Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extracting Mathematical Concepts from Text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.13830 v1 pith:33VP4RSE submitted 2022-08-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords mathematicalcategorycorpusdifferentextractingsentencessmalltext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate different systems for extracting mathematical entities from English texts in the mathematical field of category theory as a first step for constructing a mathematical knowledge graph. We consider four different term extractors and compare their results. This small experiment showcases some of the issues with the construction and evaluation of terms extracted from noisy domain text. We also make available two open corpora in research mathematics, in particular in category theory: a small corpus of 755 abstracts from the journal TAC (3188 sentences), and a larger corpus from the nLab community wiki (15,000 sentences).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Math Natural Language Inference: this should be easy!

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new Math NLI corpus from category theory abstracts plus a ten-model evaluation shows LLM unanimous votes approach human labels (88%) but individual LLMs still make basic math reasoning errors.

Pith tools