Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 60 references

Low and Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity in Mixed-Valent Sn$_2$S$_3$

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rattling Sn(II) atoms, pushed by lone pairs, are the paper's explanation for Sn2S3's low and weakly temperature-dependent lattice thermal conductivity.

desk verdict A competent anharmonic-phonon study with a plausible Sn(II) rattling mechanism, but the quantitative kappa values rest on very short AIMD and are never benchmarked against experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10260 v1 pith:3MVEKNMS submitted 2025-06-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xingang Jiang , Yongheng Li , Weiping Guo , Qi Ren , Gang Tang , Zhong-Zhen Luo , Jiawang Hong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Sn2S3mixed-valentcompoundrattlinglonepairlatticethermalconductivityWignertransportequationphononcoherenceanisotropic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the mixed-valent compound Sn2S3 owes its intrinsically low and weakly temperature-dependent lattice thermal conductivity to rattling of its Sn(II) atoms, caused by repulsion from lone-pair electrons. Using molecular dynamics simulations and a full Wigner treatment of phonon transport, it computes lattice thermal conductivities of about 1.73, 1.59, and 6.55 W/m/K along the a, c, and b axes at 300 K, with the temperature dependence flattening to $T^{-0.68}$ once wave-like coherence contributions are included. The authors show that Sn(II) rattling generates flat low-frequency optical phonons that scatter acoustic heat carriers, and that along the strongly bonded b-axis roughly 63% of the heat is carried by optical phonons. The result matters because it identifies mixed-valent compounds with lone-pair cations as a design route to low-thermal-conductivity thermoelectrics and shows that optical phonons can dominate heat conduction in quasi-1D materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rattling mode of the Sn(II) sublattice in quasi-1D Sn2S3: weakly bonded, lone-pair-bearing atoms whose large anisotropic displacements produce flat, low-frequency optical phonon branches. The quantitative engine is the Wigner transport equation, which adds off-diagonal wave-like (coherence) heat-flux terms to the standard Boltzmann particle picture; this addition is what changes the temperature dependence from about $T^{-1}$ to $T^{-0.68}$. The paper also uses the normalized trace of interatomic force constants to show that Sn(II)-S bonding is weaker and more anisotropic than Sn(IV)-S bonding, and mode-resolved group velocities to show that optical branches along the b-axis are fast enough to carry heat.

