Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 24 references

Qualitative analysis, chaotic structure and exact solution of the nonlinear seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP equation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives exact bright and anti-kink soliton solutions for the seventh-order CDG-KP equation via a ratio ansatz, and shows the same reduction becomes a chaotic planar system under forcing.

desk verdict The paper's central claim fails: the asserted twice-integrated ODE (2.7) is not the integral of (2.6), so the exact solutions and the dynamical analysis are disconnected from the sCDG-KP equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04846 v1 pith:34V3G2KV submitted 2026-08-05 math.DS math-phmath.MP

S. S. Samanta , S. Sahoo , Vijil Kumar , Rajib Mia This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q5335C0737D4534C23
keywords seventh-orderCaudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KPequation(G'/(G'+G+A))methodtravelingwavesolutionbrightsolitonanti-kinkbifurcationanalysischaoticattractorfractaldimension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish exact traveling-wave solutions of bright and anti-kink type for the (2+1)-dimensional seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP equation by applying the $(G'/(G'+G+A))$ expansion method to a twice-integrated traveling-wave ODE. It also seeks to show that the same reduced ODE becomes a planar dynamical system whose periodically forced version exhibits periodic, quasi-periodic, and chaotic behavior, with chaos indicated by sensitive dependence, a recurrence plot, a fractal dimension of 1.689, and a power spectrum. The payoff would be a single reduction that feeds two kinds of output: explicit parameter-controlled soliton formulas and a finite-dimensional picture of stability and chaos. The pivotal object is the twice-integrated ODE (2.7) derived from the eighth-order traveling-wave equation (2.6).

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the ratio $R=G'/(G'+G+A)$, where $G$ solves the second-order linear ODE $G''+BG'+CG+AC=0$; powers of $R$ turn the reduced ODE into an algebraic system for the coefficients $a_0,a_1,a_2$ and for $B,C,A$ after homogeneous balance gives $N=2$. The wave transformation $\xi=x+\omega y-\sigma t$ is what connects the two-dimensional PDE to the ODE. For the qualitative half, the carrying object is the planar polynomial system $u'=A$, $A'=p_0+p_1u+p_2u^2$, presented as Hamiltonian-like, together with its periodically forced extension $A'=p_0+p_1u+p_2u^2+Z_0\cos(\nu\xi)$; this extension is what generates the attractor, sensitivity, recurrence, and power-spectrum diagnostics.

