Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Critical Assessment of Visual Sound Source Localization Models Including Negative Audio

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01020 v3 pith:3NAUCEXQ submitted 2024-10-01 cs.CV cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CVcs.SDeess.AS
keywords audiomodelsnegativelocalizationsoundevaluationobjectpositive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The task of Visual Sound Source Localization (VSSL) involves identifying the location of sound sources in visual scenes, integrating audio-visual data for enhanced scene understanding. Despite advancements in state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, we observe three critical flaws: i) The evaluation of the models is mainly focused in sounds produced by objects that are visible in the image, ii) The evaluation often assumes a prior knowledge of the size of the sounding object, and iii) No universal threshold for localization in real-world scenarios is established, as previous approaches only consider positive examples without accounting for both positive and negative cases. In this paper, we introduce a novel test set and metrics designed to complete the current standard evaluation of VSSL models by testing them in scenarios where none of the objects in the image corresponds to the audio input, i.e. a negative audio. We consider three types of negative audio: silence, noise and offscreen. Our analysis reveals that numerous SOTA models fail to appropriately adjust their predictions based on audio input, suggesting that these models may not be leveraging audio information as intended. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the range of maximum values in the estimated audio-visual similarity maps, in both positive and negative audio cases, and show that most of the models are not discriminative enough, making them unfit to choose a universal threshold appropriate to perform sound localization without any a priori information of the sounding object, that is, object size and visibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Audio-Visual Segmentation Models Truly Segment Sounding Objects?

    cs.SD 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Audio-visual segmentation models are shown to rely on visual salience rather than audio; a new robustness benchmark and a balanced-training method largely correct this behavior under negative audio conditions.

Pith tools