Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 57 references

Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. I. Distributions, moments, and correlation functions of a free particle

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives exact conditional statistics for Brownian trajectories separated by whether kinetic energy is above or below a threshold, giving closed-form moments that deviate from equipartition by factors such as $1\pm 2/\pi$.

desk verdict A clean, genuinely new conditional-statistics analysis of Brownian energy fluctuations; the closed forms look right, but the derivations live in an unavailable supplement. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00503 v1 pith:3FPOQCQJ submitted 2019-08-01 cond-mat.stat-mech

Galen T. Craven , Abraham Nitzan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 05.40.-a05.60.-k
keywords BrownianmotionLangevinequationconditionalstatisticsenergyfluctuationsvelocitycorrelationfunctionsnonequilibriumsteadystatekineticthresholdheattransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a restricted statistical mechanics for Brownian motion: instead of averaging over every trajectory, it splits trajectories into those whose kinetic energy is above a threshold ('upside') and those below it ('downside'), and derives exact conditional distributions, moments, and correlation functions for each subensemble. The central result is that restricted observables differ from the unrestricted averages in a clean and computable way. For a steady-state initial condition and threshold equal to the initial energy, the long-time conditioned second velocity moments are $(k_BT/m)(1\pm 2/\pi)$, symmetric about the equipartition value $k_BT/m$, with the transient controlled by $\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}$. The same machinery gives two-time correlations that describe how an upside or downside classification at a later time constrains the velocity statistics at earlier times. This is the mathematical basis for resolving energy partitioning and heat currents in systems driven by multiple thermal baths, which full-ensemble averages cannot address.

What carries the argument

The central object is the restricted probability density built by inserting a Heaviside energy selector, $\Theta(E(v)-E^\ddagger)$ for upside or $\Theta(E^\ddagger-E(v))$ for downside, into the Chapman–Kolmogorov convolution of the steady-state initial density $\rho^{(ss)}(v_0)$ with the Gaussian transition density $\rho(vt|v_0 0)$. Normalizing these selected densities converts the integrals into conditional moments and correlations. Because the initial density and the transition density are both Gaussian, the integrals reduce to error functions or confluent hypergeometric series; all transient time dependence flows through the velocity variance $\sigma_v^2(t)=(k_BT/m)(1-e^{-2\gamma t})$ and the factor $G(t)=\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}$.

