Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 63 references

Open Quantum Systems Driven by Chirped Pulses: Quantized versus Semiclassical Fields and the Validity of the Rotating-Wave Approximation

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chirped pulses produce robust population transfer in open quantum systems that holds for quantized fields and without the rotating-wave approximation.

desk verdict The D2 variational runs give a plausible picture of robust chirp-driven transfer but the ansatz accuracy for open systems at finite photon number is not shown to be reliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00583 v1 pith:3NIH6AHX submitted 2026-07-01 quant-ph

Justin Zhengjie Tan , Frank Gro{ss}mann , Yiying Yan , Maxim Gelin , Yang Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords openquantumsystemschirpedpulsesrapidadiabaticpassagerotating-waveapproximationquantizedfieldspopulationtransferDavydovtrialstatevariationalmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines population transfer through chirped rapid adiabatic passage in two-level systems coupled to a phonon bath. It compares open quantum models with quantized fields against semiclassical descriptions, both with and without the rotating-wave approximation. A time-dependent variational method based on the multiple-Davydov D2 trial state is used to simulate dynamics at arbitrary finite photon numbers. The central result is that robust transfer occurs over a broad chirp-controlled regime and remains insensitive to spin-phonon coupling strength, Gaussian pulse area, and system energy gap.

What carries the argument

The multiple-Davydov D2 trial state in a time-dependent variational approach that simulates the coupled system-field dynamics for arbitrary finite mean photon number.

What would settle it

Exact numerical solutions for small mean photon numbers in the chirped regime would deviate from the variational predictions if the trial state fails to capture the dynamics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Population transfer via chirped rapid adiabatic passage is robust in open quantum systems for a wide parameter regime controlled by the laser spectral chirp. This robustness is insensitive to the spin-phonon coupling strength, Gaussian pulse area, and energy gap of the two-level system, and it persists when quantized fields replace semiclassical ones and when the rotating-wave approximation is omitted.

Load-bearing premise

The multiple-Davydov D2 trial state accurately captures the quantum dynamics for arbitrary finite mean photon number in the open-system models.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Robust transfer occurs over a wide range of laser spectral chirp values.
  • Transfer remains effective independent of spin-phonon coupling strength.
  • Transfer is insensitive to Gaussian pulse area.
  • Transfer does not depend on the two-level system energy gap.
  • Semiclassical field models and the rotating-wave approximation both remain accurate in the identified regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The variational method enables exploration of regimes where mean photon number is neither zero nor infinite.
  • Dominance of the chirp parameter over other system details may extend to related control protocols in dissipative environments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates population transfer via chirped rapid adiabatic passage in open quantum systems, comparing quantized versus semiclassical field descriptions both with and without the rotating-wave approximation. It employs a time-dependent variational approach based on the multiple-Davydov D2 trial state to simulate the quantum models at arbitrary finite mean photon number, and reports that robust population transfer occurs over a wide parameter regime controlled by the laser spectral chirp and is insensitive to spin-phonon coupling strength, Gaussian pulse area, and the two-level system energy gap.

Significance. If the variational simulations are accurate, the work would clarify the regime of validity for semiclassical and RWA approximations in driven open quantum systems and identify a chirp-controlled mechanism for robust population transfer. The ability to treat finite photon numbers variationally is a methodological strength, though the absence of benchmarks limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claims of robustness and parameter insensitivity rest entirely on time-dependent variational simulations with the multiple-Davydov D2 ansatz. No comparison to exact diagonalization, quantum trajectories, or converged hierarchy-of-equations-of-motion results is referenced, so it remains possible that the reported insensitivity arises from the finite coherent-state truncation rather than the underlying physics.
  2. Abstract: the statement that transfer 'is found to be insensitive' supplies no quantitative measures (error bars, variation ranges, or specific parameter values), preventing assessment of how wide the 'wide parameter regime' actually is or how small the residual dependence remains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comments. We agree that additional quantitative detail in the abstract is warranted and will revise accordingly. On the question of benchmarks we provide context from the method's established use while acknowledging the absence of new direct comparisons in the present work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims of robustness and parameter insensitivity rest entirely on time-dependent variational simulations with the multiple-Davydov D2 ansatz. No comparison to exact diagonalization, quantum trajectories, or converged hierarchy-of-equations-of-motion results is referenced, so it remains possible that the reported insensitivity arises from the finite coherent-state truncation rather than the underlying physics.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain new direct benchmarks against exact diagonalization or hierarchy-of-equations-of-motion methods. The multiple-Davydov D2 ansatz has been validated in the literature for spin-boson and driven open-system models, with documented convergence upon increasing the number of coherent states; our simulations employ a comparable number of states and show consistent behavior across photon-number regimes. Nevertheless, to address the concern we will add an explicit convergence study with respect to the number of Davydov states and a short discussion referencing prior benchmark comparisons for similar Hamiltonians. We maintain that the observed insensitivity is physical rather than an artifact, because the same qualitative robustness appears in the semiclassical limit (where the variational method reduces to the optical Bloch equations) and persists when the mean photon number is varied over more than an order of magnitude. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Abstract: the statement that transfer 'is found to be insensitive' supplies no quantitative measures (error bars, variation ranges, or specific parameter values), preventing assessment of how wide the 'wide parameter regime' actually is or how small the residual dependence remains.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised abstract will include concrete quantitative statements, for example the range of spin-phonon coupling strengths, pulse areas, and detunings over which the final excited-state population remains above 0.95, together with the maximum observed variation within those intervals. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results are direct numerical outputs from variational simulations

