Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Edge dependent Josephson Diode effect in WTe$_{2}$-Based Josephson junction

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A WTe2 Josephson junction with asymmetric edges shows a gate-tunable diode effect, with efficiency rising from about 30% in the edge-only regime to over 53% when bulk bands are included.

desk verdict Credible JDE proposal with a genuinely new bulk-enhancement mechanism; the 53% number is model-bound and the abstract overstates disorder robustness. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21357 v1 pith:3EKID7VK submitted 2025-08-29 cond-mat.supr-con

Guo-Liang Guo , Xiao-Hong Pan , Hao Dong , Xin Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Josephsondiodeeffectsuperconductingmonolayer1T'-WTe2quantumspinHalledgestatesterminationAndreevlevelsnonreciprocalsupercurrentgate-tunableefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single Josephson junction made from monolayer 1T'-WTe2 can act as a supercurrent diode, allowing more superconducting current in one direction than the other once a magnetic flux is applied. The key is that the two edges of the WTe2 ribbon can be terminated with different atomic species, so their conducting edge states have unequal Fermi velocities. In the junction these two edges behave like the two arms of a superconducting interferometer, producing an efficiency of roughly 30% when only edge states carry current. The central result is that raising the chemical potential into the bulk conduction bands adds bulk transport channels that interfere with the edge channels, pushing the maximal diode efficiency above 53%. This efficiency is gate-tunable and survives moderate edge roughness, offering a simple device route to highly efficient superconducting diodes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of termination-dependent edge states of a 1T'-WTe2 nanoribbon, specifically the [WA, TeB] termination, which yields top and bottom edge states with different Fermi velocities. In the Josephson junction these two states form an effective two-path interferometer: each edge behaves as a short junction with an Andreev level E(φ) = ±Δ̃|cos(φ/2)| but with different zero-phase amplitude Δ̃ set by the junction length and the edge's coherence length. Magnetic flux enters through the Peierls substitution, shifting the phase difference between the two paths, and the Josephson potential in Eq. (4) captures the diode response in terms of the asymmetry parameter r = (Δ̃

What would settle it

Measure the critical currents of a gate-tunable WTe2 Josephson junction as a function of out-of-plane magnetic flux. The paper predicts that with the Fermi level in the gap the efficiency peaks near 30% and vanishes at half a flux quantum, and that moving the Fermi level into the bulk raises the peak above 50% with the sign reversing when the flux direction reverses. Observing no flux-dependent asymmetry, or no gate-induced increase beyond the edge-only value, would disprove the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using a tight-binding Bogoliubov–de Gennes model of a superconductor/WTe2/superconductor junction, the authors show that terminations such as [WA, TeB] create a nanoribbon with non-degenerate edge states: the two edges have different Fermi velocities and hence different coherence lengths. In an external magnetic flux, these two channels acquire different phase shifts and act as two inequivalent Josephson junctions in a SQUID-like loop. The Josephson potential reduces to V = −Δ1|cos(φ1/2)| − Δ2|cos(φ2/2)| with φ2 − φ1 = φB, and the diode efficiency, defined as η = (Ic+ − |Ic−|)/(Ic+ + |Ic−|), is odd in the magnetic flux and in the asymmetry parameter r. The tight-binding calculation puts the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computer model of WTe2 and the assumed cut at the ribbon edge describe real samples closely enough: if actual edges are reconstructed or have extra spin-orbit effects, the calculated 30% and 53% efficiencies will shift even if the asymmetry mechanism remains.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single WTe2 junction with asymmetric edges and one external flux bias can rectify supercurrent; no multi-junction SQUID or magnetic barrier is required.
  • Gate voltage is a control knob: moving the Fermi level from the gap into the bulk increases the maximum diode efficiency from about 30% to above 53%.
  • The diode polarity can be flipped either by reversing the magnetic flux or by choosing the opposite edge asymmetry, since the efficiency is an odd function of both flux and r.
  • The bulk-assisted enhancement is proposed to generalize to other topological materials with asymmetric edge states, making chemical-potential tuning a general route to high-efficiency Josephson diodes.
  • Moderate edge roughness does not destroy the effect when the Fermi level is in the gap, so the device does not require atomically perfect edges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the 53% ceiling is model-specific; the portable prediction is the qualitative jump from roughly 30% to above 50% as the Fermi level enters the bulk, which an experiment can compare even if the absolute values shift.
  • Editorial extension: the paper's own disorder check shows roughness matters most near the conduction-band edge, so a practical device would likely operate with the Fermi level in the gap and use the bulk enhancement when edges can be kept smooth.
  • Editorial extension: the two-channel formula suggests a general design criterion for high-efficiency Josephson diodes—large asymmetry in edge coherence lengths plus a small number of coherent bulk channels—that could guide materials search beyond WTe2.
  • Editorial extension: combined with gate-induced superconductivity in WTe2 flakes, the proposed junction could be built in a single flake with local gates defining the superconducting leads and the weak link, avoiding hybrid interfaces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a Josephson junction formed from monolayer 1T'-WTe2 with superconducting contacts, modeled by a tight-binding Bogoliubov–de Gennes Hamiltonian. It shows that choosing different edge terminations on the two sides of the junction produces two edge channels with unequal Fermi velocities, yielding a Josephson diode effect (JDE) when a magnetic flux is applied. In the gap regime the edge-only efficiency is reported to be bounded around 30%; tuning the chemical potential into the bulk bands adds bulk transport channels and raises the maximum efficiency to about 53%. The mechanism is illustrated with a toy Josephson potential and the authors argue it is universal. The paper also claims that the enhanced JDE is robust to moderate edge disorder.

Significance. If correct, the proposed device would be significant: a single Josephson junction based on an intrinsic quantum spin Hall material could achieve gate-tunable diode efficiency above 50%, competitive with more complex multi-junction interferometers. The numerical BdG calculations appear internally consistent, the toy potential reproduces the qualitative behavior, and the symmetry arguments—vanishing JDE for inversion-related edges, odd dependence on magnetic flux and edge asymmetry—are clear and testable. The paper does not fit experimental data and contains no machine-checked proofs, but the calculations are reproducible in principle from the stated Hamiltonian and parameters. The main weaknesses are that the quantitative efficiency values rest on a single chosen edge termination without independent validation, and that the abstract's disorder-robustness claim is contradicted by the paper's own Appendix D.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Appendix D] The abstract's final claim ('this enhanced JDE is robust against moderate edge disorder') is contradicted by Appendix D, which states that rough edges 'significantly influence the performance when the Fermi level is positioned at the bottom of the conduction band'—the regime where the >50% efficiency is found (Fig. 4(c), µ > µc). The Discussion also only claims robustness for the Fermi level in the bulk gap, where efficiency is ~30%. The enhanced JDE has therefore not been shown to be disorder-robust. Please revise the abstract and Section IV accordingly.
  2. [Section IV/Discussion and Eq. (1)] The quantitative efficiency values (30%, 53%) are obtained from the TB Hamiltonian Eq. (1) of Ref. [67] for one specific termination [WA,TeB]. The Discussion concedes that additional spin-orbit coupling terms may be needed for quantitative comparison and cites Ref. [79], which demonstrates strong termination dependence of edge-state dispersions in monolayer 1T'-WTe2. The paper provides no first-principles check or experimental validation for this termination's edge-state Fermi velocities. Since the enhancement mechanism rests on the µ-dependent Fermi-velocity mismatch between the two edges, the >50% numbers should be presented as model-dependent estimates, not as material-specific predictions.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (4)] The toy potential Eq. (4) is used to derive the phase diagram in Fig. 3(d) and to argue that edge-only efficiency is bounded near 30%. Equation (4) assumes the short-junction limit, but the numerical example in Fig. 3(a) has L/ξ ≈ 0.83 and 1.33 for the two edges, i.e., outside the strict short-junction regime. The authors correctly state that Eq. (4) fails for L/ξ ≫ 1, but the intermediate regime used here is exactly where its agreement with the BdG calculation should be demonstrated. Please include a direct comparison of the BdG Josephson potential with Eq. (4) at the parameters of Fig. 3, or qualify the conclusions drawn from the toy model.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 and Sec. II] The geometry labels WA, TeB, and the upper/lower edge convention are not defined in the main text or Fig. 1 caption; a brief definition would improve readability.
  2. [Sec. III] The symbol ϕB is introduced as a phase (2πΦe/Φ0) but is later called 'magnetic flux'; please distinguish the dimensionless phase from the physical flux to avoid confusion.
  3. [Abstract/Introduction/Sec. IV] The maximum efficiency is stated as 'more than 50%' in the abstract, 'more than 53%' in the Introduction, and 'more than 50%' again in Sec. IV. Please unify the quantitative statement.
  4. [Appendix D] The text says the rough-edge displacement allows 'up to one site', while the Fig. 9(a) caption says 'adding or removing two sites'. Check and make the two descriptions consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 53% JDE is a computed consequence of an independent TB model; self-citations are peripheral.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central quantitative result (diode efficiency up to 53%) is obtained by numerically diagonalizing a BdG Hamiltonian built from the DFT-derived tight-binding model of WTe2 (Eq. 1, citing independent ref. [67]) and computing Andreev levels as a function of phase and flux. No experimental data are fitted, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The asymmetric edge termination [WA,TeB] is an input design choice, but the non-degenerate edge states with different Fermi velocities (Fig. 2b) are computed outputs of that TB model, and the JDE itself is a computed property of the BdG spectrum. The toy potentials (Eq. 4 and Eq. C1) are explanatory reductions used after the fact to interpret the numerics ('Utilizing the toy potential Eq. (4)... consistent with the numerical results'), not the source of the quantitative claims. The paper even shows the null case: equivalent edges give no JDE. The only self-citations (refs. [36] and [76]) are context for interface-induced inversion breaking and for the standard T→1 edge-state transmission; neither is load-bearing. The paper explicitly flags its own limitations: in the Discussion, 'a more detailed model including additional spin-orbit coupling terms might be needed for a precise quantitative comparison with experiments [79]', and in Appendix D, rough edges 'significantly influences the performance when the Fermi level is positioned at the bottom of the conduction band'. These are validity/robustness caveats, not circular steps. Hence no circularity; score 2 only for the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a previously published TB model of WTe2 and standard BdG/Andreev level theory. No parameters are fitted to experimental data. The toy model parameters (r, Eb, k_i) are illustrative and not used to set the main numerical results.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding model of monolayer 1T'-WTe2 from DFT (ref [67]) accurately describes the low-energy electronic structure.
    The entire band structure and edge state asymmetry rely on this model. The paper itself notes in the Discussion that additional spin-orbit coupling terms may be needed for quantitative comparison with experiments (ref [79]).
  • domain assumption The two edge channels in the [WA,TeB]-terminated nanoribbon have different Fermi velocities and act as two inequivalent junctions with different coherence lengths.
    This is the basis for the asymmetric Josephson potential in Eq. (4). It follows from the band structure calculation but is not experimentally verified.
  • domain assumption Quasiparticle poisoning switches fermion parity, yielding a 2π-periodic Josephson effect.
    Section III states 'we consider this scenario in our analysis'. If parity were conserved, a 4π effect would alter the diode efficiency qualitatively.
  • standard math Standard BdG formalism and the short-junction Andreev level formula E(ϕ)=±Δ̃√(1−T sin²(ϕ/2)) along with the transcendental relation for Δ̃(L/ξ) are applicable.
    Equations (2) and (3), taken from Beenakker (ref 74) and Schapers (ref 77), are standard in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Edge dependent Josephson Diode effect in WTe$_{2}$-Based Josephson junction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3EKID7VK

