Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Soliton resolution for the coupled complex short pulse equation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that soliton-supporting solutions of the coupled complex short pulse equation decompose into solitons or breathers plus a $t^{-1/2}$ radiation tail, with pure $t^{-1}$ decay in the forward region.

desk verdict Serious dbar steepest descent treatment of ccSP soliton resolution, but Appendix A leaves the radiation term unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22210 v1 pith:34O2K6FF submitted 2025-05-28 nlin.SI math-phmath.APmath.MP

Nan Liu , Ran Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q1535Q5137K15
keywords coupledcomplexshortpulseequationsolitonresolutionconjecturelong-timeasymptoticsRiemann–Hilbertproblemd-barsteepestdescentmethodself-symmetriccompositebreather4x4matrixLaxpair
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to settle the soliton resolution picture for the coupled complex short pulse (ccSP) equation, the two-polarization model for femtosecond pulse propagation in birefringent optical fibers. For Schwartz-class initial data that support solitons, it claims a complete long-time asymptotic description: in the space-time region $\zeta/t < -\varepsilon$ the solution is a superposition of self-symmetric solitons or composite breathers travelling at their own speeds, plus a $t^{-1/2}$ radiation term and a residual error $O(t^{-1}\ln t)$; in the region $\zeta/t > \varepsilon$ every component decays like $t^{-1}$. If true, this verifies the soliton resolution conjecture for an integrable system whose Lax pair is a $4\times 4$ matrix, and it converts the previously formal decomposition 'solitons plus radiation' into an explicit, checkable formula.

What carries the argument

The engine is the $\bar\partial$-generalization of the nonlinear steepest descent method, applied to the $4\times 4$ Riemann–Hilbert problem whose jump matrix carries the reflection coefficient $\rho(k)$ and whose residue conditions carry the norming constant matrices $C_n$ at the discrete eigenvalues $k_n$. The phase function $\theta(\hat\zeta;k) = \hat\zeta k - 1/(4k)$ has two stationary points $\pm k_0$ exactly when $\hat\zeta = \zeta/t < 0$, which is why the negative region requires local model problems while the positive region does not. The argument proceeds by a chain of transformations: conjugation by the functions $\delta_j(k)$ and $T(k)$ to normalize residues, non-analytic extension of the jump matrices off the real axis (producing a $\bar\partial$-problem with explicitly bounded $\bar\partial$-derivatives), and a split into a pure Riemann–Hilbert part, solved by an outer soliton/breather model plus parabolic-cylinder models near $\pm k_0$, and a pure $\bar\partial$ part whose integral operator norm decays like $t^{-1/6}$. The reconstruction formula reads $q_1$ and $q_2$ off the $(1,3)$ and $(1,4)$ entries of the transformed solution at $k = 0$.