What would settle it

Measure the lattice thermal conductivity of a single crystal of Sn2S3 along the a, b, and c axes from 300 to 700 K: if the temperature exponent is close to $T^{-1}$ rather than $T^{-0.68}$, or if the c-axis value is far from about 1.6 W/m/K, the rattling/Wigner explanation would be in trouble. Inelastic neutron or X-ray scattering that fails to find the predicted flat low-frequency optical branches below about 12 meV and their avoided crossing would also sever the proposed mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the intrinsically low and weakly temperature-dependent lattice thermal conductivity of Sn2S3 originates from rattling of Sn(II) atoms, not from ordinary acoustic-phonon scattering. Lone-pair electrons on adjacent Sn(II) atoms repel the Sn(II) sublattice, making Sn(II)-S bonds weak and anisotropic; Sn(II) then vibrates with much larger and more anisotropic displacements than Sn(IV) or S, at a low average frequency of 11.21 meV compared with 28.91 meV for S. These rattling vibrations create flat low-frequency optical branches that hybridize with acoustic phonons and show an avoided crossing, producing strong anharmonicity. Including both particle-like and wave-like heat conduction via the Wigner transport equation gives lattice thermal conductivities of 1.73, 1.59, and 6.55 W/m/K along a, c, and b at 300 K, an anisotropy ratio of 3.86, and a weak temperature dependence $T^{-0.68}$ rather than the conventional $T^{-1}$; along b, optical phonons carry about 63% of the total heat.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that a 3-picosecond simulation of 320 atoms samples enough of the slow, large-amplitude wobbling of Sn(II) to determine how it scatters phonons; if that wobble is slower or more collective than the simulation window, the computed heat-flow values and their temperature dependence could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the rattling picture is correct, Sn2S3's lattice thermal conductivity stays low at high temperature, so its thermoelectric figure of merit should deteriorate more slowly than in conventional $T^{-1}$ phonon-gas materials.
  • The heat-flow anisotropy ratio of 3.86 means crystal orientation matters: along a and c, heat is throttled by van der Waals gaps, while along b, optical phonons carry most of the heat.
  • Optical phonons cannot be neglected in quasi-1D and mixed-valent compounds; the common assumption that acoustic modes dominate lattice thermal conductivity fails along the b-axis of Sn2S3.
  • The rattling fingerprint—low average frequency, large anisotropic atomic displacement, and flat low-energy optical branches—offers a screening criterion for finding other low-thermal-conductivity mixed-valent thermoelectrics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inferred: if Sn(II) rattling is the cause, chemical substitutions that tighten the Sn(II) cage or quench the lone-pair repulsion should raise the lattice thermal conductivity and steepen its temperature dependence back toward $T^{-1}$; this is directly testable but not computed in the paper.
  • Inferred: the same lone-pair rattling mechanism should appear in other mixed-valent compounds with stereochemically active lone pairs, such as Sn2Se3 or Pb-based analogues, making the $T^{-0.68}$ signature and the large optical-phonon share a screening target for future materials searches.
  • Inferred: because the wave-like coherence contribution here is tied to high-frequency optical phonon pairs, isotope substitution or pressure that shifts those optical frequencies should change the coherence term more than the particle-like term, giving an experimental handle on the Wigner channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper reports first-principles calculations of lattice thermal conductivity in mixed-valent Sn2S3, a quasi-1D van der Waals material, using temperature-dependent effective potentials (TDEP), with phonon transport solved via the Boltzmann transport equation and the Wigner formulation. The authors predict strongly anisotropic conductivities of 1.73 (a), 6.55 (b), and 1.59 (c) W m-1 K-1 at 300 K, a weak temperature dependence of T^-0.68 in the full Wigner treatment, and a dominant (63%) optical-phonon contribution to conduction along the b-axis. The low and anisotropic transport is attributed to rattling of the lone-pair-bearing Sn(II) atoms, supported by mean-square-displacement analysis, potential-energy barriers, projected COHP, low average phonon frequencies, and large Grüneisen parameters for Sn(II)-dominated modes.

