pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15839 · v1 · pith:3HYHBVQRnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🧬 q-bio.CB · math.DS· physics.bio-ph· q-bio.PE· q-bio.QM

How nature discovers rare Turing islands: exploration by common limit cycles

Seyoon Kim , Antonio Matas-Gil , Robert G. Endres This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.CB math.DSphysics.bio-phq-bio.PEq-bio.QM
keywords Turing patternslimit cyclesreaction-diffusion systemsparameter explorationbiological self-organizationtransient patternsrobustnesspositional gradients
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling limit cycles to reaction-diffusion systems lets biology explore rare Turing pattern conditions dynamically.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that common biochemical limit cycles can serve as natural explorers of the narrow parameter regions where Turing patterns form in reaction-diffusion systems. By modulating parameters along the cycle's orbit, the system sweeps through permissive regimes and produces transient spatial patterns. This mechanism addresses how biological systems can reliably discover and use finely tuned conditions for self-organization without needing exact parameter values from the start. It also shows that such cycling improves the detectability and robustness of patterns, and that adding positional gradients makes them more reproducible, offering a path to stable developmental structures from simple oscillations.

Core claim

By coupling a reaction-diffusion system to a limit cycle that modulates some of its parameters, the system dynamically sweeps through Turing-permissive regimes and generates transient spatial patterns. An entropy-based measure in Fourier space quantifies the pattern formation, demonstrating that cycles enhance detectability and robustness of Turing islands. Coupling to positional gradients further increases reproducibility, suggesting a route from oscillatory dynamics to stable developmental programs.

What carries the argument

The parameter-modulating orbit from a common limit cycle, which dynamically sweeps the system through Turing-permissive parameter regimes to enable transient pattern formation.

If this is right

  • Cycles increase the detectability of patterns as measured by Fourier space entropy.
  • Pattern formation becomes more robust under parameter cycling.
  • Coupling to positional gradients improves the reproducibility of patterns.
  • This provides a mechanism to transition from temporal oscillations to stable spatial programs in development.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this holds, temporal oscillations could be a general way for biological systems to navigate complex parameter spaces for self-organization.
  • Similar exploration mechanisms might apply to other pattern-forming systems or parameter-sensitive processes in biology.
  • Experiments could test this by checking if known genetic oscillators modulate diffusion or reaction rates in ways that align with Turing conditions.

Load-bearing premise

That there exists a biologically plausible way to couple limit cycles to the parameters of a reaction-diffusion system so that the modulation passes through Turing regimes at times when pattern formation can actually occur.

What would settle it

A direct experimental observation in a synthetic or natural system where a limit cycle modulates reaction-diffusion parameters and produces measurable transient spatial patterns consistent with the model's entropy measure, or the absence of such patterns in systems known to have both oscillations and potential Turing ingredients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15839 by Antonio Matas-Gil, Robert G. Endres, Seyoon Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: From evolutionary tinkering to embryonic developmental cycles. (A) Ran￾dom sampling of parameter space by a weakly interacting clump of cells has a low probability of Turing-island discovery. Each data point represents a different clump of cells, while the thinking bubble represents molecular concentrations of individual cells in a specific clump with little time dependence. Based on the cell arrangement t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization and analysis of Shannon entropy in Fourier space. (A) Example of attracting limit cycle for k1 and k2 with vector plot. Blue region indicates a Turing island, with the shading indicating the value of the positive eigenvalue, the darker the faster the Turing instability grows from homogeneous steady state. Example parameter trajectory initiated inside (green) and outside (red) the limit cycle.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Discovering Turing islands. (A) Example of traditional random sampling of pa￾rameter space, compared to sampling by circular (B), type-1 oval (C), and type-2 oval (D) limit cycles. Each model is constrained by a domain circle that determines the domain of sampling space. (E) Encounter probability of random sampling and different limit-cycle approaches ver￾sus varying the large domain radius rmax. (F) Inter… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reproducibility of Turing patterns. (A) Selected limit cycles (green) with ran￾domly sampled points within the limit cycles (orange) around a Turing island (blue region). Examples of (B) radial noise σr = 0.16, σθ = 0 and (C) tangential noise σr = 0.04, σθ = 0.16 along the limit cycles. σr = 0.04 was used for the tangential-noise diagram to aid visualiza￾tion. (D) Example of SEF along noisy limit cycles wi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Towards robust developmental programs. (A) The French flag gradient model (red, slope = 0.0016) and the null model (blue, slope = 0). (B,C) Comparison of null model and French flag gradient model, using (B) SEF and (C) PSDs. (D) Improvement of PSDs through the gradient. Vertical dotted lines indicate t = 100, 150 and 200. (E,F) Visualization of example activator concentration (E) and SD values (F) at corre… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Turing patterns are a cornerstone of biological self-organization, yet their emergence typically requires finely tuned parameters occupying narrow regions of high-dimensional space. This poses a fundamental challenge: how can evolving biological systems reliably find and exploit such rare conditions? In this work, we propose that common biochemical limit cycles, such as those arising from genetic feedback loops, can act as natural explorers of Turing space. By coupling a reaction-diffusion system to an orbit that modulates some of its parameters, we show that the system can dynamically sweep through Turing-permissive regimes and generate transient spatial patterns. We use an entropy-based measure in Fourier space to quantify pattern formation and demonstrate how cycles enhance the detectability and robustness of Turing islands. We further explore how coupling to positional gradients increases reproducibility, suggesting a route from oscillatory dynamics to stable developmental programs. Our results highlight a powerful mechanism by which nature might bootstrap complex spatial structure from simple temporal motifs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that common biochemical limit cycles can serve as natural explorers of parameter space in reaction-diffusion systems. By coupling an RD model to an orbit that modulates select parameters, the system dynamically traverses narrow Turing-permissive regions, producing transient spatial patterns. An entropy measure computed in Fourier space is introduced to quantify pattern formation, and the authors argue that such cycles improve detectability and robustness of Turing islands; coupling to positional gradients is further shown to enhance reproducibility, offering a route from oscillatory dynamics to stable developmental programs.