What would settle it

Compute the second $\xi$-derivative of each term in Eq. (2.7) and compare with Eq. (2.6); the reduction is correct only if the terms $1260u^2(u')^2$ and $420u^3u''$ are recovered, and a mismatch at any point would show that Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11) do not solve Eq. (1.5).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that substituting $u(x,y,t)=u(\xi)$ with $\xi=x+\omega y-\sigma t$ converts the sCDG-KP equation into an eighth-order ODE (2.6), and that integrating twice yields the sixth-order ODE (2.7). On (2.7), homogeneous balance fixes $N=2$, so the solution ansatz is $u=a_0+a_1R+a_2R^2$ with $R=G'/(G'+G+A)$ and $G''+BG'+CG+AC=0$; solving the resulting algebraic system gives the coefficients (2.9) and the closed-form waves (2.10) for $\Gamma=B^2-4C>0$ and (2.11) for $\Gamma<0$, reported as bright and anti-kink solitons. The same Eq. (2.7), through the polynomial trail ansatz $u''=p_0+p_1u+p_2u^2$ with $p_2=-3/2$, becomes the planar system $u'=A$, $A'=p_0+p_1u+p_2u^2$; the paper claims that the sign combinations of $p_0,p_1$ give saddle/center equilibria and that adding $Z_0\cos(\nu\xi)$ produces quasi-periodic and chaotic attractors with the diagnostics shown. Consequently, the paper's discovery, on its own terms, is a paired result: exact bright and anti-kink soliton formulas and a qualitative route from the same reduction to bifurcation and chaos.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that integrating Eq. (2.6) twice with respect to $\xi$ yields Eq. (2.7); every exact solution, coefficient set, and dynamical reduction in the paper inherits the correctness of that single step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11) give explicit bright and anti-kink soliton profiles whose shapes are selected by the free parameters $B$, $C$, and the constants $c_1,c_2$ (or $C_1,C_2$).
  • The wave speed is tied to the same parameters by $\sigma = B^6-12B^4C+48B^2C^2-64C^3+\alpha\omega^2$, so only parameter combinations satisfying this relation support the claimed traveling waves.
  • In the reduced planar system, the sign of the Jacobian determinant $J(u,A)=-p_1-2p_2u$ and the constraint $p_2=-3/2<0$ organize the four saddle/center cases plotted in the bifurcation portraits.
  • Adding the periodic force $Z_0\cos(\nu\xi)$ moves the system among periodic, quasi-periodic, and chaotic regimes; the chaotic regime is indicated by sensitive dependence on initial conditions, fractal dimension $1.689$, fragmented recurrence-plot diagonals, and a broadband power spectrum.
  • The same traveling-wave reduction therefore serves two roles: a source of closed-form soliton profiles and a finite-dimensional system on which stability, bifurcation, and chaos can be studied.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dynamical-system conclusions are logically independent of the exact-solution formulas, so the attractor and chaos diagnostics could be verified directly by numerically integrating the forced planar system even if the closed-form waves were modified.
  • If the double-integration step is repaired, the same expansion machinery should regenerate a corrected family of exact solutions; the displayed coefficient relations in (2.9) would then need to be re-derived.
  • The reported fractal dimension 1.689 is a single-number chaos indicator; computing Lyapunov exponents for the same forced system would give a stronger, orthogonal check, and the paper explicitly leaves that for future work.
  • The same reduction template could be applied to other members of the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon hierarchy or to fractional-order generalizations, which the paper names as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the (2+1)-dimensional seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP (sCDG-KP) equation. It proposes a traveling-wave reduction, exact bright and anti-kink soliton solutions via the (G'/(G'+G+A)) method, and a qualitative analysis based on bifurcation, phase portraits, sensitivity analysis, chaotic attractors, recurrence plots, fractal dimension, and power spectra. The main advertised contributions are exact closed-form solutions of Eq. (1.5) and a description of chaotic and quasi-periodic behavior of a related dynamical system.

Significance. If the central reduction and solution steps were valid, exact formulas for a high-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP equation and a full qualitative study would be of interest to the soliton and dynamical-systems community. The paper is organized in the standard ansatz-method format and contains many graphical outputs. However, the manuscript's central reduction from Eq. (2.6) to Eq. (2.7) is algebraically incorrect as printed, and the dynamical analysis is carried out on an auxiliary forced oscillator that is not derived from the sCDG-KP equation. These are load-bearing problems, so the paper does not currently establish its advertised results.