What would settle it

Simulate $\dot v=-\gamma v+\xi(t)$ with Gaussian white noise of strength $2\gamma k_BT/m$, drawing initial velocities from the steady-state Gibbs distribution. At a fixed time $t$, compute the mean squared velocity restricted to trajectories with $\frac12 m v(t)^2>\frac12 m v(0)^2$ (upside) and to trajectories with the opposite inequality (downside). If the two conditional means do not track $(k_BT/m)[1\pm(2/\pi)\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}]$, or if the probability of each sign is not $1/2$ at all times, the central claim is disproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that upside/downside Brownian statistics form a closed calculus: with the steady-state Gibbs initial distribution, every one-time and two-time observable can be written explicitly using the Gaussian transition probability of the linear Langevin process together with error functions and confluent hypergeometric series. The signature results are the second velocity moments conditioned on the energy being above or below the initial energy, $\langle v^2(t)\rangle_\uparrow = \frac{k_BT}{m}[1+\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}]$ and $\langle v^2(t)\rangle_\downarrow = \frac{k_BT}{m}[1-\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}]$, which are symmetric about the unrestricted equipartition value. For the threshold set at the mean energy, the conditioned second moments are time-independent and strongly asymmetric, about $2.53\,k_BT/m$ upside versus $0.291\,k_BT/m$ downside. The two-time conditioned densities and correlations show that an upside/downside label at a later time reshapes the earlier velocity distribution, with exact time-symmetry for the threshold $E(0)$ and a simple exponential persistence factor $e^{-\gamma(t-t')}$ for the mean-energy threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the initial velocities are drawn from the steady-state Gibbs distribution and that the velocity dynamics is exactly the linear Langevin process with Gaussian white noise, so every transition probability is exactly Gaussian; if either fails, the closed-form formulas in Section IV do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the steady-state free-particle case, the equipartition value $k_BT/m$ is recovered only after averaging over both subensembles; conditioning on energy gain or loss displaces the kinetic energy by $\pm(2/\pi)\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}\,(k_BT/m)$ at every finite time.
  • With the mean energy as threshold, positive and negative energy fluctuations are not mirror images: their one-time kinetic energies are about $2.53$ and $0.291$ times $k_BT/m$, and these values are stationary in time.
  • For threshold $E(0)$, the two-time restricted densities are time-symmetric in the sense that at $t'=t/2$ the upside and downside densities coincide, and the conditioned energy at $t'=0$ for an upside process equals the conditioned energy at $t$ for the conjugate downside process.
  • The restricted energy change during an upside event with threshold $E(0)$ is $\langle\Delta E\rangle_\uparrow=(2/\pi)k_BT\sqrt{1-e^{-2\gamma t}}$, and during the downside event it is exactly its negative.
  • Velocity correlations conditioned on a mean-energy threshold keep the same exponential decay $e^{-\gamma(t-t')}$ as the unrestricted velocity correlation, with amplitudes set by the restricted second moments, so the relaxation time is unchanged while the correlation strength depends on the sign of the fluctuation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests a direct single-particle test: track a free colloidal or gas-phase particle in a thermal bath, condition its measured squared velocity on whether the instantaneous kinetic energy exceeds its initial value, and compare the conditional means with Eqs. (41)–(42); the predicted long-time deviation from equipartition is the fixed factor $2/\pi$, depending only on the sign of the energy ch
  • The same selective construction could be applied to other selectors, such as position, potential energy, or heat flux, by replacing $E(v)$ in the Heaviside function; the resulting conditional fluctuation statistics would be new predictions rather than consequences of this paper.
  • The multi-bath partition result previewed in the introduction—that the fraction of energy change attributed to bath $k$ is $\gamma_kT_k/\sum_j\gamma_jT_j$—is not derived here, but it follows naturally from the effective temperature $T=\sum_k\gamma_kT_k/\gamma$ used throughout, so simulating coupled thermostats and measuring per-bath energy exchange during upside/downside events would test it befor
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper develops a formalism for the statistical mechanics of a free Brownian particle whose trajectory ensemble is split into "upside" sub-ensembles (system energy above a threshold at time t) and "downside" sub-ensembles (below the threshold). The model is a linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck velocity process with effective friction γ and effective temperature T defined through coupling to N thermal baths (Sec. II). The authors derive restricted transition probabilities, one-time and two-time conditional densities, velocity and energy moments, energy changes, and velocity correlation functions for two threshold choices: the trajectory-dependent initial energy E(0) and the ensemble-averaged energy ⟨E⟩, with the initial distribution taken to be the steady-state Gibbs distribution. The central output is a set of closed-form expressions, e.g., Eqs. (41)-(42) for the conditional second velocity moments, Eqs. (73)-(74) for two-time restricted moments, and Eqs. (97)-(100) for restricted velocity correlation functions. The paper also presents series representations for the two-time once-restricted densities (Eqs. (61)-(62)) and states that detailed derivations are in a Supplementary Material file.

