$q$-Deformed Topological Recursion: Quantum Curves and Non-perturbative Analysis

Fridolin Melong; Raimar Wulkenhaar

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

$q$-Deformed Topological Recursion: Quantum Curves and Non-perturbative Analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a complete classification of admissible (r, s, q) pairs and q-Casimir configurations for which the non-perturbative connected q-amplitudes of a q-difference quantum curve are uniquely determined by shifted q-topologic

desk verdict The r≡±1 mod s classification is a genuine, interesting result backed by real determinant work, but Lemma 4.5's q-Sylvester invertibility claim is under-proved and the Section 3 half-genus bookkeeping is inconsistent; both need fixing before the main theorem can be taken as a classification of (r,s,q) pairs. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02179 v1 pith:34IPROTB submitted 2026-08-03 math-ph math.AGmath.MPmath.RT

Fridolin Melong , Raimar Wulkenhaar This is my paper

classification math-ph math.AGmath.MPmath.RT MSC 81T4537K1039A1314N1017B68

keywords q-deformed topological recursionquantum spectral curvesq-WKBAiry structuresq-loop equationstopological type propertyq-Casimir configurationsnon-perturbative amplitudes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks when the formal expansion of a q-difference quantum curve is uniquely governed by the q-deformed topological recursion, and answers with a sharp classification: the expansion exists and is unique if and only if the integer parameters (r, s) satisfy r ≡ ±1 (mod s) (or s = 1), with strict restrictions on the allowed q-Casimir shifts in each case. To reach this, the authors construct an all-order q-WKB solution for the associated matrix system, show the resulting non-perturbative connected q-amplitudes satisfy shifted q-loop equations, and identify those equations as Ward identities of a q-deformed W(gl_r) algebra. The classification matters because it tells exactly which quantum spectral curves admit a well-defined semi-classical expansion and which do not, thereby mapping the boundary of the q-deformed correspondence between geometry and integrable systems. A sympathetic reader would care because this converts a formal recursion into a concrete criterion about arithmetic conditions on (r, s) and the q-Casimir data, with direct consequences for the possible quantizations of a given spectral curve.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the q-topological type property, a refinement of the classical topological type property that controls when the q-amplitudes are uniquely determined by the q-topological recursion. Its work is carried by three objects: the all-order q-WKB gauge transformation that diagonalizes the q-connection via the q-Sylvester operator (requiring the non-resonance condition y_i(z) ≠ y_j(avg z) with avg z = (qz + q^{-1}z)/2), the q-Master Matrix M_ℏ = Ψ_ℏ E Ψ_ℏ^{-1} built from the q-WKB solution, and the q-deformed Cauchy kernel whose poles at z_1 = q z_2 and z_1 = q^{-1}z_2 yield the q-Bergman kernel ω^q_{0,2} = dz_1 dz_2 / ((z_1 - q z_2)(z_1 - q^{-1}z_2)). The refined q-Assumptio

What would settle it

For the non-admissible pair (r, s) = (7, 5) treated in the paper, compute the q-perturbed characteristic expression D_q(z, M) − D_q(z, 0) at order ℏ^2 with only S^ℏ_1 nonzero: the paper predicts a pole at z = 0 whose order exceeds the cancellation power of the q-Jacobian. If a direct calculation shows this pole is actually cancelled by contributions the paper discards, the necessity claim of the classification would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is the classification theorem: for coprime r and s with 1 ≤ r'' < s (r = r's + r''), the formal topological expansion coefficients ω^q_{g,n} of the non-perturbative connected q-amplitudes W^q_n are uniquely, non-trivially, and recursively determined by the shifted q-topological recursion if and only if one of three structural conditions holds: (i) s = 1 with arbitrary q-Casimir configurations; (ii) r ≡ 1 (mod s) with the higher q-Casimirs S^ℏ_j vanishing for all j > 1; or (iii) r ≡ −1 (mod s) with s > 2 and all q-Casimirs S^ℏ_j zero. The paper establishes this by constructing the q-WKB solution, deriving the shifted q-loop equations, and proving a refined 'q-topological type p

Load-bearing premise

The all-order q-WKB solution exists only if the q-Sylvester operator is invertible, i.e., the eigenvalues y_i(z) and y_j(avg z) never coincide for i ≠ j away from the q-ramification points; the paper states this is guaranteed but does not prove the absence of additional q-Stokes loci, so the formal construction is valid only on an unspecified domain, and the classification also relies on an imported existence/uniqueness theorem for shifted q-topological recursion that is not

