REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references
Quantum Vacuum in Matter
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Cavity vacuum fields can measurably modify materials, but ground-state dressing remains unproven.
desk verdict A well-balanced perspective on ultrastrong cavity QED that honestly flags unresolved experiments; the main defects are citation hygiene and a slightly over-assertive introduction. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the quantum Rabi–Dicke–Hopfield Hamiltonian for a single cavity mode coupled to matter excitations, with the counter-rotating terms and the $\hat{A}^2$ term retained. The load-bearing mechanism is the ultrastrong coupling regime, defined by a normalized coupling $\eta>0.1$, where the rotating-wave approximation breaks down and the joint ground state acquires virtual photons, intrinsic squeezing, and matter–vacuum entanglement. The vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift serves as the key experimental signature that the counter-rotating terms are active.
What would settle it
Measure the cavity-modified metal–insulator transition in 1T-TaS2 while independently monitoring the sample's temperature with a thermometer that is not radiatively coupled to the cavity; if the apparent transition shift disappears when thermal equilibration through the cavity is blocked, the thermal Purcell effect rather than vacuum ground-state dressing is responsible.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that measurable effects of the quantum vacuum have been experimentally observed in condensed matter cavity QED systems in the ultrastrong coupling regime, including vacuum Rabi splittings comparable to the bare frequencies and vacuum Bloch–Siegert shifts that evidence the breakdown of the rotating-wave approximation. The paper further argues that cavity vacuum fields can modify material properties, citing the breakdown of topological protection in the integer quantum Hall effect and the cavity-induced change in the apparent transition temperature of 1T-TaS2. It explicitly concedes, however, that no experiments so far have unambiguously proved vacuum engineering of the ground state itself.
Load-bearing premise
The interpretation of the key experiments as demonstrations of vacuum-field effects assumes that the observed changes are caused by quantum vacuum fluctuations rather than by thermal, radiative, or measurement artifacts; the paper itself proposes a thermal Purcell effect as an alternative explanation for the 1T-TaS2 observation.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If vacuum fields are real agents, cavity design becomes a non-perturbative handle on material properties without external illumination.
- The observed weakening of topological protection implies that vacuum fluctuations can compete with robust topological order, not just with weakly bound states.
- If the thermal Purcell effect explains the 1T-TaS2 result, then cavity-modified phase transitions may be driven by selective radiative heat exchange rather than coherent dressing, changing how such experiments are interpreted.
- The equilibrium magnonic superradiant phase transition suggests that photon condensation is physically realizable in collective magnetic modes even where the $\hat{A}^2$ term forbids it for charges.
- Reaching ultrastrong coupling with a single spin (without $\sqrt{N}$ cooperativity) would directly test the quantum Rabi model and its predicted ground-state squeezing.
Reading between the lines
- One testable extension would be to measure the quantum Hall cavity system at milli-Kelvin temperatures while sweeping the cavity detuning; if the resistivity anomaly persists with negligible thermal photon population, vacuum-field coupling is favored over thermal artifacts.
- The discussion of $k$-locality hints that cavity-modified many-body systems might still obey generalized Lieb–Robinson bounds, which could enable new numerical approaches to vacuum-dressed materials; this is not developed in the paper.
- If picocavity vacuum fields exceed 100 MV/cm, molecular electronic levels should shift; future experiments probing electronic spectra in such geometries could reveal vacuum-induced renormalization that vibrational Raman lines would miss.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This Perspective surveys the field of cavity-QED vacuum engineering in condensed matter. It introduces the quantum Rabi, Dicke, and Hopfield models with the A^2 term, discusses ultrastrong and deep-strong coupling regimes, reviews two experimental claims of vacuum-modified material properties (the integer quantum Hall breakdown in a cavity and the shifted metal-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2), catalogues cavity designs for enhancing vacuum fields, and closes with open theoretical questions such as long-range cavity-mediated interactions, the superradiant phase transition, and the role of entanglement. The paper explicitly states that no experiment has unambiguously proved vacuum engineering of the ground state, and it acknowledges the thermal Purcell effect as an alternative for the 1T-TaS2 observation.
