Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Deep Learning in SystemML using Layer-wise Adaptive Rate Scaling(LARS) Optimizer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.03018 v1 pith:3LCLP7PY submitted 2021-02-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learninglarsoptimizerdeepmodelsystemmlbatchadaptive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Increasing the batch size of a deep learning model is a challenging task. Although it might help in utilizing full available system memory during training phase of a model, it results in significant loss of test accuracy most often. LARS solved this issue by introducing an adaptive learning rate for each layer of a deep learning model. However, there are doubts on how popular distributed machine learning systems such as SystemML or MLlib will perform with this optimizer. In this work, we apply LARS optimizer to a deep learning model implemented using SystemML.We perform experiments with various batch sizes and compare the performance of LARS optimizer with \textit{Stochastic Gradient Descent}. Our experimental results show that LARS optimizer performs significantly better than Stochastic Gradient Descent for large batch sizes even with the distributed machine learning framework, SystemML.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-supervised learning for radio-astronomy source classification: a benchmark

    astro-ph.IM 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Self-supervised pretraining on radio images beats ImageNet features for radio source classification in linear evaluation, but fine-tuning erases most of the advantage.

Pith tools