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For s = 1 and s = r − 1, varying the shift parameters reconstructs all possible operator orderings of the q-quantum curve, giving a complete dictionary between shift data and quantization choices.
For intermediate 1 < s < r − 1 with r ≡ 1 (mod s), only partial ordering freedom remains; for r ≡ −1 (mod s), the quantization is rigid (only the trivial shifts).
The q-topological expansion naturally contains half-integer genus sectors (all powers of ℏ, not just even powers), so the q-deformation breaks the classical ℏ ↔ −ℏ parity while preserving recursive solvability when the arithmetic conditions are met.
The non-perturbative q-loop equations are shown to be the Ward identities of a q-deformed W(gl_r) algebra, linking the recursion to infinite-dimensional symmetry algebras.
The classification limits which (r, s, q) systems admit a well-defined topological expansion; outside the admissible set, even the primary q-Casimir generates poles that the spectral curve cannot cancel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The arithmetic condition r ≡ ±1 (mod s) likely applies beyond the explicit (r, s, q)-family: any q-difference connection whose leading Lax matrix has the same block-companion structure should face the same pole obstruction, making the condition a general feature of q-deformed topological recursion.
The unproven non-resonance assumption in the q-WKB construction (Lemma 4.5) leaves open the possibility of q-Stokes loci where eigenvalues collide under the averaged shift; checking this for small admissible examples like (r, s) = (5, 2) could determine the true domain of the formal expansion.
The appearance of half-integer genus sectors suggests the q-amplitudes may correspond to K-theoretic or refined invariants in enumerative geometry, a connection the paper does not make explicit.
The full Casimir freedom in the s = 1 case means the same classical curve admits many inequivalent quantizations; comparing spectral determinants of the different q-difference operators would give a concrete test of this moduli space.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a real paper with a genuine new result—the r≡±1 mod s classification for q-deformed (r,s) systems, backed by an explicit pole-order computation (Prop 4.35) and a plausible q-WKB construction. It builds on the authors' earlier q-Airy work rather than introducing a whole new framework, and the determinant computation is concrete enough to give the classification independent support.

The main theorem (4.38) is an iff statement about (r,s,q) pairs, yet q barely appears in its conditions. The sufficiency direction runs through Lemma 4.5, and that lemma's invertibility claim is not adequate. The q-Sylvester operator on Fourier modes multiplies the (i,j) entry by ϑ^j − ϑ^i C^k for all k∈Z; the stated non-resonance condition y_i(z)≠y_j(avg z) only checks k=s−r. For q with C=(q+q^{−1})/2 a root of unity, other modes resonate (e.g. r=3, C a primitive sixth root, k=2), and the formal gauge transformation breaks down. Such q are not roots of unity. Since the theorem claims to classify all (r,s,q), this gap is load-bearing, not cosmetic. The fix may be easy—exclude a finite q-locus, or prove invertibility fails only there—but the current statement is too strong.

Second soft spot: the genus-index and ℏ-power bookkeeping in Section 3 is internally inconsistent. Definition 3.14 and Lemma 3.15 use integer g sums, while Example 3.26, Lemma 3.17, and Remark 4.19 use half-integer sectors. Since the shifted q-Airy structure has nonzero S_{i,1}, half-genus terms are not optional; the summation must be tracked uniformly. This looks fixable by reindexing, but right now the quantum curve derivation is not one coherent proof.

The import of Theorem 2.8 from [30] is a genuine dependency, not a circular loop, assuming that paper holds up. The "proofs by assertion" in Lemma 3.13 and the trace normalization in Lemma 4.22 are thinner than the rest; Appendix D hand-waves the key step.

Who benefits: people working on q-deformed topological recursion, 5D gauge theory, and refined topological strings. It deserves a serious referee—the classification is important if fixed. I would not cite it in its current form; I would send it back for revision and ask the authors to pin down the q-locus in Lemma 4.5 and make the half-genus indexing consistent.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a q-deformed analogue of the Bergère–Eynard–Marchal framework, combining (r,s)-Airy structures, shifted q-topological recursion and q-difference quantum curves. In §3 the authors construct an all-order q-WKB solution for a rational q-connection and derive shifted q-loop equations, arriving at an explicit q-difference quantum-curve operator. In §4 they reverse the logic: starting from the q-difference system they define non-perturbative connected q-amplitudes via a q-Master Matrix, prove that these amplitudes satisfy non-perturbative q-loop equations, and introduce a refined q-Topological Type property. The main result, Theorem 4.38, is an if-and-only-if classification of the (r,s,q) pairs and q-Casimir configurations for which the formal topological expansion is uniquely and recursively determined by the shifted q-topological recursion: (i) s=1 with arbitrary q-Casimir configurations; (ii) r≡1 (mod s) with S^ℏ_j=0 for j>1; or (iii) r≡−1 (mod s), s>2, with all S^ℏ_j=0. A substantial part of the algebraic foundation is imported from the companion paper [30], especially Theorem 2.8.