Significance. The manuscript is a useful and timely review that gives a balanced view of a rapidly developing field. Its strengths are the explicit treatment of unresolved theoretical controversies (A^2 term, SRPT no-go theorem, thermal Purcell alternative), the emphasis on the distinction between robustly established vacuum effects (vacuum Rabi splitting, vacuum Bloch-Siegert shift) and the still-unproven ground-state vacuum engineering of materials, and the broad but concise overview of cavity platforms. As a Perspective, it does not introduce new derivations, so the standard circularity concerns do not apply; its value lies in synthesis and agenda-setting rather than in new evidence.
major comments (3)
- [Section 2, quantum Hall paragraph] The discussion of Ref. [28] presents the breakdown of topological protection as a cavity-vacuum effect, but the manuscript does not mention any control experiments from that work, such as a detuned cavity, a temperature measurement of the electron gas, or a variable-power/thermal-reference measurement. Given that the review later warns about measurement artifacts, the absence of such controls is load-bearing for the claim that vacuum fields modify material properties. Please either report the controls contained in the original experiment or explicitly state that this attribution remains unresolved.
- [Section 2, 1T-TaS2 and closing sentence] The thermal Purcell effect is acknowledged as a possible explanation for the 1T-TaS2 observation, yet the paragraph ends with the statement that 'the aforementioned results clearly demonstrated' the importance of unexpected pathways. If the thermal-radiative interpretation is correct, the 1T-TaS2 experiment would not demonstrate vacuum-driven material modification at all. The concluding sentence should be qualified to say that the experiments demonstrate cavity-induced changes but do not yet discriminate between vacuum-fluctuation mechanisms and thermal-radiative mechanisms.
- [Section 2, SRPT discussion] The phrase 'an equilibrium SRPT was evidently confirmed' for ErFeO3 [Ref. 25] is stronger than the evidence presented and sits awkwardly with the preceding statement that the role of the A^2 term in the SRPT is unresolved. Because Ref. 25 is described as evading the no-go theorem by using a collective magnetic mode in place of a real physical cavity, it cannot resolve the cavity-QED SRPT debate. I recommend rewording to 'has been reported' and adding one sentence explaining why this magnonic system is outside the scope of the cavity no-go theorem.
minor comments (5)
- [Section 2, references] There are unfilled reference placeholders: '[?,28–31]' in the paragraph listing experimental reports and a bare '[?]' in the sentence about strong vacuum electric field gradients. These need to be completed before publication.
- [Section 3, chiral cavities paragraph] The text says 'Figure 3(b) shows an illustration of the chiral cavity', but Fig. 3(b) is the Tamm cavity; the chiral cavity with nanoantennas appears to be Fig. 3(f). The cross-reference should be corrected.
- [Section 2, Fig. 2] There is a typo in 'Fig.2)(c)' that should read 'Fig. 2(c)'.
- [References] Several references are duplicated: Refs. [4] and [19] are the same paper, Refs. [10] and [21] are the same Hepp–Lieb paper, and Refs. [64] and [68] are the same paper. Duplicate entries should be consolidated to avoid citation inconsistencies.
- [General] The notation for the vacuum field strength E_vac in Eqs. (3) and (4) is introduced as a scalar, but the operator character of the field is used elsewhere; a clarifying sentence on the relation between the mode amplitude and the fluctuating field would improve readability.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the paper is a self-critical review whose claims rest on external experiments and standard models, not on a derivation that reduces to its inputs.
