Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using gauge/gravity duality, the paper shows that the photon ring radius of a charged black hole in Lorentz-violating massive gravity grows or shrinks with temperature depending on the chemical potential and the model parameter λ, a…

desk verdict Plausible new low-temperature chemical potential dependence of the holographic ring radius, but the central monotonicity claim is contradicted inside the paper and the cross-λ comparison uses disjoint temperature ranges. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12528 v1 pith:3HWYSISG submitted 2024-11-19 gr-qc

Xiao-Xiong Zeng , Li-Fang Li , Pan Li , Bo Liang , Peng Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 11.25.Tq04.70.-s04.50.Kd
keywords AdS/CFTcorrespondenceholographicimagesEinsteinringLorentzsymmetrybreakingmassivegravityphotonchemicalpotentialblackholeshadow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses gauge/gravity duality to compute the holographic image of a charged black hole in a Lorentz-symmetry-breaking massive gravity theory. It claims that the radius of the bright photon ring on the boundary screen carries a clear signature of both the chemical potential of the dual field theory and the bulk gravity parameter λ. At low temperatures the ring shrinks as the chemical potential grows, whereas at high temperatures the radius barely changes, matching earlier work. The new, specific claim is a reversal: for λ = 2 with chemical potential u = 1, the ring radius increases with temperature, while for λ = 4 it always decreases with temperature. If correct, holographic images could distinguish modified gravity models by their low-temperature ring behavior.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lensed response function $\langle O\rangle_{J_O}$: a Gaussian, monochromatic source $J_O(\nu,\psi)$ on the AdS boundary is decomposed into spherical harmonics, the bulk scalar field $\Phi$ is solved mode by mode through the radial equation (22) using a pseudo-spectral method, and the boundary coefficients $\langle O\rangle_l$ are combined with the source oscillation to give the response. An optical lens transform (26)–(29) converts the boundary response into a screen image $\Psi_{sc}(\hat{X}_{sc})$, whose bright peak defines the Einstein ring radius $r_R$. The geodesic counterpart is the effective potential $V(r)$ for null rays, whose maximum locates the unstable photon sphere; the identity $\sin\psi_R = r_R/f$ and the matching relation $\sin\psi_{in} = L_p/\bar\omega$ connect the wave-optics ring to the photon-sphere angular momentum.

What would settle it

Recompute the ring radius for λ = 2, u = 1 at T = 0.00239 and T = 0.03819 using twice the spectral resolution and an independent shooting method; if the radius difference between the two temperatures changes sign or shrinks below the claimed 0.08-to-0.52 variation, the reversal claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the Einstein ring formed by a scalar-wave probe in the holographic dual of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity encodes the model parameter λ and the chemical potential u in a previously unnoticed way. For λ = 2, where the geometry reduces to the Reissner-Nordström–AdS black hole, a large chemical potential u = 1 makes the ring radius grow as temperature increases, while a small chemical potential u = 0.1 makes the radius shrink as temperature rises. For λ = 4, the ring radius always decreases with increasing temperature, independent of u. These behaviors are extracted from the response function of a Gaussian source on the AdS boundary, and the paper verifies them against geometric-optics photon-sphere predictions, finding that the brightest ring sits at the photon ring.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical solution of the radial wave equation is accurate enough to resolve ring-radius shifts of a few percent, because the paper reports no convergence checks or error bars.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At low temperatures, the chemical potential changes the ring radius, so the holographic ring radius can act as a probe of the charge or chemical potential of the dual black hole.
  • The reversal in temperature dependence between λ = 2 and λ = 4 at large chemical potential provides an observable signature that could distinguish Lorentz-violating massive gravity from the Reissner-Nordström–AdS case.
  • Higher wave frequency ω makes the holographic ring match geometric optics more closely, so geodesic photon-sphere calculations become reliable guides in the high-frequency limit.
  • For sufficiently high temperature, the chemical potential no longer affects the ring radius, so the new effect is specifically a low-temperature phenomenon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sign change of $dr_R/dT$ likely traces a line in the $(u, \lambda)$ plane; a systematic scan of u between 0.1 and 1 for each λ would locate that transition and might connect to the small/large black hole phase structure in the bulk.
  • If the low-temperature ring radius is genuinely sensitive to u, one could try to invert the relation: measure ring radius and temperature to estimate the chemical potential of the dual plasma, similar to using the photon ring to infer mass or charge.
  • The claimed radius shifts are a few percent of $r_R/f$; independent high-resolution spectral runs would show whether the reversal survives numerical refinement or is an artifact of the pseudo-spectral truncation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity using the AdS/CFT dictionary and the framework of Hashimoto et al. It solves the bulk scalar-field equation with a pseudo-spectral method, extracts the boundary response, lenses it onto a screen, and studies how the Einstein-ring radius and brightness depend on source frequency, chemical potential u, temperature T, and the model parameter λ. It also compares the holographic ring radius with geometric-optics photon-sphere predictions. The central claims are that the ring radius increases with λ, that at low temperature the ring radius decreases with increasing chemical potential, and that for u = 1 the temperature dependence of the ring radius is reversed between λ = 2 and λ = 4, while for u = 0.1 the behavior is the same for both λ values.