Significance. If the quantitative results are reliable, the paper makes a useful contribution by extending the rattling paradigm to mixed-valent compounds and by demonstrating, with standard and well-established computational tools, that optical phonons can dominate heat conduction along a specific crystallographic direction. The qualitative mechanism is supported by several independent and parameter-free analyses (MSD, pCOHP, potential wells, frozen-phonon potentials), which is a genuine strength. However, the numerical values that carry the central claims depend sensitively on interatomic force constants extracted from extremely short AIMD trajectories, and the lack of any comparison with available experimental thermal-conductivity data leaves the quantitative predictions unvalidated. The paper is therefore of moderate significance in its current form; the mechanism is plausible but the numbers are not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Computational details] The TDEP interatomic force constants (IFCs) used for the thermal-conductivity calculations are extracted from AIMD runs of only 3 ps (1500 steps at a 2 fs time step) in a 2x4x2 supercell. For the low-frequency Sn(II) rattling modes with energies around 2-11 meV, whose periods are roughly 0.4-2 ps, this amounts to only a few vibrational periods, and no equilibration discard or convergence test with respect to simulation length is reported. Because the reported conductivity tensor (1.73/6.55/1.59 W m-1 K-1), the T^-0.68 dependence, and the 63% optical contribution along b all derive from these IFCs, the quantitative reliability of the central claims is not established. The authors should increase the AIMD sampling (for example, to at least 20 ps), test convergence of the extracted cubic and quartic IFCs, and preferably demonstrate that the predicted conductivity is stable with respect to simulation length.
  2. [Results and Discussion, first paragraph; SI Fig. S6] The paper cites Ref. [41] as an experimental measurement of low thermal conductivity of Sn2S3, and the SI describes thermal-diffusivity measurements on a single-crystal sample, but no experimental conductivity values are given anywhere and no comparison is made with the calculated kappa. Without a quantitative benchmark to experiment, the claim of 'low and anisotropic' conductivity is not contextualized, and the accuracy of the computational pipeline cannot be assessed. The authors should provide the experimental values (from Ref. [41] and from their own SI measurements) and compare them with the computed tensor.
  3. [Methods, Computational details and Results, third paragraph] Two different AIMD simulations are described: one of 3 ps in a 2x4x2 supercell (320 atoms) for TDEP extraction, and another of 50000 steps in a 2x3x2 supercell (160 atoms) at 300 K for atomic trajectories and MSD analysis. While these are distinct runs serving different purposes, the manuscript does not clearly state that, and the juxtaposition of '3 ps' and '50000 steps' is confusing. Please clarify which simulation was used for which analysis and ensure the reader is not misled about the length of the MD used for the IFCs.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Fig. 1] The text refers to 'COHP analysis as shown in Fig. 1b', but Fig. 1b displays XRD patterns; the actual pCOHP plot appears only in SI Fig. S2. Either move the COHP panel to Fig. 1 or correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Brillion' (Brillouin), 'stats' (states), 'oose-Einstein' (Bose-Einstein) in the SI, and 'avoid-crossing' should be 'avoided crossing'. A careful proofread is needed.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The equation for the wave-like (coherence) contribution contains a redundant denominator factor; please check it against the standard Wigner transport expression (e.g., Simoncelli et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 041013 (2022)).
  4. [Fig. 3c and text] The statement that '63% of the thermal conductivity along the b-axis is contributed by optical phonons' is made without defining how acoustic and optical modes are separated in the cumulative analysis. Specify the criterion (e.g., based on the phonon branch index or on the eigenvector projection) used to partition the conductivity.
  5. [Results, first paragraph of 'Sn(II) rattler' discussion] The average-frequency analysis reports values for the total system (22.57 meV), Sn(II) (11.21 meV), and S (28.91 meV), but omits the average frequency for Sn(IV). Providing this value would make the comparison between Sn(II) and Sn(IV) more complete.
  6. [Eq. (4)] The definition of the normalized trace of the IFC is difficult to parse because of missing parentheses and indices; please rewrite the formula in a clean, standard notation.
  7. [Methods, Computational details] The manuscript does not report the convergence of the thermal conductivity with respect to the q-point grid beyond stating that 'a 11x26x7 q-point grid was used'. A table in the SI showing kappa as a function of grid size would strengthen the reliability of the reported values.
  8. [SI, first paragraph] The SI states that isotope scattering is included, but the main text never mentions this. Add a sentence in the Methods section acknowledging the inclusion of isotope effects.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the first-principles IFC-to-thermal-conductivity chain is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain runs from DFT molecular dynamics through TDEP/hiphive-extracted temperature-dependent force constants to BTE/Wigner thermal conductivity. No parameter is fitted to the target thermal conductivity or to the experimental value cited as prior work [41]; the reported kappa values (1.59, 1.73, 6.55 W m-1 K-1), the anisotropy ratio of 3.86, and the T^-0.68 exponent all emerge from solving the transport equations with IFCs obtained from AIMD, not from imposing the answer. The rattling indicators (large MSD of Sn(II), low potential barriers, weak normalized IFC traces, low average Sn(II) frequency, flat low-frequency optical branches) are computed from the same DFT model, but they are independent diagnostics of the mechanism rather than fitted inputs to the transport calculation, so the explanation is not circular. The authors' self-citations (refs. [2], [6-14], [60]) are used for methodology, software conventions, or previous studies of other materials; none of them supplies a load-bearing premise unique to Sn2S3, and no self-citation is invoked to forbid alternatives or to import a uniqueness theorem. The noted short AIMD sampling (3 ps in a 2x4x2 supercell) is a legitimate convergence and accuracy concern that affects the reliability of quantitative numbers, but it is a correctness/sampling issue and not a definitional or fitting-based circularity. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation is a parameter-free DFT pipeline: no free parameter is fitted to the target thermal conductivity or to experimental data. The approximations are the DFT functional, dispersion correction, simulation time and supercell size, and the transport model; these are domain assumptions rather than fitted constants. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE with Grimme DFT-D1 describes the quasi-1D van der Waals bonding of Sn2S3 accurately enough for phonon transport.
    Stated in Methods: the DFT-D1 approach was considered in all calculations. No comparison to hybrid functionals, experimental phonons, or alternative vdW corrections is given.
  • domain assumption Short AIMD simulations (3 ps or the separate 50000-step run) sample the anharmonic rattling motion of Sn(II) well enough to extract converged temperature-dependent IFCs.
    Methods specifies 3 ps dynamics for TDEP; Results describes 50000 steps (100 ps) for trajectories. No convergence test with respect to simulation length or supercell size is reported.
  • domain assumption The Wigner transport equation with three- and four-phonon scattering and off-diagonal coherence terms is the appropriate transport model for Sn2S3.
    The paper invokes Refs. [51,52] for the unified Wigner formulation, but does not justify why particle-like Peierls transport alone fails; this is borrowed from prior literature.
  • domain assumption Harmonic phonons from 0 K PHONOPY/DFPT remain representative of the finite-temperature rattling lattice.
    Phonon dispersion and PDOS in Fig. 2 come from DFPT at 0 K, while thermal conductivity uses TDEP finite-temperature IFCs; the paper does not reconcile possible mode shifts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low and Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity in Mixed-Valent Sn$_2$S$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3MVEKNMS

