Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Pure momentum-shift bulk photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric flat-band Mott insulators

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In flat-band Mott insulators, the strongest shift-current peaks come from momentum-space shift, not real-space displacement.

desk verdict Clever decomposition, but the pure momentum-shift claim in Nb3X8 rests on an unverified Wannier-localizability assumption that can shift under unit-cell choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04624 v2 pith:342ZSMBP submitted 2025-02-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhuocheng Lu , Zhihao Gong , Jingshan Qi , Hua Wang , Kai Chang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords shiftcurrentbulkphotovoltaiceffectflat-bandMottinsulatormomentum-spaceWanniercenterNb3X8monolayersfirst-principlescalculationC3zsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the usual picture of the shift-current photovoltaic effect—a photoexcited wave packet jumping in real space—misses a second mechanism: the shift can happen in momentum space. The authors propose a decomposition that defines the real-space shift as the difference in Wannier centers between the conduction and valence bands, and the momentum-space shift as everything else. Applying first-principles calculations to the flat-band Mott insulators Nb3X8 (X = Cl, Br, I), they find that the strongest peaks in the shift-current spectrum come entirely from the momentum-space shift, with negligible real-space contribution. The reason is that C3z symmetry pins the relevant molecular orbitals to the center of the Nb trimer, so the real-space displacement vanishes. If right, this means large bulk photovoltaic responses can appear in flat-band Mott insulators even when interband polarization differences are minimal.

What carries the argument

The decomposition itself is the key object: starting from the standard shift vector $S^{ab}_{mn}$, define the real-space shift as the difference of Wannier centers $R^{ab}_{mn} = R^a_m - R^a_n$, and define the momentum-space shift as $K^{ab}_{mn} = S^{ab}_{mn} - R^{ab}_{mn}$. This splits $\sigma^{abb}_{SC}$ into $\sigma^{abb}_{R} + \sigma^{abb}_{K}$. The decomposition is gauge-invariant only after fixing a unit cell, and the momentum part is connected to the winding $W^{ab}_{mn}$ of the interband Berry phase; the authors show that in a two-band limit $\sigma^{abb}_{R} = -(e/\hbar) \Delta R^a \epsilon^{bb}(\omega)$, which makes the split experimentally testable.

What would settle it

Compute the Chern numbers of the four isolated bands in the Wannier tight-binding model of Nb3X8; if any is nonzero, $R^a_{mn}$ is not well defined and the $\sigma_R/\sigma_K$ split has no unique meaning. A second check is to repeat the decomposition under the different unit-cell choices the paper says are needed and see whether the fraction of real- vs momentum-space shift changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in Nb3X8 monolayers the maximum peaks of the shift current photoconductivity, $\sigma^{yyy}_{SC}$, originate entirely from the momentum-space shift $K^{ab}_{mn} = S^{ab}_{mn} - R^{ab}_{mn}$, with the real-space shift $R^{ab}_{mn} = R^a_m - R^a_n$ being the difference of Wannier centers. Symmetry analysis shows that $C_{3z}$ forces the occupied $2a_1$ and unoccupied $2a_1$/$2e$ molecular orbitals to sit at the Nb trimer center, making the real-space shift zero; the entire peak then comes from the momentum-space term, which the authors trace to phase winding (optical zeros) in the Brillouin zone. The paper further shows that the magnitude of $\sigma^{yyy}$ tracks the product of the collective shift vector and the imaginary part of the dielectric function, and that injection current is negligible in these materials.