full rationale
This manuscript is a Perspective/review, not an original derivation. Its claims are survey statements supported by citations to the external experimental literature (e.g., Refs. [28,29], Appugliese et al. and Jarc et al.) and standard textbook models (quantum Rabi/Dicke/Hopfield Hamiltonians). The only model equations, Eqs. (1)-(4), define the conventional Dicke/Hopfield Hamiltonians and the vacuum-field strength; nothing is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction. The self-citations that appear (e.g., Refs. [4,19] for the vacuum Bloch-Siegert shift, Ref. [48] for terahertz phonon polaritons, Ref. [67] for chiral cavities) are published experimental/theoretical results by the authors, but they are used as ordinary literature citations in a review; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole support for the paper's central premise, and the main material-modification claims rely on independent groups' experiments. Moreover, the paper explicitly hedges its strongest claim, stating that "no experiments so far have unambiguously proved vacuum engineering of the ground state itself" and offers a thermal Purcell effect as an alternative explanation for the 1T-TaS2 result. Acknowledging an alternative mechanism is the opposite of circular reasoning. There is no derivation chain whose output is equivalent to its input by construction; no fitted parameter renamed as prediction; and no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation that changes the conclusion.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The quantum Rabi, Dicke, and Hopfield models with the A^2 term capture the essential physics of cavity-matter systems.
- domain assumption The minimal-coupling Hamiltonian provides a valid description of light-matter interaction in condensed matter, including the A^2 term with strength D > N g0^2 / omega_mat.
- domain assumption Locality-based theorems (exponential decay of correlations, area law, Mermin-Wagner) apply to ordinary matter and need to be revisited when 2-local cavity-mediated interactions are present.
- domain assumption The observed cavity-induced changes in materials (quantum Hall breakdown, 1T-TaS2 phase transition) are attributed to vacuum fields rather than thermal or other classical effects.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Vacuum in Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3INTLK2Q
@misc{pith2026250602170,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Quantum Vacuum in Matter},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3INTLK2Q}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02170}
}
read the original abstract
An intriguing consequence of quantum field theory is that vacuum is not empty space; it is full of quantum fluctuating electromagnetic fields, or virtual photons, corresponding to their zero-point energy, even though the average number of photons is zero. These short-lived vacuum fluctuations are behind some of the most fascinating physical processes in the universe, including spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, and the Casimir force. Recent theory and experiments indicate that the properties of materials placed in photonic cavities may be altered, even in the complete absence of any external fields, through interaction with the fluctuating vacuum electromagnetic fields. Judicious engineering of the quantum vacuum surrounding the matter inside a cavity can lead to significant and nonintuitive modifications of electronic and vibrational states, producing a ``vacuum dressed'' material. These exciting new ideas have stimulated discussions regarding the fundamental physics of vacuum-matter interactions and also broadened the scope of potential applications using zero-point fluctuations to engineer materials. This Perspective will first discuss recent experimental and theoretical developments on vacuum-modified condensed matter systems, which usually require the realization of the so-called ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime. Then, we will overview some of the most promising cavity designs for enhancing vacuum electromagnetic fields in materials with various energy scales. Finally, we will discuss urgent open questions and technical challenges to be solved in this emerging field.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[28]
Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,
F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani,et al., “Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect,” Science375, 1030–1034 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[1]
P. W. Milonni,The Quantum Vacuum: An Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics(Elsevier Science, San Diego, 1994)
work page 1994
-
[2]
Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,
P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico,et al., “Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[3]
Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,
A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato,et al., “Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter,” Nat Rev Phys1, 19–40 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[4]
Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in Landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,
X. Li, M. Bamba, Q. Zhang,et al., “Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in Landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,” Nat. Photon12, 324–329 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[5]
Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field,
C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field,” Phys. Rev. B72, 115303 (2005)
work page 2005
-
[6]
S. Ashhab and F. Nori, “Qubit-oscillator systems in the ultrastrong-coupling regime and their potential for preparing nonclassical states,” Phys. Rev. A81, 042311 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[7]
Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system,
S. De Liberato, “Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system,” Nat Commun8, 1465 (2017)
work page 2017
Show all 73 references
-
[8]
Quantum Vacuum Radiation Spectra from a Semiconductor Microcavity with a Time-Modulated Vacuum Rabi Frequency,
S. D. Liberato, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, “Quantum Vacuum Radiation Spectra from a Semiconductor Microcavity with a Time-Modulated Vacuum Rabi Frequency,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 103602 (2007)
2007
-
[9]
All-optical dynamical Casimir effect in a three-dimensional terahertz photonic band gap,
D. Hagenmüller, “All-optical dynamical Casimir effect in a three-dimensional terahertz photonic band gap,” Phys. Rev. B93, 235309 (2016)
2016
-
[10]
On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The dicke maser model,
K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, “On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The dicke maser model,” Ann. Phys.76, 360–404 (1973)
1973
-
[11]
Chapter Three - Ultrastrong light–matter coupling in semiconductors,
N. M. Peraca, A. Baydin, W. Gao,et al., “Chapter Three - Ultrastrong light–matter coupling in semiconductors,” in Semiconductors and Semimetals,vol. 105, pp. 89–151. Elsevier ofSemiconductor Quantum Science and Technology S. T. Cundiff and M. Kira, eds. (Elsevier, 2020), pp. 89–151
2020
-
[12]
Cavity quantum materials,
F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, “Cavity quantum materials,” Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)
2022
-
[13]
Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving,
I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen,et al., “Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving,” Adv. Opt. Photon., AOP17, 441–525 (2025)
2025
-
[14]
Phase transitions, Two-Level atoms, and the𝐴2 term,
K. Rzążewski, K. Wódkiewicz, and W. Żakowicz, “Phase transitions, Two-Level atoms, and the𝐴2 term,” Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 432–434 (1975)
1975
-
[15]
Spontaneous Conversion from Virtual to Real Photons in the Ultrastrong-Coupling Regime,
R. Stassi, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano,et al., “Spontaneous Conversion from Virtual to Real Photons in the Ultrastrong-Coupling Regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 243601 (2013)
2013
-
[16]
GroundStateElectroluminescence,
M.Cirio,S.DeLiberato,N.Lambert,andF.Nori,“GroundStateElectroluminescence,”Phys.Rev.Lett.116,113601 (2016)
2016
-
[17]
Quantum Theory of the Electromagnetic Field in a Variable-Length One-Dimensional Cavity,
G. T. Moore, “Quantum Theory of the Electromagnetic Field in a Variable-Length One-Dimensional Cavity,” J. Math. Phys.11, 2679–2691 (1970)
1970
-
[18]
Radiation from a moving mirror in two dimensional space-time: conformal anomaly,
S. A. Fulling, P. C. W. Davies, and R. Penrose, “Radiation from a moving mirror in two dimensional space-time: conformal anomaly,” Proc. Royal Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci.348, 393–414 (1976)
1976
-
[19]
Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,
X. Li, M. Bamba, Q. Zhang,et al., “Vacuum Bloch–Siegert shift in landau polaritons with ultra-high cooperativity,” Nat. Photonics12, 324–329 (2018)
2018
-
[20]
Perfectintrinsicsqueezingatthesuperradiantphasetransition critical point,
K.Hayashida,T.Makihara,N.MarquezPeraca,etal.,“Perfectintrinsicsqueezingatthesuperradiantphasetransition critical point,” Sci. Rep.13, 2526 (2023)
2023
-
[21]
On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model,
K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, “On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model,” Ann. Phys.76, 360–404 (1973)
1973
-
[22]
Superradiantquantumphasetransitionforlandaupolaritons with rashba and zeeman couplings,
G.Manzanares, T.Champel, D.M.Basko, andP.Nataf,“Superradiantquantumphasetransitionforlandaupolaritons with rashba and zeeman couplings,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter105, 245304 (2022)
2022
-
[23]
Theory of photon condensation in an arbitrary-gauge condensed matter cavity model,
D. M. Rouse, A. Stokes, and A. Nazir, “Theory of photon condensation in an arbitrary-gauge condensed matter cavity model,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter107, 205128 (2023)
2023
-
[24]
Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity,
K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, “Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity,” Nature464, 1301–1306 (2010)
2010
-
[25]
Observation of the Magnonic Dicke Superradiant Phase Transition,
D. Kim, S. Dasgupta, X. Ma,et al., “Observation of the Magnonic Dicke Superradiant Phase Transition,” (2024). arXiv:2401.01873
2024 arXiv
-
[26]
Making ab initio QED functional(s): Nonperturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling,
C. Schäfer, F. Buchholz, M. Penz,et al., “Making ab initio QED functional(s): Nonperturbative and photon-free effective frameworks for strong light–matter coupling,” PNAS118, e2110464118 (2021)
2021
-
[27]
Can we observe nonperturbative vacuum shifts in cavity QED?