major comments (4)
  1. [2.1, Eq. (2.7)] The transition from Eq. (2.6) to Eq. (2.7) is asserted without calculation, and the displayed equation is not the twice-integrated form of Eq. (2.6). Integrating Eq. (2.6) once gives u^(7)+420u^3u'+210u^2u'''+420u u'u''+28u u^(5)+28u'u^(4)+70u''u'''+(alpha*omega^2-sigma)u'=const; integrating again with zero integration constants gives u^(6)+105u^(4)+210u^2u''+28u u^(4)+35(u'')^2+(alpha*omega^2-sigma)u=0. The printed Eq. (2.7) instead contains (alpha*omega^2-sigma)u', so differentiating Eq. (2.7) twice produces (alpha*omega^2-sigma)u''' rather than the (alpha*omega^2-sigma)u'' in Eq. (2.6). Since the coefficients in Eq. (2.9) and the solutions in Eqs. (2.10)-(2.11) are obtained by solving this erroneous reduced ODE, the exact-solution claim for Eq. (1.5) is unsupported. No independent residual or substitution check is provided to show that Eqs. (2.10) or (2.11) satisfy Eq. (2.6) or Eq. (1.5).
  2. [3, Eqs. (3.5)-(3.7)] The dynamical system (3.7) is obtained from the polynomial-trail assumption u''=p0+p1u+p2u^2, but the coefficients in Eq. (3.6) force p0=(3/2)p1^2 and p2=-3/2, so p0 is always nonnegative and p2 is fixed. The bifurcation cases in Section 3.1 nevertheless choose p0=-0.5 for the cases p0,p1<0 and p0<0,p1>0, directly contradicting Eq. (3.6). Moreover, Eq. (3.7) is never derived from Eq. (1.5) or from a consistent version of Eq. (2.7); it is an auxiliary ODE. The phase-portrait and bifurcation conclusions therefore do not describe the sCDG-KP equation.
  3. [3.2-3.7, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.11)] The chaotic and sensitivity analysis is performed on the ad hoc forced system dA/dxi=p2u^2+p1u+p0+Z0*cos(nu*xi), with p0, p1, Z0, and nu chosen independently of Eq. (3.6), and with no derivation from Eq. (1.5). Consequently the chaotic attractor, sensitivity plots, recurrence plot, fractal dimension, and power spectrum describe a different, externally forced oscillator rather than the sCDG-KP equation. Additionally, system (3.11) promotes nu to a state variable with dnu/dxi=C while the forcing term in Eq. (3.10) uses nu*xi, so the two formulations are inconsistent and one cannot attribute the reported qualitative behavior to Eq. (1.5).
  4. [2.1, Figures 1 and 2] The numerical illustrations contradict the stated solution cases and the definition of the equation. For B=1 and C=1 one has Gamma=B^2-4C=-3<0, yet Figure 1 plots Eq. (2.10), which is only defined for Gamma>0; Figure 2 uses omega=sqrt(-1), which is complex despite the real traveling-wave transformation, and both captions set alpha=0.5 even though Eq. (1.5) specifies alpha=+/-1. These inconsistencies undermine the graphical evidence for the claimed bright and anti-kink soliton behavior.
minor comments (5)
  1. [1, Eq. (1.4)] Equation (1.4) is missing the '=0' on the right-hand side; it currently ends with 'u7x' followed by no equality.
  2. [2.1, Eq. (2.8)] Equation (2.8) omits the square on the last term; it should read u(xi)=a0+a1*(G0/(G0+G+A))+a2*(G0/(G0+G+A))^2.
  3. [2.1, text after Eq. (2.2)] The traveling-wave transformation is written as xi=x+omega*y+q*z-sigma*t, but the dependent variable u is assumed independent of z and the constant q is never defined or used.
  4. [3, Eq. (3.8)] Equation (3.8) is not an equation; it appears intended as the Hamiltonian H(u,A)=A^2/2-(p2*u^3/3+p1*u^2/2+p0*u), and the Jacobian expression in Eq. (3.9) uses undefined symbols s1 and s2 rather than p1 and p2.
  5. [3.6, Figure 10] The vertical-axis label in Figure 10 contains a typo, 'log(n mber of boxes)', and the caption lists parameters p0=0.7, p1=0.2 that are not connected to Eq. (3.6).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the exact solutions are a constructive ansatz solve, and the self-citations are routine, non-load-bearing method attributions.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain in Sections 2 and 3. The exact solutions (2.10)-(2.11) are produced by a standard constructive procedure: impose a traveling-wave reduction, assume the (G'/(G'+G+A)) form (2.4)/(2.8), substitute together with (2.5) into the reduced ODE, collect powers, solve the algebraic system for the coefficients (2.9), and insert the result. No step defines the target solution in terms of itself, and no parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. The reduction from (2.6) to (2.7) is asserted, not shown, and appears algebraically wrong; the later bifurcation section also uses p0, p1 values incompatible with the solved values in (3.6). These are serious correctness and consistency defects, but they are not circularity as defined for this pass: the later system is an arbitrary replacement, not a forced restatement of the fitted coefficients. The self-citations ([20], [21]) attribute the solution method and prior applications, but the method is fully re-stated in Section 2, so those citations are not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem, imported ansatz, or renamed empirical result carries the argument. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0, even though the paper's mathematical correctness appears questionable on other grounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation rests on several free constants and two unsupported reductions. The exact-solution claim uses B,C and omega as free tuning parameters; the dynamical claim uses p0,p1,Z0,nu chosen by hand after fitting to the polynomial ansatz. The 'integrating twice' step is an undeclared assumption that appears false, and the polynomial-trail u''=p0+p1*u+p2*u^2 is imposed rather than derived. No new physical entities are introduced except an artificial third state for plotting attractors.