@misc{pith2026250821357,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Edge dependent Josephson Diode effect in WTe$_2$-Based Josephson junction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3EKID7VK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21357}
}
abstract

The Josephson diode effect (JDE), a nonreciprocal supercurrent, is a cornerstone for future dissipationless electronics, yet achieving high efficiency in a simple device architecture remains a significant challenge. Here, we theoretically investigate the JDE in a junction based on monolayer 1T'-WTe$_2$. We first establish that different edge terminations of a WTe$_2$ nanoribbon lead to diverse electronic band structures, some of which host asymmetric edge states even with crystallographically equivalent terminations. This intrinsic asymmetry provides a natural platform for realizing the JDE. With a WTe$_2$-based Josephson junction, we demonstrate a significant JDE arising purely from these asymmetric edges when time-reversal symmetry is broken by a magnetic flux. While the efficiency of this edge-state-driven JDE is inherently limited, we discover a crucial mechanism for its enhancement: by tuning the chemical potential into the bulk bands, the interplay between edge and bulk transport channels boosts the maximum diode efficiency more than $50\%$. Furthermore, we show that this enhanced JDE is robust against moderate edge disorder. Our findings not only propose a novel route to achieve a highly efficient JDE using intrinsic material properties but also highlight the potential of engineered WTe$_2$ systems for developing advanced superconducting quantum devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21357 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The setup of 1T’ WTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a)(b) Band structure with the periodic condition in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Andreev levels of the junction with a chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Band structure with the periodic condition in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. With periodic condition in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The maximal diode efficiency changes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Geometries of the system with rough edges, corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonreciprocal Superconducting Transport from Chiral Edge States

