Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking LLMs in an Embodied Environment for Blue Team Threat Hunting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.11901 v1 pith:35XLLB5X submitted 2025-05-17 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords llmsembodiedthreatbluecyberteamthreat-huntingtasksteam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As cyber threats continue to grow in scale and sophistication, blue team defenders increasingly require advanced tools to proactively detect and mitigate risks. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for enhancing threat analysis. However, their effectiveness in real-world blue team threat-hunting scenarios remains insufficiently explored. In this paper, we present CYBERTEAM, a benchmark designed to guide LLMs in blue teaming practice. CYBERTEAM constructs an embodied environment in two stages. First, it models realistic threat-hunting workflows by capturing the dependencies among analytical tasks from threat attribution to incident response. Next, each task is addressed through a set of embodied functions tailored to its specific analytical requirements. This transforms the overall threat-hunting process into a structured sequence of function-driven operations, where each node represents a discrete function and edges define the execution order. Guided by this framework, LLMs are directed to perform threat-hunting tasks through modular steps. Overall, CYBERTEAM integrates 30 tasks and 9 embodied functions, guiding LLMs through pipelined threat analysis. We evaluate leading LLMs and state-of-the-art cybersecurity agents, comparing CYBERTEAM's embodied function-calling against fundamental elicitation strategies. Our results offer valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs in threat hunting, laying the foundation for the practical adoption in real-world cybersecurity applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Success Rate: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Offensive and Defensive Security Agents

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Security-agent success changes differently with budget: offensive CTF tasks improve with more compute, while defensive SOC work depends more on tool discipline than spend.

  2. Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs assisting cyber threat intelligence fail mainly due to spurious correlations, contradictory knowledge, and constrained generalization that stem from the threat landscape itself.

Pith tools