Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Anomalous skew scattering of plasmons in a Dirac electron fluid

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Plasmons incident on a Berry-flux disk undergo resonant skew scattering at discrete frequencies set by a chiral trapped interface mode.

desk verdict The Berry flux target setup is new and the hydrodynamic framework is clean, but Eq. (6) does not match the zeros of the phase-shift denominator from the paper's own Appendix C for the large-α regime the paper emphasizes. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01566 v2 pith:3LWST6JH submitted 2025-01-02 cond-mat.mes-hall

Cooper Finnigan , Dmitry K. Efimkin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords plasmonscatteringskewBerryfluxanomalousHalleffecthydrodynamicmodelDiracelectronfluidchiralinterfacemodegrapheneplasmonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a circular patch of nonzero Berry flux in a Dirac electron fluid acts as a resonant skew-scattering target for plasmons: incoming plasmon waves are deflected to one side with a large average scattering angle. The flux patch induces a frequency-dependent anomalous Hall response, so the asymmetry is not uniform but concentrates at a discrete set of resonance frequencies set by the patch radius and the flux strength. The resonances are traced to a chiral, non-topological interface mode that circulates the patch and becomes trapped there. If the mechanism holds, it offers a magnetic-field-free way to steer plasmons in graphene and topological insulator films at meV energies, using light-induced or proximity-induced Berry flux.

What carries the argument

The central object is the chiral, non-topological interface plasmon trapped at the Berry-flux interface $F(x)=F\,\Theta(x)$, with dispersion $\Omega_{\mathrm{int}}(q_y)= u q_y \omega_*/\sqrt{(u q_y)^2+\omega_*^2}$. In the circular geometry, the standing-wave condition $2\pi q_\ell r_F = 2\pi \ell$ quantizes this dispersion to $\Omega_\ell$, so the same mode that circulates the disk is responsible for the resonant peaks in the scattering. The machinery also includes the hydrodynamic equations with the anomalous-velocity Hall term proportional to $F$; the Berry flux drops out of the bulk wave equation for density but enters through the radial-current boundary condition at the disk edge, producing the phase shifts $\delta_\ell$.

What would settle it

A direct near-field experiment on graphene with a circularly polarized pump spot could look for the sign-changing average scattering angle and peaks at the predicted $\Omega_\ell$; if the predicted peaks are absent or the asymmetry does not exceed $\pi/4$ near them, the central claim fails. A simpler theoretical check is to numerically solve the same scattering problem with a smooth flux profile or finite damping and compare to Eq. (6).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that plasmons incident on a circular region with nonzero Berry flux undergo large, resonant skew scattering. The scattering amplitude is computed by partial-wave analysis of the hydrodynamic density equation, with phase shifts determined by continuity of density and radial current at the disk edge. At intermediate frequencies $\omega_*/2 \lesssim \omega \lesssim \omega_*$, the total cross-section shows narrow peaks at the discrete frequencies $\Omega_\ell$ of a chiral interface mode circulating the disk, and the average scattering angle exceeds $\pm\pi/4$ near resonance. The resonance set is $$\Omega_\ell = \frac{\ell \omega_g \omega_*}{\sqrt{(\ell \omega_g)^2+\omega_*^2}},$$ with $\omega_g = u/r_F$ and $\omega_* = 2n\hbar/mF$; the paper argues the same mechanism can be realized in graphene under circularly polarized light and on topological insulator surfaces with a ferromagnetic flake.