full rationale

The paper applies a time-dependent variational approach using the multiple-Davydov D2 trial state to integrate the dynamics of open quantum models with finite mean photon number, both with and without the rotating-wave approximation. All reported findings on population transfer, its robustness under chirp control, and its insensitivity to spin-phonon coupling, pulse area, and TLS gap are computed outcomes of these simulations across parameter regimes. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem, or renames an input as a derived result; the method is treated as a standard numerical tool whose outputs are presented as such.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on the accuracy of the multiple-Davydov D2 variational ansatz for finite-photon quantum fields and standard open-quantum-system modeling assumptions; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The multiple-Davydov D2 trial state provides a sufficient approximation to the quantum dynamics with arbitrary finite mean photon number.
    Employed to simulate the quantum models as stated in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Open Quantum Systems Driven by Chirped Pulses: Quantized versus Semiclassical Fields and the Validity of the Rotating-Wave Approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3NIH6AHX

@misc{pith2026260700583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Open Quantum Systems Driven by Chirped Pulses: Quantized versus Semiclassical Fields and the Validity of the Rotating-Wave Approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3NIH6AHX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00583}
}
abstract

Population transfer via chirped rapid adiabatic passage is studied using open quantum and semiclassical models, with and without the rotating-wave approximation. A time-dependent variational approach based on the multiple-Davydov D$_2$ trial state is employed to simulate the quantum models with an arbitrary finite mean photon number. We examine the accuracy of both the semiclassical field description and the rotating-wave approximation. Robust population transfer is identified over a wide parameter regime controlled by the laser spectral chirp and is found to be insensitive to the spin--phonon coupling strength, Gaussian pulse area, and energy gap of the two-level system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00583 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The calculations are performed for the represen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Time evolution of population transfer P1(t) of the quantum JC model (blue), quantum Rabi model (orange), semiclassical Rabi model (yellow) and semiclassical JC model (purple) with different initial mean photon number |α| 2 for various pulse area: (a) |α| 2 = 104 , Θ = π; (b) |α| 2 = 104 , Θ = 2π; (c) |α| 2 = 104 , Θ = 3π; (d) |α| 2 = 104 , Θ = 4π; (e) |α| 2 = 1, Θ = π; (f) |α| 2 = 1, Θ = 2π; (g) |α| 2 = 1, Θ = 3π; a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two-dimensional heatmaps of the final transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-dimensional heatmaps of the final transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED

    H. J. Kimble, “Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED” Phys. Scr.T76, 127 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Quantum Noise Reduction in Raman Lasers

    H. Ritsch, M. A. M. Marte and P. Zoller, “Quantum Noise Reduction in Raman Lasers” EPL19, 7-12 (1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    Coherent Destruction of Tunneling

    F. Grossmann, T. Dittrich, P. Jung, and P. H¨ anggi,“Coherent Destruction of Tunneling”, Phys. Rev. Lett.,67, 516-519 (1991)

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Femtosec- ond Laser photoelectron spectroscopy on atoms and small molecules: Prototype Studies in Quantum Control

    M. Wollenhaupt, V. Engel, and T. Baumert, “Femtosec- ond Laser photoelectron spectroscopy on atoms and small molecules: Prototype Studies in Quantum Control”, An- nual Review of Physical Chemistry56, 25-56 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Control of quan- tum phenomena: past, present and future

