Pith. sign in

REVIEW 51 references

Observation of correlation-driven topological transport and robust ferromagnetism in 2D CrS$_2$

T0 review · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Catalyst-free CVD-grown 1T-CrS2 is a stable layered ferromagnet above room temperature in which correlations and spin-orbit coupling drive topological Hall transport.

desk verdict Solid materials advance on air-stable high-Tc 1T-CrS2; the topological Hall claim is the soft joint and should be tempered. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23625 v1 pith:3HD7PDPN submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Sk Md Obaidulla , M. Nur Hasan , Dayal Das , Rafiqul Alam , Antonio Supina , Muhammad Awais Aslam , Sherif Kamal , Iva Šarić Jankovic
show 5 more authors
Aleksandar Matkovic Christian Teichert Atindra Nath Pal Heike C. Herper Marko Kralj
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords 1T-CrS22DferromagnettopologicalHalleffectvanderWaalsmagnetCVDgrowthelectroniccorrelationsspin-orbitcouplingCurietemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first catalyst-free chemical vapour deposition growth of phase-pure layered 1T-CrS2 and argues that the material is a rare ambient-stable van der Waals ferromagnet with an out-of-plane easy axis and a Curie temperature above room temperature. Transport shows a semimetal-to-insulator crossover near 80 K, negative magnetoresistance that survives to 350 K, and a topological Hall signal that appears only below about 30 K. First-principles calculations attribute the electronic reconstruction to spin-orbit coupling that gaps Dirac-like crossings together with on-site correlations that suppress electron pockets and lower the carrier density, while Heisenberg exchange calculations explain the high-temperature ferromagnetic order. The result is offered as a single 3d layered platform in which robust ferromagnetism and correlation-driven topological transport coexist without encapsulation.

What carries the argument

The cooperative DFT+U+SOC reconstruction: spin-orbit coupling gaps the Dirac-like crossings while on-site Coulomb correlations suppress electron pockets, reduce carrier density, and enhance momentum-dependent out-of-plane spin polarization; strong nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic Heisenberg exchange then stabilizes the long-range order.

What would settle it

Real-space magnetic imaging (MFM or Lorentz TEM) that either reveals or rules out non-coplanar spin textures below 30 K at the fields of the Hall hump, or a Berry-curvature transport calculation that quantitatively matches the measured topological Hall amplitude and carrier density.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Phase-pure layered 1T-CrS2 grown by catalyst-free CVD is a highly stable van der Waals ferromagnet with out-of-plane easy-axis anisotropy and Curie temperature above room temperature. In this material electronic correlations and spin-orbit coupling cooperatively reconstruct the Fermi surface, suppress electron pockets, and produce an emergent topological Hall effect below 30 K, establishing 1T-CrS2 as a correlated 3d layered ferromagnet that hosts both robust magnetism and topological transport.

Load-bearing premise

That the low-temperature Hall hump left after antisymmetrizing up- and down-field sweeps is a genuine topological Hall signal from correlation-driven Berry physics rather than residual multi-band or domain effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 1T-CrS2 becomes a practical ambient-stable platform for room-temperature two-dimensional spintronics without encapsulation.
  • Correlation-driven Fermi-surface reconstruction supplies a design route to topological transport in other 3d transition-metal dichalcogenides.
  • Negative magnetoresistance persisting to 350 K shows spin-disorder scattering remains coupled to the ferromagnetic state across a wide temperature window.
  • Devices can combine high-Curie-temperature ferromagnetism with a distinct low-temperature topological Hall regime in a single layered crystal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the topological Hall signal is momentum-space Berry curvature from the gapped, correlation-reconstructed pockets rather than real-space skyrmions, electrostatic gating through the low-carrier-density Fermi surface should continuously switch the signal on and off.
  • The same catalyst-free CVD protocol may extend to other Cr-based 1T dichalcogenides where competing polytypes have blocked phase-pure growth.
  • Thickness-dependent topological Hall amplitude would separate bulk Berry-phase contributions from domain-wall or interface scattering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild phenomenological construction in Eq. 2; core CVD, magnetism, and DFT+U results are not circular by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [§II.A, Eq. (2)]
    "To capture the continuous semimetal–insulator crossover observed experimentally, we describe the temperature-dependent gap, Δα(T)=ΔSOC+λ[m(T)−mc]/(1+exp[−k(m(T)−mc)]), where ΔSOC is the correlation-induced gap, m(T) is the temperature-dependent magnetization, mc denotes the critical magnetization required for FS reconstruction, λ characterizes the exchange-enhanced contribution to the gap, and k controls the sharpness of the crossover."

