REVIEW
Full Duplex Operation for Small Cells
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Full duplex (FD) communications has the potential to double the capacity of a half duplex (HD) system at the link level. However, FD operation increases the aggregate interference on each communication link, which limits the capacity improvement. In this paper, we investigate how much of the potential doubling can be practically achieved in the resource-managed, small multi-cellular system, similar to the TDD variant of LTE, both in indoor and outdoor environments, assuming FD base stations (BSs) and HD user equipment (UEs). We focus on low-powered small cellular systems, because they are more suitable for FD operation given practical self-interference cancellation limits. A joint UE selection and power allocation method for a multi-cell scenario is presented, where a hybrid scheduling policy assigns FD timeslots when it provides a throughput advantage by pairing UEs with appropriate power levels to mitigate the mutual interference, but otherwise defaults to HD operation. Due to the complexity of finding the globally optimum solution of the proposed algorithm, a sub-optimal method based on a heuristic greedy algorithm for UE selection, and a novel solution using geometric programming for power allocation, is proposed. With practical self-interference cancellation, antennas and circuits, it is shown that the proposed hybrid FD system achieves as much as 94% throughput improvement in the downlink, and 92% in the uplink, compared to a HD system in an indoor multi-cell scenario and 54% in downlink and 61% in uplink in an outdoor multi-cell scenario. Further, we also compare the energy efficiency of FD operation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.