R. Sáez-Blázquez, D. de Bernardis, J. Feist, and P. Rabl, “Can we observe nonperturbative vacuum shifts in cavity QED?” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 013602 (2023)
2023
-
[29]
Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2,
G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro,et al., “Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2,” Nature622, 487–492 (2023)
2023
-
[30]
Extraordinary Electrical Conductance through Amorphous Nonconducting Polymers under Vibrational Strong Coupling,
S. Kumar, S. Biswas, U. Rashid,et al., “Extraordinary Electrical Conductance through Amorphous Nonconducting Polymers under Vibrational Strong Coupling,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 18999–19008 (2024)
2024
-
[31]
Exploring superconductivity under strong coupling with the vacuum electromagnetic field,
A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan,et al., “Exploring superconductivity under strong coupling with the vacuum electromagnetic field,” The J. Chem. Phys.162, 134701 (2025)
2025
-
[32]
Quantum electron transport controlled by cavity vacuum fields,
G. Arwas and C. Ciuti, “Quantum electron transport controlled by cavity vacuum fields,” Phys. Rev. B107, 045425 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Weakened Topological Protection of the Quantum Hall Effect in a Cavity,
V. Rokaj, J. Wang, J. Sous,et al., “Weakened Topological Protection of the Quantum Hall Effect in a Cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196602 (2023)
2023
-
[34]
Controlling radiative heat flow through cavity electrodynamics,
F. Fassioli, J. Faist, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, “Controlling radiative heat flow through cavity electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. B111, 165425 (2025)
2025
-
[35]
Polaritonic Chemistry: Collective Strong Coupling Implies Strong Local Modification of Chemical Properties,
D. Sidler, C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, “Polaritonic Chemistry: Collective Strong Coupling Implies Strong Local Modification of Chemical Properties,” The J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 508–516 (2021)
2021
-
[36]
Vacuum-dressed cavity magnetotransport of a two-dimensional electron gas,
N. Bartolo and C. Ciuti, “Vacuum-dressed cavity magnetotransport of a two-dimensional electron gas,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 205301 (2018)
2018
-
[37]
Ultrastrong coupling between nanoparticle plasmons and cavity photons at ambient conditions,
D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, E. Zhukova,et al., “Ultrastrong coupling between nanoparticle plasmons and cavity photons at ambient conditions,” Nat Commun11, 2715 (2020)
2020
-
[38]
THz Ultrastrong Coupling in an Engineered Fabry–Perot Cavity,
E. Mavrona, S. Rajabali, F. Appugliese,et al., “THz Ultrastrong Coupling in an Engineered Fabry–Perot Cavity,” ACS Photonics p. acsphotonics.1c00717 (2021)
2021
-
[39]
Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,
Q. Zhang, M. Lou, X. Li,et al., “Collective non-perturbative coupling of 2D electrons with high-quality-factor terahertz cavity photons,” Nat. Phys12, 1005–1011 (2016)
2016
-
[40]
Ultrastrong Coupling of the Cyclotron Transition of a 2D Electron Gas to a THz Metamaterial,
G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Turčinková,et al., “Ultrastrong Coupling of the Cyclotron Transition of a 2D Electron Gas to a THz Metamaterial,” Science335, 1323–1326 (2012)
2012
-
[41]
Terahertz Light–Matter Interaction beyond Unity Coupling Strength,
A. Bayer, M. Pozimski, S. Schambeck,et al., “Terahertz Light–Matter Interaction beyond Unity Coupling Strength,” Nano Lett.17, 6340–6344 (2017)
2017
-
[42]
Multimode ultrastrong coupling in three-dimensional photonic-crystal cavities,