    C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti and H. Rabitz, “Control of quan- tum phenomena: past, present and future” New J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Pathways to New Applications for Quantum Control

    D. Keefer and R. de Vivie-Riedle, “Pathways to New Applications for Quantum Control” Acc. Chem. Res51, 9, 2279–2286 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Ul- trafast Coherent Control of Condensed Matter with At- tosecond Precision

    H. Katsuki, N. Takei, C. Sommer, and K. Ohmori, “Ul- trafast Coherent Control of Condensed Matter with At- tosecond Precision” Acc. Chem. Res51(5), 1174–1184 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Cooling and trap- ping of neutral atoms

    H. Metcalf, and P. van der Straten, “Cooling and trap- ping of neutral atoms” Physics reports244(4-5), 203- 286 (1994)

    work page 1994

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, “Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules” Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A time-dependent perspective

    D. J. Tannor, “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A time-dependent perspective”, University Science books, Sausalito (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Coherent Control of Atomic, Molecular, and Electronic Processes

    M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, “Coherent Control of Atomic, Molecular, and Electronic Processes” Academic Press (Vol. 42, pp. 287–345) (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    Coherent manipulations of atoms using laser light

    B.W. Shore, “Coherent manipulations of atoms using laser light.” Acta Phys. Slovaca58(3), 243-486 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Variational approach to light matter interaction: Bridging quantum and semiclassical limits

    Y. Yan, Z. L¨ u and J. Luo, “Variational approach to light matter interaction: Bridging quantum and semiclassical limits” Phys. Rev. A110, 013706 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Nuclear Induction

    F. Bloch, “Nuclear Induction” Phys. Rev.70, 460 (1946)

    1946

  7. [15]

    The Nuclear In- duction Experiment

    F. Bloch, W. Hansen and M. Packard, “The Nuclear In- duction Experiment” Phys. Rev.70, 474 (1946)

    1946

  8. [16]

    Adiabatic population transfer with frequency-swept laser pulses

    J. S. Melinger, S. R. Gandhi, A. Hariharan, D. Goswami, and W. S. Warren, “Adiabatic population transfer with frequency-swept laser pulses” J. Chem. Phys.101, 6439–6454 (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    General theory of popu- lation transfer by adiabatic rapid passage with intense, chirped laser pulses

    V. Malinovsky and J. Krause, “General theory of popu- lation transfer by adiabatic rapid passage with intense, chirped laser pulses” Eur. Phys. J. D14, 147–155 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    Chirped laser excitation of quantum dot excitons cou- pled to a phonon bath

    A. Debnath, C. Meier, B. Chatel and T. Amand, “Chirped laser excitation of quantum dot excitons cou- pled to a phonon bath” Phys. Rev. B86, 161304(R) (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Stabilization of adia- batic population transfer by strong coupling to a phonon bath

    M. Werther and F. Grossmann, “Stabilization of adia- batic population transfer by strong coupling to a phonon bath” Phys. Rev. A102, 063710 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Robust Quan- tum Dot Exciton Generation via Adiabatic Passage with Frequency-Swept Optical Pulses

    C.-M. Simon, T. Belhadj, B. Chatel, T. Amand, P. Renucci, A. Lemaitre, O. Krebs, P. A. Dalgarno, R. J. Warburton, X. Marie and B. Urbaszek, “Robust Quan- tum Dot Exciton Generation via Adiabatic Passage with Frequency-Swept Optical Pulses” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 166801 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    The Jaynes Cum- mings Model and Its Descendants: Modern Research Di- rections

    J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos, “The Jaynes Cum- mings Model and Its Descendants: Modern Research Di- rections” Bristol England (Temple Circus, Temple Way, Bristol BS1 6HG, UK): IOP Publishing, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Optical Resonance and Two- Level Atoms

    L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, “Optical Resonance and Two- Level Atoms” (Wiley, New York, 1975)

    1975

  15. [23]

    Laser-induced population transfer by adi- abatic passage techniques

    N. V. Vitanov, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, “Laser-induced population transfer by adi- abatic passage techniques” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.52, 763-809 (2001)

    2001

  16. [24]

    Stark- shift-chirped rapid-adiabatic-passage technique among three states

    A. A. Rangelov, N. V. Vitanov, and B. W. Shore, “Stark- shift-chirped rapid-adiabatic-passage technique among three states” Phys. Rev. A72, 053403 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    High- Fidelity Adiabatic Passage by Composite Sequences of Chirped Pulses

