REVIEW 2 cited by
Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding $\epsilon$-stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in $\epsilon$ better than $\epsilon^{-8/5}$, which is within $\epsilon^{-1/15}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than $\epsilon^{-12/7}$, while $\epsilon^{-2}$ is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves the rate $\epsilon^{-1}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}$, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Some Worst-Case Datasets of Deterministic First-Order Methods for Solving Binary Logistic Regression
The authors give worst-case logistic regression datasets on which every deterministic first-order method needs Ω(1/√ε) oracle queries for an ε-approximate solution.
-
Observability conditions for neural state-space models with eigenvalues and their roots of unity
A set of sufficient conditions and training losses for enforcing observability in neural state-space models, with one clean Mamba condition and several unproven high-probability Fourier results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.