F. Tay, A. Mojibpour, S. Sanders,et al., “Multimode ultrastrong coupling in three-dimensional photonic-crystal cavities,” Nat Commun16, 3603 (2025)
2025
-
[43]
Characteristics of photonic band gaps in woodpile three-dimensional terahertz photonic crystals,
H. Liu, J. Yao, D. Xu, and P. Wang, “Characteristics of photonic band gaps in woodpile three-dimensional terahertz photonic crystals,” Opt. Express, OE15, 695–703 (2007)
2007
-
[44]
Analysis of planar defect structures in three-dimensional layer-by-layer photonic crystals,
J.-F. Chen, R.-T. Hong, and J.-Y. Yang, “Analysis of planar defect structures in three-dimensional layer-by-layer photonic crystals,” J. Appl. Phys.104, 063111 (2008)
2008
-
[45]
Tamm Cavity in the Terahertz Spectral Range,
S. Messelot, C. Symonds, J. Bellessa,et al., “Tamm Cavity in the Terahertz Spectral Range,” ACS Photonics7, 2906–2914 (2020)
2020
-
[46]
Ultrastrong coupling between a cavity resonator and the cyclotron transition of a two-dimensional electron gas in the case of an integer filling factor,
D. Hagenmüller, S. De Liberato, and C. Ciuti, “Ultrastrong coupling between a cavity resonator and the cyclotron transition of a two-dimensional electron gas in the case of an integer filling factor,” Phys. Rev. B81, 235303 (2010)
2010
-
[47]
Polaritonicnonlocalityinlight–matterinteraction,
S.Rajabali,E.Cortese,M.Beck,etal.,“Polaritonicnonlocalityinlight–matterinteraction,”Nat.Photon.15,690–695 (2021)
2021
-
[48]
Terahertz Cavity Phonon Polaritons in Lead Telluride in the Deep-Strong Coupling Regime,
A. Baydin, M. Manjappa, S. S. Mishra,et al., “Terahertz Cavity Phonon Polaritons in Lead Telluride in the Deep-Strong Coupling Regime,” (2025). arXiv:2501.10856
2025 arXiv
-
[49]
Mode-multiplexing deep-strong light-matter coupling,
J. Mornhinweg, L. K. Diebel, M. Halbhuber,et al., “Mode-multiplexing deep-strong light-matter coupling,” Nat Commun15, 1847 (2024)
2024
-
[50]
Terahertz field enhancement by a metallic nano slit operating beyond the skin-depth limit,
M. A. Seo, H. R. Park, S. M. Koo,et al., “Terahertz field enhancement by a metallic nano slit operating beyond the skin-depth limit,” Nat. Photon3, 152–156 (2009)
2009
-
[51]
Cavity-mediated superthermal phonon correlations in the ultrastrong coupling regime,
D. Kim, J. Hou, G. Lee,et al., “Cavity-mediated superthermal phonon correlations in the ultrastrong coupling regime,” (2024). arXiv:2409.04505
2024
-
[52]
Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities
F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann,et al., “Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities”,” Science354, 726–729 (2016)
2016
-
[53]
CavityQuantumElectrodynamicswithHyperbolicvanderWaalsMaterials,
Y.Ashida,A.İmamoğlu,andE.Demler,“CavityQuantumElectrodynamicswithHyperbolicvanderWaalsMaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216901 (2023)
2023
-
[54]
Far-fieldexcitationofsinglegrapheneplasmoncavitieswithultracompressed mode volumes,
I.Epstein,D.Alcaraz,Z.Huang,etal.,“Far-fieldexcitationofsinglegrapheneplasmoncavitieswithultracompressed mode volumes,” Science368, 1219–1223 (2020)
2020
-
[55]
Programmable hyperbolic polaritons in van der Waals semiconductors,
A. J. Sternbach, S. H. Chae, S. Latini,et al., “Programmable hyperbolic polaritons in van der Waals semiconductors,” Science371, 617–620 (2021)
2021
-
[56]
Good plasmons in a bad metal,
F. L. Ruta, Y. Shao, S. Acharya,et al., “Good plasmons in a bad metal,” (2024). arXiv:2406.05703
2024 arXiv
-
[57]
Resonant nanostructures for highly confined and ultra-sensitive surface phonon-polaritons,
A. M. Dubrovkin, B. Qiang, T. Salim,et al., “Resonant nanostructures for highly confined and ultra-sensitive surface phonon-polaritons,” Nat Commun11, 1863 (2020)