Load-bearing premise

The main load-bearing premise is that the Berry-flux target can be treated as a sharp circular step in an otherwise uniform, lossless, collisionless fluid, with the hydrodynamic response remaining accurate up to the resonance frequencies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The average scattering angle $\langle \phi \rangle$ changes sign through each resonance and its extrema exceed $\pm\pi/4$, so a single Berry-flux disk can act as a frequency-selective plasmon deflector.
  • Resonance frequencies are given by Eq. (6); changing the disk radius $r_F$ or the Dirac mass $\Delta$ (via light intensity or proximity) tunes $\omega_g$ and $\omega_*$, hence the deflected frequencies.
  • At low frequencies $\omega \lesssim \omega_*/2$ the anomalous response is too weak to scatter, while at high frequencies $\omega \gtrsim \omega_*$ forward scattering dominates; the useful window is $\omega_*/2 \lesssim \omega \lesssim \omega_*$.
  • The same physics works in the two proposed platforms, graphene under circularly polarized light and a topological insulator surface with a ferromagnetic flake, with resonances in the tens-of-meV range.
  • A velocity mismatch between the illuminated or flaked region and the surrounding fluid has only a minor effect on the resonant skew scattering, so the prediction is robust to that detail.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension: replace the sharp disk $F(r)=F\Theta(r_F-r)$ with a smooth flux profile and check whether the Eq. (6) resonances shift or survive; the sharp step is the main idealization.
  • Testable extension: compute the collective scattering of a periodic array of Berry-flux disks; the paper only mentions gratings as a future possibility.
  • Editorial connection: the non-Hermitian reformulation in Appendix F may map onto other wave-scattering problems, though the paper does not pursue this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends a collisionless hydrodynamic description of Dirac electron fluids to the scattering of plasmons off a circular region with a uniform Berry flux (an anomalous Hall target). It derives a chiral interface mode for a half-plane Berry-flux boundary, obtains its dispersion, and then uses partial-wave analysis for a disk target to compute the total cross-section and the average scattering angle. The central claim is that the scattering is strongly skewed and exhibits resonant peaks at the discrete frequencies of a trapped chiral mode, Ω_l = l ω_g ω_* / sqrt((l ω_g)^2 + ω_*^2), with average scattering angles exceeding π/4 near resonance. The paper also gives material estimates for graphene under circularly polarized light and for topological insulator surfaces, and it includes appendices on velocity mismatch, partial-wave algebra, chiral multilayers, a Kubo-formula comparison, and an eigenvalue reformulation.

