Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distilling Knowledge from Object Classification to Aesthetics Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00809 v1 pith:3KWQIVW4 submitted 2022-06-02 cs.MM cs.CV

classification cs.MMcs.CV
keywords aestheticcontentsmodellabelsknowledgedistinctimagevarious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we point out that the major dilemma of image aesthetics assessment (IAA) comes from the abstract nature of aesthetic labels. That is, a vast variety of distinct contents can correspond to the same aesthetic label. On the one hand, during inference, the IAA model is required to relate various distinct contents to the same aesthetic label. On the other hand, when training, it would be hard for the IAA model to learn to distinguish different contents merely with the supervision from aesthetic labels, since aesthetic labels are not directly related to any specific content. To deal with this dilemma, we propose to distill knowledge on semantic patterns for a vast variety of image contents from multiple pre-trained object classification (POC) models to an IAA model. Expecting the combination of multiple POC models can provide sufficient knowledge on various image contents, the IAA model can easier learn to relate various distinct contents to a limited number of aesthetic labels. By supervising an end-to-end single-backbone IAA model with the distilled knowledge, the performance of the IAA model is significantly improved by 4.8% in SRCC compared to the version trained only with ground-truth aesthetic labels. On specific categories of images, the SRCC improvement brought by the proposed method can achieve up to 7.2%. Peer comparison also shows that our method outperforms 10 previous IAA methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools