REVIEW 1 cited by
Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Identifying the software weaknesses exploited by attacks supports efforts to reduce developer introduction of vulnerabilities and to guide security code review efforts. A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. Ideally, the security community would measure the prevalence of the software weaknesses used in actual exploitation. This work advances that goal by introducing a simple metric that utilizes public data feeds to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. The metric is evaluated on a set of 130 weaknesses that were commonly found in vulnerabilities between April 2021 and March 2024. Our analysis reveals that 92 % of the weaknesses are not being constantly exploited.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Vul4Py: Benchmarking Automated Vulnerability Repair in Python with Paired Exploit and Functional Oracles
Vul4Py gives 100 real Python vulnerabilities a paired exploit-and-functional oracle, and on this benchmark agentic repair systems outperform direct prompting and a specialized tool by a wide margin.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.