    B. T. Torosov, S. Gu´ erin, and N. V. Vitanov, “High- Fidelity Adiabatic Passage by Composite Sequences of Chirped Pulses” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 233001 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Strong optical forces from adiabatic rapid passage

    X. Miao, E. Wertz, M. G. Cohen, and H. Metcalf, “Strong optical forces from adiabatic rapid passage” Phys. Rev. A75, 011402(R) (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    Quantum state engineering in a cavity by Stark chirped 8 rapid adiabatic passage

    M. Amniat-Talab, R. Khoda-Bakhsh, and S. Gu´ erin, “Quantum state engineering in a cavity by Stark chirped 8 rapid adiabatic passage” Phys. Lett. A359, 366 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    Controllable coherent population transfers in superconducting qubits for quantum computing

    L. F. Wei, J. R. Johansson, L. X. Cen, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Controllable coherent population transfers in superconducting qubits for quantum computing” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 113601 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Magnus expansion for a chirped quantum two-level system

    P. Nalbach and V. Leyton, “Magnus expansion for a chirped quantum two-level system”, Phys. Rev. A98, 023855 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Deterministic implementa- tions of quantum gates with circuit QEDs via Stark- chirped rapid adiabatic passages

    J. Chen and L.-F. Wei, “Deterministic implementa- tions of quantum gates with circuit QEDs via Stark- chirped rapid adiabatic passages” Phys. Lett. A379, 2549 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Dissipative preparation of many-body quan- tum states: Toward practical quantum advantage

    L. Lin, “Dissipative preparation of many-body quan- tum states: Toward practical quantum advantage”, APL Computational Physics1, 010901, (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Role of quadratic and cubic spectral phases in ladder climbing with ultra- short pulses

    B. Chatel, J. Degert, and B. Girard, “Role of quadratic and cubic spectral phases in ladder climbing with ultra- short pulses” Phys. Rev. A70, 053414 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Role of chirping in pulsed single-photon spectroscopy

    E. Darsheshdar, A. Khan, F. Albarelli, and A. Datta, “Role of chirping in pulsed single-photon spectroscopy” Phys. Rev. A110, 043710 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Defining the Semiclassical Limit of the Quantum Rabi Hamiltonian

    E.K. Twyeffort Irish, and A.D. Armour, “Defining the Semiclassical Limit of the Quantum Rabi Hamiltonian” Phys. Rev. Lett129, 183603 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Jaynes–Cummings model with atomic mo- tion

    R. Schlicher, “Jaynes–Cummings model with atomic mo- tion” Optics Communications70, 97-102 (1989)

    1989

  28. [36]

    The Quantum Theory of Optical Coher- ence

    R.J. Glauber, “The Quantum Theory of Optical Coher- ence” Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963)

    1963

  29. [37]

    The hierarchy of Davydovs Ansatze: From guesswork to numerically exact many-body wave func- tions

    Y. Zhao, “The hierarchy of Davydovs Ansatze: From guesswork to numerically exact many-body wave func- tions.” J. Chem. Phys.158, 080901 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    The hierar- chy of Davydovs Ansatze and its applications

    Y. Zhao, K. Sun, L. Chen and M. Gelin, “The hierar- chy of Davydovs Ansatze and its applications.” WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.12, 1589 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Wave Mechanics

    J. Frenkel, “Wave Mechanics”, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1934)

    1934

  32. [40]

    Resonance fluorescence in intense laser fields

    D.E. Browne and C.H. Keitel, “Resonance fluorescence in intense laser fields.” Journal of Modern Optics47(8), 1307–1337 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    On the Theory of Energy Transfer. II

    L.D. Landau, “On the Theory of Energy Transfer. II.” Phys. Z. Sowjetunion2, 46-51 (1932)

    1932

  34. [42]

    Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels

    C. Zener, “Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels” Proc. R. Soc. London A137, 696-702 (1932)

    1932

  35. [43]

    Davydov-Ansatz for Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg- Majorana transitions in an environment: Tuning the sur- vival probability via number state excitation

    M. Werther, F. Großmann, Z. Huang and Y. Zhao, “Davydov-Ansatz for Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg- Majorana transitions in an environment: Tuning the sur- vival probability via number state excitation.” J. Chem. Phys.150, 234109 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Elec- tronic resonance with anticorrelated pigment vibrations drives photosynthetic energy transfer outside the adia- batic framework,

    V. Tiwari, W. K. Peters, and D. M. Jonas, “Elec- tronic resonance with anticorrelated pigment vibrations drives photosynthetic energy transfer outside the adia- batic framework,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 1203–1208 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Spin-valley lifetimes in a silicon quantum dot with tunable valley splitting,

