Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generative Adversarial Neural Cellular Automata

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04328 v1 pith:3GLH7IHB submitted 2021-07-19 cs.NE cs.CV

classification cs.NEcs.CV
keywords automatacellularmodelneuraladversarialconceptsinglecells
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by the interaction between cells, the recently introduced concept of Neural Cellular Automata shows promising results in a variety of tasks. So far, this concept was mostly used to generate images for a single scenario. As each scenario requires a new model, this type of generation seems contradictory to the adaptability of cells in nature. To address this contradiction, we introduce a concept using different initial environments as input while using a single Neural Cellular Automata to produce several outputs. Additionally, we introduce GANCA, a novel algorithm that combines Neural Cellular Automata with Generative Adversarial Networks, allowing for more generalization through adversarial training. The experiments show that a single model is capable of learning several images when presented with different inputs, and that the adversarially trained model improves drastically on out-of-distribution data compared to a supervised trained model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Missing Data Imputation using Neural Cellular Automata

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NICA, an iterative self-attention model styled after cellular automata, achieves lower mean RMSE than Mean, KNN, MICE, and GAIN on 14 of 15 tabular datasets with simulated MCAR missingness.

Pith tools