Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Edge Detection in Convolutional Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.13576 v1 pith:3PWMON3A submitted 2020-12-25 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords neuralrobustnesscolorconvolutionaldetectionedgeedgesmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ability to detect edges is a fundamental attribute necessary to truly capture visual concepts. In this paper, we prove that edges cannot be represented properly in the first convolutional layer of a neural network, and further show that they are poorly captured in popular neural network architectures such as VGG-16 and ResNet. The neural networks are found to rely on color information, which might vary in unexpected ways outside of the datasets used for their evaluation. To improve their robustness, we propose edge-detection units and show that they reduce performance loss and generate qualitatively different representations. By comparing various models, we show that the robustness of edge detection is an important factor contributing to the robustness of models against color noise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defective Edge Detection Using Cascaded Ensemble Canny Operator

    cs.CV 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A short paper claims a quaternion Canny variant reaches about 99 percent accuracy for edge detection, but the algorithm, evaluation protocol, and code are all underspecified.

Pith tools