Significance. If the central mechanism holds, the work supplies a concrete dynamical route by which biological systems could locate rare Turing conditions without evolutionary fine-tuning of parameters. It links ubiquitous genetic limit cycles to spatial self-organization and suggests a plausible origin for developmental robustness, with potential implications for both theoretical developmental biology and synthetic pattern-forming circuits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (transient pattern formation)] The core claim that transient Turing patterns emerge during parameter sweeps rests on the assumption that the limit-cycle transit time through the unstable region is long enough for spatial modes to amplify. No explicit comparison between the limit-cycle period and the inverse of the maximum linear growth rate of the Turing instability appears in the results or methods; without this adiabaticity or dwell-time condition, the effective dynamics reduce to a time-averaged system whose instability can be suppressed. This issue is load-bearing for the transient-pattern claim.
  2. [Methods (entropy measure definition)] The entropy-based Fourier measure is presented as a detector of Turing islands, yet its sensitivity to the modulation speed, to additive noise, and to the precise definition of the spatial power spectrum is not quantified. If the measure responds to any deviation from spatial homogeneity rather than specifically to the linearly unstable band, the reported enhancement of detectability by cycles may be overstated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'we show' the enhancement of robustness but does not name the concrete RD system or the biochemical oscillator employed; a brief statement of the minimal model assumptions would improve readability.
  2. [Figure legends] Figure captions should explicitly list the parameter values traversed by the limit cycle at the instants when snapshots are taken, to allow readers to verify that the system is inside the Turing region at those moments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide detailed responses below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (transient pattern formation)] The core claim that transient Turing patterns emerge during parameter sweeps rests on the assumption that the limit-cycle transit time through the unstable region is long enough for spatial modes to amplify. No explicit comparison between the limit-cycle period and the inverse of the maximum linear growth rate of the Turing instability appears in the results or methods; without this adiabaticity or dwell-time condition, the effective dynamics reduce to a time-averaged system whose instability can be suppressed. This issue is load-bearing for the transient-pattern claim.