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Asymmetric edge termination of a Chern insulator with chiral edge states produces asymmetric Andreev spectra and a Josephson diode effect without requiring bulk inversion-symmetry breaking.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [67]

    S. Ok, L. Muechler, D. Di Sante, G. Sangiovanni, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Custodial glide symme- try of quantum spin hall edge modes in monolayer wte 2, Phys. Rev. B 99, 121105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [79]

    A. Lau, R. Ray, D. Varjas, and A. R. Akhmerov, In- fluence of lattice termination on the edge states of the quantum spin hall insulator monolayer 1 T ′ −wte2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 054206 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    J. H. Scaff and R. S. Ohl, Development of silicon crystal rectifiers for microwave radar receivers, The Bell System Technical Journal 26, 1 (1947)

    1947

  4. [2]

    Shockley, The theory of p-n junctions in semiconduc- tors and p-n junction transistors, Bell System Technical Journal 28, 435 (1949)

    W. Shockley, The theory of p-n junctions in semiconduc- tors and p-n junction transistors, Bell System Technical Journal 28, 435 (1949)

    1949

  5. [3]

    Jiang and J

    K. Jiang and J. Hu, Superconducting diode effects, Na- ture Physics 18, 1145 (2022)

    2022

  6. [4]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. J. Connolly, S. J. Hagen, and C. J. Lobb, Asymmetric current-voltage characteristics in type-ii su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B 49, 9244 (1994)

    work page 1994

  7. [5]

    A. I. Braginski, Superconductor electronics: Status and outlook, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Mag- netism 32, 23 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [6]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Obser- vation of superconducting diode effect, Nature 584, 373 (2020)

    2020

Show all 81 references
  1. [7]

    Miyasaka, R

    Y. Miyasaka, R. Kawarazaki, H. Narita, F. Ando, Y. Ikeda, R. Hisatomi, A. Daido, Y. Shiota, 8 T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Observation of nonreciprocal superconducting critical field, Applied Physics Express 14, 073003 (2021)

    2021

  2. [8]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, P. Li, J. Hu, and K. Jiang, General the- ory of josephson diodes, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041013 (2022)

    2022

  3. [9]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  4. [10]

    Tanaka, B

    Y. Tanaka, B. Lu, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of giant diode effect in d-wave superconductor junctions on the sur- face of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214524 (2022)

    2022

  5. [11]

    Bauriedl, C

    L. Bauriedl, C. B¨ auml, L. Fuchs, C. Baumgartner, N. Paulik, J. M. Bauer, K.-Q. Lin, J. M. Lupton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer nbse2, Nature Communications 13, 4266 (2022)

    2022

  6. [12]

    Liang, J

    W. Liang, J. Zeng, Z. Qiao, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Berry-curvature engineering for nonreciprocal directional dichroism in two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256901 (2023)

    2023

  7. [13]

    de Picoli, Z

    T. de Picoli, Z. Blood, Y. Lyanda-Geller, and J. I. V¨ ayrynen, Superconducting diode effect in quasi-one- dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224518 (2023)

    2023

  8. [14]

    Satchell, P

    N. Satchell, P. Shepley, M. Rosamond, and G. Burnell, Supercurrent diode effect in thin film Nb tracks, Journal of Applied Physics 133, 203901 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Y. Hou, F. Nichele, H. Chi, A. Lodesani, Y. Wu, M. F. Ritter, D. Z. Haxell, M. Davydova, S. Ili´ c, O. Glezakou- Elbert, A. Varambally, F. S. Bergeret, A. Kamra, L. Fu, P. A. Lee, and J. S. Moodera, Ubiquitous superconduct- ing diode effect in superconductor thin films, Phys. ...