    The functional form is built so that large low-T magnetization opens/enhances the gap (insulating) and reduced m closes it (semimetallic). Once m(T) and the observed T_TI are known, the crossover is encoded by construction rather than predicted from independent microscopic parameters; λ, k, and mc are free knobs that make the model track the data.

full rationale

The load-bearing experimental claims (catalyst-free CVD of 1T-CrS2, OOP FM with Tc>350 K, MAE≈0.28 MJ m−3, semimetal–insulator crossover, negative MR, and the low-T Hall hump) are direct measurements, not forced by fitted inputs. First-principles MAE (0.27 MJ m−3), LKAG exchanges, and Monte Carlo Tc≈390 K are independent electronic-structure outputs compared to experiment, not tautologies. The only clear construction is the phenomenological gap Δα(T) (Eq. 2), which is explicitly written to track the observed crossover once m(T) is known; it is not sold as an ab initio prediction of T_TI. Choice of U_eff=3.2 eV that suppresses electron pockets is conventional DFT+U practice and is not shown to be reverse-engineered from the Hall data. THE isolation via sweep subtraction is a contested physical interpretation (possible residual AHE hysteresis), not a circular derivation. No self-citation uniqueness theorem or renamed empirical law carries the central claim. Score 2 reflects one minor descriptive construction, not forced central results.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The load-bearing physics rests on standard DFT+U+SOC and classical Heisenberg/Monte Carlo machinery, plus the experimental identification of 1T phase purity and of the Hall hump as topological. Free parameters that move the central electronic narrative are U_eff and the phenomenological gap coefficients; the invented interpretive entity is the correlation-driven topological Hall regime itself.

free parameters (3)
  • U_eff (DFT+U) = 3.2 eV
    On-site Coulomb interaction set to 3.2 eV to obtain electron-pocket suppression and the low-carrier FS used to explain insulating transport and THE; not derived from first principles in the text.
  • Phenomenological gap parameters Δ_SOC, λ, m_c, k in Eq. (2)
    Temperature-dependent gap form is constructed so that Δα tracks magnetization across the ~80 K crossover; coefficients are not independently measured.
  • Arrhenius activation energy Δ = ≈9.36 meV
    Extracted from low-T ρ(T)∝exp(Δ/k_B T) fit and used as evidence of a narrow reconstructed gap.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE (+D3) with optional SOC and static DFT+U adequately describe Cr t2g bands, magnetic anisotropy, and Fermi-surface topology of 1T-CrS2.
    Entire electronic-structure and exchange narrative (§A, §C, Methods) depends on this standard but approximate framework for correlated 3d TMDCs.
  • domain assumption Classical Heisenberg model with LKAG Jij plus Metropolis Monte Carlo yields a reliable Curie temperature for this itinerant 2D magnet.
    Tc≈390 K comparison to experiment (Fig. 3g) assumes classical spins and the extracted isotropic Jij hierarchy.
  • ad hoc to paper Antisymmetrized Hall difference R_THE_xy=[R↑_xy−R↓_xy]/2 isolates a topological Hall component distinct from ordinary and anomalous Hall terms.
    Central 'topological transport' claim in §D rests on this subtraction protocol without additional topological diagnostics.
  • standard math Mermin–Wagner evasion by finite MAE allows long-range 2D FM order at finite T.
    Invoked in Introduction and magnetism section to justify stable 2D ferromagnetism given measured/calculated MAE.
  • domain assumption Goodenough–Kanamori 90° Cr–S–Cr superexchange explains ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor coupling for 3d2 t2g moments.
    Used in §C and Fig. 3f to rationalize the sign of Jij.
invented entities (1)
  • Correlation-driven topological Hall regime in 1T-CrS2 below ~30 K
    purpose: Unifies the low-T Hall hump with DFT+U+SOC Fermi-surface reconstruction and reduced carrier density.
    THE is inferred from transport lineshape plus correlated FS calculations; no direct observation of skyrmions, non-coplanar texture, or quantized/ Berry-curvature-computed σ_xy matching the device is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of correlation-driven topological transport and robust ferromagnetism in 2D CrS$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HD7PDPN