What would settle it

Compute the time evolution of a two-soliton solution of the ccSP equation built from two purely imaginary eigenvalues $k_1 = i\nu_1$ and $k_2 = i\nu_2$ taken with $\nu_1 = \nu_2$, so that the equal-speed condition (2.30) fails while the rest of Assumption 2.1 holds: if the two self-symmetric solitons do not separate and the asymptotic formula (1.4) misses the true solution by more than $O(t^{-1}\ln t)$, the speed-ordering hypothesis is confirmed as load-bearing. A second check is to evaluate (1.8) at a gap velocity $v < 0$, $v \neq v_n$, using numerically computed scattering data $\rho(\pm k_0)$, and compare the predicted $t^{-1/2}$ radiation profile with a direct numerical evolution of the equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 asserts that for Schwartz initial data satisfying Assumption 2.1, as $t \to \infty$ the solution $(q_1, q_2)$ of the ccSP equation, written in the moving scale $\zeta(x,t)$ with $x = \zeta + O(1)$, behaves as follows. In the region $\zeta/t < -\varepsilon$, the solution equals a sum, over the $N$ discrete eigenvalues $k_n$, of exactly computable one-soliton or one-breather terms, namely composite breathers when the eigenvalue has nonzero real part and self-symmetric solitons when it is purely imaginary, plus a $t^{-1/2}$ amplitude built from a parabolic-cylinder model evaluated at the stationary phase points $\pm k_0$, with uniform error $O(t^{-1}\ln t)$. Away from the soliton velocities $v_n = -1/(4|k_n|^2)$, the leading term in the negative region is purely radiative, a $t^{-1/2}$ field expressed through the reflection coefficient $\rho(\pm k_0)$, its determinant, and the Gamma function. In the region $\zeta/t > \varepsilon$ both the solution components and the correction to $x = \zeta$ are $O(t^{-1})$. The paper also proves, as Theorem 2.2, that the associated $4\times 4$ Riemann–Hilbert problem genuinely reconstructs a solution of the ccSP equation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Assumption 2.1: the initial data's scattering data must have no spectral singularities on the real axis, full-rank $2\times 2$ norming constant matrices $C_n$, and discrete eigenvalues whose soliton speeds $-1/(4|k_n|^2)$ are all distinct and ordered; if two eigenvalues share a speed, the corresponding solitons or breathers never separate and the superposition formula is not the right asymptotic ansatz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the region $\zeta/t < -\varepsilon$ the leading term is a sum of explicit one-soliton and one-breather profiles, each travelling at speed $v_n = -1/(4|k_n|^2)$, with a $t^{-1/2}$ radiation correction computed from the reflection coefficient at the two stationary phase points.
  • In the region $\zeta/t > \varepsilon$ both components decay as $O(t^{-1})$ with $x = \zeta + O(t^{-1})$, so no solitons leak into the forward characteristic cone.
  • When the discrete spectrum is empty, formula (1.8) reduces to the known purely radiative long-time behavior, and the paper closes a technical gap in that earlier analysis concerning the function $\delta_{2-}(k)$.
  • The $4\times 4$ parabolic cylinder model Riemann–Hilbert problem solved in the appendix is a reusable tool for long-time asymptotics of other integrable equations with $4\times 4$ matrix Lax pairs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If two discrete eigenvalues share the same modulus $|k_n|$, Assumption 2.1's speed ordering fails and the two solitons travel together forever, so the sum-of-solitons formula would need to be replaced by a bound-state analysis; that is a natural next problem and a boundary of the present theorem.
  • Formula (1.8) says the radiative field between soliton lines is encoded entirely in $\rho(\pm k_0)$, which suggests an inverse-style experiment: measure the asymptotic radiation tail of a two-polarization pulse and read off spectral data at those two points.
  • The two-stationary-point $\bar\partial$ scheme should transfer to other two-component short-pulse-type systems, where composite breathers are expected to play the same role.
  • Because the $t^{-1/2}$ soliton–radiation interaction term is absent in the purely radiative regime, its appearance in (1.4) is a concrete, numerically checkable signature that distinguishes soliton-bearing from radiation-only initial data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a long-time asymptotic analysis for the coupled complex short pulse (ccSP) equation on the line, for Schwartz initial data that may support solitons. The authors set up a 4x4 matrix Riemann-Hilbert problem from the Lax pair, apply the d-bar generalization of the Deift-Zhou steepest descent method, and obtain asymptotic formulas in two space-time regions: decay of order O(t^{-1}) for zeta/t > epsilon, and, for zeta/t < -epsilon, a superposition of self-symmetric solitons or composite breathers together with a t^{-1/2} radiation term and an O(t^{-1} log t) error. A parabolic-cylinder model problem is solved in Appendix B and is used to compute the leading radiation coefficients.