    Authors: We agree that this timescale comparison is crucial for validating the transient pattern formation mechanism. In the revised version of the manuscript, we have added an explicit analysis in the Results section comparing the limit-cycle period to the inverse of the maximum linear growth rate. Specifically, we compute the dwell time spent in the Turing-unstable parameter region and show that it exceeds the characteristic amplification time for the unstable spatial modes by a sufficient margin in our simulations. This ensures that the patterns have time to develop before the parameters exit the unstable regime. We have also included this condition in the Methods section for clarity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (entropy measure definition)] The entropy-based Fourier measure is presented as a detector of Turing islands, yet its sensitivity to the modulation speed, to additive noise, and to the precise definition of the spatial power spectrum is not quantified. If the measure responds to any deviation from spatial homogeneity rather than specifically to the linearly unstable band, the reported enhancement of detectability by cycles may be overstated.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding the robustness of the entropy-based Fourier measure. To address this, we have performed additional numerical experiments in the revised manuscript to quantify the measure's sensitivity to modulation speed and additive noise levels. These results demonstrate that the measure remains effective in detecting the specific unstable Fourier modes associated with Turing patterns, even under moderate noise and varying modulation speeds. Furthermore, we have clarified the definition of the spatial power spectrum in the Methods and shown through controls that it does not respond indiscriminately to any spatial inhomogeneity but is tuned to the band of unstable wavenumbers. A new supplementary figure illustrates these sensitivity analyses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper builds on established Turing instability analysis and limit-cycle dynamics from prior literature, proposing a coupling mechanism to sweep parameters and generate transient patterns quantified via an entropy measure in Fourier space. No equations or claims reduce by construction to author-defined fits, self-citations that carry the central result, or ansatzes imported without independent justification. The timescale comparison concern raised by the skeptic is a potential correctness issue rather than a circularity reduction. The derivation remains independent and falsifiable against standard RD simulations and biological parameter ranges.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to standard background assumptions; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are identifiable from the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Turing patterns emerge only in narrow, finely tuned parameter regimes of reaction-diffusion systems.
    Implicitly invoked as the starting challenge the work addresses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5705 in / 1166 out tokens · 48761 ms · 2026-05-19T17:36:06.892811+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The chemical basis of morphogenesis.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Alan Mathison Turing. The chemical basis of morphogenesis.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 237(641):37–72, August 1952. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1952.0012. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/ rstb.1952.0012

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 1952

  2. [2]

    Antonio Matas-Gil and Robert G. Endres. Tuning and toggling turing patterns in gene circuits.Cell Reports Physical Science, 7(1), January 2026. ISSN 2666-3864. doi: 10.1016/ j.xcrp.2025.103056. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.103056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.103056 2026

  3. [3]

    Scholes, David Schnoerr, Mark Isalan, and Michael P

    Natalie S. Scholes, David Schnoerr, Mark Isalan, and Michael P. H. Stumpf. A Com- prehensive Network Atlas Reveals That Turing Patterns Are Common but Not Ro- bust.Cell Systems, 9(3):243–257.e4, September 2019. ISSN 2405-4712, 2405-4720. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.007. URLhttps://www.cell.com/cell-systems/abstract/ S2405-4712(19)30264-9. 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.007 2019

  4. [4]

    Driever and C

    W. Driever and C. Nüsslein-Volhard. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.Cell, 54(1):95–104, July 1988. ISSN 0092-8674. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90183-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90183-3 1988

  5. [5]

    Raspopovic, L

    J. Raspopovic, L. Marcon, L. Russo, and J. Sharpe. Digit patterning is controlled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing network modulated by morphogen gradients.Science, 345(6196): 566–570, August 2014. doi: 10.1126/science.1252960. URLhttps://www.science.org/ doi/10.1126/science.1252960

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1252960 2014

  6. [6]

    L. Wolpert. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation.Jour- nal of Theoretical Biology, 25(1):1–47, October 1969. ISSN 0022-5193. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5193(69)80016-0. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0022519369800160

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    Elowitz and Stanislas Leibler

    Michael B. Elowitz and Stanislas Leibler. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators.Nature, 403(6767):335–338, January 2000. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/ 35002125. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/35002125

    work page arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Jure Tica, Martina Oliver Huidobro, Tong Zhu, Georg K. A. Wachter, Roozbeh H. Pazuki, Dario G. Bazzoli, Natalie S. Scholes, Elisa Tonello, Heike Siebert, Michael P. H. Stumpf, Robert G. Endres, and Mark Isalan. A three-node Turing gene circuit forms periodic spatial patterns in bacteria.Cell Systems, 15(12):1123–1132.e3, December 2024. ISSN 2405-

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S2405471224003119

    doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2024.11.002. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S2405471224003119

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.11.002 2024

  10. [10]

    Gierer and H

    A. Gierer and H. Meinhardt. A theory of biological pattern formation.Kybernetik, 12 (1):30–39, December 1972. ISSN 1432-0770. doi: 10.1007/BF00289234. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1007/BF00289234

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00289234 1972

  11. [11]

    High-throughput mathematical analysis identifies Turing networks for patterning with equally diffusing sig- nals.eLife, 5:e14022, April 2016