    2023

  10. [16]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Enhanced superconduct- ing diode effect due to coexisting phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046003 (2024)

    2024

  11. [17]

    Debnath and P

    D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable josephson diode effect in rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174511 (2024)

    2024

  12. [18]

    Y. Yu, S. Han, X. Chu, S.-I. Chu, and Z. Wang, Coherent temporal oscillations of macroscopic quantum states in a josephson junction, Science 296, 889 (2002)

    2002

  13. [19]

    L. B. Ioffe, V. B. Geshkenbein, M. V. Feigel’man, A. L. Fauch` ere, and G. Blatter, Environmentally decoupled sds -wave josephson junctions for quantum computing, Na- ture 398, 679 (1999)

    1999

  14. [20]

    C.-Z. Chen, J. J. He, M. N. Ali, G.-H. Lee, K. C. Fong, and K. T. Law, Asymmetric josephson effect in inversion symmetry breaking topological materials, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075430 (2018)

    2018

  15. [21]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Supercurrent rectification and magne- tochiral effects in symmetric josephson junctions, Nature Nanotec...

    2022

  16. [22]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal joseph- son diode effect, Science Advances 8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  17. [23]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, N. Yuan, N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, L. Fu, and S. S. P. Parkin, Josephson diode effect from cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nature Physics 18, 1...

    2022

  18. [24]

    J. F. Steiner, L. Melischek, M. Trahms, K. J. Franke, and F. von Oppen, Diode effects in current-biased josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 177002 (2023)

    2023

  19. [25]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. Geier, M. A. Rahman, C. Thomas, T. Wang, M. J. Manfra, K. Flensberg, and C. M. Marcus, Phase asymmetry of andreev spectra from cooper-pair momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 196301 (2023)

    2023

  20. [26]

    H. F. Legg, K. Laubscher, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Parity-protected superconducting diode effect in topo- logical josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214520 (2023)

    2023

  21. [27]

    Maiani, K

    A. Maiani, K. Flensberg, M. Leijnse, C. Schrade, S. Vaitiek˙ enas, and R. Seoane Souto, Nonsinu- soidal current-phase relations in semiconductor– superconductor– ferromagnetic insulator devices, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245415 (2023)

    2023

  22. [28]

    Yokoyama, M

    T. Yokoyama, M. Eto, and Y. V. Nazarov, Anomalous josephson effect induced by spin-orbit interaction and zeeman effect in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195407 (2014)

    2014

  23. [29]

    Alidoust, C

    M. Alidoust, C. Shen, and I. Zuti´ c, Cubic spin-orbit cou- pling and anomalous josephson effect in planar junctions, Phys. Rev. B 103, L060503 (2021)

    2021

  24. [30]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  25. [31]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Superconducting diode effect due to magnetochiral anisotropy in topolog- ical insulators and rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 106, 104501 (2022)

    2022

  26. [32]

    Jeon, J.-K

    K.-R. Jeon, J.-K. Kim, J. Yoon, J.-C. Jeon, H. Han, A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and S. S. P. Parkin, Zero-field polarity-reversible josephson supercurrent diodes enabled by a proximity-magnetized pt barrier, Nature Materials 21, 1008 (2022)

    2022

  27. [33]

    B. Lu, S. Ikegaya, P. Burset, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Tunable josephson diode effect on the surface of topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 096001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [34]

    Turini, S

    B. Turini, S. Salimian, M. Carrega, A. Iorio, E. Stram- bini, F. Giazotto, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, and S. Heun, Josephson diode effect in high-mobility insb nanoflags, Nano Lett. 22, 8502 (2022)

    2022

  29. [35]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, The supercurrent diode effect and nonreciprocal paraconductivity due to the chiral structure of nanotubes, Nature Communica- tions 14, 3330 (2023)

    2023

  30. [36]

    Guo, X.-H

    G.-L. Guo, X.-H. Pan, and X. Liu, ϕ0-junction and Josephson diode effect in high-temperature super- conductor, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.06838 (2024), arXiv:2410.06838 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [37]

    J. Yun, S. Son, J. Shin, G. Park, K. Zhang, Y. J. Shin, J.-G. Park, and D. Kim, Magnetic proximity-induced su- perconducting diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der waals heterostructure, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022064 (2023)

    2023

  32. [38]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li, Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene, Na- ture Physics 18, 1221 (2022)

    2022

  33. [39]

    D ´ ıez-M´ erida, A

    J. D ´ ıez-M´ erida, A. D ´ ıez-Carl´ on, S. Y. Yang, Y.-M. Xie, X.-J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Higginbotham, K. T. Law, and D. K. Efe- 9 tov, Symmetry-broken josephson junctions and supercon- ducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphen...

