. Garst, A. Bauer, I. Stasinopou- los, H. Berger, C. Pfleiderer, and D. Grundler, Universal heli- magnon and skyrmion excitations in metallic, semiconducting and insulating chiral magnets, Nature Mater.14, 478 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Srivastava, Y

    T. Srivastava, Y . Sassi, F. Ajejas, A. Vecchiola, I. Ngouag- nia Yemeli, H. Hurdequint, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V . Cros, T. Devolder, J.-V . Kim, and G. de Loubens, Resonant dynamics of three-dimensional skyrmionic textures in thin film multilayers, APL Materials11, 06111...

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Hubert and R

    A. Hubert and R. Sch ¨afer,Magnetic Domains, The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998). 8

    1998

  13. [21]

    Prestwood, C

    D. Prestwood, C. E. A. Barker, K. D. Stenning, C. W. F. Free- man, T. Wei, T. Kikkawa, T. Dion, D. Stoeffler, Y . Henry, M. Bailleul, N. Naushad, W. Griggs, T. Thomson, M. Cubukcu, J. C. Gartside, E. Saitoh, W. R. Branford, and H. Kurebayashi, Spin wave resonance in yttrium ir...

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    I. S. Camara, S. Tacchi, L.-C. Garnier, M. Eddrief, F. For- tuna, G. Carlotti, and M. Marangolo, Magnetization dynamics of weak stripe domains in fe–n thin films: a multi-technique complementary approach, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter29, 465803 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    A. K. Dhiman, N. Le ´sniewski, R. Gieniusz, J. Kisielewski, P. Mazalski, Z. Kurant, M. Matczak, F. Stobiecki, M. Krawczyk, A. Lynnyk, A. Maziewski, and P. Gruszecki, Reconfigurable magnonic crystals: Spin wave propagation in pt/co multilayer in saturated and stripe domain phas...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Vukadinovic, M

    N. Vukadinovic, M. Labrune, J. B. Youssef, A. Marty, J. C. Toussaint, and H. Le Gall, Ferromagnetic resonance spectra in a weak stripe domain structure, Phys. Rev. B65, 054403 (2001)

    2001

  17. [25]

    Banerjee, P

    C. Banerjee, P. Gruszecki, J. W. Klos, O. Hellwig, M. Krawczyk, and A. Barman, Magnonic band structure in a co/pd stripe domain system investigated by brillouin light scat- tering and micromagnetic simulations, Phys. Rev. B96, 024421 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Ebels, L

    U. Ebels, L. D. Buda, K. Ounadjela, and P. E. Wigen, Small amplitude dynamics of nonhomogeneous magnetization distri- butions: The excitation spectrum of stripe domains, inSpin Dy- namics in Confined Magnetic Structures I, edited by B. Hille- brands and K. Ounadjela (Springer ...

    2002

  19. [27]

    Ramesh and P

    M. Ramesh and P. Wigen, Ferromagnetodynamics of parallel stripe domains - domain walls system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials74, 123 (1988)

    1988

  20. [28]

    Kr ¨uger and S

    F. Kr ¨uger and S. Scheidl, Spin dynamics of stripes, Phys. Rev. B67, 134512 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    G. Leaf, H. Kaper, M. Yan, V . Novosad, P. Vavassori, R. E. Camley, and M. Grimsditch, Dynamic origin of stripe domains, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 017201 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Kisielewski, P

    J. Kisielewski, P. Gruszecki, M. Krawczyk, V . Zablotskii, and A. Maziewski, Between waves and patterns: Spin wave freezing in films with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134416 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Grassi, M

    M. Grassi, M. Geilen, K. A. Oukaci, Y . Henry, D. Lacour, D. Stoeffler, M. Hehn, P. Pirro, and M. Bailleul, Higgs and Goldstone spin-wave modes in striped magnetic texture, Phys. Rev. B105, 094444 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Benaziz, T

    N. Benaziz, T. Devolder, and J.-P. Adam, Method of analysis of the spectra obtained by microfocused brillouin light scattering, Phys. Rev. B112, 144441 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Soumah, N

    L. Soumah, N. Beaulieu, L. Qassym, C. Carr ´et´ero, E. Jacquet, R. Lebourgeois, J. Ben Youssef, P. Bortolotti, V . Cros, and A. Anane, Ultra-low damping insulating magnetic thin films get perpendicular, Nat Commun9, 3355 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    V . J. Fratello, S. E. G. Slusky, C. D. Brandle, and M. P. Norelli, Growth-induced anisotropy in bismuth: Rare-earth iron garnets, Journal of Applied Physics 60, 2488 (1986), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/60/7/2488/18606519/2488 1 online.pdf

    1986

  27. [35]

    Gou ´er´e, H

    D. Gou ´er´e, H. Merbouche, A. El Kanj, F. Kohl, C. Carr ´et´ero, I. Boventer, R. Lebrun, P. Bortolotti, V . Cros, J. Ben Youssef, and A. Anane, Temperature-independent ferromagnetic reso- nance shift in bi-doped yig garnets through magnetic anisotropy tuning, Phys. Rev. Mater...

