Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Dynamical phase transition in generalized Dicke model with strongly interacting trapped Rydberg ions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that adding density-density interactions between Rydberg-excited trapped ions to the dissipative Dicke model creates a three-phase structure with a tricritical point and phonon-lasing limit cycles.

desk verdict Finite-size numerics on Rydberg-ion Dicke dynamics are worth a look, but the mean-field phase diagram doesn't follow from the stated Hamiltonian and the tricritical point is inherited from prior work. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05955 v1 pith:3QRNVEMB submitted 2026-08-06 quant-ph

Manish Chaudhary , Rejish Nath , Weibin Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords dynamicalphasetransitiondissipativeDickemodelRydbergionstrappedtricriticalpointLiouvilliangapLoschmidtechomean-fielddiagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that adding density-density interactions between Rydberg-excited trapped ions to the standard dissipative Dicke model does more than shift its parameters: it changes the kind of phase structure the model can have. The steady-state spin polarization is no longer given by the familiar two-root problem of the Dicke model but by a cubic polynomial, so for strong enough Rydberg coupling the phase diagram acquires an extra coexistence region, a phonon-lasing region with self-sustained oscillations, and a tricritical point where three phases meet. The authors support this mean-field picture with exact finite-size simulations, showing that near the transition the Liouvillian gap closes with system size and observables such as spin averages, Loschmidt echoes, and entropies display slow relaxation and metastability. A reader would care because trapped-ion Rydberg platforms allow laser drive, detuning, spin-phonon coupling, dissipation, and interaction strength to be tuned in one experiment, making the predicted phase structure a testable route to nonequilibrium many-body phases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized Dicke Hamiltonian $H=\frac{\Omega}{N}\sum_j\sigma^x_j+\Delta\sum_j\sigma^z_j+\sum_{j\neq l}V_{jl}\sigma^z_j\sigma^z_l+g\sum_j\sigma^z_j(a+a^\dagger)+\omega a^\dagger a$ together with Markovian decay at rate $\gamma$, reduced through mean-field factorization to five coupled equations for the phonon displacement $X$, momentum $P$, and collective spin components $S_x,S_y,S_z$. The argument turns on the cubic steady-state equation for $S_z$: its three roots, analyzed by linear stability, produce the coexistence regions and the tricritical point, while the Hopf bifurcation that destabilizes the fixed point generates the phonon-lasing limit cycles. In the finite-size analysis the analogous mechanism is the first nonzero Liouvillian eigenvalue $\lambda_1$, whose real part sets the relaxation rate and whose imaginary part signals surviving oscillatory modes.

What would settle it

Concretely, one can redo the finite-size Lindblad dynamics for $N\geq 6$ with the full distance-dependent $V_{jl}\sim1/|r_j-r_l|^3$ and several phonon modes instead of the uniform-$V$, single-mode reduction; if the coexistence region and the tricritical point disappear or move far from the reported values, the central claim fails. A laboratory version would scan $g/\Omega$ and $\gamma/\Omega$ in a trapped-ion Rydberg chain at $V/\Omega\simeq5$ and look for the two transition lines meeting at the predicted tricritical point, with slow relaxation and metastable transients in the spin average or fluorescence signal near it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the level of the paper's own claims, the central discovery is that the Rydberg interaction term $V_{jl}\sigma^z_j\sigma^z_l$ introduces a nonlinear channel that fundamentally restructures the dissipative Dicke model. In the mean-field limit, the steady-state spin polarization $S_z$ satisfies a cubic equation, and for interaction strengths above $V>\sqrt{27}\Omega/4$ a second critical point $(g^-_c,\gamma^-_c)$ emerges alongside the conventional Dicke critical point. The resulting phase diagram contains a bright phase, a dark phase, an interaction-induced coexistence region, a phonon-lasing region where no stable fixed point exists and limit-cycle oscillations appear through Hopf bifurcations, and a tricritical point where the three phases meet. Finite-size exact solutions of the Lindblad equation show that increasing the ion number $N$ drives the Liouvillian gap toward zero, and that near the transition the spin average, Loschmidt echo, and von Neumann entropies exhibit slow relaxation and metastability consistent with the mean-field phases.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that every pair of Rydberg ions feels one averaged interaction strength $V=(1/(2N))\sum_{j\neq l}V_{jl}$ and that only the center-of-mass vibrational mode of the chain matters, so anything that depends on the actual $1/r^3$ distance dependence or on the other phonon modes could change the phase boundaries, the tricritical point, and the relaxation signatures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A trapped-ion Rydberg chain with $V/\Omega=5$ should display three competing phases, with the two transition lines meeting at $(g/\Omega,\gamma/\Omega)=(1.36,0.57)$ and $(1.77,0.52)$ locating the tricritical point in experimentally tunable parameters.
  • Sudden quenches of the spin-phonon coupling across the interaction-induced coexistence region will produce slow, non-abrupt transitions with metastability, rather than sharp switching, and the direction of the transition reverses when $V/\Omega$ is reduced from 5 to 1.
  • Rydberg interactions enlarge the effective Liouvillian gap and suppress the imaginary part of $\lambda_1$, so finite systems equilibrate faster and with fewer coherent oscillations than the purely dissipative Dicke model.
  • As the ion number $N$ increases, the Liouvillian gap closes, meaning the dissipative phase transition becomes sharper and finite-size scaling of the gap can be used to locate it.
  • The Loschmidt echo and subsystem entropies distinguish the three regimes: coherent revivals in the closed model, damped plateaus with dissipation, and monotonic approach to a size-dependent steady value when Rydberg interactions are present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's uniform-interaction and single-phonon-mode assumptions are the first things to stress-test: a full treatment of the $1/r^3$ tail and of radial vibrational modes could move the tricritical point and broaden or shrink the coexistence region, so the precise numbers in the reported phase boundaries should be read as predictions of the reduced model.
  • Because the extra critical point exists only for $V>\sqrt{27}\Omega/4$, the model suggests a sharp interaction-threshold phenomenon: below that threshold the Rydberg interaction only shifts the usual Dicke boundaries, while above it a qualitatively new phase appears; measuring fluorescence intermittency while tuning the Rydberg level would be a direct test.
  • The suppression of coherent revivals by Rydberg interactions can be interpreted as an effective dephasing channel; a testable extension is to compare the time at which the Loschmidt echo loses its first revival against the imaginary part of $\lambda_1$ as $V$ varies.
  • A natural next step is to include multiple phonon modes and non-Markovian decay, which the authors identify as future work; the multimode case may convert the sharp tricritical point into a cluster of nearby bifurcations, changing the finite-size relaxation signatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a generalized dissipative Dicke model for a trapped-ion chain with Rydberg-mediated state-dependent interactions. The model combines collective spin-phonon coupling, a Rydberg density-density interaction, coherent driving, and spontaneous emission. The authors report a mean-field phase diagram with bright and dark phases, coexistence and limit-cycle regions, and a tricritical point; they also compute quench dynamics and exact finite-size Lindblad dynamics, examining spin averages, level populations, the Liouvillian spectrum, the Loschmidt echo, and von Neumann entropies. The central thesis is that Rydberg interactions add a nonlinear channel that qualitatively changes the Dicke phase structure and produces finite-size signatures of slow relaxation and metastability.