Load-bearing premise

The real-space part of the shift is defined as the difference of Wannier centers, so every band in the calculation must have an exponentially localized Wannier function with a well-defined center; that fails for bands with nonzero Chern number, and the paper does not show that the four isolated bands of Nb3X8 are Chern-trivial.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flat-band Mott insulators can be strong bulk photovoltaic materials even when their interband polarization differences are tiny.
  • The maximum shift-current peak in Nb3X8 is unchanged by deformation and disorder as long as $C_{3z}$ symmetry is preserved.
  • The relation $\sigma^{abb}_{R} = -(e/\hbar) \Delta R^a \epsilon^{bb}(\omega)$ gives a direct way to measure the real-space contribution separately from the total shift current.
  • Screening for large momentum-space shift currents can target materials with symmetry-enforced optical zeros, not just materials with large polarization differences.
  • Nb$_3$I$_8$ has the highest shift-current response because its larger collective shift vector outweighs its slightly smaller dielectric absorption.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decomposition should apply to other $C_{3z}$-symmetric flat-band Mott insulators where charge centers sit at symmetry sites, predicting similar pure momentum-shift responses.
  • Equation (5) offers an experimental handle: measure the dielectric function and the Wannier-center difference separately; if the real-space product does not match the computed $\sigma_R$, the decomposition needs revision.
  • Since the momentum shift is traced to optical zeros in the Brillouin zone, materials with symmetry-enforced zeros at high-symmetry points could be screened computationally for large $K$-shift currents.
  • The robustness claim under $C_{3z}$ hints that disorder preserving $C_{3z}$ will not suppress the effect, but strain that breaks $C_{3z}$ should sharply reduce the peak: a testable prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a decomposition of the shift-current photoconductivity into a real-space contribution, defined as the difference of Wannier centers of the conduction and valence bands, and a momentum-space contribution, defined as the shift vector minus this Wannier-center difference. The authors apply the decomposition to first-principles Wannier-interpolated calculations of Nb3X8 (X = Cl, Br, I) monolayers and report that the maximum peaks in the shift-current spectra arise almost entirely from the momentum-space contribution. They attribute this to C3z symmetry, which places the relevant Nb-trimer molecular orbitals at the trimer center and hence gives zero real-space shift for those transitions. The paper also connects the shift-current magnitude to the product of a collective shift vector and the imaginary part of the dielectric function, and it reports a negligible injection current in these systems.