Significance. If the central claim held, the paper would predict a magnetic-field-free, frequency-selective, strongly directional scattering of plasmons, with resonance frequencies set by the Berry flux and target radius and reaching meV scales that micromagnets cannot access. The hydrodynamic framework and the partial-wave scattering setup are clean, and the Kubo-conductivity comparison in Appendix E is a useful external anchor. However, the load-bearing connection between the claimed resonance frequencies, Eq. (6), and the paper's own scattering phase shifts, Appendix C, is internally inconsistent for the plotted parameters. This issue directly affects the quantitative prediction of resonance positions and the attribution of the peaks to chiral trapped modes, so the significance of the result as presented is substantially weakened pending a correction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV and Appendix C, Eqs. (6) and (C4)] The text claims that the resonant peaks in the scattering observables are accurately described by Eq. (6) and highlights the first three harmonics ℓ=1,2,3 in Figs. 3 and 4. According to the phase shifts of Appendix C, tanδ_ℓ = B_ℓ/A_ℓ, a real-frequency partial-wave resonance requires A_ℓ = 0, i.e., 1 + πℓ(ω/ω_*) J_ℓ(αω/ω_*) Y_ℓ(αω/ω_*) = 0 with α = r_F ω_*/u. For α = 9.8, the frequencies from Eq. (6) are ω/ω_* ≈ 0.1015, 0.2000, and 0.2927 for ℓ=1,2,3. At the corresponding arguments qr_F = αω/ω_* ≈ 0.995, 1.960, and 2.868, the products J_ℓY_ℓ are approximately −0.34, −0.22, and −0.13, giving A_1≈0.89, A_2≈0.72, and A_3≈0.64. None of these A_ℓ is close to zero, so the associated partial waves are not resonant at the frequencies claimed. The identification of the peaks with Eq. (6) is therefore not supported by the calculation as written; the authors need to locate the actual resonances from A_ℓ(ω)=0 (or from the complex poles of the S-matrix) and reassess the comparison with the trapped-mode frequencies.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (6)] The quantization condition 2π q_ℓ r_F = 2πℓ uses the half-plane interface dispersion (4) locally around the circular boundary. This heuristic standing-wave condition does not account for the finite penetration length of the mode or its radiative leakage into the continuum. The correct condition for a resonant state in the scattering problem should follow from the vanishing of the denominator of the partial-wave S-matrix, which is A_ℓ = 0 for real frequencies (or A_ℓ + iB_ℓ = 0 for complex poles). These conditions are not equivalent to q_ℓ r_F = ℓ, as the numerical discrepancy in the previous comment demonstrates. The derivation of Eq. (6) needs to be replaced by an actual disk eigenmode calculation, or the agreement with Eq. (6) must be demonstrated from the scattering matrix rather than assumed from the half-plane dispersion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I] The section title contains a typo: "INTRODUTION" should be "INTRODUCTION".
  2. [Sec. II] The text refers to the "Poison equation"; this should be the "Poisson equation".
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The step function in the current expressions is written as Θ(r − r_F), which is unity outside the target and zero inside, opposite to the target definition F(r)=F Θ(r_F − r) used in Sec. II. The coefficients in (C4) appear to correspond to the physical convention, so the notation in (C1) should be fixed for consistency.
  4. [Appendix C, after Eq. (C4)] The phase-shift formula is written as "δℓ(qrF) = tan(Bℓ/Aℓ)"; this should be "tan δℓ = Bℓ/Aℓ" or equivalently "δℓ = arctan(Bℓ/Aℓ)".
  5. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption contains a duplicated fragment: "calculated for alculated forϵF = 2∆".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scattering calculation is self-contained, though the identification of Eq. (6) with the Appendix C resonance condition is a separate correctness concern.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The hydrodynamic equations are imported from Song and Rudner (Ref. [5]), an external source, and the partial-wave scattering theory in Appendix C is solved from those equations with the step-function Berry flux profile, without fitting. The interface dispersion Eq. (4) comes from the boundary-condition solution in Appendix B, and Eq. (6) is an independent standing-wave quantization prediction for a circular boundary. The scattering phase shifts, total cross-section, and average scattering angle are computed from the Bessel-function matching conditions and Eq. (9), so the claimed resonances are not built into the scattering calculation by construction. The Kubo comparison in Appendix E is an external anchor for the hydrodynamic conductivities rather than a fit to scattering outputs. Self-citations to Refs. [25] and [51] provide an analogy and a prior hydrodynamic technique, but the Berry-flux target problem is solved in the present paper. A non-circular internal-consistency issue should be flagged for the correctness pass: the Appendix C resonance condition is A_l = 1 + pi l (omega/omega_*) J_l(q r_F) Y_l(q r_F) = 0, whereas Eq. (6) gives q r_F = omega/omega_* = l/sqrt(l^2 + alpha^2); for alpha = 9.8 this yields A_1 close to 0.90 rather than zero, so the printed equations do not establish that the Eq. (6) frequencies are the scattering peaks. This is a real quantitative discrepancy, but it is not circular because the two conditions are not equated by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction is analytical and parameter-free in its resonance structure; the chosen Delta, epsilon_F, rF, n, d, and kappa enter only as representative experimental inputs, not as fitted constants. The main conceptual inputs are the hydrodynamic model of Ref. [5] and the ideal sharp target, neither of which is independently verified in this paper.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic equations with anomalous velocity (Eq. 2) describe the collisionless dynamics of a 2D Dirac electron fluid, with no damping or interband transitions.
    This is the starting model, taken from Ref. [5]; the entire scattering derivation uses it.
  • domain assumption The gated response is described by the local capacitance approximation phi = rho/C.
    Used to close the Poisson equation and to obtain the linear bulk plasmon dispersion; valid for qd <= 1.
  • ad hoc to paper The Berry flux target has a sharp circular step profile F(r) = F Theta(rF - r).
    This idealization makes partial-wave matching analytic; real laser or proximity profiles are smooth.
  • domain assumption For the two proposed platforms, the anomalous Hall region is described by the massive Dirac model with Berry flux F = g Delta/(4 pi epsilon_F) and mass m = epsilon_F/v^2.
    Used for material-specific estimates in Sec. V; the paper cites Refs. [34,35] for feasibility.
  • domain assumption The scattering problem is lossless; no disorder, phonon, or radiation damping is included.
    Resonance widths and amplitudes in a real sample would be affected by dissipation, which is not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous skew scattering of plasmons in a Dirac electron fluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3LWST6JH

@misc{pith2026250101566,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous skew scattering of plasmons in a Dirac electron fluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3LWST6JH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01566}
}
read the original abstract

The Berry phase-related nontrivial electronic band geometries can significantly influence bulk and edge plasmons resulting in their non-reciprocal propagation and opening new opportunities for plasmonics. In the present work, we extend the hydrodynamic framework to describe the scattering of plasmons in a Dirac electron fluid off a circular region with an induced nonzero anomalous Hall response, i.e. a Berry flux target. We demonstrate that the scattering has a giant asymmetry or skewness and exhibits a series of resonances. The latter appears due to a chiral non-topological trapped mode circulating the target. We discuss possible experimental realizations, including the surface of a topological insulator film and graphene irradiated by the circularly polarized beam.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01566 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the considered setup. Plas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The dispersion of the interfacial plasmon (orange), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The scattering strength and frequency dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The scattering angle and frequency dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Beam/flake radius and frequency dependence of the total cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Transverse (top) and longitudinal (bottom) optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The CPL induces a local anoma- lous Hall response and an effective Dirac mass in this re- gion