Significance. If the proof is correct, the paper verifies the soliton resolution conjecture for the ccSP equation, which is associated with a 4x4 matrix Lax pair and therefore goes beyond the more common 2x2 cases treated in much of the literature. The paper also provides a detailed reconstruction proof (Theorem 2.2), a careful treatment of the two stationary points in the region zeta/t < -epsilon, and an explicit solution of a new 4x4 parabolic-cylinder model problem. These are genuine technical contributions and the paper is clearly written in its overall structure. The asymptotic results are obtained from the Riemann-Hilbert problem whose inputs - reflection coefficient, discrete eigenvalues, and norming constants - come from the initial data through scattering theory; there is no fitting of any target quantity to the asymptotic formulas.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.12)-(A.19) and Proposition 3.3] The proof of estimate (3.102) does not control the actual source term in the integral representation. The function delta-tilde_1(k) defined in (A.10) satisfies the scalar model (A.11) with source f(k) = [rho rho^dagger - (tr[rho rho^dagger] + det[rho rho^dagger]) I] delta_{2-}(k), as stated in (A.12). However, the proof then defines f-tilde(k) in (A.14) by dropping the factor delta_{2-}(k), decomposes f-tilde = f-tilde_1 + f-tilde_2 + f-tilde_3, and uses the estimates (A.15)-(A.17) for this decomposed function. The true function f(k) e^{-2it theta} is never decomposed, so the bounds B1-B4 in (A.18)-(A.19) do not apply to the integral representation (A.13) of N delta-tilde_1. This is not a cosmetic omission: delta_{2-}(k) is only continuous, so it cannot be absorbed into the analytic or rational pieces f-tilde_2 and f-tilde_3, and no alternative estimate is supplied. Since (3.102) and its analogue (3.103) are the only estimates that justify replacing the matrix-valued functions delta_j(k) by the scalar delta(k) I in the local model (3.93)-(3.100), the t^{-1/2} radiation terms and the coefficient formula in (1.8) of Theorem 1.1 are not established as written. The citation to [20] at (A.19) cannot close the gap, because the paper's own Highlight (III) identifies [20] as the source of this very problem.
  2. [Section 3.4.2, Eqs. (3.93)-(3.100)] The construction of the local parabolic-cylinder model depends in an essential way on the scalarization estimates (3.102)-(3.103). In (3.93) the matrix-valued expression delta_1 rho^dagger delta_2 e^{-2it theta} is rewritten as a sum of three terms, and the first two terms are discarded using those estimates. The model RH problem 3.7 then contains only the scalar quantity delta(k)^2, through the definitions (3.96)-(3.100). If the proof of (3.102)-(3.103) fails, the model problem 3.7 is not the correct local limit of the original jump matrix, and the coefficient mu_1^{(k0)} given in (3.112), together with the radiation term in Theorem 1.1, is conditional on an unproved assertion. The paper needs either a correct estimate for the source f(k) including the factor delta_{2-}(k), or a modified local model that retains the full matrix nature of delta_j(k) and shows that the extra terms are subleading.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several grammatical and typographical errors, including 'possess' in the abstract, 'an residual error' also in the abstract, 'the a solution' in Highlight (II), and 'Asumption' in Remark 2.1. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Section 3.4.2, RH problem 3.5] In the statement of RH problem 3.5, the jump condition is written with 'mu_{\pm}^{(ccSP)}' although the function being defined is mu^{(k0)}; the notation should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3.5, Eq. (3.141)] The notation || s - k ||_{L^2(k0,+\infty)} is used for a norm of a function of u with v and y as parameters; the parametric dependence should be made explicit to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Appendix A, after Eq. (A.14)] The sentence 'By the analytic decomposition method for scattering data in [15]' should state the exact regularity hypotheses on rho that make the decomposition f-tilde = f-tilde_1 + f-tilde_2 + f-tilde_3 valid with the bounds (A.15)-(A.17), and should explain why those hypotheses apply to the actual source f(k) = f-tilde(k) delta_{2-}(k).
  5. [Section 4, Lemma 4.1] In the proof of the extension for R1, the displayed formula for the d-bar derivative uses '\bar\partial R_4(z)' instead of '\bar\partial R_1(z)'; this appears to be a typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the asymptotic formulas are derived from scattering data through a forward RH/∂̄ steepest-descent chain, with no fitted inputs and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity: the scattering data (reflection coefficient, discrete eigenvalues, and norming constants) are produced from the initial data by the Volterra/Jost analysis in Section 2, and the final asymptotic formulas in Theorem 1.1 are then obtained by a forward sequence of RH transformations in Section 3 together with the parabolic-cylinder model solved independently in Appendix B via classical Weber-equation theory. No parameter appearing in the final asymptotic formula is fitted to that formula or to a subset of the data that the formula is then said to predict, and the soliton/breather components are reconstructed from the same scattering data rather than being inserted as an ansatz. The citations to [10] and [24] are by different author groups and provide independent IST and soliton facts; they are not a self-citation chain, and no uniqueness theorem from the present authors is invoked to force a choice. The appendix estimate flagged in the reviewer's attack concerns whether the continuous factor δ2−(k) is fully controlled when reducing to the scalar model; even if that were a gap, it would be a technical correctness issue rather than a circular reduction, because it does not assert that the asymptotic output was used to define an input. Accordingly, no circularity step is identified and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted free parameters and no new physical entities. The central claim depends on standard inverse-scattering machinery, on the explicit Assumption 2.1 about scattering data, and on classical analytic tools. The free-parameter ledger is empty because the scattering data are inputs from the initial condition rather than quantities fitted to the asymptotic result.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Lax pair and inverse scattering framework for the ccSP equation from reference [24] are valid and can be used to formulate the Riemann-Hilbert problem.
    Used throughout Section 2 to define scattering data, eigenfunctions, and the main Riemann-Hilbert problem. The present paper does not rederive the Lax pair from Maxwell's equations.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: Schwartz initial data generate scattering data with no spectral singularities, full-rank norming matrices C_n, and distinct soliton speeds.
    Invoked in Section 2.3 and used later for residue calculations and separation of soliton velocities. It excludes several physically and mathematically interesting cases.
  • standard math Solvability of Riemann-Hilbert problems via Zhou's vanishing lemma and Beals-Coifman small-norm theory.
    Used in Theorem 2.1, Proposition 3.2, and the small-norm Riemann-Hilbert problem for the error function E(k).
  • standard math Standard asymptotic properties of parabolic cylinder functions and the Weber equation from reference [42].
    Used in Appendix B to solve the parabolic cylinder model Riemann-Hilbert problem and to obtain the leading coefficient mu_1^(PC).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Soliton resolution for the coupled complex short pulse equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/34O2K6FF