Significance. If the decomposition is valid, the result is conceptually important: it would provide a first-principles framework for separating real-space and momentum-space shift currents and would demonstrate that large shift-current responses need not be accompanied by sizable interband polarization differences. The numerical work is careful in several respects: the shift-current spectra are computed with a standard Wannier-interpolation approach, the Hubbard-U dependence is explicitly tested for Nb3I8, and the decomposition is checked against a symmetry argument. These strengths make the manuscript a potentially useful contribution to the bulk-photovoltaic-effect literature. However, the central claim rests on the Wannier-center decomposition, whose validity is not established for the four isolated bands; this is the main barrier to acceptance.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The decomposition K^ab_mn = S^ab_mn - R^a_mn presupposes that each band participating in the transitions has a well-defined, exponentially localized Wannier function with a well-defined center. The manuscript repeatedly calls the four low-energy bands 'topological flat bands' (e.g., in the Introduction and in the caption of Fig. 2), but it never reports the Chern numbers or Wilson-loop windings of these bands, nor does it demonstrate that the Wannier90 construction yields localized Wannier functions for them. If any of the four bands has nonzero Chern number, the Wannier center R^a_n is not well-defined and the conclusion that the maximum peaks are pure momentum-space shifts would be an artifact of the Wannierization. I request that the authors compute and report the Chern numbers (or Wilson-loop windings) and the Wannier spread for the four isolated bands, and discuss explicitly whether the bands satisfy the localization condition required by Eq. (3).
  2. [After Eq. (3)] The sentence 'This decomposition remains invariant provided a specific unit cell is chosen' acknowledges but does not resolve the gauge/branch ambiguity. Under a change of Wannier branch, R^a_mn shifts by a lattice vector and K^ab_mn shifts oppositely, so the split sigma_R/sigma_K is not invariant even though the total sigma_SC is. The paper does not specify a unique convention for fixing the Wannier centers, nor does it show that the reported sigma_R/sigma_K ratios at the maximum peaks are independent of this choice. Since the headline claim is precisely that the peak is 'entirely' momentum-space, the decomposition must be shown to be robust to this ambiguity; otherwise the claim is not established.
  3. [Fig. 3] The symmetry argument that C3z places the molecular orbitals at the Nb trimer center establishes the symmetry of the localized molecular-orbital basis, but it does not by itself establish that the Wannier centers of the Bloch bands obtained from the Wannier90 construction coincide with those molecular-orbital centers. In particular, if the Wannier functions are not exponentially localized, their centers can depend on details of the Wannierization procedure. The authors should provide a direct verification, for instance by showing that the Wannier centers of the four isolated bands lie at the trimer center (or at the positions assumed in the text) and that the real-space contribution at the maximum peaks vanishes within numerical accuracy for all three materials.
  4. [Eq. (5)] Equation (5) is presented as a way to make the real-space contribution 'potentially verifiable' because it is a product of the Wannier-center difference and the imaginary part of the dielectric function. However, the Wannier-center difference is not a directly measurable quantity unless a unique Wannier representation is fixed, and the two-band approximation may not be accurate for the energy range containing the maximum peaks. The authors should specify the conditions under which Eq. (5) is intended to hold and how Delta R^a would be determined experimentally or from first principles in a gauge-invariant manner.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The term 'topological flat band' is used without a precise definition; since the central claim depends on band topology, the authors should define what they mean (e.g., nonzero Chern number or finite Wilson-loop winding) and state whether the four isolated bands are topological in that sense.
  2. [Fig. 1] The caption states '(rv, kv) and (rc, kc) denote the centers of wavefunctions for electrons in the valence and conduction bands' but does not define these symbols in the main text; please clarify or add a definition near Eq. (3).
  3. [Fig. 4] The collective shift vector S^yy in Eq. (6) is compared in Fig. 4 with sigma^yy and epsilon^yy, but the text does not explain how the different units are scaled or how the constant factors are chosen; please state the normalization explicitly.
  4. [Supplementary Section B] The Hubbard-U test is performed only for Nb3I8; the authors conclude that the conclusions are robust to U variation, but for the other two materials the U dependence is not shown. A sentence clarifying that the same behavior is expected (or providing the analogous results) would strengthen this point.
  5. [Supplementary Section C] The injection-current spectra in Figs. 6(c-e) are scaled by a factor of ten for comparison, but the scaling is not visible in the figure itself; please indicate the scaling factor in the figures or caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (3) is a definitional decomposition and the pure momentum-shift result follows from C3z symmetry, not from fitting or from a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The shift-current formula (Eq. 2) is the standard Sipe-Shkrebtii expression. The real-space shift is defined as the Wannier-center difference R^a_mn, and the momentum-space shift is then defined by K^ab_mn = S^ab_mn - R^a_mn (Eq. 3), so sigma = sigma_R + sigma_K is a rearrangement, not a fitted identity. The nontrivial first-principles content is that R^a_mn vanishes for the relevant molecular-orbital transitions; the paper gives an independent symmetry argument that C3z places the Nb3 molecular-orbital Wannier centers at the trimer center, producing zero real-space shift. This is an external input (the crystal symmetry and the computed Wannier centers), not an output of the decomposition. No parameter is fitted to the shift-current spectra: Hubbard U = 2 eV and tau = 1e-13 s are literature/conventional values, and the Supplemental Material checks U = 1-3 eV without changing the conclusions. The Wannier-localizability/Chern-number and unit-cell-gauge caveats are validity concerns rather than circularity: they do not make any equation equivalent to its input by construction. The only possible self-citation (footnote 31, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 23 (2024)) is an aside about SnTe and is not load-bearing for the Nb3X8 result. A non-finding with a minor caveat is the appropriate verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard shift-current formula (Sipe-Shkrebtii), the GGA+U description of Nb3X8, and the new Wannier-center decomposition. The decomposition's physical meaning depends on the Wannier localization assumption and the unit-cell choice, which are the paper's weakest premises. No new physical entities are introduced; the momentum-space shift is a rearrangement of existing quantities.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U = 2.0 eV (also 1 and 3 eV tested)
    Chosen to treat Nb 4d correlations in GGA+U; conventional value from prior literature, not fitted to the shift current. Conclusions robust across U.
  • Relaxation time tau = 1.0e-13 s
    Used only for the injection current calculation, not central to the shift current claim.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The shift current photoconductivity formula (Eq. 2) is valid.
    Standard nonlinear response theory in the length gauge, from Refs. 11, 16, 30.
  • domain assumption Nb3X8 monolayers are described by GGA+U with U = 2 eV and a four-band Wannier model.
    Used throughout; tested over U = 1 to 3 eV in the Supplementary, but not benchmarked against experiment.
  • ad hoc to paper The Wannier center difference R^a_mn is a well-defined real-space shift, requiring exponentially localized Wannier functions.
    Central to the decomposition in Eq. (3); not established for bands that may have nonzero Chern number.
  • ad hoc to paper A specific unit cell resolves the Wannier center ambiguity without changing the physics.
    The paper states this in the text after Eq. (3), but does not prove cell-independence of the sigma_R/sigma_K split.
  • standard math The magnetic moment direction does not affect the shift current because it is even under time reversal.
    Symmetry argument given in Section III.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pure momentum-shift bulk photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric flat-band Mott insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/342ZSMBP

