Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Curriculum Learning for Graph Neural Networks: Which Edges Should We Learn First

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18735 v1 pith:36K4PWKH submitted 2023-10-28 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords edgeslearningdatacurriculumdifficultygnnsgraphsamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved great success in representing data with dependencies by recursively propagating and aggregating messages along the edges. However, edges in real-world graphs often have varying degrees of difficulty, and some edges may even be noisy to the downstream tasks. Therefore, existing GNNs may lead to suboptimal learned representations because they usually treat every edge in the graph equally. On the other hand, Curriculum Learning (CL), which mimics the human learning principle of learning data samples in a meaningful order, has been shown to be effective in improving the generalization ability and robustness of representation learners by gradually proceeding from easy to more difficult samples during training. Unfortunately, existing CL strategies are designed for independent data samples and cannot trivially generalize to handle data dependencies. To address these issues, we propose a novel CL strategy to gradually incorporate more edges into training according to their difficulty from easy to hard, where the degree of difficulty is measured by how well the edges are expected given the model training status. We demonstrate the strength of our proposed method in improving the generalization ability and robustness of learned representations through extensive experiments on nine synthetic datasets and nine real-world datasets. The code for our proposed method is available at https://github.com/rollingstonezz/Curriculum_learning_for_GNNs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bi-directional Curriculum Learning for Graph Anomaly Detection: Dual Focus on Homogeneity and Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bi-directional curriculum module that trains two copies of any graph anomaly detector on opposite difficulty orderings and fuses their scores improves detection on seven benchmarks.

Pith tools