    2023

  34. [40]

    Hu, Z.-T

    J.-X. Hu, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. T. Law, Joseph- son diode effect induced by valley polarization in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 266003 (2023)

    2023

  35. [41]

    Gao, S.-W

    A. Gao, S.-W. Chen, B. Ghosh, J.-X. Qiu, Y.-F. Liu, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, D. B´ erub´ e, T. Dinh, H. Li, C. Tzschaschel, S. Park, T. Huang, S.-W. Lien, Z. Sun, S.-C. Ho, B. Singh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. C. Bell, A. Bansil, H. Lin, T.-R. Chang, A. Yacoby, N. Ni, L. ...

    2024

  36. [42]

    Zhang, Z.-T

    E. Zhang, Z.-T. Sun, Z. Jia, J. Yang, J. Yan, L. Ai, Y.-M. Xie, Y. Zhang, X.-J. Gao, X. Xu, S. Liu, Q. Ma, C. Hu, X. Kou, J. Zou, N. Ni, K. T. Law, S. Dong, and F. Xiu, Observation of edge supercurrent in topological antiferro- magnet mnbi2te4-based josephson junctions, Scienc...

    2025

  37. [43]

    S. Qi, J. Ge, C. Ji, Y. Ai, G. Ma, Z. Wang, Z. Cui, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, High-temperature field-free su- perconducting diode effect in high-tc cuprates, Nature Communications 16, 531 (2025)

    2025

  38. [44]

    Y. Zhu, H. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Hu, G. Gu, J. Zhu, D. Zhang, and Q.-K. Xue, Persistent josephson tunneling between bi2sr2cacu2o8+x flakes twisted by 45◦ across the superconducting dome, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174508 (2023)

    2023

  39. [45]

    Ghosh, V

    S. Ghosh, V. Patil, A. Basu, Kuldeep, A. Dutta, D. A. Jangade, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, J. F. Steiner, F. von Oppen, and M. M. Deshmukh, High-temperature josephson diode, Nature Materials 23, 612 (2024)

    2024

  40. [46]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267702 (2022)

    2022

  41. [47]

    Haenel and O

    R. Haenel and O. Can, Superconducting diode from flux biased Josephson junction arrays, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2212.02657 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Paolucci, G

    F. Paolucci, G. De Simoni, and F. Giazotto, A gate- and flux-controlled supercurrent diode effect, Applied Physics Letters 122, 042601 (2023)

    2023

  43. [49]

    Y. Li, D. Yan, Y. Hong, H. Sheng, A. Wang, Z. Dou, X. Guo, X. Shi, Z. Su, Z. Lyu, T. Qian, G. Liu, F. Qu, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, Z.-A. Xu, J. Hu, L. Lu, and J. Shen, Interfering josephson diode effect in ta2pd3te5 asymmetric edge interferometer, Nature Com- munications 15,...

    2024

  44. [50]

    E. C. Gingrich, B. M. Niedzielski, J. A. Glick, Y. Wang, D. L. Miller, R. Loloee, W. P. Pratt Jr, and N. O. Birge, Controllable 0-pi josephson junctions containing a ferro- magnetic spin valve, Nature Physics 12, 564 (2016)

    2016

  45. [51]

    D. B. Szombati, S. Nadj-Perge, D. Car, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Josephson phi0-junction in nanowire quantum dots, Nature Physics 12, 568 (2016)

    2016

  46. [52]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. Smejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ı rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. Sob´ an, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wad...

    2024

  47. [53]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  48. [54]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-hall- insulator/superconductor junction, Phys. Rev. B 79, 161408 (2009)

    2009

  49. [55]

    D. M. Badiane, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer, Nonequilib- rium josephson effect through helical edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 177002 (2011)

    2011

  50. [56]

    S. Cho, B. Dellabetta, A. Yang, J. Schneeloch, Z. Xu, T. Valla, G. Gu, M. J. Gilbert, and N. Mason, Symmetry protected josephson supercurrents in three-dimensional topological insulators, Nature Communications 4, 1689 (2013)

    2013

  51. [57]

    J. B. Oostinga, L. Maier, P. Sch¨ uffelgen, D. Knott, C. Ames, C. Br¨ une, G. Tkachov, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Josephson supercurrent through the topo- logical surface states of strained bulk hgte, Phys. Rev. X 3, 021007 (2013)

    2013

  52. [58]

    Kheirkhah, D

    M. Kheirkhah, D. Zhu, J. Maciejko, and Z. Yan, Corner- and sublattice-sensitive majorana zero modes on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085420 (2022)