@misc{pith2026250204624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pure momentum-shift bulk photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric flat-band Mott insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/342ZSMBP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04624}
}
abstract

The shift current photovoltaic effect is conventionally understood as the real-space displacement of a wave packet induced by photoexcitation. However, this interpretation becomes insufficient in flat-band systems, where quasiparticles are too massive to accelerate in real space under the optical electric field. Here, we developed a physically consistent method to decompose the shift current into real-space and momentum-space components. A surprising pure momentum-space shift current is found theoretically in flat-band Mott insulator Nb$_3$X$_8$ (X = Cl, Br, I) monolayers. This work underscores that significant shift current responses can emerge even in systems with minimal interband polarization differences, highlighting the potential for exploring novel bulk photovoltaic effects in flat-band Mott insulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04624 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Shift current mechanism (a) and two typical con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Crystal structure and band structure of Nb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Shift current spectra of Nb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Collective shift vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band structures (a-c) and shift current spectra (d-f) in Nb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic of injection current mechanism and injection current spectra in Nb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Projector Method for Nonlinear Light-Matter Interactions and Quantum Geometry

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A gauge-invariant projector formalism, implemented in the Wannier basis with finite-spread corrections, computes shift current and quantum geometry in real materials and matches established methods on GeS.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. E. Spanier, V. M. Fridkin, A. M. Rappe, A. R. Akba- shev, A. Polemi, Y. Qi, Z. Gu, S. M. Young, C. J. Haw- ley, D. Imbrenda, G. Xiao, A. L. Bennett-Jackson, and C. L. Johnson, Power conversion efficiency exceeding the Shockley–Queisser limit in a ferroelectric insulator, Nat. Photonics 10, 611 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Dai and A

    Z. Dai and A. M. Rappe, Recent progress in the theory of bulk photovoltaic effect, Chem. Phys. Rev. 4, 011303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    We were surprised to find that the maximum peaks of shift current spectra in Nb 3X8 monolayers originate en- tirely from the momentum-space shift. To illustrate its origin, we separately calculated the contributions of ex- citations from the occupied 2a 1 molecular orbital to the unoccupied 2a 1 and 2e molecular orbitals for the shift current, and plotted...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys

    P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035309 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    S. M. Young and A. M. Rappe, First principles calcu- lation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferro- electrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116601 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of non- linear optical effects in solids, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501524 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Nakamura, S

    M. Nakamura, S. Horiuchi, F. Kagawa, N. Ogawa, T. Ku- rumaji, Y. Tokura, and M. Kawasaki, Shift current pho- tovoltaic effect in a ferroelectric charge-transfer complex, Nat. Commun. 8, 281 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    C.-K. Chan, N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and P. A. Lee, Photocurrents in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 95, 041104 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    J. Ma, Q. Gu, Y. Liu, J. Lai, P. Yu, X. Zhuo, Z. Liu, J.- H. Chen, J. Feng, and D. Sun, Nonlinear photoresponse of type-II Weyl semimetals, Nat. Mater. 18, 476 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Holder, H. Ishizuka, F. De Juan, N. Na- gaosa, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Switchable magnetic bulk photovoltaic effect in the two-dimensional magnet CrI 3, Nat. Commun. 10, 3783 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, and D. Xiao, Tunable layer circular photogalvanic effect in twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077401 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Electrically and magnetically switchable nonlinear photocurrent in PT-symmetric magnetic topological quantum materials, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 199 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    D. Rees, K. Manna, B. Lu, T. Morimoto, H. Borrmann, C. Felser, J. E. Moore, D. H. Torchinsky, and J. Oren- stein, Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0509 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    de Juan, A

    F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals, Nat. Commun. 8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Chaudhary, C

    S. Chaudhary, C. Lewandowski, and G. Refael, Shift- current response as a probe of quantum geometry and electron-electron interactions in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013164 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Twisted photovoltaics at terahertz frequencies from momentum shift current, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013209 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Holder, D