@misc{pith2026250610260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low and Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity in Mixed-Valent Sn$_2$S$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3MVEKNMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10260}
}
abstract

Compounds of Sn, such as SnSe and SnS, exhibit novel phonon characteristics and low thermal conductivity, making them emerging star materials in the thermoelectric family. In this work, through the Boltzmann transport equation scheme and the Wigner thermal transport model, quasi-1D mixed-valent Sn$_2$S$_3$ were found to exhibit a low thermal conductivity along c-axis with a weak temperature dependence. The low thermal conductivity is attributed to the anharmonic rattling vibrations of weakly bonded Sn(II) atoms, which are influenced by the coulomb interaction of lone pairs at adjacent Sn(II) atoms. The rattling of Sn(II) induces low-frequency flat optical phonons and avoids crossing behavior. The atomic displacements and mean square displacement (MSD) analysis reveal that Sn(II) atoms exhibit significantly greater and anisotropic displacements compared to Sn(IV) and S, confirming that Sn(II) behaves as a rattler. The results obtained from this work suggest an opportunity to discover low thermal conductivity in mixed-valent compounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Saito, K

    W. Saito, K. Hayashi, H. Nagai, and Y . Miyazaki, Preparation and thermoelectric properties of mixed valence compound Sn2S3, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Z. Zhao, X. Zhang, and L.-D. Zhao, Strategies for manipulating thermoelectric properties of layered oxides, Matter 6, 3274 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Y . Li, J. Liu, X. Wang, and J. Hong, Anomalous suppressed thermal conductivity in CuInTe2 under pressure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [3]

    X.-L. Shi, J. Zou, and Z.-G. Chen, Advanced Thermoelectric Design: From Materials and Structures to Devices, Chem. Rev. 120, 7399 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    Zheng, T

    Y . Zheng, T. J. Slade, L. Hu, X. Y . Tan, Y . Luo, Z.-Z. Luo, J. Xu, Q. Yan, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Defect engineering in thermoelectric materials: what have we learned?, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 9022 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Sarkar, A