Significance. If established, the claimed low-temperature chemical-potential dependence and the λ-dependent reversal would go beyond the earlier result of Ref. [37] and would make holographic ring radii a potentially sharper probe of the parameters of this massive-gravity model. The paper's inclusion of both wave-optics and geometric-optics results is a useful consistency check, and the figures provide extensive qualitative information about the dependence of the images on λ, u, T, and frequency. However, the central claim is currently supported by internally contradictory monotonicity statements in the validation section and by a comparison over disjoint temperature intervals, so the significance of the paper is conditional on resolving those issues.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Figs. 23 and 25] The validation section contradicts itself about the small-chemical-potential case. The text says "when the chemical potential is small, such as u = 0.1 and u = 0.5, the ring radius does not exhibit a monotonic relationship with increasing temperature T," but a few paragraphs later it says "From Fig. 23, we know that for the small chemical potential, the ring radius decreases as the temperature increases while for the large chemical potential the ring radius increases as the temperature increases." Both statements are presented as conclusions from the same comparison, and they cannot both be correct. This directly affects the paper's central claim about which temperature-dependence behavior is definitive for small u.
  2. [Sec. 3 summary and Sec. 4, Figs. 13–14 vs 17–18] The claimed "reversal" of the temperature dependence for u = 1 is not compared on a common thermodynamic domain. For λ = 2, u = 1, the data are at T = 0.00239, 0.01432, 0.02623, and 0.03819 (Figs. 13–14), while for λ = 4, u = 1, the data are at T = 0.79578, 0.50131, 0.41560, and 0.36937 (Figs. 17–18). These intervals do not overlap, so the sign difference in dR/dT could be a property of different temperature regimes rather than a reversal induced by λ. The authors should either extend the calculation to a common T range, use a normalized temperature variable, or reformulate the claim to account for the different admissible ranges.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (22)] The pseudo-spectral solution of the radial equation is described in a single sentence, and no convergence tests or error estimates are reported. The central trends involve radius shifts of only 0.01–0.03 in units of f (for example, 0.58 to 0.61 in Fig. 7 and 0.75 to 0.71 in Fig. 12), so the extracted monotonicities require numerical resolution at that scale. Please provide truncation checks and estimated numerical uncertainties for the quoted ring radii.
  4. [Eqs. (29)–(30)] As printed, the window function in Eq. (30) is W = 0 for 0 ≤ |X| ≤ d and W = 1 for |X| ≥ d, while the integral in Eq. (29) is restricted to |X| ≤ d. Taken literally, the right-hand side of Eq. (29) vanishes identically. This appears to be a typo, but it should be corrected by either changing the window function to 1 inside the aperture and 0 outside, or by changing the integration domain, because the image construction depends on this step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (41) and Fig. 21 caption] The phrase "For the case λ = −1, λ = 2" in Eq. (41) and the caption of Fig. 21 saying "λ = −1" are inconsistent with the paper's stated choice χ = −1, λ > 1; these should presumably read χ = −1.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typos, including "find the the ring radius increases" in the abstract and "flat sapce" in the Introduction; these should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 5, first paragraph] The conclusion states that "at low temperatures (as shown in Fig. 24) and high temperatures (as shown in Fig. 26), the radius of the photon ring decreases with increasing chemical potential u," but Figs. 24 and 26 correspond to different λ values, and Fig. 26 shows that at high T the radius changes very little with u; this wording should be aligned with the actual figure contents.
  4. [Sec. 4, final paragraph] The text refers to "blue curves" for the geodesic prediction, but the figures show solid curves without a specific color designation in the captions; please clarify the line-style/color convention.
  5. [Sec. 3, Fig. 7] The sentence "the brightest of the Einstein ring decreases with the increase of the parameter λ" is grammatically unclear; it should say the peak brightness of the Einstein ring decreases as λ increases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: all ring-radius claims are numerical outputs of the same input metric, and cited prior work is methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) the static spherically symmetric charged AdS metric (Eq. 10) is taken as input from the Lorentz-breaking massive gravity action; (ii) the complex scalar field is solved from Eq. (22) with the boundary source Eq. (18) using the pseudo-spectral method cited to [37]; (iii) the lensed response is converted to an image via Eqs. (26)-(29); (iv) independently, null geodesics (Eqs. 31-40) give the geometric-optics photon radius. Every ring radius quoted in Secs. 3-4 is an output of this pipeline; no parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The low-temperature decrease of the ring radius with chemical potential, and the lambda=2 vs lambda=4 difference in temperature dependence, are numerical results of the displayed equations rather than identities or fitted relations. The Sec. 4 comparison uses the same input metric, so it is a consistency check rather than an external benchmark, but the paper does not present it as an independent falsification. Citations [37,38,45,48] include overlapping authors, but they supply the solution method and background model, not an unverified uniqueness theorem, and the central low-temperature claim does not reduce to them. The self-contradictory monotonicity statements in Sec. 4 and the disjoint temperature intervals for lambda=2 and lambda=4 are correctness and precision risks, not circular reasoning. No circular step can be exhibited, so no step is reported.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity theory and its scalar fields are taken from prior work. The free parameters listed are chosen model and numerical inputs, not fitted to external data.