Significance. If the main claims are correct, this would be a meaningful extension of topological recursion to q-difference systems, with a concrete, falsifiable classification of admissible pairs. The explicit pole-order/determinant analysis in Proposition 4.35 is a valuable and unusual feature, as are the worked examples (5,2), (7,4) and the non-admissible (7,5). The paper also gives an explicit split-pole q-Bergman kernel and a clear statement of the q-topological type property, making the structure easy to test. However, two load-bearing technical points—the invertibility locus of the q-Sylvester operator in Lemma 4.5 and the genus-index bookkeeping in the §3 q-WKB summation—are not resolved in the submitted version, and the proof of the base case Lemma 4.22 is only a sketch. These gaps prevent acceptance in the current form, but they appear to be local and potentially fixable.

major comments (3)

[§4.1, Lemma 4.5, Eq. (4.24)] The formal diagonalization requires the q-Sylvester operator L_{q,Y0}: M ↦ M Y0(z) − Y0(z) M(avg z) to be invertible on off-diagonal matrices. With Y0 diagonal as in Lemma 4.3, substituting M_{ij}(z)=c z^k gives the eigenvalue y_j(z) − C^k y_i(z), where C=(q+q^{-1})/2. The non-resonance condition stated in Lemma 4.5, y_i(z)≠y_j(avg z), addresses only the single Fourier mode k=s−r. It does not control the infinite set of modes k∈Z. For q with C^m=1 and μ_r⊂μ_m, resonances occur; for example r=3, C a primitive sixth root of unity, k=2 gives ϑ^j=ϑ^i C^2. Such q exist and need not be roots of unity. At those q, Eq. (4.23) has no unique solution at some order, so the formal gauge transformation (4.17)–(4.18), the q-Master Matrix expansion (Prop. 4.10), the non-perturbative q-loop equations (Prop. 4.15), and the identification with shifted q-TR (Thm. 4.20) are not established. Since Theorem 4.
[§3.2.2–§3.2.4: Def. 3.14, Lemma 3.15, Lemma 3.17, Thm. 3.24, Ex. 3.26] The genus-index conventions are inconsistent across the q-WKB summation. Definition 3.14 defines ξ_{i,q} as a sum over 'all g,n' without specifying whether g ranges over Z_{≥0} or (1/2)Z_{≥0}. Lemma 3.15 sums over integer g, while Lemma 3.17 and Example 3.26 include sums over g≥1/2, and Theorem 3.24 sums over g≥1. The paper itself declares in Remark 4.19 that half-genus sectors are generic for q-difference systems, and the partition function (2.9) includes g∈(1/2)N. The resulting ℏ-powers of the shift constants S_{i,2g} differ between formulas, so the quantum-curve operator of Theorem 3.24 is not an unambiguous consequence of the preceding resummation. This affects the claim of an all-order q-WKB construction and the quantum-curve correspondence in §3. The indexing must be fixed or the half-genus sectors must be shown to drop out in this part of the derivation.
[Appendix D / Lemma 4.22] Lemma 4.22 states the base case of the q-topological type property: the leading-order two-point correlator is exactly the split-pole q-Bergman kernel. This is a hard input for the recursion and for Proposition 4.33. The proof in Appendix D, however, is a sketch: after reducing to a determinant derivative via Jacobi’s formula, it says only that 'the algebraic contraction fixes the normalization constant to unity,' without specifying T(z1,z2) or computing the trace/adjugate contraction. Since condition (c) of Definition 4.17 and the subsequent identification with q-TR both require this kernel exactly, the computation should be supplied, or the split-pole form should be stated explicitly as an additional assumption (it already appears as part of Definition 2.2).