    Luciano Marcon, Xavier Diego, James Sharpe, and Patrick Müller. High-throughput mathematical analysis identifies Turing networks for patterning with equally diffusing sig- nals.eLife, 5:e14022, April 2016. ISSN 2050-084X. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14022. URL https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14022

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.14022 2016

  12. [12]

    Krause, Meredith A

    Andrew L. Krause, Meredith A. Ellis, and Robert A. Van Gorder. Influence of Curva- ture, Growth, and Anisotropy on the Evolution of Turing Patterns on Growing Manifolds. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 81(3):759–799, 2019. ISSN 0092-8240. doi: 10.1007/ s11538-018-0535-y. URLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6373535/

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Martina Oliver Huidobro and Robert G. Endres. Effects of multistability, absorbing boundaries and growth on Turing pattern formation, September 2024. URLhttps: //www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.09.611947v1

    work page doi:10.1101/2024.09.09.611947v1 2024

  14. [14]

    London : Longmans, Green and Co., 1892

    George John Romanes and Conway Lloyd Morgan.Darwin and after Darwin : an exposition of the Darwinian theory and a discussion of post-Darwinian questions. London : Longmans, Green and Co., 1892. URLhttp://archive.org/details/darwinafterdarwi00romaiala

    work page

  15. [15]

    Bordyugov, A

    G. Bordyugov, A. E. Granada, and H. Herzel. How coupling determines the entrainment of circadian clocks.The European Physical Journal B, 82(3):227–234, August 2011. ISSN 1434-6036. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2011-20337-1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2011-20337-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2011-20337-1 2011

  16. [16]

    Machta, Ricky Chachra, Mark K

    Benjamin B. Machta, Ricky Chachra, Mark K. Transtrum, and James P. Sethna. Pa- rameter Space Compression Underlies Emergent Theories and Predictive Models.Sci- ence, 342(6158):604–607, November 2013. doi: 10.1126/science.1238723. URLhttps: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1238723. 16

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1238723 2013

  17. [17]

    Chenyi Fei, Yuansheng Cao, Qi Ouyang, and Yuhai Tu. Design principles for en- hancing phase sensitivity and suppressing phase fluctuations simultaneously in biochem- ical oscillatory systems.Nature Communications, 9(1):1434, April 2018. ISSN 2041-

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-018-03826-4

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03826-4. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-018-03826-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03826-4

  19. [19]

    Hiscock and Sean G

    Tom W. Hiscock and Sean G. Megason. Orientation of Turing-like Patterns by Morphogen Gradients and Tissue Anisotropies.Cell systems, 1(6):408–416, December 2015. ISSN 2405-4712. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.001. URLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC4707970/

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.001 2015

  20. [20]

    Wilson, Sebastian S

    Stuart P. Wilson, Sebastian S. James, Daniel J. Whiteley, and Leah A. Krubitzer. Limit cycle dynamics can guide the evolution of gene regulatory networks towards point attrac- tors.Scientific Reports, 9(1):16750, November 2019. ISSN 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/ s41598-019-53251-w. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53251-w

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    H. G. Enjieu Kadji, J. B. Chabi Orou, R. Yamapi, and P. Woafo. Nonlinear dynamics and strange attractors in the biological system.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 32(2):862– 882, April 2007. ISSN 0960-0779. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.063. URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077905011240

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.063 2007

  22. [22]

    Periodic, Quasi-periodic and Chaotic Dynamics in Simple Gene Elements with Time Delays.Scientific Reports, 6 (1):21037, February 2016

    YokoSuzuki, MingyangLu, EshelBen-Jacob, andJoséN.Onuchic. Periodic, Quasi-periodic and Chaotic Dynamics in Simple Gene Elements with Time Delays.Scientific Reports, 6 (1):21037, February 2016. ISSN 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/srep21037. URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/srep21037

    work page doi:10.1038/srep21037 2016

  23. [23]

    Multi-synchronization and other patterns of multi- rhythmicity in oscillatory biological systems.Interface Focus, 12(3):20210089, April 2022

    Albert Goldbeter and Jie Yan. Multi-synchronization and other patterns of multi- rhythmicity in oscillatory biological systems.Interface Focus, 12(3):20210089, April 2022. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0089. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/ rsfs.2021.0089

    work page doi:10.1098/rsfs.2021.0089 2022

  24. [24]