    Graphene pumped by circularly polarized beam As for the first setup, Graphene is placed near a gate, and a small circular region is pumped with circularly po- larised light (CPL). The CPL induces a local anoma- lous Hall response and an effective Dirac mass in this re- gion. We estimate the following set of parameters for this setup: electron velocity out...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The local anoma- lous Hall response at its top surface [71] can be in- duced via the magnetic proximity effect with magnetic flake with out-of-surface magnetization

    The surface of topological insulator As for the second setup, a thin topological insulator film is placed at the massive gate. The local anoma- lous Hall response at its top surface [71] can be in- duced via the magnetic proximity effect with magnetic flake with out-of-surface magnetization. For estimations, we use the following set of parameters: electro...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Scattering results Beam/flake radius and frequency dependence of the to- tal cross sectionsσ and the average scattering angle⟨ϕ⟩ for the Dirac electrons in graphene and at the surface of topological insulator are presented in Fig. (5). The calculations account for the plasmon velocity mismatch, which was neglected in the main part of the paper. The mismat...

    work page 1920

  4. [4]

    Berry phase effects on electronic properties,

    Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Anomalous hall effect,

    Naoto Nagaosa, Jairo Sinova, Shigeki Onoda, A. H. Mac- Donald, and N. P. Ong, “Anomalous hall effect,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Giant tunable nonre- ciprocity of light in weyl semimetals,

    O. V. Kotov and Yu. E. Lozovik, “Giant tunable nonre- ciprocity of light in weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B98, 195446 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Surfaceplas- mon polaritons in topological weyl semimetals,

    JohannesHofmannandSankarDasSarma,“Surfaceplas- mon polaritons in topological weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 241402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Chiral plas- mons without magnetic field,

    Justin C. W. Song and Mark S. Rudner, “Chiral plas- mons without magnetic field,” Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences113, 4658–4663 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Plasmon geometric phase and plasmon hall shift,

    Li-kun Shi and Justin C. W. Song, “Plasmon geometric phase and plasmon hall shift,” Phys. Rev. X8, 021020 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Quantum plasmonic nonreciprocity in parity-violating magnets,

    Arpit Arora, Mark S. Rudner, and Justin C. W. Song, “Quantum plasmonic nonreciprocity in parity-violating magnets,” Nano Letters22, 9351–9357 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Chiral surface and edge plasmons in ferromagnetic conductors,

    Steven S.-L. Zhang and Giovanni Vignale, “Chiral surface and edge plasmons in ferromagnetic conductors,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 224408 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Plasmonic nonreciprocity driven by band hybridization in moiré ma- terials,

    Michał Papaj and Cyprian Lewandowski, “Plasmonic nonreciprocity driven by band hybridization in moiré ma- terials,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 066801 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Intrinsic nonreciprocal bulk plasmons in noncentrosym- metric magnetic systems,

    Debasis Dutta, Atasi Chakraborty, and Amit Agarwal, “Intrinsic nonreciprocal bulk plasmons in noncentrosym- metric magnetic systems,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 165404 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Optical properties, plas- mons, and orbital skyrme textures in twisted tmds,

    Lorenzo Cavicchi, Koen J. A. Reijnders, Mikhail I. Kat- snelson, and Marco Polini, “Optical properties, plas- mons, and orbital skyrme textures in twisted tmds,” (2024), arXiv:2410.18025 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Light control with weyl semimetals,

    Cheng Guo, Viktar S. Asadchy, Bo Zhao, and Shanhui Fan, “Light control with weyl semimetals,” eLight3, 2 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Moiré photonics and optoelectronics,

    Luojun Du, Maciej R. Molas, Zhiheng Huang, Guangyu Zhang, Feng Wang, and Zhipei Sun, “Moiré photonics and optoelectronics,” Science 379, eadg0014 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Modern scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy for advanced material research,