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (4.17)] The notation $\vec Y_{\ell\ge 1}$ and the ordered product are not defined; the branch of the matrix exponential/logarithm and the convergence/formal meaning should be specified.
[§4.1, Eq. (4.18)] 'avg z' is used in the formula before it is defined; define $M_{q,x}$ and $\operatorname{avg} z$ consistently in one place.
[Thm. 3.24, Eq. (3.75)] The operator ordering in $[D_{r,q}\cdots D_{i,q}]$ is not defined; clarify whether it is simple concatenation, q-Weyl ordered, or some other prescription.
[Throughout] There are several typos and consistency issues: 'refered' in the proof of Lemma 3.5, 'Functio nal' in the Section 3.3 heading, 'Wiht copy' in the author email footer, and the shift constants are denoted both S_{i,n} and S_{i,\ell}.
[Theorem 2.8] Theorem 2.8 is quoted from the companion paper [30] without proof. This is acceptable as a dependency, but the manuscript should state explicitly that the main classification theorem is conditional on the correctness of [30] and on the applicability of that theorem to the present shifted q-spectral curves.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central derivation is self-contained, with [30] as an external dependency rather than an internal loop.

full rationale

The main classification (Thm 4.38) is not a renamed input or a fitted prediction. The necessity direction rests on the independent determinant pole-order analysis of Prop 4.35, which derives the constraints r'' in {1,s-1} and vanishing of higher q-Casimirs from regularity of the q-perturbed characteristic expression. The sufficiency direction is supported in-paper by the induction in Thm 4.20, which shows that the q-loop equations plus the q-topological type property force the expansion coefficients to satisfy the q-topological recursion; uniqueness there follows by decreasing Euler characteristic, not by importing the conclusion. The cited Theorems 2.7 and 2.8 from the authors' prior work [30] supply the existence and uniqueness of the shifted q-topological recursion framework and the q-loop equations; this is a dependency on earlier work, but the paper does not assume the classification and then re-derive it. The q-Sylvester invertibility in Lemma 4.5 is asserted with a non-resonance condition that is not fully analyzed (for example, additional q-resonances at certain roots of unity are not ruled out); this is an analytic gap or correctness risk, not a circular reduction. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, and no central equation is definitionally equivalent to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No empirical data are fitted; the 'free parameters' are the shift/Casimir constants whose admissibility is the paper's output. The key axioms are the split-pole q-Bergman kernel, the centered q-connection/gauge action, and the imported existence theorem from [30]. The non-resonance condition is an unproved domain assumption. No new physical entities with external evidence are introduced.

free parameters (1)

Shift/Casimir constants S_{i,2g} (and q-Casimir functions S^ℏ_j(z)) = Not fitted; formal constants constrained by s-consistency and by the classification
Introduced in (2.6) and Example 4.2 to parameterize operator orderings; the classification decides which are admissible, but their values are not derived from first principles.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the shifted q-topological recursion correlators and q-Airy structure (Theorem 2.8 of the present paper, proved in [30]).
Used to define the wave function (3.46) and the recursion (2.23); this is the load-bearing imported result.
ad hoc to paper The q-deformed Bergman kernel has the split-pole form dz1 dz2 / ((z1−qz2)(z1−q^{-1}z2)).
Postulated in Definition 2.2 and used as the fundamental bidifferential (Lemma 4.22); the recursion kernel (2.22) and the classification's pole analysis depend on this exact form.
ad hoc to paper The centered gauge action (4.18) with average point avg z=(qz+q^{-1}z)/2 is the correct q-analogue of the classical gauge transformation for ∇_{q,ℏ}.
Used in Lemma 4.5 to construct the formal diagonalization; the standard q-difference gauge action would involve U(qz) and U(q^{-1}z) separately.
standard math Standard residue theorem, Vieta's formulas, Vandermonde inversion, and the q-derivative identities (1.1)-(1.4).
Used throughout the proof of Lemma 3.9, Proposition 4.35, and Appendices A-C.
domain assumption The non-resonance condition y_i(z) ≠ y_j(avg z) for i≠j away from q-ramification points.
Needed for invertibility of the q-Sylvester operator in Lemma 4.5; asserted without proof.

invented entities (3)

Centered q-ℏ-connection ∇_{q,ℏ} = M_{q,x}·Q̂ − L(x,ℏ;q)
purpose: Defines the matrix system whose WKB solutions yield the q-amplitudes
New definition (4.1); no external falsifiable handle.
q-Master Matrix M_ℏ(z,E)=Ψ_ℏ(z)EΨ_ℏ(z)^{-1}
purpose: Generator of non-perturbative connected q-amplitudes and q-loop equations
Definition (4.34); internal to the formalism.
q-Casimir functions S^ℏ_j(z)
purpose: Parametrize admissible deformations/quantizations; the classification constrains them
Formal series in Example 4.2; no independent prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $q$-Deformed Topological Recursion: Quantum Curves and Non-perturbative Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/34IPROTB

