pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08273 · v1 · pith:2ZY5G6GPnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · ✦ hep-ph

Probing Signatures of Right-Handed Neutrinos via b to s ν barν Decays

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords right-handed neutrinosb to s nu nubarBelle IInew physicseffective field theorybranching fractionspolarization fractionflavor anomalies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Belle II measurement of B to K nu nubar constrains right-handed neutrino operators in b to s transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether right-handed neutrinos can explain the recent Belle II measurement showing a deviation in the branching fraction of B+ to K+ nu nubar from Standard Model expectations. It performs a model-independent analysis in the low-energy effective theory restricted to dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos. Combining the Belle II central value with the upper limit on B to K* nu nubar places bounds on the new physics couplings. The resulting parameter space predicts sizeable enhancements in the branching fractions of B to K* nu nubar, Bs to phi nu nubar, and Lambda_b to Lambda nu nubar while the longitudinal polarization fraction F_L^K* supplies independent information on the operator structure. These correlations yield concrete predictions that can be tested at Belle II, LHCb, and FCC-ee.

Core claim

Using the Belle II measurement of B(B+ to K+ nu nubar) together with the upper limit on B(B to K* nu nubar), dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos are constrained in a model-independent way, producing sizeable enhancements in the branching fractions of the studied b to s nu nubar modes and allowing F_L^K* to distinguish among the underlying right-handed neutrino interaction structures.

What carries the argument

Dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos in the effective theory for b to s nu nubar transitions

If this is right

  • Sizeable enhancements appear in B(B to K* nu nubar), B(Bs to phi nu nubar), and B(Lambda_b to Lambda nu nubar).
  • The branching fractions of the different modes exhibit strong correlations.
  • The longitudinal polarization fraction F_L^K* supplies complementary sensitivity to the right-handed neutrino operator structure.
  • Testable signatures are expected at Belle II, LHCb, and the future FCC-ee experiment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted enhancements are observed, the same operator framework could be applied to other flavor-changing processes to search for consistent right-handed neutrino effects.
  • Future high-precision data could resolve the relative sizes of different operator coefficients and thereby identify the dominant interaction structure.
  • The approach could be combined with constraints from neutrino mass generation mechanisms to test whether the same right-handed neutrinos appear in both sectors.

Load-bearing premise

The observed deviation is produced solely by dimension-six vector operators with right-handed neutrinos and receives no significant contributions from other new physics or higher-dimensional operators.

What would settle it

A precision measurement returning the B to K nu nubar branching fraction to the Standard Model value or yielding an F_L^K* value outside the range allowed by the constrained operators would falsify the right-handed neutrino explanation within this setup.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08273 by Dinesh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, Prisha, Priyanka Boora.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Constraints on the WCs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Correlation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Correlations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recent Belle II measurement of $\mathcal{B}(B^+\to K^+\nu\bar{\nu})$, which deviates from the Standard Model prediction, provides a strong motivation to search for New Physics in $b\to s\nu\bar{\nu}$ transitions. We perform a model-independent analysis within the low-energy effective theory, focusing on dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos. Using the Belle II measurement of $\mathcal{B}({B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}})$ together with the upper limit on $\mathcal{B}({B\to K^{*}\nu\bar{\nu}})$, we constrain the new physics interactions. We study the correlation of $\mathcal{B}({B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}})$ with $\mathcal{B}({B\to K^{*}\nu\bar{\nu}})$, $\mathcal{B}({B_s\to\phi\nu\bar{\nu}})$, $\mathcal{B}({\Lambda_b\to\Lambda\nu\bar{\nu}})$, and the longitudinal polarization fraction $F_L^{K^*}$. We find sizeable enhancements in all branching fractions studied, while $F_L^{K^*}$ offers complementary sensitivity to the underlying RHN interaction structure. These results provide testable signatures of right-handed neutrino interactions at Belle~II and LHCb, and at the future FCC-ee experiment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper performs a model-independent analysis in the low-energy effective theory, restricted to dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos. It uses the Belle II central value for B(B+ → K+ νν̄) together with the upper limit on B(B → K* νν̄) to constrain the relevant Wilson coefficients, then examines correlations of this branching fraction with B(B → K* νν̄), B(Bs → φ νν̄), B(Λb → Λ νν̄), and the longitudinal polarization fraction F_L^{K*}. The analysis reports sizeable enhancements in all branching fractions and notes that F_L^{K*} provides complementary sensitivity to the underlying RHN operator structure, yielding testable predictions for Belle II, LHCb, and FCC-ee.