    2022

  28. [36]

    J. B. Youssef,Characterisation and physical study of bismuth substituted thin garnet films grown by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE), Phd thesis, Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie (1986)

    1986

  29. [37]

    Fakhrul, B

    T. Fakhrul, B. Khurana, H. T. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, Y . Fan, G. A. Riley, L. Liu, and C. A. Ross, Substrate-dependent anisotropy and damping in epitaxial bismuth yttrium iron garnet thin films, Advanced Materials Interfaces10, 2300217 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    S. Das, R. Mansell, L. Flaj ˇsman, L. Yao, and S. van Di- jken, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in bi-substituted yttrium iron garnet films, Journal of Applied Physics 134, 243902 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0184675/18275785/243902 1 5.0184675.pdf

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    M. Liu, Q. Li, C. Song, H. Feng, Y . Song, L. Zhong, L. Pan, C. Zhao, Q. Li, J. Xu, S. Li, J. Wang, Q. Liu, and D. Cao, Mi- crowave excitations and hysteretic magnetization dynamics of stripe domain films, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials547, 168939 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    N ¨ortemann, R

    F. N ¨ortemann, R. L. Stamps, and R. E. Camley, Microscopic calculation of spin waves in antiferromagnetically coupled mul- tilayers: Nonreciprocity and finite-size effects, Physical Review B47, 11910 (1993)

    1993

  33. [41]

    Henry, O

    Y . Henry, O. Gladii, and M. Bailleul, Propagating spin-wave normal modes: A dynamic matrix approach using plane-wave demagnetizating tensors (2016), arXiv:1611.06153

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    K ¨orber, G

    L. K ¨orber, G. Quasebarth, A. Otto, and A. K ´akay, Finite- element dynamic-matrix approach for spin-wave dispersions in magnonic waveguides with arbitrary cross section, AIP Ad- vances11, 095006 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    K ¨orber, G

    L. K ¨orber, G. Quasebarth, A. Hempel, F. Zahn, A. Otto, E. Westphal, R. Hertel, and A. Kakay, TetraX: Finite-Element Micromagnetic-Modeling Package (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Le ´sniewski, Y

    N. Le ´sniewski, Y . Dadoenkova, F. F. L. Bentivegna, and P. Gruszecki, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in thin films enables extraordinary spin-wave phenomena: Anti-larmor pre- cession, negative reflection and refraction, multireflection and multirefraction, ACS Applied Mat...

    2026

  37. [45]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv.4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Leliaert, J

    J. Leliaert, J. Mulkers, J. D. Clercq, A. Coene, M. Dvornik, and B. V . Waeyenberge, Adaptively time stepping the stochas- tic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation at nonzero temperature: Implementation and validation in MuMax 3, AIP Advances7, 125010 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Massouras, S

    M. Massouras, S. Perna, M. D’Aquino, C. Serpico, and J.- V . Kim, Mode-resolved micromagnetics study of parametric spin wave excitation in thin-film disks, Physical Review B110, 064435 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    P. D. Welch, The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Esti- mation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time Averag- ing Over Short, Modified Periodograms, IEEE Trans. Audio & Electroacoust.15, 70 (1967)

    1967

  41. [49]

    Bilzer,Microwave Susceptibility of Thin Ferromagnetic Films: Metrology and Insight into Magnetization Dynamics, Ph.D

    C. Bilzer,Microwave Susceptibility of Thin Ferromagnetic Films: Metrology and Insight into Magnetization Dynamics, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´e Paris-Sud XI (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Jesenska, T

    E. Jesenska, T. Yoshida, K. Shinozaki, T. Ishibashi, L. Beran, M. Zahradnik, R. Antos, M. Ku ˇcera, and M. Veis, Optical and magneto-optical properties of bi substituted yttrium iron garnets prepared by metal organic decomposition, Opt. Mater. Express 6, 1986 (2016). 9 SUPPLEM...

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.