@misc{pith2026260802179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $q$-Deformed Topological Recursion: Quantum Curves and Non-perturbative Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/34IPROTB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02179}
}

abstract

This work investigates the $q$-deformation of $(r,s)$-Airy structures and their realization via $q$-difference operators, providing a bridge between quantum spectral curves and integrable systems. We construct an all-order $q$-WKB solution for the matrix systems associated with the $q$-quantized curve $E_q(x,y)=0$. We demonstrate that the resulting non-perturbative connected $q$-amplitudes satisfy a set of shifted $q$-loop equations, which can be interpreted as the Ward identities of a $q$-deformed $\mathcal{W}(\mathfrak{gl}_r)$ algebra. Our main result provides a rigorous classification of admissible $(r,s,q)$ pairs and $q$-Casimir configurations that satisfy the $q$-topological type property. This ensures that the semi-classical expansion is uniquely governed by the $q$-topological recursion, offering new insights into the $q$-quantization of mirror curves and their underlying algebraic structures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith

[30]

Melong and R

F. Melong and R. Wulkenhaar,q-Deformed Topological Recursion, Weight Vectors and Algebraic Struc- tures, preprint arXiv:2606.16441 (2026)

arXiv 2026
[1]

T. Aoki, T. Kawai and Y. Takei. Exact WKB analysis of non-adiabatic transition probabilities for three levels.J. Phys. A35(10), 2401–2430 (2002)

2002
[2]

Belliard

R. Belliard. A renormalised description of meromorphic connections over curves (2024). arXiv:2402.13362

arXiv 2024
[3]

Belliard, B

R. Belliard, B. Eynard and O. Marchal. Integrable differential systems of topological type and recon- struction by the topological recursion.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e18(10), 3193–3248 (2017)

2017
[4]

Belliard, B

R. Belliard, B. Eynard and O. Marchal. Loop equations from differential systems on curves.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e19(1), 141–161 (2018)

2018
[5]

Belliard, V

R. Belliard, V. Bouchard, R. Kramer and T. Nelson. Highest weight vectors, shifted topological recursion and quantum curves.Commun. Math. Phys.406, 274 (2025)

2025
[6]

Berg` ere and B

M. Berg` ere and B. Eynard. Determinantal formulae and loop equations (2009). arXiv:0901.3273

arXiv 2009
[7]

Berg` ere, G

M. Berg` ere, G. Borot and B. Eynard. Rational differential systems, loop equations, and application to theqth reductions of KP.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e16(12), 2713–2782 (2015)

2015

Show all 32 references

[8]

Borot, V

G. Borot, V. Bouchard, N.K. Chidambaram and T. Creutzig. Whittaker vectors forW-algebras from topological recursion.Selecta Math. (N.S.)30(2), 33–91 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-024- 00921-x. arXiv:2104.04516

2024 arXiv
[9]

Borot, V

G. Borot, V. Bouchard, N.K. Chidambaram, T. Creutzig and D. Noshchenko. Higher Airy struc- tures,Walgebras and topological recursion.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.296(1476), 108 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1476. arXiv:1812.08738

2024 arXiv
[10]

Borot, V

G. Borot, V. Bouchard, N.K. Chidambaram, R. Kramer and S. Shadrin. Taking limits in topological recursion.J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)112(3), Paper No. e70286 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.70286. arXiv:2309.01654

2025
[11]

Borot, R

G. Borot, R. Kramer and Y. Sch¨ uler. Higher Airy structures and topological recursion for sin- gular spectral curves.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e D(2023). https://doi.org/10.4171/AIHPD/168. arXiv:2010.03512

2023 arXiv
[12]

Bott and L

R. Bott and L. W. Tu.Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 82, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982

1982
[13]

Bouchard

V. Bouchard. Les Houches lecture notes on topological recursion (2024). arXiv:2409.06657

2024
[14]

Bouchard and B

V. Bouchard and B. Eynard. Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion.J. ´Ec. polytech. Math.4, 845–908 (2017)

2017
[15]

Bouchard, T

V. Bouchard, T. Creutzig and A. Joshi. Airy ideals, transvections andW(sp 2N )-algebras.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e25(5), (2024)

2024
[16]

Cartan.Formes diff´ erentielles, Hermann, Paris, 1967

H. Cartan.Formes diff´ erentielles, Hermann, Paris, 1967

1967
[17]