@misc{pith2026260723625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of correlation-driven topological transport and robust ferromagnetism in 2D CrS$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HD7PDPN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23625}
}
abstract

The realization of correlated layered magnets hosting robust ferromagnetism with emergent topological transport remains a key challenge in quantum materials. Here we report the first catalyst-free chemical vapour deposition growth of layered 1T-CrS$_2$, establishing a highly stable vdWs ferromagnet with an out-of-plane easy-axis anisotropy and a Curie temperature above room temperature. Transport measurements reveal a semimetal--insulator crossover near 80 K and pronounced negative magnetoresistance up to 350 K. A topological Hall effect emerges below 30 K, a rare signature of correlated transport in layered transition-metal dichalcogenide ferromagnets. First-principles calculations show that spin--orbit coupling gaps Dirac-like crossings, while electronic correlations reconstruct the Fermi surface by suppressing electron pockets and reducing the carrier density, enhancing momentum-dependent out-of-plane spin polarization. Magnetic measurements, supported by Heisenberg exchange calculations, reveal strong nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic exchange that stabilizes long-range ferromagnetism. Our results establish 1T-CrS$_2$ as a rare correlated 3$d$ layered ferromagnet in which electronic correlations and spin--orbit coupling cooperatively drive emergent topological transport.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23625 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. g, the linear Dirac-like crossing evolves into a gapped massive dispersion with finite momentum￾dependent band splittings emerging throughout the vicinity of the EF . These SOC-induced modifications introduce additional low-energy scales into the electronic states and substantially alter the topology of the near-EF states. The orbital-projected SF reveals that SOC not only lifts the band degeneracies but also enhanc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. e shows the calculated isotropic exchange parameters Jij as a function of the normalized Cr–Cr distance (Rij/a). The calculated exchange interactions are predominantly ferromagnetic and remain finite over several neighbouring shells. Interestingly, although the nearest-neighbour exchange interaction is ferromagnetic, the second- and third-nearest-neighbour couplings become comparatively stronger. This behaviour refl… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (22 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a presents the longitudinal magnetoresistance, defined as MR = [Rxx(B) − Rxx(0)]/Rxx(0) [40, 41], measured for H ⊥ ab over 2–300 K. The MR is predominantly negative throughout the entire temperature range, with no appreciable conventional positive orbital contribution …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Partial spectral function of Cr 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Orbital-resolved spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Orbital-resolved spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Orbital-resolved spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Orbital-resolved spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Orbital-resolved spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Partial spectral function of Cr 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Orbital-resolved DFT+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Orbital-resolved DFT+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Orbital-resolved DFT+SOC spectral function for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Orbital-resolved DFT+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Orbital-resolved DFT+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Partial spectral function of Cr 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Orbital-resolved DFT+U+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Orbital-resolved DFT+U+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Orbital-resolved DFT+U+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Orbital-resolved DFT+U+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Orbital-resolved DFT+U+SOC spectral function for the Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Schematic illustration of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth process of layered 1T-CrS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Optical images of as-grown 1T-CrS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. Calculated two-dimensional Cr-projected Fermi surfaces obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_25.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf,Nature 603, 41 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki,Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Y. Khan, S. M. Obaidulla, A. Gayen, T. Liang, X. Wang, and M. Xu,Nano Today34, 100902 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner,Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  5. [5]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden,et al.,Nature546, 270 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang,et al.,Nature546, 265 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Burkov,Nat