    Xinzhong Chen, Debo Hu, Ryan Mescall, Guanjun You, D. N. Basov, Qing Dai, and Mengkun Liu, “Modern scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy for advanced material research,” Advanced Materials 31, 1804774 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Plasmon reflections by topological electronic boundaries in bilayer graphene,

    Bor-Yuan Jiang, Guang-Xin Ni, Zachariah Addison, Jing K. Shi, Xiaomeng Liu, Shu Yang Frank Zhao, Philip Kim, Eugene J. Mele, Dimitri N. Basov, and Michael M. Fogler, “Plasmon reflections by topological electronic boundaries in bilayer graphene,” Nano Letters 17, 7080–7085 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Tun- able plasmonic reflection by bound 1d electron states in a 2d dirac metal,

    B.-Y. Jiang, G. X. Ni, C. Pan, Z. Fei, B. Cheng, C. N. Lau, M. Bockrath, D. N. Basov, and M. M. Fogler, “Tun- able plasmonic reflection by bound 1d electron states in a 2d dirac metal,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 086801 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Collectiveexcitationsonasurfaceoftopological insulator,

    Dmitry K. Efimkin, Yurii E. Lozovik, and Alexey A. Sokolik,“Collectiveexcitationsonasurfaceoftopological insulator,” Nanoscale Research Letters7, 163 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Lippmann- schwinger theory for two-dimensional plasmon scatter- ing,

    Iacopo Torre, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, Alberto Diaspro, Vittorio Pellegrini, and Marco Polini, “Lippmann- schwinger theory for two-dimensional plasmon scatter- ing,” Phys. Rev. B96, 035433 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Semiclassical theory for plasmons in two- dimensional inhomogeneous media,

    T. M. Koskamp, M. I. Katsnelson, and K. J. A. Reijnders, “Semiclassical theory for plasmons in two- dimensional inhomogeneous media,” Phys. Rev. B108, 085414 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Scattering of quasistatic plasmons from one- dimensional junctions of graphene: Transfer matrices, fresnel relations, and nonlocality,

    Vyacheslav Semenenko, Mengkun Liu, and Vasili Pere- beinos, “Scattering of quasistatic plasmons from one- dimensional junctions of graphene: Transfer matrices, fresnel relations, and nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 024049 (2020). 10

    2020

  16. [24]

    Plasmon scattering at a junction in double-layer two-dimensional electron gas plasmonic waveguide,

    Hanghui Deng, Shengpeng Yang, Hongyang Guo, Zijian Qiu, Ping Zhang, Shaomeng Wang, Zhanliang Wang, Zhigang Lu, Yuan Zheng, and Yubin Gong, “Plasmon scattering at a junction in double-layer two-dimensional electron gas plasmonic waveguide,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Refraction laws for two-dimensional plasmons,

    Dmitry A. Svintsov and Georgy V. Alymov, “Refraction laws for two-dimensional plasmons,” Phys. Rev. B108, L121410 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Scattering of surface plasmons on graphene by a discontinuity in surface con- ductivity,

    Behzad Rejaei and Amin Khavasi, “Scattering of surface plasmons on graphene by a discontinuity in surface con- ductivity,” Journal of Optics17, 075002 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Anoma- lous reflection phase of graphene plasmons and its influ- ence on resonators,

    A. Yu. Nikitin, T. Low, and L. Martin-Moreno, “Anoma- lous reflection phase of graphene plasmons and its influ- ence on resonators,” Phys. Rev. B90, 041407 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Giant res- onant skew scattering of plasma waves in a two- dimensional electron gas,

    Cooper Finnigan and Dmitry K. Efimkin, “Giant res- onant skew scattering of plasma waves in a two- dimensional electron gas,” Phys. Rev. B 110, L041406 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Quasistationary near-gate plasmons in van der Waals heterostructures,

    A. A. Zabolotnykh, V. V. Enaldiev, and V. A. Volkov, “Quasistationary near-gate plasmons in van der Waals heterostructures,” Physical Review B104, 195435 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Zeemangyrotropicscatterers: Resonance splitting, anomalous scattering, and embed- ded eigenstates,

    Constantinos Valagiannopoulos, S Ali Hassani Gangaraj, andFrancescoMonticone,“Zeemangyrotropicscatterers: Resonance splitting, anomalous scattering, and embed- ded eigenstates,” Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 8 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Topological scattering resonances at ultralow frequencies,