free parameters (5)
  • λ (model parameter) = 2, 3, 4, 5
    Parameter in the metric controlling the r^{-λ} term; central to the temperature-dependence reversal and ring-radius increase claims.
  • u (chemical potential) = 0.1 to 1
    Set by Q/rh; the low-temperature ring-radius decrease with increasing u is a central claim.
  • T (temperature) = 0.28 to 0.95 range
    Varied via horizon radius rh; temperature dependence of the ring radius is the main subject.
  • ω (source frequency) = 20, 40, 60, 80
    Frequency of the Gaussian boundary source; higher ω makes rings sharper and closer to geometric optics.
  • e (scalar charge) = 0.01
    Charge of the probe scalar field; chosen small, enters response function and photon ring position.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps the boundary source J0 to a bulk scalar field and the response <O> to the holographic image.
    Invoked in Sec. 2 and central to the method; cited to [34-36].
  • domain assumption The metric (10) is a valid charged AdS black hole solution in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity.
    Taken from [45-48] without derivation; the paper assumes this solution and its properties.
  • domain assumption The scalar field is a probe with negligible backreaction.
    Stated in Sec. 2: 'we consider the weak coupling problem and only the effect of the metric on the scalar field is involved.'
  • standard math The pseudo-spectral discretization converges to the true solution of Eq. (22).
    The method is cited from [37] but no convergence study is provided in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper χ = -1 and λ > 1.
    Chosen to compare with RN-AdS at λ=2 and to keep the ADM mass finite; not observationally motivated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HWYSISG

@misc{pith2026241112528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HWYSISG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12528}
}
read the original abstract

Using the AdS/CFT correspondence, this paper investigates the holographic images of a charged black hole within the context of Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity. The photon rings, luminosity-deformed rings, or light points from various observational perspectives are obtained. We also study the influences of both the chemical potential and temperature on the Einstein ring. Unlike the previous work, which primarily examines the effect of chemical potential on ring radius at high temperatures and find no change in the radius with varying chemical potential, we also investigate the effect of chemical potential on the ring radius at low temperature besides at high temperature. Our findings indicate that at low temperatures, the photon ring radius decreases with increasing of chemical potential, while at high temperatures, the results are consistent with previous studies. Additionally, we explore the impact of the model parameter {\lambda} on the Einstein ring radius and find the the ring radius increases as the model parameter {\lambda} increases. More interestingly, for the large chemical potential, u = 1, the temperature dependence of the photon ring radius is reversed for {\lambda} = 2 and {\lambda} = 4. Conversely, for a small chemical potential u = 0.1, the temperature dependence of the Einstein ring stays the same as {\lambda} = 2 and {\lambda} = 4.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing Extended Theories of Gravity via Black Hole Photon Rings

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    For Konoplya-Zhidenko deformed Schwarzschild black holes, epsilon controls photon sphere, shadow, and photon ring size while a2 and b2 are observationally degenerate, and EHT data constrain epsilon to about -0.09 to 0...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    Hashimoto, S

    K. Hashimoto, S. Kinoshita and K. Murata. Imaging black holes through the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev. D, 2020, 101: no.6, 066018

    work page 2020

  2. [37]

    Erdmenger

    J. Erdmenger. Introduction to Gauge/Gravity Duality. PoS, 2018, TASI2017: 001

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip afte...