Chari and A

V. Chari and A. Pressley.A Guide to Quantum Groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

1994
[18]

Chekhov, B

L. Chekhov, B. Eynard and N. Orantin. Free energy topological expansion for the 2-matrix model.J. High Energy Phys.2006(12), 1–31 (2006)

2006
[19]

Eynard, E

B. Eynard, E. Garcia-Failde, O. Marchal and N. Orantin. Quantization of classical spectral curves via topological recursion.Comm. Math. Phys.405(5), 116–118 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024- 04997-6. arXiv:2106.04339

2024 arXiv
[20]

Eynard, M

B. Eynard, M. Mulase and B. Safnuk. The Laplace transform of the cut-and-join equation and the Bouchard-Mari˜ no conjecture on Hurwitz numbers.Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.47(2), 629–670 (2011)

2011
[21]

Eynard and N

B. Eynard and N. Orantin. Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion.Commun. Number Theory Phys.1(2), 347–452 (2007)

2007
[22]

Eynard and N

B. Eynard and N. Orantin. Topological recursion in enumerative geometry and random matrices.J. Phys. A42(29), 293001-117 (2009)

2009
[23]

Gasper and M

G. Gasper and M. Rahman.Basic Hypergeometric Series, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2004

2004
[24]

Iwaki, O

K. Iwaki, O. Marchal and A. Saenz. Painlev´ e equations, topological type property and reconstruction by the topological recursion.J. Geom. Phys.124, 16–54 (2018)

2018
[25]

Kac and P

V. Kac and P. Cheung.Quantum Calculus, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

2002
[26]

Kontsevich and Y

M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman. Airy structures and symplectic geometry of topological recursion. Topological recursion and its influence in analysis, geometry, and topology.Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 100, 433–489 (2018). arXiv:1701.09137

2018 arXiv
[27]

R. Kramer. Cycles of curves, cover counts, and central invariants,Universiteit van Amsterdam(2019), 328pp. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/588b7706-082d-4836-9cf7-7ca5025f3d64

2019
[28]

Lang.Fundamentals of Differential Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol

S. Lang.Fundamentals of Differential Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 191, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1999. 51

1999
[29]

J. M. Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 218, Springer- Verlag, New York, 2013

2013
[31]

Sole and V.G

A. Sole and V.G. Kac. Finite vs affineW-algebras.Japan. J. Math.1(1), 137–261 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11537-006-0505-2. arXiv:math-ph/0511055

2006 arXiv
[32]

Spivak.Calculus on Manifolds: A Modern Approach to Classical Theorems of Advanced Calculus, Westview Press, New York, 1965

M. Spivak.Calculus on Manifolds: A Modern Approach to Classical Theorems of Advanced Calculus, Westview Press, New York, 1965. Mathematisches Institut der Universit¨at M¨unster Einsteinstr. 62, 48149 M¨unster, Germany, e-mail:fridolin.melong@uni-muenster.de (Wiht copy to frido...

1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [30]

Melong and R

F. Melong and R. Wulkenhaar,q-Deformed Topological Recursion, Weight Vectors and Algebraic Struc- tures, preprint arXiv:2606.16441 (2026)

arXiv 2026

[2] [1]

T. Aoki, T. Kawai and Y. Takei. Exact WKB analysis of non-adiabatic transition probabilities for three levels.J. Phys. A35(10), 2401–2430 (2002)

2002

[3] [2]

Belliard

R. Belliard. A renormalised description of meromorphic connections over curves (2024). arXiv:2402.13362

arXiv 2024

[4] [3]

Belliard, B

R. Belliard, B. Eynard and O. Marchal. Integrable differential systems of topological type and recon- struction by the topological recursion.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e18(10), 3193–3248 (2017)

2017

[5] [4]

Belliard, B

R. Belliard, B. Eynard and O. Marchal. Loop equations from differential systems on curves.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e19(1), 141–161 (2018)

2018

[6] [5]

Belliard, V

R. Belliard, V. Bouchard, R. Kramer and T. Nelson. Highest weight vectors, shifted topological recursion and quantum curves.Commun. Math. Phys.406, 274 (2025)

2025

[7] [6]

Berg` ere and B

M. Berg` ere and B. Eynard. Determinantal formulae and loop equations (2009). arXiv:0901.3273

arXiv 2009

[8] [7]

Berg` ere, G

M. Berg` ere, G. Borot and B. Eynard. Rational differential systems, loop equations, and application to theqth reductions of KP.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e16(12), 2713–2782 (2015)

2015