    T. Holder, D. Kaplan, and B. Yan, Consequences of time- reversal-symmetry breaking in the light-matter interac- tion: Berry curvature, quantum metric, and diabatic mo- tion, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033100 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene, Nature 583, 215 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Z. Sun, H. Zhou, C. Wang, S. Kumar, D. Geng, S. Yue, X. Han, Y. Haraguchi, K. Shimada, P. Cheng, L. Chen, Y. Shi, K. Wu, S. Meng, and B. Feng, Observation of topological flat bands in the kagome semiconductor Nb3Cl8, Nano Lett. 22, 4596 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Regmi, T

    S. Regmi, T. Fernando, Y. Zhao, A. P. Sakhya, G. Dhakal, I. Bin Elius, H. Vazquez, J. D. Denlinger, J. Yang, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, T. Cao, and M. Neupane, Spectroscopic evidence of flat bands in breathing kagome semiconductor Nb3I8, Commun. Mater. 3, 100 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    S. Gao, S. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Yan, X. Han, X. Ji, W. Tao, J. Liu, T. Wang, S. Yuan, G. Qu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Huang, M. Pan, S. Peng, Y. Hu, H. Li, Y. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Meng, L. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, Z. Chen, M. Shi, H. Ding, H. Yang, K. Jiang, Y. Li, H. Lei, Y. Shi, H. W...

    2023

  20. [28]

    L. Feng, X. Chen, and J. Qi, Nonvolatile electric field con- trol of spin-valley-layer polarized anomalous Hall effect in a two-dimensional multiferroic semiconductor bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115407 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Grytsiuk, M

    S. Grytsiuk, M. I. Katsnelson, E. G. V. Loon, and M. R¨ osner, Nb 3Cl8: A prototypical layered mott- hubbard insulator, npj Quantum Materials 9, 8 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a mott in- sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Aversa and J

    C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Nonlinear optical susceptibili- ties of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge anal- ysis, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14636 (1995)

    1995

  24. [32]

    We observe that a divergent shift vector and zero absorp- tion result in a finite shift current in the SnTe monolayer [npj Comput. Mater. 10, 23 (2024)]. Therefore, while op- tical transitions induce a large real-space shift due to 6 the dispersive nature of the bands, the mom...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Rangel, B

    T. Rangel, B. M. Fregoso, B. S. Mendoza, T. Mori- moto, J. E. Moore, and J. B. Neaton, Large bulk photo- voltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 067402 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    B. M. Fregoso, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quanti- tative relationship between polarization differences and the zone-averaged shift photocurrent, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075421 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, S

    J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, S. S. Tsirkin, and I. Souza, Ab Initio calculation of the shift photocurrent by Wannier interpo- lation, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245143 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    F. A. Cotton, Metal atom clusters in oxide systems, In- org. Chem. 3, 1217 (1964)

    1964

  30. [38]

    B. E. Bursten, F. A. Cotton, M. B. Hall, and R. C. Naj- jar, Survey of the bonding in several structural types of trinuclear molybdenum and tungsten cluster compounds, Inorg. Chem. 21, 302 (1982)

    1982

  31. [39]

    J. R. Kennedy, P. Adler, R. Dronskowski, and A. Si- mon, Experimental and theoretical electronic structure investigations on α-Nb3Cl8 and the intercalated phase B′-NaNb3Cl8, Inorg. Chem. 35, 2276 (1996)

    1996

  32. [40]

    J. P. Sheckelton, K. W. Plumb, B. A. Trump, C. L. Bro- holm, and T. M. McQueen, Rearrangement of van der waals stacking and formation of a singlet state at T = 90 K in a cluster magnet, Inorg. Chem. Front.4, 481 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Haraguchi, C

    Y. Haraguchi, C. Michioka, M. Ishikawa, Y. Nakano, H. Yamochi, H. Ueda, and K. Yoshimura, Magnetic– nonmagnetic phase transition with interlayer charge dis- proportionation of Nb 3 trimers in the cluster compound Nb3Cl8, Inorg. Chem. 56, 3483 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Jiang, Q

    J. Jiang, Q. Liang, R. Meng, Q. Yang, C. Tan, X. Sun, and X. Chen, Exploration of new ferromagnetic, semi- conducting and biocompatible Nb 3X8 (X = Cl, Br or I) monolayers with considerable visible and infrared light absorption, Nanoscale 9, 2992 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    J. Hu, X. Zhang, C. Hu, J. Sun, X. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, and G. Li, Correlated flat bands and quantum spin liquid state in a cluster Mott insulator, Commun Phys 6, 172 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- wei...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.