REVIEW
Pre-processing Blood-Volume-Pulse for In-the-wild Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Pre-processing Blood-Volume-Pulse for In-the-wild Applications
read the original abstract
Blood-volume-pulse (BVP) is a biosignal commonly used in applications for non-invasive affect recognition and wearable technology. However, its predisposition to noise constitutes limitations for its application in real-life settings. This paper revisits BVP processing and proposes standard practices for feature extraction from empirical observations of BVP. We propose a method for improving the use of features in the presence of noise and compare it to a standard signal processing approach of a 4th order Butterworth bandpass filter with cut-off frequencies of 1 Hz and 8 Hz. Our method achieves better results for most time features as well as for a subset of the frequency features. We find that all but one time feature and around half of the frequency features perform better when the noisy parts are known (best case). When the noisy parts are unknown and estimated using a metric of skewness, the proposed method in general works better or similar to the Butterworth bandpass filter, but both methods also fail for a subset features. Our results can be used to select BVP features that are meaningful under different SNR conditions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.