Significance. If the results are correct, they provide a useful, parameter-free set of conditioned statistics for a Gaussian (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck) velocity process, with no fitted parameters; the inputs are the physical constants of the model. The formulas pass multiple internal consistency checks: the probability-weighted sums of the upside and downside moments reproduce the unrestricted moment (Eqs. (41)-(42) with p↑=p↓=1/2), the two-time correlation functions average to the unrestricted correlation e^{-γ(t-t')} (Eqs. (97)-(98)), and the t→0 and t→∞ limits are consistent with the defining integrals. The multi-bath motivation is plausible and the framework could be applied to energy partitioning in later work. However, the manuscript as submitted is not self-contained: the derivations of the central closed-form results are delegated to a Supplementary Material file that is not included in the arXiv text, so the referee and readers can verify internal consistency but cannot audit the derivations from the defining integrals. A number of typographical errors in key formulas further complicate verification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV and Section VI] All closed-form results in Section IV are introduced with the statement that 'details of these derivations can be found in the Supplementary Material,' but the supplementary file is not part of the arXiv submission. The paper's central claim is precisely these derivations, from the integral definitions (22)-(25), (37)-(38), (69)-(70), and (95)-(96) to the closed forms (27)-(28), (41)-(42), (51)-(52), (73)-(74), (76)-(77), and (97)-(100). With the supplement absent, the referee can check limits and consistency but cannot verify that the integrals actually reduce to the stated expressions. Please supply the supplementary material as an ancillary file and include in the main text at least one complete derivation, preferably for Eqs. (41)-(42) from Eq. (37), so that the path from the Gaussian transition probability to a closed form is auditable.
  2. [Section IV D, Eqs. (61)-(62) and Figs. 4-7] The series representations for the two-time once-restricted densities (Eqs. (61)-(62)) are extremely involved, and the text notes that evaluating these sums to convergence is computationally slow. Yet no direct comparison is shown between the closed forms and direct numerical integration of the defining integrals (59)-(60). The figures appear to be based on quadrature of the integral forms, but it is not stated whether the plotted curves use the series or the integrals. Adding a short validation table or a supplementary figure comparing the closed-form expressions with adaptive numerical integration for representative parameter sets would make the central results independently checkable, especially since the derivations are not included in the submission.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (28)] The denominator in the expression for the downside density is written with the condition E(t) > E(0); it should be E(t) < E(0) to match the definition of p↓ in Eq. (23). Since p↑ = p↓ = 1/2 in this case, the numerical results are unaffected, but the formula as written is incorrect.
  2. [Eq. (54)] The definition of p↓↓ is labelled '≡ p↑↑(t′, t | ρ0 0)' after the equality; this should read '≡ p↓↓(t′, t | ρ0 0)'. The same line uses p↑↑ on the left side for the (↑,↑) probability, so the two labels are confused.
  3. [Section IV A] The text states that both restricted densities 'have a singularity at v=0.' From Eqs. (27)-(28), the upside density is zero at v=0 and the downside density is finite at v=0; only the derivative is discontinuous there. 'Cusp' or 'non-differentiability' would be more accurate than 'singularity'.
  4. [Section IV B] In the sentence following Eq. (38), the numerator of the restricted moment is described as 'a normalization factor.' The numerator is the unnormalized restricted moment; the denominator p↓ is the normalization factor. Please correct this wording.
  5. [Eqs. (78)-(79)] In Eq. (79), the second term on the right-hand side carries the condition E(t) > E(0) with a down-arrow subscript; it should be E(t) < E(0) with the down-arrow, in analogy with Eq. (78). The surrounding equations (80)-(85) show that the intended formula is the downside counterpart.
  6. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction emphasize that the model is a 'nonequilibrium Brownian process' driven by multiple thermal sources. Within this paper, however, the restricted observables only depend on the effective friction γ and effective temperature T of Eqs. (6) and (8); the process is an ordinary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process whose stationary state is the Gibbs distribution of Eq. (11). The multi-bath nonequilibrium content is deferred to later papers. Please adjust the wording so that the reader is not led to expect nonequilibrium-specific results in this paper.
  7. [Section IV D] The notation in Eqs. (59)-(60) and elsewhere uses both '⏐' and '|' for conditional statements; please standardize to a single symbol. Also, the superscript '<' is used both as a label and as a relational symbol in expressions such as '(v′ t′ < t | ... )', which can be confusing.
  8. [Title and affiliation] The title contains 'fre e particle' and the affiliation contains 'Phil adelphia'; these appear to be typographical or OCR artifacts and should be corrected in the manuscript source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the restricted statistics are direct conditional integrals of the standard Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck transition density, with no fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The unrestricted process is the standard linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process (Eq. 5) with Gaussian white noise (Eq. 7), and the transition probability is the textbook Gaussian density (Eq. 12). The upside/downside quantities are then defined by inserting Heaviside selectors on the energy into integrals of this known transition density (Eqs. 22-25, 37-38, 53-56, 69-70, 95-96). No parameter is fitted to any subset of the predicted data, and no predicted moment is equal to an input by construction: the closed forms such as Eqs. (41)-(42) and (97)-(100) are nontrivial evaluations of those Gaussian integrals, and the paper states that the detailed evaluations are provided in the Supplementary Material. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. 21-24 and 52-57) are not used to justify the central derivation, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The paper's own limiting checks, such as the reduction of two-time formulas to one-time formulas and the symmetric split about the unrestricted moment, are consistent with conditional expectations and do not indicate circularity. The main genuine caveat is verifiability rather than circularity: Section IV says 'Details of these derivations can be found in the Supplementary Material,' and that supplement is not included in the arXiv version, so the closed-form evaluations cannot be independently audited from the text alone. There is also a minor typo in Eq. (28) involving the condition E(t)>E(0), which does not affect the numerical results because p_up = p_down = 1/2 for that threshold. These are presentation and auditability issues, not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters and no invented entities. It depends on the standard linear Langevin model and the assumption of a steady-state initial distribution for the closed-form results.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The velocity process obeys the linear Langevin equation with Gaussian white noise, leading to a Gaussian transition probability (Eq. 12).
    This is the standard Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model, stated in Section II. All derivations in the paper build on this Gaussian form.
  • domain assumption The initial velocity distribution is the steady-state Gibbs distribution, ρ0 = ρ(ss) (Eq. 11), for all explicit closed-form results.
    Most formulas in Section IV are derived specifically under this assumption, as stated in the text and in the Supplementary Material. Without it, the results are only implicit integral forms.
  • standard math The multi-temperature system with friction γ = Σ γk has an effective temperature T = Σ γk Tk / γ, giving a steady-state Gibbs distribution (Eqs. 7, 8, 11).
    This is a standard result for a particle coupled to multiple Markovian baths, used to extend the equilibrium formalism to the nonequilibrium case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. I. Distributions, moments, and correlation functions of a free particle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3FPOQCQJ