  4. [2]

    S. G. Turyshev. Experimental Tests of General Relativity: Recent Progress and Future Directions. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 2009, 179: 3034

    work page 2009

  5. [3]

    Perlmutter et al

    SS. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project]. Measurements of and from 42 High Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 1999, 517: 565-586

    work page 1999

  6. [4]

    Sofue and V

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin. Rotation curves of spiral galaxies. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 2001, 39: 137-174

    work page 2001

  7. [5]

    D. C. Maurya. Modified f(Q,C) gravity dark energy models with observational constraints. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2024, 39: no.10, 2450034

    work page 2024

  8. [6]

    Cognola, E

    G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini. A Class of viable modified f(R) gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 77: 046009

    work page 2008

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa. Construction of cosmologically viable f(G) dark energy models. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 675: 1-8

    2009

  2. [8]

    Deruelle and L

    N. Deruelle and L. Farina-Busto. The Lovelock Gravitational Field Equations in Cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 1990, 41: 3696

    1990

  3. [9]

    Fierz and W

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli. On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 1939, 173: 211232

    1939

  4. [10]

    S. L. Dubovsky. Phases of massive gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2004, 10: 076

    2004

  5. [11]

    V. A. Rubakov and P. G. Tinyakov. Infrared-modified gravities and massive gravitons. Phys. Usp., 2008, 51: 759-792

    2008

  6. [12]

    Stepanian, S

    A. Stepanian, S. Khlghatyan and V. G. Gurzadyan. Black hole shadow to probe modified gravity. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2021, 136: no.1, 127

    2021

  7. [13]

    Ayzenberg and N

    D. Ayzenberg and N. Yunes. Black Hole Shadow as a Test of General Relativity: Quadratic Gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 2018, 35: no.23, 235002

    2018

  8. [14]

    X. M. Kuang, Z. Y. Tang, B. Wang and A. Wang. Constraining a modified gravity theory in strong gravitational lensing and black hole shadow observations. Phys. Rev. D, 2022, 106: no.6, 064012

    2022

  9. [15]

    Antoniou, A

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos and P. Kanti. Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2018, 120: no.13, 131102

    2018

  10. [16]

    X. X. Zeng, H. Q. Zhang and H. Zhang. Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss Bonnet black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2020, 80: no.9, 872

    2020

  11. [17]

    X. X. Zeng and H. Q. Zhang. Influence of quintessence dark energy on the shadow of black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2020, 80: no.11, 1058

    2020

  12. [18]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope]. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2019, 875: no.1, L4

    2019

  13. [19]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope]. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2022, 930: no.2, L12

    2022

  14. [20]

    P. Z. He, Q. Q. Fan, H. R. Zhang and J. B. Deng. Shadows of rotating Hayward de Sitter black holes with astrometric observables. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2020, 80: no.12, 1195

    2020

  15. [21]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia and E. Agol. Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2000, 528: L13

    2000

  16. [22]

    R. S. Lu, A. E. Broderick, F. Baron, J. D. Monnier, V. L. Fish, S. S. Doeleman and V. Pankratius. Imaging the Supermassive Black Hole Shadow and Jet Base of M87 with the Event Horizon Telescope. Astrophys. J., 2014, 788: 120

    2014

  17. [23]

    Vagnozzi, R

    S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y. D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, A. Allahyari, P. Bambhaniya, D. Dey, S. G. Ghosh and P. S. Joshi, et al. Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A. Class. Quant. Grav., 2023,...