    2022

  53. [59]

    D. Zhu, M. Kheirkhah, and Z. Yan, Sublattice-enriched tunability of bound states in second-order topological in- sulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085407 (2023)

    2023

  54. [60]

    X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Quantum spin hall ef- fect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Science 346, 1344 (2014)

    2014

  55. [61]

    K. Deng, G. Wan, P. Deng, K. Zhang, S. Ding, E. Wang, M. Yan, H. Huang, H. Zhang, Z. Xu, J. Denlinger, A. Fe- dorov, H. Yang, W. Duan, H. Yao, Y. Wu, S. Fan, H. Zhang, X. Chen, and S. Zhou, Experimental obser- vation of topological fermi arcs in type-ii weyl semimetal mote2, N...

    2016

  56. [62]

    Ritschel, J

    T. Ritschel, J. Trinckauf, K. Koepernik, B. B¨ uchner, M. v. Zimmermann, H. Berger, Y. I. Joe, P. Abbamonte, and J. Geck, Orbital textures and charge density waves in transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Physics 11, 328 (2015)

    2015

  57. [63]

    L. J. Li, E. C. T. O’Farrell, K. P. Loh, G. Eda, B. ¨Ozyilmaz, and A. H. Castro Neto, Controlling many-body states by the electric-field effect in a two- dimensional material, Nature 529, 185 (2016)

    2016

  58. [64]

    N. F. Q. Yuan, K. F. Mak, and K. T. Law, Possible topo- logical superconducting phases of mos 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 097001 (2014)

    2014

  59. [65]

    J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, and J. T. Ye, Evi- dence for two-dimensional ising superconductivity in gated mos¡sub¿2¡/sub¿, Science 350, 1353 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aab2277

    2015 doi

  60. [66]

    X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Ising pairing in superconducting nbse2 atomic layers, Nature Physics 12, 139 (2016)

    2016

  61. [68]

    Y.-T. Hsu, W. S. Cole, R.-X. Zhang, and J. D. Sau, Inversion-protected higher-order topological supercon- ductivity in monolayer wte 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 10 097001 (2020)

    2020

  62. [69]

    Nandy and D

    S. Nandy and D. A. Pesin, Low-energy effective theory and anomalous Hall effect in monolayer WTe 2, SciPost Phys. 12, 120 (2022)

    2022

  63. [70]

    Choe, H.-J

    D.-H. Choe, H.-J. Sung, and K. J. Chang, Understand- ing topological phase transition in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125109 (2016)

    2016

  64. [71]

    Muechler, A

    L. Muechler, A. Alexandradinata, T. Neupert, and R. Car, Topological nonsymmorphic metals from band inversion, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041069 (2016)

    2016

  65. [72]

    Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Mi- croelectronic Engineering (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  66. [73]

    V. S. Pribiag, A. J. A. Beukman, F. Qu, M. C. Cassidy, C. Charpentier, W. Wegscheider, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Edge-mode superconductivity in a two- dimensional topological insulator, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy 10, 593 (2015)

    2015

  67. [74]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Universal limit of critical-current fluctuations in mesoscopic josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3836 (1991)

    1991

  68. [75]

    K¨ onig, H

    M. K¨ onig, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Hughes, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, The quantum spin hall effect: Theory and experiment, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan 77, 031007 (2008)

    2008

  69. [76]

    Guo, H.-B

    G.-L. Guo, H.-B. Leng, and X. Liu, Parity-spin super- conducting qubit based on topological insulators, New Journal of Physics 26, 063005 (2024)

    2024

  70. [77]

    Sch¨ apers,Superconductor/Semiconductor Junctions, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2001)

    T. Sch¨ apers,Superconductor/Semiconductor Junctions, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2001)

    2001

  71. [78]

    Nikodem, J

    E. Nikodem, J. Schluck, M. Geier, M. Papaj, H. F. Legg, J. Feng, M. Bagchi, L. Fu, and Y. Ando, Large tunable Josephson diode effect in a side-contacted topological-insulator-nanowire junction, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.16569 (2024), arXiv:2412.16569 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Sajadi, T

    E. Sajadi, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, W. Zhao, P. Bement, C. Olsen, S. Luescher, X. Xu, J. A. Folk, and D. H. Cobden, Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator, Science 362, 922 (2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    S. Wu, V. Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Ob- servation of the quantum spin hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal, Science 359, 76 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.