@misc{pith2026250522210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Soliton resolution for the coupled complex short pulse equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/34O2K6FF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22210}
}
abstract

We address the long-time asymptotics of the solution to the Cauchy problem of ccSP (coupled complex short pulse) equation on the line for decaying initial data that can support solitons. The ccSP system describes ultra-short pulse propagation in optical fibers, which is a completely integrable system and posses a $4\times4$ matrix Wadati--Konno--Ichikawa type Lax pair. Based on the $\bar{\partial}$-generalization of the Deift--Zhou steepest descent method, we obtain the long-time asymptotic approximations of the solution in two kinds of space-time regions under a new scale $(\zeta,t)$. The solution of the ccSP equation decays as a speed of $O(t^{-1})$ in the region $\zeta/t>\varepsilon$ with any $\varepsilon>0$; while in the region $\zeta/t<-\varepsilon$, the solution is depicted by the form of a multi-self-symmetric soliton/composite breather and $t^{-1/2}$ order term arises from self-symmetric soliton/composite breather-radiation interactions as well as an residual error order $O(t^{-1}\ln t)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    X. Geng, W. Liu, R. Li, Long-time asymptotics for the coupled complex short-pulse equation with decaying initial data, J. Differential Equations 386 (2024) 113–163. 2, 3, 48

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Ablowitz, B

    M.J. Ablowitz, B. Prinari, A.D. Trubatch, Discrete and Continuous Nonlinear Schr ¨odinger Systems, in: London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. 2

    work page 2004

  3. [2]

    Arruda, J

    L.K. Arruda, J. Lenells, Long-time asymptotics for the derivative nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation on the half-line, Nonlinearity 30 (2017) 4141–4172. 2

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Beals, R

    R. Beals, R. Coifman, Scattering and inverse scattering for first order systems, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984) 39–90. 28

    work page 1984

  5. [4]

    Biondini, S

    G. Biondini, S. Li, D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions in the presence of a discrete spectrum, Commun. Math. Phys. 382(3) (2021) 1495–

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Borghese, R

    M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, K.T.-R. McLaughlin, Long time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´e, Anal. Non Lin´eaire 35(4) (2018) 887–920. 2

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. Its, D. Shepelsky, Painlev ´e-type asymptotics for the Camassa–Holm equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 42(4) (2010) 1854–1873. 2

    work page 2010

  8. [7]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Shepelsky, A Riemann–Hilbert approach for the Degasperis–Procesi equation, Nonlinear- ity 26 (2013) 2081–2107. 2

    work page 2013

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Shepelsky, L. Zielinski, The short pulse equation by a Riemann–Hilbert approach, Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) 1345–1373. 2

    2017

  2. [9]

    Buckingham, S

    R. Buckingham, S. Venakides, Long-time asymptotics of the nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation shock problem, Com- mun. Pure Appl. Math. 60 (2007) 1349–1414. 2

    2007

  3. [10]

    Caudrelier, A

    V . Caudrelier, A. Gkogkou, B. Prinari, Soliton interactions and Yang-Baxter maps for the complex coupled short- pulse equation, Stud. Appl. Math. 151 (2023) 285–351. 2, 7, 26

    2023

  4. [11]

    G. Chen, J. Liu, Soliton resolution for the focusing modified KdV equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar ´e, Anal. Non Lin´eaire 38(6) (2021) 2005–2071. 2, 30