    D. Sarkar, A. Bhui, I. Maria, M. Dutta, and K. Biswas, Hidden structures: a driving factor to achieve low thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric performance, Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 6100 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    B. Wei, Y . Li, W. Li, K. Wang, Q. Sun, X. Yang, D. L. Abernathy, Q. Gao, C. Li, J. Hong et al., High-order phonon anharmonicity and thermal conductivity in GaN, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Q. Ren, D. Chen, L. Rao, Y . Lun, G. Tang, and J. Hong, Machine -learning-assisted discovery of 212-Zintl-phase compounds with ultra -low lattice thermal conductivity, J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 1157 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    Y . Li, X. Li, B. Wei, J. Liu, F. Pan, H. Wang, P. Cheng, H. Zhang, D. Xu, W. Bao et al., Phonon Coherence in Bismuth‐Halide Perovskite Cs3Bi2Br9 With Ultralow Thermal Conductivity, Adv. Funct. Mater. (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    Y . Li, J. Chen, C. Lu, H. Fukui, X. Yu, C. Li, J. Zhao, X. Wang, W. Wang, and J. Hong, Multiphonon interaction and thermal conductivity in half-Heusler LuNiBi, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Q. Ren, Y . Li, Y . Lun, G. Tang, and J. Hong, First-principles study of the lattice thermal conductivity of the nitride perovskite LaWN3, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Y . Pang, Y . Li, Z. Gao, X. Qian, X. Wang, J. Hong, and P. Jiang, Thermal transport manipulated by vortex domain walls in bulk h-ErMnO3, Mater. Today Phys. 31 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    B. Wei, J. Liu, Q. Cai, A. Alatas, A. H. said, M. Hu, C. Li, and J. Hong, Giant anisotropic in-plane thermal conduction induced by Anomalous phonons in pentagonal PdSe2, Mater. Today Phys. 22 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Y . Li, J. Liu, and J. Hong, Anharmonicity -induced strong temperature -dependent thermal conductivity in CuInX2 (X=Se, Te), Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    B. Wei, X. Yu, C. Yang, X. Rao, X. Wang, S. Chi, X. Sun, and J. Hong, Low -temperature anharmonicity and the thermal conductivity of cesium iodide, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    S. Lee, K. Esfarjani, T. Luo, J. Zhou, Z. Tian, and G. Chen, Resonant bonding leads to low lattice thermal conductivity, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014)

    2014

  9. [16]

    J. Ji, Q. Tang, M. Yao, H. Yang, Y . Jin, Y . Zhang, J. Xi, D. J. Singh, J. Yang, and W. Zhang, Functional-Unit-Based Material Design: Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in Thermoelectrics with Linear Triatomic Resonant Bonds, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18552 (2022)

    2022

  10. [17]

    R. Chen, S. Hu, W. Ren, and C. Zeng, Modulating phonon transport in bilayer black phosphorus: Unraveling the interplay of strain and interlayer quasicovalent bonds, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    Z. Zeng, X. Shen, R. Cheng, O. Perez, N. Ouyang, Z. Fan, P. Lemoine, B. Raveau, E. Guilmeau, and Y . Chen, Pushing thermal conductivity to its lower limit in crystals with simple structures, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    M. Jian, Z. Feng, Y . Xu, Y . Yan, G. Zhao, and D. J. Singh, Ultralow lattice thermal conductivity induced by anharmonic cation rattling and significant role of intrinsic point defects in 12 TlBiS2, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Jiang, Z

    X. Jiang, Z. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Wang, and Y . Liu, Ultralow thermal conductivity and anharmonic rattling in two-dimensional WB4 monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Zhang, D

    J. Zhang, D. Ishikawa, M. M. Koza, E. Nishibori, L. Song, A. Q. R. Baron, and B. B. Iversen, Dynamic Lone Pair Expression as Chemical Bonding Origin of Giant Phonon Anharmonicity in Thermoelectric InTe, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    Carnevali, S