@misc{pith2026190800503,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Upside/Downside statistical mechanics of nonequilibrium Brownian motion. I. Distributions, moments, and correlation functions of a free particle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3FPOQCQJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00503}
}
read the original abstract

Statistical properties of Brownian motion that arise by analyzing, separately, trajectories over which the system energy increases (upside) or decreases (downside) with respect to a threshold energy level, are derived. This selective analysis is applied to examine transport properties of a nonequilibrium Brownian process that is coupled to multiple thermal sources characterized by different temperatures. Distributions, moments, and correlation functions of a free particle that occur during upside and downside events are investigated for energy activation and energy relaxation processes, and also for positive and negative energy fluctuations from the average energy. The presented results are sufficiently general and can be applied without modification to standard Brownian motion. This article focuses on the mathematical basis of this selective analysis. In subsequent articles in this series we apply this general formalism to processes in which heat transfer between thermal reservoirs is mediated by activated rate processes that take place in a system bridging them.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00503 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Energy of a representative stochastic process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Restricted upside and downside probability density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Velocity moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two-time twice-restricted probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two-time once-restricted upside and downside proba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Two-time once-restricted velocity moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Velocity correlation as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jarzynski , journal Phys

    author C. Jarzynski , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 78 , pages 2690 ( year 1997 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2690 1997

  2. [2]

    author D. J. Evans , author E. G. D. Cohen , and author G. P. Morriss , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 71 , pages 2401 ( year 1993 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.2401 1993

  3. [3]

    Kurchan , journal J

    author J. Kurchan , journal J. Phys. A volume 31 , pages 3719 ( year 1998 ), http://stacks.iop.org/0305-4470/31/i=16/a=003

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    author G. E. Crooks , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 61 , pages 2361 ( year 2000 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2361

    doi:10.1103/physreve.61.2361 2000

  5. [5]

    Seifert , journal Rep

    author U. Seifert , journal Rep. Prog. Phys. volume 75 , pages 126001 ( year 2012 ), http://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/75/i=12/a=126001