2020
-
[58]
Phonon polaritonics in broad terahertz frequency range with quantum paraelectric SrTiO3,
R. Xu, T. Lin, J. Luo,et al., “Phonon polaritonics in broad terahertz frequency range with quantum paraelectric SrTiO3,” Adv. Mater.35, 2302974 (2023)
2023
-
[59]
High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride,
H. Herzig Sheinfux, L. Orsini, M. Jung,et al., “High-quality nanocavities through multimodal confinement of hyperbolic polaritons in hexagonal boron nitride,” Nat. Mater. pp. 1–7 (2024)
2024
-
[60]
Cavity quantum electrodynamical Chern insulator: Towards light-induced quantized anomalous Hall effect in graphene,
X. Wang, E. Ronca, and M. A. Sentef, “Cavity quantum electrodynamical Chern insulator: Towards light-induced quantized anomalous Hall effect in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B99, 235156 (2019)
2019
-
[61]
Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities,
H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, C. Schäfer,et al., “Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities,” Nat. Mater.20, 438–442 (2021)
2021
-
[62]
Engineering topology in graphene with chiral cavities,
C. B. Dag and V. Rokaj, “Engineering topology in graphene with chiral cavities,” Phys. Rev. B110, L121101 (2024)
2024
-
[63]
Chiral flat-band optical cavity with atomically thin mirrors,
D. G. Suárez-Forero, R. Ni, S. Sarkar,et al., “Chiral flat-band optical cavity with atomically thin mirrors,” Sci. Adv. 10, eadr5904 (2024)
2024
-
[65]
Chiral TeraHertz Surface Plasmonics,
I. Aupiais, R. Grasset, D. Daineka,et al., “Chiral TeraHertz Surface Plasmonics,” ACS Photonics11, 4184–4192 (2024)
2024
-
[66]
Polariton ring currents and circular dichroism of Mg-porphyrin in a chiral cavity,
S. Sun, B. Gu, and S. Mukamel, “Polariton ring currents and circular dichroism of Mg-porphyrin in a chiral cavity,” Chem. Sci.13, 1037–1048 (2022)
2022
-
[67]
Terahertz chiral photonic-crystal cavities with broken time-reversal symmetry,
F. Tay, S. Sanders, A. Baydin,et al., “Terahertz chiral photonic-crystal cavities with broken time-reversal symmetry,” (2024). arXiv:2410.21171
2024 arXiv
-
[68]
Terahertzchiralsubwavelengthcavitiesbreakingtime-reversalsymmetry via ultrastrong light-matter interaction,
J.Andberger,L.Graziotto,L.Sacchi,etal.,“Terahertzchiralsubwavelengthcavitiesbreakingtime-reversalsymmetry via ultrastrong light-matter interaction,” Phys. Rev. B109, L161302 (2024)
2024
-
[69]
Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases of quantum lattice systems,
S. Bachmann, S. Michalakis, B. Nachtergaele, and R. Sims, “Automorphic equivalence within gapped phases of quantum lattice systems,” Commun. Math. Phys.309, 835–871 (2012)
2012
-
[70]
Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models,
N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, “Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)
1966
-
[71]
Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations,
M. B. Hastings and T. Koma, “Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations,” Commun. mathematical physics 265, 781–804 (2006)
2006
-
[72]
Lieb-robinsonboundsandtheexponentialclusteringtheorem,
B.NachtergaeleandR.Sims,“Lieb-robinsonboundsandtheexponentialclusteringtheorem,”Commun.mathematical physics265, 119–130 (2006)
2006
-
[73]
An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems,
M. B. Hastings, “An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems,” J. statistical mechanics: theory experiment 2007, P08024 (2007)
2007
-
[74]
Local observables and particle statistics i,
S. Doplicher, R. Haag, and J. E. Roberts, “Local observables and particle statistics i,” Commun. Math. Phys.23, 199–230 (1971)
1971
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.