    V . Carnevali, S. Mukherjee, D. J. V oneshen, K. Maji, E. Guilmeau, A. V . Powell, P. Vaqueiro, and M. Fornari, Lone Pair Rotation and Bond Heterogeneity Leading to Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in Aikinite, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 9313 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Y . Zhu, J. Liu, B. Wei, S. Xu, Y . Song, X. Wang, T. L. Xia, J. Chen, G. J. Snyder, and J. Hong, Giant phonon anharmonicity driven by the asymmetric lone pairs in Mg3Bi2, Mater. Today Phys. 27 (2022)

    2022

  17. [24]

    Yamada, M

    T. Yamada, M. Yoshiya, M. Kanno, H. Takatsu, T. Ikeda, H. Nagai, H. Yamane, and H. Kageyama, Correlated Rattling of Sodium‐Chains Suppressing Thermal Conduction in Thermoelectric Stannides, Advanced Materials 35 (2023)

    2023

  18. [25]

    J. Qi, B. Dong, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y . Chen, Q. Zhang, S. Danilkin, X. Chen, J. He, L. Fu et al., Dimer rattling mode induced low thermal conductivity in an excellent acoustic conductor, Nat. Commun. 11 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    Y . Wang, Q. Gan, M. Hu, J. Li, L. Xie, and J. He, Anharmonic lattice dynamics and the origin of intrinsic ultralow thermal conductivity in AgI materials, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Hong and L

    A. Hong and L. Ma, Ultralow thermal conductivity in quaternary compound Ag2BaSnSe4 due to square-cylinder cage-like structure with rattling vibration, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Juneja and A

    R. Juneja and A. K. Singh, Rattling-Induced Ultralow Thermal Conductivity Leading to Exceptional Thermoelectric Performance in AgIn5S8, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 33894 (2019)

    2019

  22. [29]

    P. Ying, X. Li, Y . Wang, J. Yang, C. Fu, W. Zhang, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Hierarchical Chemical Bonds Contributing to the Intrinsically Low Thermal Conductivity in α‐MgAgSb Thermoelectric Materials, Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    Z. Feng, Y . Fu, Y . Zhang, and D. J. Singh, Characterization of rattling in relation to thermal conductivity: Ordered half-Heusler semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020)

    2020

  24. [31]

    W. Lee, H. Li, A. B. Wong, D. Zhang, M. Lai, Y . Y u, Q. Kong, E. Lin, J. J. Urban, J. C. Grossman et al., Ultralow thermal conductivity in all -inorganic halide perovskites, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 8693 (2017)

    2017

  25. [32]

    M. K. Jana, K. Pal, A. Warankar, P. Mandal, U. V . Waghmare, and K. Biswas, Intrinsic Rattler - Induced Low Thermal Conductivity in Zintl Type TlInTe2, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4350 (2017)

    2017

  26. [33]

    H. Lin, G. Tan, J. N. Shen, S. Hao, L. M. Wu, N. Calta, C. Malliakas, S. Wang, C. Uher, C. Wolverton et al., Concerted Rattling in CsAg5Te3 Leading to Ultralow Thermal Conductivity and High Thermoelectric Performance, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55, 11431 (2016)

    2016

  27. [34]

    L. A. Burton, D. Colombara, R. D. Abellon, F. C. Grozema, L. M. Peter, T. J. Savenije, G. Dennler, and A. Walsh, Synthesis, Characterization, and Electronic Structure of Single -Crystal SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2, Chemistry of Materials 25, 4908 (2013)

    2013

  28. [35]

    Asfandiyar, B. Cai, L. -D. Zhao, and J. -F. Li, High thermoelectric figure of merit ZT > 1 in SnS polycrystals, Journal of Materiomics 6, 77 (2020)

    2020

  29. [36]

    Tan, L.-D

    Q. Tan, L.-D. Zhao, J.-F. Li, C.-F. Wu, T.-R. Wei, Z.-B. Xing, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Thermoelectrics with earth abundant elements: low thermal conductivity and high thermopower in doped SnS, J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 17302 (2014). 13

    2014

  30. [37]

