Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Long does a Burst Burst?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1310.2540 v2 pith:3F6EHQ7U submitted 2013-10-09 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords grbsburstdurationgamma-rayobservationssamplecentraldistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Several gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) last much longer (~hours) in gamma-rays than typical long GRBs (~ minutes), and recently it was proposed that these "ultra-long GRBs" may form a distinct population, probably with a different (e.g. blue supergiant) progenitor than typical GRBs. However, Swift observations suggest that many GRBs have extended central engine activities manifested as flares and internal plateaus in X-rays. We perform a comprehensive study on a large sample of Swift GRBs with XRT observations to investigate GRB central engine activity duration and to determine whether ultra-long GRBs are unusual events. We define burst duration t_burst based on both gamma-ray and X-ray light curves rather than using gamma-ray observations alone. We find that t_burst can be reliably measured in 343 GRBs. Within this "good" sample, 21.9% GRBs have t_burst >=10^3 s and 11.5% GRBs have t_burst >=10^4 s. There is an apparent bimodal distribution of t_burst in this sample. However, when we consider an "undetermined" sample (304 GRBs) with t_burst possibly falling in the gap between GRB duration T_90 and the first X-ray observational time, as well as a selection effect against t_burst falling into the first Swift orbital "dead zone" due to observation constraints, the intrinsic underlying t_burst distribution is consistent with being a single component distribution. We found that the existing evidence for a separate ultra-long GRB population is inconclusive, and further multi-wavelength observations are needed to draw a firmer conclusion. We also discuss the theoretical implications of our results. In particular, the central engine activity duration of GRBs is generally much longer than the gamma-ray T90 duration and it does not even correlate with T90. It would be premature to make a direct connection between T90 and the size of the progenitor star.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of ultra-long gamma-ray bursts and X-ray plateau phases as evidence that the central engine keeps working long after the first flash.

Pith tools