    Yuta Otobe, Eui Min Jeong, Shunsuke Ito, Yuta Shinohara, Nobuhiro Kurabayashi, Atsu Aiba, Yoshitaka Fukada, Jae Kyoung Kim, and Hikari Yoshitane. Phosphoryla- tion of DNA-binding domains of CLOCK–BMAL1 complex for PER-dependent inhibi- tion in circadian clock of mammalian cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(23):e2316858121, June 202...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2316858121 2024

  25. [25]

    Yu, Grant D

    Han Cho, Xuan Zhao, Megumi Hatori, Ruth T. Yu, Grant D. Barish, Michael T. Lam, Ling-Wa Chong, Luciano DiTacchio, Annette R. Atkins, Christopher K. Glass, Christopher Liddle, Johan Auwerx, Michael Downes, Satchidananda Panda, and Ronald M. Evans. Regulation of Circadian Behavior and Metabolism by Rev-erbαand Rev-erbβ.Nature, 485 (7396):123–127, March 2012...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11048 2012

  26. [26]

    TuringPatternsintheChlorineDioxide- Iodine-Malonic Acid Reaction–Diffusion Batch System.Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3):1387–1393, March 2024

    LioraKatz, LeonardoSilva-Dias, andMilosDolnik. TuringPatternsintheChlorineDioxide- Iodine-Malonic Acid Reaction–Diffusion Batch System.Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3):1387–1393, March 2024. ISSN 0021-9584. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01208. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01208

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01208 2024

  27. [27]

    Hans Meinhardt and Piet A. J. de Boer. Pattern formation in Escherichia coli: A model for the pole-to-pole oscillations of Min proteins and the localization of the division site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(25):14202–14207, December 2001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251216598. URLhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.251216598. 17

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.251216598 2001

  28. [28]

    The Clock and Wavefront Self-Organizing model recre- ates the dynamics of mouse somitogenesis in vivo and in vitro.Development (Cambridge, England), 151(10):dev202606, May 2024

    Julie Klepstad and Luciano Marcon. The Clock and Wavefront Self-Organizing model recre- ates the dynamics of mouse somitogenesis in vivo and in vitro.Development (Cambridge, England), 151(10):dev202606, May 2024. ISSN 0950-1991. doi: 10.1242/dev.202606. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165719/

    work page doi:10.1242/dev.202606 2024

  29. [29]

    Sonnen, Volker M

    Katharina F. Sonnen, Volker M. Lauschke, Julia Uraji, Henning J. Falk, Yvonne Petersen, Maja C. Funk, Mathias Beaupeux, Paul François, Christoph A. Merten, and Alexander Aulehla. Modulation of Phase Shift between Wnt and Notch Signaling Oscillations Controls Mesoderm Segmentation.Cell, 172(5):1079–1090.e12, February 2018. ISSN 0092-8674, 1097-4172. doi: 1...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.026 2018

  30. [30]

    Janina Mothes, Dorothea Busse, Bente Kofahl, and Jana Wolf. Sources of dynamic variabil- ity in NF-κB signal transduction: a mechanistic model.BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 37(4):452–462, April 2015. ISSN 1521-1878. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400113

    work page doi:10.1002/bies.201400113 2015

  31. [31]

    Genetic oscillation deduced from Hopf bifurcation in a genetic regulatory network with delays.Mathematical Biosciences, 215(1):55–63, September 2008

    Min Xiao and Jinde Cao. Genetic oscillation deduced from Hopf bifurcation in a genetic regulatory network with delays.Mathematical Biosciences, 215(1):55–63, September 2008. ISSN 0025-5564. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2008.05.004. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0025556408000783

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2008.05.004 2008

  32. [32]

    Swain, Michael B

    Peter S. Swain, Michael B. Elowitz, and Eric D. Siggia. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (20):12795–12800, October 2002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162041399. URLhttps://www.pnas. org/doi/10.1073/pnas.162041399

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.162041399 2002

  33. [33]

    Gérard and A

    C. Gérard and A. Goldbeter. The Cell Cycle is a Limit Cycle.Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 7(6):126–166, 2012. ISSN 0973-5348, 1760-6101. doi: 10.1051/ mmnp/20127607. URLhttps://www.mmnp-journal.org/articles/mmnp/abs/2012/06/ mmnp201276p126/mmnp201276p126.html. Number: 6

    work page arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Limit Cycle Models for Circadian Rhythms Based on Transcriptional Regulation in Drosophila and Neurospora