    S. Ali Hassani Gangaraj, Constantinos Valagiannopou- los, and Francesco Monticone, “Topological scattering resonances at ultralow frequencies,” Physical Review Re- search 2, 023180 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Closedí Óform solu- tion to the scattering of a skew strip field by metallic pin in a slab,

    Constantinos A. Valagiannopoulos, “Closedí Óform solu- tion to the scattering of a skew strip field by metallic pin in a slab,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research-pier 79, 1–21 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Rigorous analysis of a metallic circular post in a rectangular waveguide with step discontinuity of sidewalls,

    Constantine A. Valagiannopoulos and Nikolaos K. Uzunoglu, “Rigorous analysis of a metallic circular post in a rectangular waveguide with step discontinuity of sidewalls,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 55, 1673–1684 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Floquet topological insulators,

    Jérôme Cayssol, Balázs Dóra, Ferenc Simon, and Roderich Moessner, “Floquet topological insulators,” physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters7, 101–108 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene,

    Takashi Oka and Hideo Aoki, “Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene,” Physical Review B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Topological characterization of periodi- cally driven quantum systems,

    Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner, and Eu- gene Demler, “Topological characterization of periodi- cally driven quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene,

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, “Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene,” Nature Physics16, 38–41 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Above 400-k robust perpendicular ferromagnetic phase in a topological insulator,

    Chi Tang, Cui-Zu Chang, Gejian Zhao, Yawen Liu, Zilong Jiang, Chao-Xing Liu, Martha R. McCartney, David J. Smith, Tingyong Chen, Jagadeesh S. Mood- era, and Jing Shi, “Above 400-k robust perpendicular ferromagnetic phase in a topological insulator,” Science Advances 3, e1700307 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Independent tun- ing of electronic properties and induced ferromagnetism in topological insulators with heterostructure approach,

    Zilong Jiang, Cui-Zu Chang, Chi Tang, Peng Wei, Ja- gadeesh S. Moodera, and Jing Shi, “Independent tun- ing of electronic properties and induced ferromagnetism in topological insulators with heterostructure approach,” Nano Letters 15, 5835–5840 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Recent progress in proximity coupling of mag- netismtotopologicalinsulators,

    Semonti Bhattacharyya, Golrokh Akhgar, Matthew Gebert, Julie Karel, Mark T. Edmonds, and Michael S. Fuhrer, “Recent progress in proximity coupling of mag- netismtotopologicalinsulators,” AdvancedMaterials 33, 2007795 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Chi- ral plasmon in gapped Dirac systems,

    Anshuman Kumar, Andrei Nemilentsau, Kin Hung Fung, George Hanson, Nicholas X. Fang, and Tony Low, “Chi- ral plasmon in gapped Dirac systems,” Physical Review B 93, 041413 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Edge modes and Fabry-Perot Plasmonic Reso- nances in anomalous-Hall Thin Films,

    Thomas Benjamin Smith, Iacopo Torre, and Alessandro Principi, “Edge modes and Fabry-Perot Plasmonic Reso- nances in anomalous-Hall Thin Films,” Physical Review B 99, 155422 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    For Dirac electrons at the surface of topological insulator, the spin operator vector needs to be rotated byπ/2

  36. [44]

    See Ap- pendix D for discussion

    Interestingly, this expression is more generic and valid for chiral charge carriers in graphene multilayers. See Ap- pendix D for discussion

  37. [45]

    It should be mentioned that predictions of the hydrody- namic theory reasonably agree with the microscopic one up to even higher frequencies, approximately3ϵF/2

  38. [46]

    Graphene plasmonics,

    A. N. Grigorenko, M. Polini, and K. S. Novoselov, “Graphene plasmonics,” Nature Photonics 6, 749–758 (2012)

    2012

  39. [48]

    Observa- tion of dirac plasmons in a topological insulator,

    P. Di Pietro, M. Ortolani, O. Limaj, A. Di Gaspare, V. Giliberti, F. Giorgianni, M. Brahlek, N. Bansal, N. Koirala, S. Oh, P. Calvani, and S. Lupi, “Observa- tion of dirac plasmons in a topological insulator,” Nature Nanotechnology 8, 556–560 (2013)

    2013

  40. [49]

    Coupled dirac plasmons in topological insulators,

    Theresa P. Ginley and Stephanie Law, “Coupled dirac plasmons in topological insulators,” Advanced Optical Materials 6, 1800113 (2018)

    2018

  41. [50]