free parameters (5)
  • B, C in auxiliary ODE = B=1, C=1 in Figs. 1 and 2; otherwise free
    Constants in G''+BG'+CG+AC=0; the solution coefficients and sigma depend on them, so they are free tuning parameters for the claimed solution family.
  • omega in traveling-wave transformation = 1, sqrt(-1), 3.9, -3.5, etc.
    Wave transformation xi=x+omega*y-sigma*t; sigma is then fixed by Eq. (2.9) only if the constraint alpha=+/-1 is respected, which the figures violate.
  • p0, p1 in reduced system = p0=1.5, p1=2.5; p0=-0.5, p1=-4.5; p0=3.5, p1=-1.5; p0=-0.5, p1=4.5
    In Section 3.1 these are chosen freely, but Eq. (3.6) forces p0=1.5*p1^2, which is always nonnegative, so some choices contradict the paper's own fitted relations.
  • Z0, nu in forcing term = Z0=-1.3, nu=-4.5; Z0=-0.3, nu=-2.5; Z0=-0.3, nu=-3.5; etc.
    Added forcing term Z0*cos(nu*xi) in system (3.10); values are chosen by hand to produce periodic, quasi-periodic, or chaotic-looking plots.
  • d0 integration constant = -4*(sigma-alpha*omega^2)/89
    Appears in the first integral (3.3); it is determined by substitution back into Eq. (2.7) and is not tested against the original PDE.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Eq. (2.7) is obtained by integrating Eq. (2.6) twice with respect to xi and setting integration constants to zero.
    Stated without proof in Section 2.1; double differentiation of Eq. (2.7) does not recover Eq. (2.6), missing the terms 1260u^2(u')^2 and 420u^3u''.
  • ad hoc to paper The reduced ODE admits the polynomial-trail representation u''=p0+p1u+p2u^2 with the first integral (u')^2=2p0u+p1u^2+(2p2/3)u^3+d0.
    Imposed in Section 3 before Eq. (3.2); it is solved for p and d0 by substitution into Eq. (2.7), so the phase-space analysis is only as valid as this ansatz.
  • domain assumption The traveling-wave transformation u(x,y,t)=u(xi), xi=x+omega*y-sigma*t, converts Eq. (1.5) into an ODE that can be integrated twice in closed form.
    The transformation itself is standard, but the integrability needed for Eq. (2.7) is not established by any conservation-law argument.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary function G satisfies G''+BG'+CG+AC=0 for real constants B,C,A, and the ansatz phi=G0/(G0+G+A) covers all relevant solutions.
    This is the basis of the cited method [20]; it restricts the solution family to a specific rational form without a completeness argument.
invented entities (2)
  • Forced nonautonomous system du/dxi=A, dA/dxi=p2*u^2+p1*u+p0+Z0*cos(nu*xi)
    purpose: Used to explore periodicity, quasi-periodicity, and chaos instead of the original PDE.
    The forcing term is not present in Eq. (1.5) or Eq. (2.7); no justification connects its dynamics to the sCDG-KP equation.
  • Artificial third state nu with dnu/dxi=C in system (3.11)
    purpose: Creates a 3D phase space for plotting a chaotic attractor.
    nu is the frequency parameter in the cosine forcing; promoting it to a dynamical variable is not derived from the equation, and C is not specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Qualitative analysis, chaotic structure and exact solution of the nonlinear seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/34V3G2KV

@misc{pith2026260804846,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Qualitative analysis, chaotic structure and exact solution of the nonlinear seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/34V3G2KV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04846}
}
abstract