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Onsager , journal Phys

    author L. Onsager , journal Phys. Rev. volume 37 , pages 405 ( year 1931 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

    doi:10.1103/physrev.37.405 1931

  7. [7]

    Sekimoto , journal Prog

    author K. Sekimoto , journal Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp. volume 130 , pages 17 ( year 1998 ), doi:10.1143/PTPS.130.17

    doi:10.1143/ptps.130.17 1998

  8. [8]

    Seifert , journal Phys

    author U. Seifert , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 040602 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040602

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.040602 2005

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Van den Broeck , in booktitle Physics of Complex Colloids ( publisher IOS Press , year 2013 ), vol

    author C. Van den Broeck , in booktitle Physics of Complex Colloids ( publisher IOS Press , year 2013 ), vol. volume 184 , pp. pages 155--193

    2013

  2. [10]

    author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. volume 114 , pages 1192 ( year 1959 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.114.1192

    1959 doi

  3. [11]

    Rieder , author J

    author Z. Rieder , author J. L. Lebowitz , and author E. Lieb , journal J. Math. Phys. volume 8 , pages 1073 ( year 1967 ), doi:10.1063/1.1705319

    1967 doi

  4. [12]

    Casher and author J

    author A. Casher and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal J. Math. Phys. volume 12 , pages 1701 ( year 1971 ), doi:10.1063/1.1665794

    1971 doi

  5. [13]

    Segal , author A

    author D. Segal , author A. Nitzan , and author P. H\"anggi , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 119 , pages 6840 ( year 2003 ), doi:10.1063/1.1603211

    2003 doi

  6. [14]

    Segal and author A

    author D. Segal and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 94 , pages 034301 ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301

    2005 doi

  7. [15]

    Dhar and author J

    author A. Dhar and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 134301 ( year 2008 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.134301

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    Kannan , author A

    author V. Kannan , author A. Dhar , and author J. L. Lebowitz , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 85 , pages 041118 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.041118

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    Sabhapandit , journal Phys

    author S. Sabhapandit , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 85 , pages 021108 ( year 2012 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021108

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Dhar and author R

    author A. Dhar and author R. Dandekar , journal Physica A volume 418 , pages 49 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.002

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    author K. A. Velizhanin , author S. Sahu , author C.-C. Chien , author Y. Dubi , and author M. Zwolak , journal Sci. Rep. volume 5 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1038/srep17506

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Murashita and author M

    author Y. Murashita and author M. Esposito , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 94 , pages 062148 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.94.062148

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 113 , pages 9421 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.1609141113

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 146 , pages 092305 ( year 2017 a ), doi:10.1063/1.4971293

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    author G. T. Craven and author A. Nitzan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 118 , pages 207201 ( year 2017 b ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.207201

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Chen , author G

    author R. Chen , author G. T. Craven , and author A. Nitzan , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 124101 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1063/1.4990410

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 24 , pages 966 ( year 1956 ), doi:10.1063/1.1742723

    1956 doi

  18. [26]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. volume 15 , pages 155 ( year 1964 ), doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.15.100164.001103

    1964

  19. [27]

    author R. A. Marcus and author N. Sutin , journal Biochim. Biophys. Acta volume 811 , pages 265 ( year 1985 ), doi:10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X

    1985 doi

  20. [28]

    author R. A. Marcus , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 65 , pages 599 ( year 1993 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.599

    1993 doi

  21. [29]

    H \"a nggi , author P

    author P. H \"a nggi , author P. Talkner , and author M. Borkovec , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 62 , pages 251 ( year 1990 ), 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.251

    1990 doi

  22. [30]

    author D. G. Truhlar , author B. C. Garrett , and author S. J. Klippenstein , journal J. Phys. Chem. volume 100 , pages 12771 ( year 1996 )

    1996

  23. [31]

    Komatsuzaki and author R

    author T. Komatsuzaki and author R. S. Berry , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 98 , pages 7666 ( year 2001 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.131627698

    2001 doi

  24. [32]