    2021

  5. [12]

    Charlier, J

    C. Charlier, J. Lenells, Airy and Painlev ´e asymptotics for the mKdV equation, J. London Math. Soc. 101(1) (2020) 194–225. 2

    2020

  6. [13]

    Charlier, J

    C. Charlier, J. Lenells, The soliton resolution conjecture for the Boussinesq equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. 191 (2024) 103621. 2

    2024

  7. [14]

    Charlier, J

    C. Charlier, J. Lenells, D. Wang, The “good” Boussinesq equation: long-time asymptotics, Anal. PDE. 16(6) (2023) 1351–1388. 2

    2023

  8. [15]

    Deift, X

    P . Deift, X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann–Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation, Ann. Math. 137 (1993) 295–368. 2, 30, 47

    1993

  9. [16]

    Dieng, K.T.-R

    M. Dieng, K.T.-R. McLaughlin, Long-time asymptotics for the NLS equation via dbar methods, Preprint arXiv:0805.2807 (2008). 2

    2008 arXiv

  10. [17]

    B.-F. Feng, L. Ling, Darboux transformation and solitonic solution to the coupled complex short pulse equation, Phys. D 437 (2022) 133332. 2

    2022

  11. [18]

    Feng, Complex short pulse and couple complex short pulse equations, Phys

    B.-F. Feng, Complex short pulse and couple complex short pulse equations, Phys. D 297 (2015) 62–75. 1

    2015

  12. [19]

    Gardner, J.M

    C.S. Gardner, J.M. Greene, M.D. Kruskal, R.M. Miura, Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1095–1097. 2

    1967

  13. [21]

    X. Geng, H. Liu, The nonlinear steepest descent method to long-time asymptotics of the coupled nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation, J. Nonlinear Sci. 28(2) (2018) 739–763. 2

    2018

  14. [22]

    X. Geng, J. Wang, K. Wang, R. Li, Soliton resolution for the complex short-pulse positive flow with weighted Sobolev initial data in the space-time soliton regions, J. Differential Equations 386 (2024) 214–268. 2

    2024

  15. [23]

    X. Geng, K. Wang, M. Chen, Long-time asymptotics for the Spin-1 Gross–Pitaevskii equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 382(1) (2021) 585–611. 2

    2021

  16. [24]

    Gkogkou, B

    A. Gkogkou, B. Prinari, B. Feng, A.D. Trubatch, Inverse scattering transform for the complex coupled short-pulse equation, Stud. Appl. Math. 148 (2022) 918–963. 2, 4, 5, 7, 26

    2022

  17. [25]

    B. Guo, N. Liu, Y. Wang, Long-time asymptotics for the Hirota equation on the half-line, Nonlinear Anal. 174 (2018) 118–140. 2

    2018

  18. [26]

    Guo, Y.-F

    B. Guo, Y.-F. Wang, Bright-dark vector soliton solutions for the coupled complex short pulse equations in nonlinear optics, Wave Motion 67 (2016) 47–54. 1

    2016

  19. [27]

    Huang, L

    L. Huang, L. Zhang, Higher order Airy and Painlev ´e asymptotics for the mKdV hierarchy, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54 (2022) 5291–5334. 2

    2022

  20. [28]

    Huang, L

    Y. Huang, L. Ling, X. Zhang, Long-time asymptotics of the coupled nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation in a weighted Sobolev space, Preprint arXiv:2504.21315 (2025). 2 53

    2025

  21. [29]

    Its, Asymptotic behavior of the solutions to the nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation, and isomonodromic deforma- tions of systems of linear differential equations, Dokl

    A. Its, Asymptotic behavior of the solutions to the nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation, and isomonodromic deforma- tions of systems of linear differential equations, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 261(1) (1981) 14–18. 2

    1981

  22. [30]

    Jenkins, J

    R. Jenkins, J. Liu, P . Perry, C. Sulem, Soliton resolution for the derivative nonlinear Schr ¨odinger equation, Com- mun. Math. Phys. 363 (2018) 1003–1049. 2

    2018

  23. [31]

    Kumar, A.-M

    V . Kumar, A.-M. Wazwaz, Symmetry analysis for complex soliton solutions of coupled complex short pulse equa- tion, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021) 5238–5250. 2

    2021

  24. [32]

