REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Challenges in Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Research Insights and Future Prospects
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning has brought significant advances in cybersecurity, particularly in the development of Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS). These improvements are mainly attributed to the ability of machine learning algorithms to identify complex relationships between features and effectively generalize to unseen data. Deep neural networks, in particular, contributed to this progress by enabling the analysis of large amounts of training data, significantly enhancing detection performance. However, machine learning models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where carefully crafted input data can mislead the model into making incorrect predictions. While adversarial threats in unstructured data, such as images and text, have been extensively studied, their impact on structured data like network traffic is less explored. This survey aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive review of machine learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) and thoroughly analyzing their susceptibility to adversarial attacks. We critically examine existing research in NIDS, highlighting key trends, strengths, and limitations, while identifying areas that require further exploration. Additionally, we discuss emerging challenges in the field and offer insights for the development of more robust and resilient NIDS. In summary, this paper enhances the understanding of adversarial attacks and defenses in NIDS and guide future research in improving the robustness of machine learning models in cybersecurity applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
REAL-IoT: Characterizing GNN Intrusion Detection Robustness under Practical Adversarial Attack
GNN-based intrusion detectors show lower accuracy on REAL-IoT's merged datasets, but the paper's own tables are inconsistent and the drift protocol is not a true distribution-shift test.
-
Vulnerability Disclosure through Adaptive Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on NIDS
The authors claim that a black-box attacker can identify sensitive traffic features from side-channel indicators and reduce an IDS's accuracy from 99% to 48% while staying invisible to an anomaly detector.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.