    Bartsch , author R

    author T. Bartsch , author R. Hernandez , and author T. Uzer , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 95 , pages 058301(1) ( year 2005 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.058301

    2005 doi

  25. [33]

    Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    author A. Nitzan , title Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 2006 )

    2006

  26. [34]

    Hernandez , author T

    author R. Hernandez , author T. Bartsch , and author T. Uzer , journal Chem. Phys. volume 370 , pages 270 ( year 2010 ), doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.01.016

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Peters , journal J

    author B. Peters , journal J. Phys. Chem. B volume 119 , pages 6349 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02547

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    author G. T. Craven and author R. Hernandez , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 115 , pages 148301 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.148301

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Chandler , title Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 1987 )

    author D. Chandler , title Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , year 1987 )

    1987

  30. [38]

    author W. H. Greene , title Econometric Analysis ( publisher Prentice Hall , year 2002 )

    2002

  31. [39]

    Ranganatham , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Pearson Education India , year 2006 )

    author M. Ranganatham , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Pearson Education India , year 2006 )

    2006

  32. [40]

    author F. K. Reilly and author K. C. Brown , title Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management ( publisher Cengage Learning , year 2011 )

    2011

  33. [41]

    author F. A. Sortino and author R. Van Der Meer , journal J. Portfolio Manage. volume 17 , pages 27 ( year 1991 )

    1991

  34. [42]

    author F. A. Sortino and author L. N. Price , journal J. Invest. volume 3 , pages 59 ( year 1994 )

    1994

  35. [43]

    Keating and author W

    author C. Keating and author W. F. Shadwick , journal J. Perf. Measure. volume 6 , pages 59 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  36. [44]

    Ang , author J

    author A. Ang , author J. Chen , and author Y. Xing , journal Rev. Financ. Stud. volume 19 , pages 1191 ( year 2006 ), doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj035

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    Zwanzig , title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , address London , year 2001 )

    author R. Zwanzig , title Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics ( publisher Oxford University Press , address London , year 2001 )

    2001

  38. [46]

    Revuelta , author G

    author F. Revuelta , author G. T. Craven , author T. Bartsch , and author R. Hernandez , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 074104 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1063/1.4997571

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    author G. T. Craven , author A. Junginger , and author R. Hernandez , journal Phys. Rev. E volume 96 , pages 022222 ( year 2017 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022222

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Chandrasekhar , journal Rev

    author S. Chandrasekhar , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 15 , pages 1 ( year 1943 ), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.15.1

    1943 doi

  41. [49]

    author G. E. Uhlenbeck and author L. S. Ornstein , journal Phys. Rev. volume 36 , pages 823 ( year 1930 ), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.823

    1930 doi

  42. [50]

    author D. V. Matyushov , journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. volume 113 , pages 9401 ( year 2016 ), doi:10.1073/pnas.1610542113

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    Cohen , in booktitle Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures ISAAC 2015 ( organization Springer , year 2015 ), pp

    author L. Cohen , in booktitle Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures ISAAC 2015 ( organization Springer , year 2015 ), pp. pages 1--35

    2015

  44. [52]

    note Results for the different case E^ = E(0) and _0 = (v-v_0) are given in the Supplementary Material

  45. [53]

    note Derivations of restricted transport properties are given in the Supplementary Material

  46. [54]

    author E. W. Ng and author M. Geller , journal Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards B volume 73 , pages 1–20 ( year 1969 )

    1969

  47. [55]

    author M. K. Simon and author D. Divsalar , journal IEEE Trans. Commun. volume 46 , pages 200 ( year 1998 ), doi:10.1109/26.659479

    1998 doi

  48. [56]

    Fayed and author A

    author H. Fayed and author A. Atiya , journal Math. Comp volume 83 , pages 235 ( year 2014 ), doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2013-02720-2

    2014 doi

  49. [57]

    Fayed , author A

    author H. Fayed , author A. Atiya , and author A. Badawi , journal Math. Sci. Lett. volume 4 , pages 249 ( year 2015 ), doi:10.12785/msl/040305

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.