Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

QB4AIRA: A Question Bank for AI Risk Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.09300 v2 pith:34X4O5J2 submitted 2023-05-16 cs.SE

Sung Une Lee , Harsha Perera , Boming Xia , Yue Liu , Qinghua Lu , Liming Zhu , Olivier Salvado , Jon Whittle This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SE
keywords riskqb4airaassessmentframeworksquestionsresponsiblebankquestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, has raised concerns about responsible AI development and utilization. Existing frameworks lack a comprehensive synthesis of AI risk assessment questions. To address this, we introduce QB4AIRA, a novel question bank developed by refining questions from five globally recognized AI risk frameworks, categorized according to Australia's AI ethics principles. QB4AIRA comprises 293 prioritized questions covering a wide range of AI risk areas, facilitating effective risk assessment. It serves as a valuable resource for stakeholders in assessing and managing AI risks, while paving the way for new risk frameworks and guidelines. By promoting responsible AI practices, QB4AIRA contributes to responsible AI deployment, mitigating potential risks and harms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Question Bank to Assess AI Inclusivity: Mapping out the Journey from Diversity Errors to Inclusion Excellence

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 253-question bank for assessing AI inclusivity, organized into five pillars, built from guidelines, literature, and LLM assistance, but validated only through AI-generated personas.

Pith tools