REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating Machine Translation Performance on Chinese Idioms with a Blacklist Method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Idiom translation is a challenging problem in machine translation because the meaning of idioms is non-compositional, and a literal (word-by-word) translation is likely to be wrong. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the quality of idiom translation of MT systems. We introduce a new evaluation method based on an idiom-specific blacklist of literal translations, based on the insight that the occurrence of any blacklisted words in the translation output indicates a likely translation error. We introduce a dataset, CIBB (Chinese Idioms Blacklists Bank), and perform an evaluation of a state-of-the-art Chinese-English neural MT system. Our evaluation confirms that a sizable number of idioms in our test set are mistranslated (46.1%), that literal translation error is a common error type, and that our blacklist method is effective at identifying literal translation errors.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Chengyu-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Chinese Idiom Understanding and Use
Chengyu-Bench is a 2,937-example human-verified benchmark showing LLMs are strong at idiom sentiment classification but weak at appropriateness and open cloze generation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.