    Lee, J.-H

    M.-J. Lee, J.-H. Ahn, J. H. Sung, H. Heo, S. G. Jeon, W. Lee, J. Y . Song, K.-H. Hong, B. Choi, S.- H. Lee et al., Thermoelectric materials by using two -dimensional materials with negative correlation between electrical and thermal conductivity, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016)

    2016

  31. [38]

    T. J. Whittles, L. A. Burton, J. M. Skelton, A. Walsh, T. D. Veal, and V . R. Dhanak, Band Alignments, Valence Bands, and Core Levels in the Tin Sulfides SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3: Experiment and Theory, Chemistry of Materials 28, 3718 (2016)

    2016

  32. [39]

    L. A. H. Jones, W. M. Linhart, N. Fleck, J. E. N. Swallow, P. A. E. Murgatroyd, H. Shiel, T. J. Featherstone, M. J. Smiles, P. K. Thakur, T.-L. Lee et al., Sn 5s2 lone pairs and the electronic structure of tin sulphides: A photoreflectance, high-energy photoemission, and theor...

    2020

  33. [40]

    Sen and P

    R. Sen and P. Johari, One -Dimensional-Sn2X3 (X = S, Se) as Promising Optoelectronic and Thermoelectronic Materials: A Comparison with Three -Dimensional-Sn2X3, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 12733 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab -initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  37. [45]

    Grimme, Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction, J

    S. Grimme, Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction, J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    Hellman, I

    O. Hellman, I. A. Abrikosov, and S. I. Simak, Lattice dynamics of anharmonic solids from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Hellman, P

    O. Hellman, P. Steneteg, I. A. Abrikosov, and S. I. Simak, Temperature dependent effective potential method for accurate free energy calculations of solids, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 87, 104111 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Eriksson, E

    F. Eriksson, E. Fransson, and P . Erhart, The Hiphive Package for the Extraction of High‐Order Force Constants by Machine Learning, Advanced Theory and Simulations 2 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, and N. Mingo, ShengBTE: A solver of the Boltzmann transport equation for phonons, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1747 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Z. Han, X. Yang, W. Li, T. Feng, and X. Ruan, FourPhonon: An extension module to ShengBTE for computing four-phonon scattering rates and thermal conductivity, Comput. Phys. Commun. 270 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Simoncelli, N

    M. Simoncelli, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Unified theory of thermal transport in crystals and glasses, Nat. Phys. 15, 809 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Simoncelli, N

    M. Simoncelli, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Wigner Formulation of Thermal Transport in Solids, Physical Review X 12 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Dronskowski and P

    R. Dronskowski and P. E. Blöchl, Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy -resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density -functional calculations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 97, 8617 (1993)

    1993

  47. [55]

    Kniep, D

    R. Kniep, D. Mootz, U. Severin, and H. Wunderlich, Structure of tin (II) tin (IV) trisulphide, a 14 redetermination, Structural Science 38, 2022 (1982)

    1982

  48. [56]

    V . N. Tuoc and T. D. Huan, Predicted Binary Compounds of Tin and Sulfur, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 17067 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    M. K. Jana, K. Pal, U. V . Waghmare, and K. Biswas, The Origin of Ultralow Thermal Conductivity in InTe: Lone‐Pair‐Induced Anharmonic Rattling, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55, 7792 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    J. Yang, Z. Yang, X. Wang, Y . Chen, Y . Xu, B. Zou, Y . Yan, and H. Sun, First -Principles Thermoelectric Study of SrMgSi and CaMgGe Zintl-Phase Compounds, ACS Applied Energy Materials 6, 8141 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Chang and L

    C. Chang and L. -D. Zhao, Anharmoncity and low thermal conductivity in thermoelectrics, Mater. Today Phys. 4, 50 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    H. Liu, X. Yu, K. Wu, Y . Gao, S. Tongay, A. Javey, L. Chen, J. Hong, and J. Wu, Extreme In-Plane Thermal Conductivity Anisotropy in Titanium Trisulfide Caused by Heat -Carrying Optical Phonons, Nano Lett. 20, 5221 (2020). 1 Supporting Information Low and Anisotropic Thermal C...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.