    A. Burkov,Nat. Mater.15, 1145 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    B. Li, Z. Wan, C. Wang, P. Chen, B. Huang, X. Cheng, Q. Qian, J. Li, Z. Zhang, G. Sun,et al.,Nat. Mater.20, 818 (2021)

    2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    D. Tian, S. Zhong, J. Dong, S. Zhou, Z. Liu, K. Chen, W. Zhang, L. Cao, X. He, X. Li,et al.,Nat. Mater.25, 956 (2026)

    2026

  2. [10]

    L. Peng, Y. Yuan, G. Li, X. Yang, J.-J. Xian, C.-J. Yi, Y.-G. Shi, and Y.-S. Fu,Nat. Commun.8, 659 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Z. Fei, T. Palomaki, S. Wu, W. Zhao, X. Cai, B. Sun, P. Nguyen, J. Finney, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden,Nat. Phys.13, 677 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    R. Alam, D. Dutta, M. Sariket, N. Kumar, A. Agarwal, and A. N. Pal,Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2418643 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, H. Shen, V. Fatemi, S. Wu, T.-R. Chang, G. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, C.-K. Chan, Q. D. Gibson,et al.,Nat. Phys.14, 900 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    P. C. Adak, S. Sinha, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Nat. Rev. Mater.9, 481 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Safeer, M

    A. Safeer, M. Ghorbani-Asl, W. Jolie, A. V. Krasheninnikov, T. Michely, and J. Fischer,Adv. Funct. Mater.35, e00907 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Chou, H.-Y

    P.-Y. Chou, H.-Y. Sung, C.-H. Wang, C.-W. Huang, and W.-W. Wu,ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces17, 59665 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    H. Bai, G. R. M. Tainton, M. Och, M. Rimmer, I. Maity, F. Mione, K. Tanwar, R. Cai, J. Parker, K. Zhiquan, E. C. Duran, E. Tillotson, S. Sullivan-Allsop, A. Eggeman, S. Deng, D. Bromley, J. N. Carter-Gartside, A. Vanstone, S. Heutz, W. R. Branford, E. Navarro- Moratalla, J. C....

    2025

  10. [18]

    C. Wang, X. Zhou, Y. Pan, J. Qiao, X. Kong, C.-C. Kaun, and W. Ji,Phys. Rev. B97, 245409 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen,Introduction to Solid State Physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. N. Guin, K. Manna, C. Shekhar, and C. Felser,Chem. Rev.121, 2780 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Asano and C

    K. Asano and C. Hotta,Phys. Rev. B83, 245125 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Kozii, B

    V. Kozii, B. Skinner, and L. Fu,Phys. Rev. B99, 155123 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    H. Hu, X. Feng, Y. Pan, V. Hasse, H. Wang, B. He, and C. Felser,Nat. Commun.16, 119 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Lee, X.-Q

    Y.-H. Lee, X.-Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, M.-T. Chang, C.- T. Lin, K.-D. Chang, Y.-C. Yu, J. T.-W. Wang, C.-S. Chang, L.-J. Li,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.5458 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Z. Lei, J. Zhan, L. Tang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang,Adv. Energy Mater.8, 1703482 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Shivayogimath, J