Significance. If the results hold within the stated operator subspace, the work supplies concrete, correlated predictions for multiple b → s νν̄ channels and demonstrates the diagnostic power of F_L^{K*} for distinguishing vector RHN interactions. This directly ties a recent experimental anomaly to future observables and gives credit for the explicit use of the Belle II measurement to fix parameters and derive falsifiable correlations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (operator basis): the headline claims of 'signatures of right-handed neutrino interactions' and the reported correlations rest on the explicit restriction to dimension-six vector operators with RH neutrinos only. No quantitative scan or comparison is provided against scalar/tensor operators or left-handed neutrino contributions that could produce a comparable shift in B(B → K νν̄) while satisfying the B → K* upper limit; without this, the extracted parameter space and predicted enhancements are not shown to be unique to the RHN case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and the recommendation of major revision. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (operator basis): the headline claims of 'signatures of right-handed neutrino interactions' and the reported correlations rest on the explicit restriction to dimension-six vector operators with RH neutrinos only. No quantitative scan or comparison is provided against scalar/tensor operators or left-handed neutrino contributions that could produce a comparable shift in B(B → K νν̄) while satisfying the B → K* upper limit; without this, the extracted parameter space and predicted enhancements are not shown to be unique to the RHN case.

    Authors: Our analysis is explicitly limited to dimension-six vector operators involving right-handed neutrinos, as stated in the title, abstract, and Section 2. The objective is to map out the signatures and correlations that follow within this well-defined subspace, using the Belle II central value and the B → K* upper limit to fix the allowed Wilson coefficients. We do not claim that the resulting enhancements or correlations are unique to right-handed neutrinos, nor do we exclude the possibility that scalar/tensor operators or left-handed neutrino contributions could produce comparable shifts while satisfying the same experimental inputs. Such a broader comparison lies outside the stated scope of the work. The predictions remain testable and falsifiable under the assumptions adopted in the manuscript. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper restricts its scope explicitly to dimension-six vector operators with right-handed neutrinos, fits Wilson coefficients to the Belle II central value (plus the K* upper limit), and then computes correlations and enhancements for other branching fractions and F_L^{K*}. This is standard conditional EFT phenomenology using external data; no equation reduces by construction to a self-definition, no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The operator restriction is stated as an assumption rather than derived, so the derivation chain remains self-contained against the cited experimental inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only limits visibility; the central claim rests on standard EFT assumptions and data-driven constraints on operator coefficients, with no new entities introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Wilson coefficients of vector operators with RH neutrinos
    Fitted or constrained from Belle II branching fraction data to produce the stated bounds and enhancements.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Low-energy effective theory with dimension-six operators is sufficient to describe the b to s nu nubar transitions
    Invoked to justify the model-independent analysis framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5779 in / 1165 out tokens · 18515 ms · 2026-06-27T19:18:49.882851+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Albrecht, D

    J. Albrecht, D. van Dyk and C. Langenbruch,Flavour anomalies in heavy quark decays, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.120(2021) 103885 [arXiv:2107.04822]. 15

  2. [2]

    Crivellin,New Physics in the Flavour Sector, in51st Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, pp

    A. Crivellin,New Physics in the Flavour Sector, in51st Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, pp. 183–188, ARISF, 2016 [arXiv:1605.02934]

  3. [3]

    Botella, G.C

    F.J. Botella, G.C. Branco and M. Nebot,The Hunt for New Physics in the Flavour Sector with up vector-like quarks,JHEP12(2012) 040 [arXiv:1207.4440]

  4. [4]

    Straub,New Physics Searches in Flavour Physics,Nuovo Cim

    D.M. Straub,New Physics Searches in Flavour Physics,Nuovo Cim. C035N1(2012) 249 [arXiv:1107.0266]

  5. [5]

    Buras,Flavour Theory: 2009,PoSEPS-HEP2009(2009) 024 [arXiv:0910.1032]

    A.J. Buras,Flavour Theory: 2009,PoSEPS-HEP2009(2009) 024 [arXiv:0910.1032]

  6. [6]

    Glashow, J

    S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani,Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry,Phys. Rev. D2(1970) 1285

  7. [7]

    Buras, J

    A.J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff and D.M. Straub,B→K (∗)ννdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,JHEP02(2015) 184 [arXiv:1409.4557]

  8. [8]

    Bause, H

    R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz and G. Hiller,Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays,JHEP12(2021) 061 [arXiv:2109.01675]

  9. [9]

    Browder, N.G

    T.E. Browder, N.G. Deshpande, R. Mandal and R. Sinha,Impact of B→Kνν¯ measurements on beyond the Standard Model theories,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 053007 [arXiv:2107.01080]

  10. [10]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and O. Sumensari,Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯),Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138411 [arXiv:2309.02246]

  11. [11]

    Buchalla, A.J

    G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras and M.E. Lautenbacher,Weak Decays beyond Leading Logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys.68(1996) 1125 [hep-ph/9512380]

  12. [12]

    Colangelo, F

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, P. Santorelli and E. Scrimieri,RareB→K (∗) neutrino anti-neutrino decays atBfactories,Phys. Lett. B395(1997) 339 [hep-ph/9610297]

  13. [13]

    Altmannshofer, A.J

    W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, D.M. Straub and M. Wick,New strategies for New Physics search inB→K ∗ν¯ν,B→Kν¯νandB→X sν¯νdecays,JHEP04(2009) 022 [arXiv:0902.0160]

  14. [14]

    Descotes-Genon, S

    S. Descotes-Genon, S. Fajfer, J.F. Kamenik and M. Novoa-Brunet,Implications ofb→sµµ anomalies for future measurements ofB→K (∗)ν¯νandK→πν¯ν,Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135769 [arXiv:2005.03734]. 16 [15]LHCbcollaboration,Test of lepton universality inb→sℓ +ℓ− decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 051803 [arXiv:2212.09152]. [16]BELLEcollaboration,Test of lepton flav...