    Dirac plas- mons and beyond: the past, present, and future of plas- monics in 3D topological insulators,

    T. Ginley, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and S. Law, “Dirac plas- mons and beyond: the past, present, and future of plas- monics in 3D topological insulators,” MRS Communica- tions 8, 782–794 (2018)

    2018

  42. [51]

    Plasmonics in topological insulators: Spin-charge separation, the influence of the inversion layer, and phonon-plasmon coupling,

    Tobias Stauber, Guillermo Gómez-Santos, and Luis Brey, “Plasmonics in topological insulators: Spin-charge separation, the influence of the inversion layer, and phonon-plasmon coupling,” ACS Photonics4, 2978–2988 (2017)

    2017

  43. [52]

    For the magnetic field interface, ωc ∼ B, and the trapped chiral mode arises from the zero-frequency band, favor- ing the low-frequency nature of the scattering resonances

    The dependence of the threshold frequency on the strength of the transverse response exhibits opposite trends for the two problems, resulting in distinct behav- iors of the plasmon spectra as the interface emerges. For the magnetic field interface, ωc ∼ B, and the trapped chir...

  44. [53]

    Topological magnetoplasmon,

    Dafei Jin, Ling Lu, Zhong Wang, Chen Fang, John D. Joannopoulos, Marin Soljačić, Liang Fu, and Nicholas X. 11 Fang, “Topological magnetoplasmon,” Nature Communi- cations 7, 13486 (2016)

    2016

  45. [54]

    Equatorial magnetoplasma waves,

    Cooper Finnigan, Mehdi Kargarian, and Dmitry K. Efimkin, “Equatorial magnetoplasma waves,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 205426 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    Super skew scattering in two-dimensional Dirac mate- rial systems with a flat band,

    Cheng-Zhen Wang, Hong-Ya Xu, and Ying-Cheng Lai, “Super skew scattering in two-dimensional Dirac mate- rial systems with a flat band,” Physical Review B103, 195439 (2021)

    2021

  47. [56]

    Magnetic scattering with spin-momentum locking: Single scatter- ers and diffraction grating,

    S.Wolski, V.K.Dugaev, andE.Ya.Sherman,“Magnetic scattering with spin-momentum locking: Single scatter- ers and diffraction grating,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023164 (2023)

    2023

  48. [57]

    Skyrmion- induced anomalous hall conductivity on topological in- sulator surfaces,

    Yasufumi Araki and Kentaro Nomura, “Skyrmion- induced anomalous hall conductivity on topological in- sulator surfaces,” Phys. Rev. B96, 165303 (2017)

    2017

  49. [58]

    Scattering of dirac electrons from a skyrmion: Emer- gence of robust skew scattering,

    Cheng-Zhen Wang, Hong-Ya Xu, and Ying-Cheng Lai, “Scattering of dirac electrons from a skyrmion: Emer- gence of robust skew scattering,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013247 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    Klein scattering of spin-1 Dirac-Weyl wave and localized sur- face plasmon,

    Hong-Ya Xu, Liang Huang, and Ying-Cheng Lai, “Klein scattering of spin-1 Dirac-Weyl wave and localized sur- face plasmon,” Physical Review Research 3, 013284 (2021)

    2021

  51. [60]

    Revival resonant scattering, perfect caustics, and isotropic transport of pseudospin-1 particles,

    Hong-Ya Xu and Ying-Cheng Lai, “Revival resonant scattering, perfect caustics, and isotropic transport of pseudospin-1 particles,” Physical Review B 94, 165405 (2016)

    2016

  52. [61]

    The effective Hamiltonian respects the interplay between inversion and particle-hole symmetries, ensuring the sta- bility of its eigenvalues, which describe the dispersion relations of plasmons

  53. [62]

    Quantuminter- nal structure of plasmons,

    JinlyuCao, H.A.Fertig, andLuisBrey,“Quantuminter- nal structure of plasmons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 196403 (2021)

    2021

  54. [63]

    Inverse scattering of peri- odic surfaces with a superlens,

    Peijun Li and Yuliang Wang, “Inverse scattering of peri- odic surfaces with a superlens,” Opt. Express31, 30894– 30910 (2023)

    2023

  55. [64]

    See the supplementary material of Ref. [25] for calcula- tions showing the robustness of skew scattering to mag- netic scatterer shape, and the robustness of the interface mode to the profile of the magnetic field profile varia- tions

  56. [65]