The main objective of this work is to investigate the traveling wave solution and dynamic characteristics of the (2 + 1)-dimensional seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP (sCDG-KP) equation. Applying the ($\frac{G^{\prime}}{G^{\prime}+G+A}$) method, we examine the exact solution of the (2 + 1)-dimensional seventh-order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-KP (sCDG-KP) equation by altering it into a reduced ODE via a suitable wave transformation. Graphical representations, such as 2D, 3D, and a heat map of the ascertained solution, are present to facilitate comprehension of the empirical relevance of the obtained solutions. As a result, we acquired a bright and anti-kink soliton solution. Next, we alter the ODE into a 2D system of equations to analyze the dynamical behavior of the reduced system via bifurcation analysis, phase portrait, and attractor analysis. During this process, we portray the graphical visualization of the bifurcation phase portrait, 2D phase portrait, 3D phase portrait, time series, chaotic attractor, sensitive analysis, fractal dimension, recurrence plot, and power spectrum of the dynamical system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04846 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical representation of Eq,2.10 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphical representation of Eq,2.11 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bifurcation portrait of system(3.7) with different conditio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase portrait of system(3.10) with σ = −1.1, α = 1, ω = 3.9, z0 = −1.3, ν = −4.5. 3.3 Sensitive analysis: The sensitive analysis illustrates the system’s dynamics that are highly de￾pendent on the variation of parameters and initial conditions. In this section, we see…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase portrait of system(3.10) wit σ = −1.05, α = 1, ω = −3.5, z0 = −0.3, ν = −2.5. 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 u A (a) 2D phase portrait 0 50 100 150 200 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 u Ξ (b) 3D phase portrait 0 50 100 150 200 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 u Ξ (…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase portrait of system(3.10) with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sensitive analysis of (3.10) with σ = −2.5, α = 5.5, ω = −3.5, z0 = 0.3, ν = −0.05. 3.4 Chaotic attractor: A chaotic attractor can greatly aid comprehension of the system’s long-term behavior in the chaotic system. It’s fractal geometry and sensitive to initial con￾dit…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Chaotic attractor of system(3.11) with σ = −2.5, α = 1, ω = 3.5, z0 = −1.3, ν = −4.5. 3.5 Recurrence plot: A recurrence plot is a visual representation of the hidden dynamical structure of a nonlinear dynamical system to identify the behavior of the system within a tim…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Recurrence of system(3.10) with p0 = 0.7, p1 = 0.2, z0 = 0.3, ν = −4.5. 3.6 fractal dimension: The fractal dimension is a primary numerical indicator used to delineate the geometric complexity of an attractor that originates from a dynamical system. An integer values c…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fractal dimension of the system(3.10) withp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Power spectrum of the system(3.10). 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Tripathy and S

    A. Tripathy and S. Sahoo. Exact solutions for the ion sound lang muir wave model by using two novel analytical methods. Results in Physics , 19, 12 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [14]

    Optimal system, s ymme- try reductions and exact solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional seve nth-order caudrey–dodd–gibbon–kp equation

    Mengyao Qin, Yunhu Wang, and Manwai Yuen. Optimal system, s ymme- try reductions and exact solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional seve nth-order caudrey–dodd–gibbon–kp equation. Symmetry, 16, 4 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Abbasbandy and F

    S. Abbasbandy and F. Samadian Zakaria. Soliton solutions for the fifth-order kdv equation with the homotopy analysis method. Nonlinear Dynamics , 51:83–87, 1 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [2]

    Exac t travelling solutions for fifth order caudrey-dodd-gibbon equation

    M Abdollahzadeh, M Hosseini, M Ghanbarpour, and H Shirvani. Exac t travelling solutions for fifth order caudrey-dodd-gibbon equation . Technical report, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [3]

    Maalee Almheidat, Mohammad Alqudah, A. A. Alderremy, Mawahib Elamin, Emad E. Mahmoud, and Shabir Ahmad. Lie-b¨ acklund symmetr y, soliton solutions, chaotic structure and its characteristics of the extended (3 + 1) dimensional kairat-ii model. Nonlinear Dynamics , 113:2635–2651, 2 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [4]

    Exploring so litary wave solutions of the generalized integrable kadomtsev–petviashv ili equation via lie symmetry and hirota’s bilinear method

    Beenish, Maria Samreen, and Fehaid Salem Alshammari. Exploring so litary wave solutions of the generalized integrable kadomtsev–petviashv ili equation via lie symmetry and hirota’s bilinear method. Symmetry, 17, 5 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [5]

    A. A. Darwish and A. Ramady. Applications of algebraic method to e x- actly solve some nonlinear partial differential equations. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 33:1263, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [6]

    Recurrence plot s of dynamical systems

    J.-P Eckmann, S Oliffson Kamphorst, and D Ruelle. Recurrence plot s of dynamical systems. Technical report, 1987

    work page 1987

Show all 24 references
  1. [7]

    Homotopy perturbation method for solving systems of non- linear coupled equations

    A A Hemeda. Homotopy perturbation method for solving systems of non- linear coupled equations. Technical report, 2012

    2012

  2. [8]

    Bb acklund trans- formations and exact solutions for some nonlinear evolution equatio ns in solar magnetostatic models, 2002