    Jean-Christophe Leloup, Didier Gonze, and Albert Goldbeter. Limit Cycle Models for Circadian Rhythms Based on Transcriptional Regulation in Drosophila and Neurospora. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 14(6):433–448, December 1999. ISSN 0748-7304. doi: 10. 1177/074873099129000948. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1177/074873099129000948

    work page doi:10.1177/074873099129000948 1999

  35. [35]

    Ahmad Shaberi, Aibek Kappassov, Antonio Matas-Gil, and Robert G

    Hazlam S. Ahmad Shaberi, Aibek Kappassov, Antonio Matas-Gil, and Robert G. Endres. Optimal network sizes for most robust Turing patterns.Scientific Reports, 15(1):2948, January 2025. ISSN 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86854-7. URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/s41598-025-86854-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86854-7 2025

  36. [36]

    Interaction of Turing and Hopf bifurcations in chemical systems.Physical Review A, 46(10):6315–6322, November 1992

    Arkady Rovinsky and Michael Menzinger. Interaction of Turing and Hopf bifurcations in chemical systems.Physical Review A, 46(10):6315–6322, November 1992. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevA.46.6315. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.6315

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.6315 1992

  37. [37]

    Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Diffusive Mussel-Algae Model Near Turing-Hopf Bifurcation.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(4):2030–2062, January 2017

    Yongli Song, Heping Jiang, Quan-Xing Liu, and Yuan Yuan. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Diffusive Mussel-Algae Model Near Turing-Hopf Bifurcation.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(4):2030–2062, January 2017. ISSN 1536-0040. doi: 10. 1137/16M1097560. URLhttps://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/16M1097560

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1097560 2030

  38. [38]

    Jeremy B. A. Green and James Sharpe. Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine.Development, 142(7):1203–1211, April 2015. ISSN 0950-1991. doi: 10.1242/dev.114991. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1242/dev.114991. 18

    work page doi:10.1242/dev.114991 2015

  39. [39]

    Linear optimization over per- mutation groups

    László Pecze. A solution to the problem of proper segment positioning in the course of digit formation.Bio Systems, 173:266–272, November 2018. ISSN 1872-8324. doi: 10.1016/j. biosystems.2018.04.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2018

  40. [40]

    Woolley, Andrew L

    Thomas E. Woolley, Andrew L. Krause, and Eamonn A. Gaffney. Bespoke Turing Sys- tems.Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 83(5):41, 2021. ISSN 0092-8240. doi: 10.1007/ s11538-021-00870-y. URLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7979634/

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    ProbingintrinsicpropertiesofarobustmorphogengradientinDrosophila.Developmen- tal cell, 15(4):558–567, October 2008

    Feng He, Ying Wen, Jingyuan Deng, Xiaodong Lin, Long Jason Lu, Renjie Jiao, and Jun Ma. ProbingintrinsicpropertiesofarobustmorphogengradientinDrosophila.Developmen- tal cell, 15(4):558–567, October 2008. ISSN 1534-5807. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.004. URLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2629455/

    work page doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.004 2008

  42. [42]

    Precision of morphogen gradients in neural tube devel- opment.Nature Communications, 13(1):1145, March 2022

    Roman Vetter and Dagmar Iber. Precision of morphogen gradients in neural tube devel- opment.Nature Communications, 13(1):1145, March 2022. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/ s41467-022-28834-3. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28834-3

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Foty and Malcolm S

    Ramsey A. Foty and Malcolm S. Steinberg. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation.Developmental Biology, 278(1):255–263, February 2005. ISSN 0012-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0012160604008048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012 2005

  44. [44]

    Wei Du, Arshia Bhojwani, and Jimmy K. Hu. FACEts of mechanical regulation in the morphogenesis of craniofacial structures.International Journal of Oral Science, 13(1):4, February 2021. ISSN 2049-3169. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-00110-4. URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/s41368-020-00110-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41368-020-00110-4 2021

  45. [45]

    Wagner, L

    J. Wagner, L. Ma, J.J. Rice, W. Hu, A.J. Levine, and G.A. Stolovitzky. p53–Mdm2 loop controlled by a balance of its feedback strength and effective dampening using ATM and delayed feedback.IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology, 152(3):109–118, September 2005. doi: 10.1049/ip-syb:20050025. URLhttps://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/abs/ 10.1049/ip-syb%3A20050025. 19

    work page doi:10.1049/ip-syb:20050025 2005