    Li, S.-F

    Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, E. Fan, Soliton resolution for the complex short pulse equation with weighted Sobolev initial data in space-time solitonic regions, J. Differential Equations 329 (2022) 31–88. 2

    2022

  25. [33]

    Li, S.-F

    Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, On the soliton resolution and the asymptotic stability of N-soliton solution for the Wadati–Konno–Ichikawa equation with finite density initial data in space-time solitonic regions, Adv. Math. 409 (2022) 108639. 2

    2022

  26. [34]

    Ling, B.-F

    L. Ling, B.-F. Feng, Z. Zhu, Multi-soliton, multi-breather and higher order rogue wave solutions to the complex short pulse equation, Phys. D 327 (2016) 13–29. 1

    2016

  27. [35]

    N. Liu, B. Guo, Long-time asymptotics for the Sasa–Satsuma equation via nonlinear steepest descent method, J. Math. Phys. 60(1) (2019) 011504. 2

    2019

  28. [36]

    N. Liu, B. Guo, Painlev ´e-type asymptotics of an extended modified KdV equation in transition regions, J. Differ- ential Equations 280 (2021) 203–235. 2

    2021

  29. [37]

    N. Liu, M. Chen, B. Guo, Long-time asymptotics of solution for the fifth-order modified KdV equation in the presence of discrete spectrum, Stud. Appl. Math. 153 (2024) e12742. 2

    2024

  30. [38]

    N. Liu, X. Zhao, B. Guo, Long-time asymptotic behavior for the matrix modified Korteweg–de Vries equation, Phys. D 443 (2023) 133560. 2

    2023

  31. [39]

    McLaughlin, P

    K.T.-R. McLaughlin, P . Miller, The¯∂ steepest descent method and the asymptotic behavior of polynomials orthog- onal on the unit circle with fixed and exponentially varying nonanalytic weights, Intern. Math. Res. Papers 2006 (2006) 48673. 2

    2006

  32. [40]

    McLaughlin, P

    K.T.-R. McLaughlin, P . Miller, The ¯∂ steepest descent method for orthogonal polynomials on the real line with varying weights, Intern. Math. Res. Notices 2008 (2008) rnn075. 2

    2008

  33. [41]

    D. Wang, C. Zhu, X. Zhu, Miura transformations and large-time behaviors of the Hirota–Satsuma equation, J. Differential Equations 416 (2025) 642–699. 2

    2025

  34. [42]

    Whittaker, G.N

    E.T. Whittaker, G.N. Watson, A course of modern analysis, Cambridge University Press. 1927. 51, 52

    1927

  35. [43]

    J. Xu, E. Fan, Long-time asymptotic behavior for the complex short pulse equation, J. Differential Equations 269 (2020) 10322–10349. 2

    2020

  36. [44]

    W. Xun, E. Fan, Long time and Painlev ´e-type asymptotics for the Sasa–Satsuma equation in solitonic space time regions, J. Differential Equations 329 (2022) 89–130. 2

    2022

  37. [45]

    Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathe- matics, Philadelphia, 2010

    J.K. Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathe- matics, Philadelphia, 2010. 2

    2010

  38. [46]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, Soliton resolution for the short-pulse equation, J. Differential Equations 280 (2021) 644–689. 2

    2021

  39. [47]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, On the long-time asymptotics of the modified Camassa–Holm equation in space-time solitonic regions, Adv. Math. 402 (2022) 108340. 2

    2022

  40. [48]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, Soliton resolution and large time behavior of solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Novikov equation with a nonzero background, Adv. Math. 426 (2023) 109088. 2

    2023

  41. [49]

    Zakharov, S.V

    V .E. Zakharov, S.V . Manakov, Asymptotic behavior of nonlinear wave systems integrated by the inverse scattering method, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 71 (1976) 203–215, Sov. Phys. JETP 44(1) (1976) 106–112. 2

    1976

  42. [50]

    X. Zhao, L. Wang, A two-component Sasa–Satsuma equation: large-time asymptotics on the line, J. Nonlinear Sci. 34(2) (2024) 38. 2

    2024

  43. [51]

    Zhou, The Riemann–Hilbert problem and inverse scattering, SIAM J

    X. Zhou, The Riemann–Hilbert problem and inverse scattering, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20(4) (1989) 966–986. 10, 16, 25 SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS , N ANJING UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOL - OGY, N ANJING 210044, P.R. C HINA Email address: ln10475@163.com SC...

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.