    A H Khater, D K Callebaut, W Malliet, and E S Kamel. Bb acklund trans- formations and exact solutions for some nonlinear evolution equatio ns in solar magnetostatic models, 2002

    2002

  3. [9]

    Lakshmanan and S

    M. Lakshmanan and S. Rajasekar. Nonlinear Dynamics . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. 19

    2003

  4. [10]

    Comparison between the homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method

    Shijun Liao. Comparison between the homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 169:1186–1194, 10 2005

    2005

  5. [11]

    Highly dispersive optical solitons in the absence of self-phase modula tion by lie symmetry

    Sandeep Malik, Sachin Kumar, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yıldırım, Luminit a Moraru, Simona Moldovanu, Catalina Iticescu, and Abdulaziz Alotaibi. Highly dispersive optical solitons in the absence of self-phase modula tion by lie symmetry. Symmetry, 15, 4 2023

    2023

  6. [12]

    Finding the exact solution of special nonlinear partial differen tial equations by homotopy analysis method, 2014

    Mashallah Matinfar, Mohammad Saeidy, Yasir Khan, and Behzad G harah- suflu. Finding the exact solution of special nonlinear partial differen tial equations by homotopy analysis method, 2014

    2014

  7. [13]

    Phase trajectories, chaotic behavio r, and soli- tary wave solutions for (3+1)-dimensional integrable kadomtsev- petviashvili equation in fluid dynamics

    Naila Nasreen, Ankit Yadav, Sandeep Malik, Ejaz Hussain, Abdulla h Saad Alsubaie, and Faisal Alsharif. Phase trajectories, chaotic behavio r, and soli- tary wave solutions for (3+1)-dimensional integrable kadomtsev- petviashvili equation in fluid dynamics. Chaos, Solitons and F...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Tag-ElDin, Sharifa h E

    Hamood Ur Rehman, Aziz Ullah Awan, ElSayed M. Tag-ElDin, Sharifa h E. Alhazmi, Mansour F. Yassen, and Rizwan Haider. Extended hyperbo lic func- tion method for the (2 +1)-dimensional nonlinear soliton equation. Results in Physics , 40:105802, 2022

    2022

  9. [16]

    He’s homotopy per turba- tion method: An effective tool for solving nonlinear integral and inte gro- differential equations

    Jafar Saberi-Nadjafi and Asghar Ghorbani. He’s homotopy per turba- tion method: An effective tool for solving nonlinear integral and inte gro- differential equations. Computers and Mathematics with Applications , 58:2379–2390, 12 2009

    2009

  10. [17]

    Sahoo and S

    S. Sahoo and S. Saha Ray. The new exact solutions of variant ty pes of time fractional coupled schr¨ odinger equations in plasma physics. Journal of Applied Analysis and Computation , 7:824, 2017

    2017

  11. [18]

    Seadawy, M

    Aly R. Seadawy, M. Arshad, and Dianchen Lu. Stability analysis of new exact traveling-wave solutions of new coupled kdv and new coupled z akharov- kuznetsov systems. European Physical Journal Plus , 132, 4 2017. 20

    2017

  12. [19]

    7th-order caudrey-dodd-g ibbon equation and fisher-type equation by homotopy analysis method

    Ankita Sharma and Rajan Arora. 7th-order caudrey-dodd-g ibbon equation and fisher-type equation by homotopy analysis method. International Jour- nal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences , 5:272–282, 4 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Tripathy, S

    A. Tripathy, S. Sahoo, and K. M. Sahu. Complex quadrupled-po wer-law non- linearity form of radhakrishnan-kundu-lakshmanan equation: nov el optical soliton analysis. Physica Scripta , 99, 12 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    A new algorithm for calculating adomian polyn omials for nonlinear operators

    Abdul-Majid Wazwaz. A new algorithm for calculating adomian polyn omials for nonlinear operators. Technical report

  15. [23]

    Multiple-soliton solutions for the kp equatio n by hirota’s bilinear method and by the tanh-coth method

    Abdul Majid Wazwaz. Multiple-soliton solutions for the kp equatio n by hirota’s bilinear method and by the tanh-coth method. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 190:633–640, 7 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Zayed, Reham M.A

    Elsayed M.E. Zayed, Reham M.A. Shohib, and Mohamed E.M. Alngar. New extended generalized kudryashov method for solving three nonline ar partial differential equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control , 25:598, 2020. 21

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.