    2023

  18. [24]

    Broderick and A

    A. Broderick and A. Loeb. Imaging the Black Hole Silhouette of M87: Implications for Jet Formation and Black Hole Spin. Astrophys. J., 2009, 697: 1164-1179

    2009

  19. [25]

    B. C. Bromley, F. Melia and S. Liu. Polarimetric imaging of the massive black hole at the galactic center. Astrophys. J. Lett., 2001, 555: L83

    2001

  20. [26]

    S. C. Noble, P. K. Leung, C. F. Gammie and L. G. Book. Simulating the Emission and Outflows from Accretion Disks. Class. Quant. Grav., 2007, 24: S259-S274

    2007

  21. [27]

    Bambi, K

    C. Bambi, K. Freese, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli. Testing the rotational nature of the supermassive object M87* from the circularity and size of its first image. Phys. Rev. D, 2019, 100: no.4, 044057

    2019

  22. [28]

    Vagnozzi and L

    S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli. Hunting for extra dimensions in the shadow of M87*. Phys. Rev. D, 2019, 100: no.2, 024020

    2019

  23. [29]

    Allahyari, M

    A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi and D. F. Mota. Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020, 02: 003

    2020

  24. [30]

    Khodadi, A

    M. Khodadi, A. Allahyari, S. Vagnozzi and D. F. Mota. Black holes with scalar hair in light of the Event Horizon Telescope. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020, 09: 026

    2020

  25. [31]

    G. Z. Babar, A. Z. Babar and F. Atamurotov. Optical properties of Kerr Newman spacetime in the presence of plasma. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2020, 80: no.8, 761

    2020

  26. [32]

    Kumar and S

    R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh. Black Hole Parameter Estimation from Its Shadow. Astrophys. J., 2020, 892: 78

    2020

  27. [34]

    Hashimoto, S

    K. Hashimoto, S. Kinoshita and K. Murata. Einstein Rings in Holography. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2019, 123: no.3, 031602

    2019

  28. [35]

    E. Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 1998, 2: 253-291

    1998

  29. [36]

    Baggioli

    M. Baggioli. Gravity, holography and applications to condensed matter. [arXiv:1610.02681 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y. Liu, Q. Chen, X. X. Zeng, H. Zhang, W. L. Zhang and W. Zhang. Holographic Einstein ring of a charged AdS black hole. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022, 10: 189

    2022

  31. [39]

    X. X. Zeng, K. J. He, J. Pu, G. p. Li and Q. Q. Jiang. Holographic Einstein rings of a Gauss Bonnet AdS black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2023, 83: no.10, 897

    2023

  32. [40]

    X. X. Zeng, L. F. Li and P. Xu. Holographic Einstein rings of a black hole with a global monopole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2024, 84: 7, 714

    2024

  33. [41]

    X. Y. Hu, X. X. Zeng, L. F. Li and P. Xu. Holographic Einstein rings of Non-commutative black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2024, 84: 2, 199

    2024

  34. [42]

    X. X. Zeng, M. I. Aslam, R. Saleem and X. Y. Hu. Holographic Einstein Rings of Black Holes in Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity. [arXiv:2311.04680 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    X. Y. Hu, X. X. Zeng, L. F. Li and P. Xu. Holographic study on Einstein ring for a charged black hole in conformal gravity. Results Phys., 2024, 61: 107707

    2024

  36. [44]

    X. X. Zeng, X. Y. Hu and K. J. He. Holographic image features of an AdS black hole in Einstein-power-Yang-Mills gravity. [arXiv:2406.03083 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    J. Y. Gui, X. X. Zeng, K. J. He and H. Ye. Holographic Einstein Ring of Deformed AdS-Schwarzschild Black Holes. [arXiv:2407.09069 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Liang, S

    B. Liang, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu. Quasinormal Modes and Van der Waals like phase transition of charged AdS black holes in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 2019, 28: no.09, 1950113

    2019

  39. [47]

    Fernando

    S. Fernando. Massive gravity with Lorentz symmetry breaking: black holes as heat engines. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 2018, 33: no.31, 1850177

    2018

  40. [48]

    Chabab, H

    M. Chabab, H. El Moumni, S. Iraoui and K. Masmar. Phase transitions and geothermodynamics of black holes in dRGT massive gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2019, 79: no.4, 342

    2019

  41. [49]

    X. M. Liu, H. B. Shao and X. X. Zeng. Van der Waals-like phase transition from holographic entanglement entropy in Lorentz breaking massive gravity. Adv. High Energy Phys., 2017, 2017: 6402101

    2017

  42. [50]

    M. V. Bebronne and P. G. Tinyakov. Black hole solutions in massive gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2009, 04: 100

    2009

  43. [51]

    Fernando

    S. Fernando. P-V criticality in AdS black holes of massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 2016, 94: no.12, 124049

    2016

  44. [52]

    \"Ovg\"un, R

    A. \"Ovg\"un, R. C. Pantig and \'A. Rinc\'on. 4D scale-dependent Schwarzschild-AdS/dS black holes: study of shadow and weak deflection angle and greybody bounding. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2023, 138: no.3, 192

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.