    Transformation media for linear liquid surface waves,

    Huanyang Chen, Jiong Yang, Jian Zi, and C. T. Chan, “Transformation media for linear liquid surface waves,” Europhysics Letters 85, 24004 (2009)

    2009

  57. [66]

    Broadband cylindrical acoustic cloak for linear surface waves in a fluid,

    M. Farhat, S. Enoch, S. Guenneau, and A. B. Movchan, “Broadband cylindrical acoustic cloak for linear surface waves in a fluid,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 134501 (2008)

    2008

  58. [67]

    Hydrodynamic metamaterial cloak for drag-free flow,

    Juhyuk Park, Jae Ryoun Youn, and Young Seok Song, “Hydrodynamic metamaterial cloak for drag-free flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 074502 (2019)

    2019

  59. [68]

    Hydro- dynamicmetamaterials: Principles, experiments, andap- plications,

    Mengyao Chen, Xiangying Shen, and Lei Xu, “Hydro- dynamicmetamaterials: Principles, experiments, andap- plications,” Droplet 2, e79 (2023)

    2023

  60. [69]

    Transformation op- tics using graphene,

    Ashkan Vakil and Nader Engheta, “Transformation op- tics using graphene,” Science332, 1291–1294 (2011)

    2011

  61. [70]

    Polarization-controlled tunable direc- tional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons,

    Jiao Lin, J. P. Balthasar Mueller, Qian Wang, Guanghui Yuan, Nicholas Antoniou, Xiao-Cong Yuan, and Fed- erico Capasso, “Polarization-controlled tunable direc- tional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons,” Science 340, 331–334 (2013)

    2013

  62. [71]

    Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons,

    Qing Zhang, Guangwei Hu, Weiliang Ma, Peining Li, Alex Krasnok, Rainer Hillenbrand, Andrea Alˆ„, and Cheng-Wei Qiu, “Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons,” Nature (2021), 10.1038/s41586-021- 03581-5

    2021 doi

  63. [72]

    On-chip photonic Fourier transform with surface plasmon polari- tons,

    Shan Shan Kou, Guanghui Yuan, Qian Wang, Luping Du, Eugeniu Balaur, Daohua Zhang, Dingyuan Tang, Brian Abbey, Xiao-Cong Yuan, and Jiao Lin, “On-chip photonic Fourier transform with surface plasmon polari- tons,” Nature (2016), 10.1038/lsa.2016.34

    2016 doi

  64. [73]

    Polaritons in layered two- dimensional materials,

    Tony Low, Andrey Chaves, Joshua D. Caldwell, An- shuman Kumar, Nicholas X. Fang, Phaedon Avouris, Tony F. Heinz, Francisco Guinea, Luis Martin-Moreno, and Frank Koppens, “Polaritons in layered two- dimensional materials,” Nature Materials 16, 182–194 (2017), publisher: Nature ...

    2017

  65. [74]

    The Dirac electrons at the bottom surface of the film are assumed to hybridize with conducting electrons in the gate

  66. [75]

    Giant magneto- optical kerr effect and universal faraday effect in thin- film topological insulators,

    Wang-Kong Tse and A. H. MacDonald, “Giant magneto- optical kerr effect and universal faraday effect in thin- film topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 057401 (2010)

    2010

  67. [76]

    Non-Drude THz conductivity of graphene due to structural distortions,

    Tan-Phat Nguyen, Mykhailo Klymenko, Gary Beane, Mitko Oldfield, Kaijian Xing, Matthew Gebert, Se- monti Bhattacharyya, Michael S. Fuhrer, Jared H. Cole, and Agustin Schiffrin, “Non-Drude THz conductivity of graphene due to structural distortions,” (2023), 10.48550/arXiv.2310.06180

    2023 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    Edge magnetoplasmons in a bounded two-dimensional electron fluid,

    Alexander L. Fetter, “Edge magnetoplasmons in a bounded two-dimensional electron fluid,” Phys. Rev. B 32, 7676–7684 (1985)

    1985

  69. [78]

    The explicit expression forC is given by C =   0 0 K 0 K 0 K 0 0   , where K is the complex conjugation operator

    The symmetry works as CH (q)C −1 = −H(−q). The explicit expression forC is given by C =   0 0 K 0 K 0 K 0 0   , where K is the complex conjugation operator. Only the positive frequency states correspond to physical modes supported by two-dimensional electron gas

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.