Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What makes a good data augmentation for few-shot unsupervised image anomaly detection?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.03294 v3 pith:37M4G6KU submitted 2023-04-06 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords augmentationdataanomalydetectionmethodsdifferentunsupervisedalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Data augmentation is a promising technique for unsupervised anomaly detection in industrial applications, where the availability of positive samples is often limited due to factors such as commercial competition and sample collection difficulties. In this paper, how to effectively select and apply data augmentation methods for unsupervised anomaly detection is studied. The impact of various data augmentation methods on different anomaly detection algorithms is systematically investigated through experiments. The experimental results show that the performance of different industrial image anomaly detection (termed as IAD) algorithms is not significantly affected by the specific data augmentation method employed and that combining multiple data augmentation methods does not necessarily yield further improvements in the accuracy of anomaly detection, although it can achieve excellent results on specific methods. These findings provide useful guidance on selecting appropriate data augmentation methods for different requirements in IAD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Benchmark Performance to Tool Deployment: Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On the BowTie manufacturing dataset, 19 unsupervised anomaly detection models show unstable, preprocessing-sensitive performance, and a consensus audit suggests nominal-data contamination affects results.

Pith tools