  15. [15]

    M. Fael, J. Jenkins, E. Lunghi and Z. Polonsky,The Standard Model prediction for the rare decayB→X sνν,JHEP03(2026) 217 [arXiv:2512.19138]

  16. [16]

    Hu and Z.-B

    Q.-Y. Hu and Z.-B. Duan,Influence of invisible light particles onΛb→ΛEmiss,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 095007 [arXiv:2510.05272]

  17. [17]

    D. Das, D. Shameer and R. Sain, Λ b →Λ (∗)ν¯νdecays and the recent Belle-IIB + →K +ν¯ν data,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 1 [arXiv:2507.01863]

  18. [18]

    Rosauro-Alcaraz and L.P.S

    S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L.P.S. Leal,Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K (∗)νν,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 795 [arXiv:2404.17440]. 17

  19. [19]

    Altmannshofer, S.A

    W. Altmannshofer, S.A. Gadam and K. Toner,New strategies for new physics search with Λb→Λνν¯decays,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 075005 [arXiv:2501.10652]

  20. [20]

    Altmannshofer and P

    W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl,New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 952 [arXiv:2103.13370]

  21. [21]

    Buras and P

    A.J. Buras and P. Stangl,On the interplay of constraints fromB s,D, and K meson mixing inZ ′ models with implications forb→sν¯νtransitions,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 519 [arXiv:2412.14254]

  22. [22]

    Felkl, S.L

    T. Felkl, S.L. Li and M.A. Schmidt,A tale of invisibility: constraints on new physics in b→ sνν,JHEP12(2021) 118 [arXiv:2111.04327]

  23. [23]

    Beˇ cirevi´ c, S

    D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, S. Fajfer, N. Koˇ snik and L. Paviˇ ci´ c,Right-handed interactions in puzzling B-decays,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139285 [arXiv:2410.23257]

  24. [24]

    He and G

    X.G. He and G. Valencia,RK(∗)νand non-standard neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B 821(2021) 136607 [arXiv:2108.05033]

  25. [25]

    Crivellin, S

    A. Crivellin, S. Iguro and T. Kitahara,Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯and B→Kνν¯,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 095016 [arXiv:2505.05552]

  26. [26]

    Chen, C.-W

    C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang and L.M.G. de la Vega,Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact onB→Kν νandK→πν νdecays,JHEP09(2025) 055 [arXiv:2503.22431]

  27. [27]

    Altmannshofer, A

    W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia and J. Martin Camalich,Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075008 [arXiv:2311.14629]

  28. [28]

    Wang, H.K

    Z.S. Wang, H.K. Dreiner and J.Y. G¨ unther,The decayB→K+ν+ ¯νat Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 66 [arXiv:2309.03727]

  29. [29]

    Aliev, A

    T.M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz and I. Turan,Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯decays via dark Z resonances,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015025 [arXiv:2503.22347]. [40]Belle-IIcollaboration,Evidence for B+→K+νν¯decays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 112006 [arXiv:2311.14647]. 18 [41]Bellecollaboration,Search forB→hν¯νdecays with semileptonic tagging at Belle,Phys. Rev. D96...

  30. [30]

    Felkl, A

    T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta and M.A. Schmidt,When energy goes missing: new physics in b→sννwith sterile neutrinos,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1135 [arXiv:2309.02940]

  31. [31]

    Escalona, J.P

    P. Escalona, J.P. Pinheiro, V. Oliveira, A. Doff and C.A. De Sousa Pires,Three Decades of FCNC Studies in 3-3-1 Model with Right-Handed Neutrinos: From Z’-Dominance to the Alignment Limit,Universe11(2025) 396 [arXiv:2510.17979]

  32. [32]

    Delle Rose, S

    L. Delle Rose, S. Khalil, S.J.D. King and S. Moretti,R K andR K∗ in an Aligned 2HDM with Right-Handed Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115009 [arXiv:1903.11146]. [47]Particle Data Group Collaborationcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

  33. [33]

    King,Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures, (2025) [arXiv:2502.07877]

    S.F. King,Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures, (2025) [arXiv:2502.07877]

  34. [34]

    Bailey et al.,B→Kl +l− Decay Form Factors from Three-Flavor Lattice QCD,Phys

    J.A. Bailey et al.,B→Kl +l− Decay Form Factors from Three-Flavor Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 025026 [arXiv:1509.06235]

  35. [35]

    Bharucha, D.M

    A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub and R. Zwicky,B→V ℓ +ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules,JHEP08(2016) 098 [arXiv:1503.05534]

  36. [36]

    Detmold and S

    W. Detmold and S. Meinel, Λ b →Λℓ +ℓ− form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with relativisticbquarks,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 074501 [arXiv:1602.01399]. [52]FCCcollaboration,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1468 [arXiv:2505.00272]