    A. Shivayogimath, J. D. Thomsen, D. M. Mackenzie, M. Geisler, R.-M. Stan, A. J. Holt, M. Bianchi, A. Crovetto, P. R. Whelan, A. Carvalho,et al.,Nat. Commun.10, 2957 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    F. Cui, X. Zhao, J. Xu, B. Tang, Q. Shang, J. Shi, Y. Huan, J. Liao, Q. Chen, Y. Hou,et al.,Adv. Mater. 32, 1905896 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    M. R. Habib, S. Wang, W. Wang, H. Xiao, S. M. Obaidulla, A. Gayen, Y. Khan, H. Chen, and M. Xu, Nanoscale11, 20123 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    G. K. Rajendran Nair, A. Abdelaziem, X. Zhao, X. Wang, D. Hu, Y. Wu, C. Xun, F. Le Goualher, C. Zhu, P. L. P. Yin,et al.,Phys. Status Solidi RRL16, 2100495 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    W. Ge, P. M. Sass, J. Yan, S. H. Lee, Z. Mao, and W. Wu, Phys. Rev. B103, 134403 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Trygg, B

    J. Trygg, B. Johansson, O. Eriksson, and J. M. Wills, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2871 (1995)

    1995

  24. [32]

    Wang, C.-C

    M.-C. Wang, C.-C. Huang, C.-H. Cheung, C.-Y. Chen, S. G. Tan, T.-W. Huang, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhao, G. Wu, Y.-P. Feng,et al.,Ann. Phys.532, 1900452 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Liechtenstein, M

    A. Liechtenstein, M. Katsnelson, V. Antropov, and V. Gubanov,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.67, 65 (1987)

    1987

  26. [34]

    J. M. Wills, O. Eriksson, M. Alouani, and D. L. Price, inElectronic Structure and Physical Properies of Solids: The Uses of the LMTO Method Lectures of a Workshop Held at Mont Saint Odile, France, October 2–5, 1998 (Springer, 2000) pp. 148–167

    1998

  27. [35]

    Soriano, M

    D. Soriano, M. I. Katsnelson, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Nano Lett.20, 6225 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Eriksson, A

    O. Eriksson, A. Bergman, L. Bergqvist, and J. Hellsvik, Ab Initio Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Bonilla, S

    M. Bonilla, S. Kolekar, Y. Ma, H. C. Diaz, V. Kalappattil, R. Das, T. Eggers, H. R. Gutierrez, M.-H. Phan, and M. Batzill,Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 289 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Wan, C. Huang, P. Gu, X. Zhang, Y. Wu, M. Liu, Y. Li, K. Wang, and E. Kan,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 31212 (2025). 11

    2025

  31. [39]

    L. Meng, Z. Zhou, M. Xu, S. Yang, K. Si, L. Liu, X. Wang, H. Jiang, B. Li, P. Qin,et al.,Nat. Commun. 12, 809 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Jiang, G

    W. Jiang, G. Chen, K. Liu, J. Zang, S. G. Te Velthuis, and A. Hoffmann,Physics Reports704, 1 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Roychowdhury, P

    S. Roychowdhury, P. Yanda, K. Samanta, C. Yi, M. Yao, F. Orlandi, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, E. G. D. Valle, P. Constantinou,et al.,Adv. Mater.36, 2305916 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    W. Jie, Z. Yang, F. Zhang, G. Bai, C. W. Leung, and J. Hao,ACS nano11, 6950 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    M. N. Ali, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q. D. Gibson, L. M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong,et al.,Nature514, 205 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    M. Piva, J. Souza, G. Lombardi, K. Pakuszewski, C. Adriano, P. Pagliuso, and M. Nicklas,Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 074204 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    H. Wang, Y. Dai, G.-M. Chow, and J. Chen,Prog. Mater. Sci.130, 100971 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Y. L. Huang, W. Chen, and A. T. Wee,SmartMat2, 139 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller,Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  40. [48]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof,Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  41. [49]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg,J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Szilva, Y

    A. Szilva, Y. Kvashnin, E. A. Stepanov, L. Nordstr¨ om, O. Eriksson, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 035004 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Entel, A

    P. Entel, A. Dannenberg, M. Siewert, H. C. Herper, M. E. Gruner, D. Comtesse, H.-J. Elmers, and M. Kallmayer, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A43, 2891 (2012). 12 V. SUPPLEMENT AR Y INFORMA TION A. Calculation for lattice parameters from SAED image of 1T-CrS 2 For 1T-...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.