Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-Parametric Calibration of Probabilistic Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.07690 v1 pith:3IUILZT6 submitted 2018-06-20 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords regressioncalibrationestimatesmodelprobabilityapproachesbeencalibrating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The task of calibration is to retrospectively adjust the outputs from a machine learning model to provide better probability estimates on the target variable. While calibration has been investigated thoroughly in classification, it has not yet been well-established for regression tasks. This paper considers the problem of calibrating a probabilistic regression model to improve the estimated probability densities over the real-valued targets. We propose to calibrate a regression model through the cumulative probability density, which can be derived from calibrating a multi-class classifier. We provide three non-parametric approaches to solve the problem, two of which provide empirical estimates and the third providing smooth density estimates. The proposed approaches are experimentally evaluated to show their ability to improve the performance of regression models on the predictive likelihood.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Know Your Account: Double Graph Inference-based Account De-anonymization on Ethereum

    cs.SI 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual static-dynamic graph model with ECE-weighted confidence calibration classifies Ethereum account types and reports F1 scores above 97 percent.

Pith tools