pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.06409 · v4 · pith:3BSTHGCZnew · submitted 2019-06-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Superfluid stiffness in cuprates: Effect of Mott transition and phase competition

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords antiferromagnetismstiffnesssuperconductivitysuperfluidphasesidecoexistencecompetition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Superfluid stiffness $\rho_s$ is a defining characteristic of the superconducting state, allowing phase coherence and supercurrent. It is accessible experimentally through the penetration depth. Coexistence of $d$-wave superconductivity with other phases in underdoped cuprates, such as antiferromagnetism (AF) or charge-density waves (CDW), may drastically alter $\rho_s$. To shed light on this physics, the zero-temperature value of $\rho_s=\rho_{zz}$ along the $c$-axis was computed for different values of Hubbard interaction $U$ and different sets of tight-binding parameters describing the high-temperature superconductors YBCO and NCCO. We used Cellular Dynamical Mean-Field Theory for the one-band Hubbard model with exact diagonalization as impurity solver and state-of-the-art bath parametrization. We conclude that Mott physics plays a dominant role in determining the superfluid stiffness on the hole-doped side of the phase diagram. On the electron-doped side, antiferromagnetism wins over superconductivity near half-filling. But upon approaching optimal electron-doping, homogeneous coexistence between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism causes the superfluid stiffness to drop sharply. Hence, on the electron-doped side, it is competition between antiferromagnetism and $d$-wave superconductivity that plays a dominant role in determining the value of $\rho_{zz}$ near half-filling. At large overdoping, $\rho_{zz}$ behaves in a more BCS-like manner in both the electron- and hole-doped cases. We comment on some qualitative implications of these results for the superconducting transition temperature.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.