    C. H. Yang, A. Rossi, R. Ruskov, N. S. Lai, F. A. Mo- hiyaddin, S. Lee, C. Tahan, G. Klimeck, A. Morello, and A. S. Dzurak, “Spin-valley lifetimes in a silicon quantum dot with tunable valley splitting,” Nat. Commun.4, 2069 (2013)

  38. [46]

    Large, tunable valley splitting and single-spin relaxation mech- anisms in a Si/Si xGe1−x quantum dot,

    A. Hollmann, T. Struck, V. Langrock, A. Schmidbauer, F. Schauer, T. Leonhardt, K. Sawano, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, D. Bougeard, and L. R. Schreiber, “Large, tunable valley splitting and single-spin relaxation mech- anisms in a Si/Si xGe1−x quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. Ap- plie...

    2020

  39. [47]

    Optical studies of the 1.945 eV vibronic band in diamond,

    G. Davies and M. F. Hamer, “Optical studies of the 1.945 eV vibronic band in diamond,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 348, 285–298 (1976)

    1976

  40. [48]

    The infrared absorption band and vibronic structure of the nitrogen-vacancy center in dia- mond,

    P. Kehayias, M. W. Doherty, D. English, R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, K. Jensen, N. Leefer, P. Hemmer, N. B. Man- son, and D. Budker, “The infrared absorption band and vibronic structure of the nitrogen-vacancy center in dia- mond,” Phys. Rev. B88, 165202 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Probing the origin of excitonic states in monolayer WSe 2,

    J. Huang, T. B. Hoang, and M. H. Mikkelsen, “Probing the origin of excitonic states in monolayer WSe 2,” Sci. Rep.6, 22414 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Phonon-assisted oscillatory exciton dynamics in mono- layer MoSe2,

    C. M. Chow, H. Yu, A. M. Jones, J. R. Schaibley, M. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, R. Merlin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, “Phonon-assisted oscillatory exciton dynamics in mono- layer MoSe2,” npj 2D Mater. Appl.1, 33 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Robust quan- tum dot exciton generation via adiabatic passage with frequency-swept optical pulses,

    C.-M. Simon, T. Belhadj, B. Chatel, T. Amand, P. Renucci, A. Lemaitre, O. Krebs, P. A. Dalgarno, R. J. Warburton, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, “Robust quan- tum dot exciton generation via adiabatic passage with frequency-swept optical pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 166801 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Piezoelectric exciton- acoustic phonon coupling in single quantum dots,

    D. Sarkar, H. P. van der Meulen, J. M. Calleja, J. M. Meyer, R. J. Haug, and K. Pierz, “Piezoelectric exciton- acoustic phonon coupling in single quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. B78, 241305(R) (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single quantum dot,

    J. H. Quilter, A. J. Brash, F. Liu, M. Gl¨ assl, A. M. Barth, V. M. Axt, A. J. Ramsay, M. S. Skolnick, and A. M. Fox, “Phonon-assisted population inversion of a single quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 137401 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Quantum Simulation of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion,

    D. Lv, S. An, Z. Liu, J.-N. Zhang, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and K. Kim, “Quantum Simulation of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion,” Phys. Rev. X8, 021027 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrody- namics,

    A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.- S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrody- namics,” Nature431, 162–167 (2004)

    2004

  49. [57]

    Dynamics of the dis- sipative two-state system,

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, “Dynamics of the dis- sipative two-state system,” Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1–85 (1987)

    1987

  50. [58]

    Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed., World Scientific, Singapore (2012)

    U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed., World Scientific, Singapore (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Modelling exciton– phonon interactions in optically driven quantum dots,

    A. Nazir and D. P. S. McCutcheon, “Modelling exciton– phonon interactions in optically driven quantum dots,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 103002 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Quantum Rabi Model with Trapped Ions

    J. Pedernaleset al., “Quantum Rabi Model with Trapped Ions.” Sci Rep5, 15472 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Quantum Simulation of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion

    D Lvet al., “Quantum Simulation of the Quantum Rabi Model in a Trapped Ion.” Phys. Rev. X8, 021027 (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime

    J. Braum¨ uller, M. Marthaler, A. Schneider andet al., “Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime.” Nat Commun8, 779 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Two-photon quantum Rabi model with superconducting circuits

    S. Felicettiet al., “Two-photon quantum Rabi model with superconducting circuits.” Phys. Rev. A97, 013851 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.