Significance. If the derivation were sound, the trapped-Rydberg-ion platform would be a timely and useful setting for studying dissipative phase transitions, and the combination of mean-field and exact finite-size diagnostics is well motivated. The finite-size numerics are a genuine computational effort, and the choice of observables (Liouvillian gap, Loschmidt echo, subsystem entropies) is appropriate for probing metastability and critical slowing down. However, the mean-field equations at the heart of the paper are not derivable from the stated Hamiltonian, so the phase diagram, critical couplings, and tricritical point are not established for the model described. In addition, the mean-field part is largely a restatement of the authors' earlier Ref. [38] while the abstract presents it as a new finding. The finite-size simulations are independent, but as presented they are interpreted against a mean-field reference that corresponds to a different model. The paper therefore cannot currently support its central claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (6)] The mean-field equations (6) are not the mean-field limit of the Hamiltonian (2). Direct Heisenberg evolution with the stated H and the factorization used in Sec. 3.1 gives, with V = (1/(2N)) sum_{j != l} V_jl, the equations dX/dt = omega P, dP/dt = -omega X - g N S_z, dS_x/dt = -2(Delta + 2gX) S_y - 4V S_z S_y - (gamma/2) S_x, dS_y/dt = 2(Delta + 2gX) S_x + 4V S_z S_x - 2 Omega S_z - (gamma/2) S_y, and dS_z/dt = 2 Omega S_y - gamma (1 + S_z). Equation (6) instead has dP/dt = g N S_z - omega X, i.e. the opposite sign of the spin-phonon term, and its S_y equation has the opposite sign of the f(X,P) S_x and V S_z S_x terms; the Rydberg feedback in dS_x/dt is also a factor of two smaller than the ordered sum in Eq. (2) implies. Consequently the fixed points, the stability analysis, Eqs. (10)-(12), and Fig. 2(c) are properties of a different model, not of the Hamiltonian stated in Eq. (2). This is an algebraic inconsistency in the central derivation, not a physical approximation or a minor sign convention issue.
  2. [Sec. 3.3 and Abstract] The mean-field phase diagram, including the tricritical coordinates in Eq. (12) and the critical couplings in Eq. (11), is presented in the abstract and introduction as a new finding ("we find"), but the body of the paper states that this analysis "has been analyzed in detail in [38]" and refers to Ref. [38] for further details. No derivation of Eqs. (10)-(12) is given in this manuscript. The contribution therefore needs to be reframed: the new element is the finite-size dynamics, not the mean-field phase diagram. As written, the attribution of the central phase-diagram result is misleading.
  3. [Sec. 4] The finite-size simulations are presented as going beyond the mean-field approximation, but they solve the Lindblad equation with the Hamiltonian (2) while the mean-field phase diagram used for interpretation is generated from Eq. (6), which is inconsistent with Eq. (2). The comparisons in Figs. 4-7 between exact dynamics and the phases of Fig. 2(c) are therefore not a test of the mean-field predictions; they compare two different models. In addition, the numerics set V/Omega = 5 without specifying how the distance-dependent couplings V_jl ~ |r_j - r_l|^{-3} in Eq. (2) are reduced to a uniform V; if a uniform coupling is used, the sensitivity of the reported finite-size signatures to this replacement is not assessed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2)] The ordered sum over j,l with j != l counts every pair twice; please state explicitly that V_jl is symmetric and clarify whether the intended term is 2 sum_{j<l} V_jl sigma^z_j sigma^z_l.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (10)] The notation "3X j=0" is a typo and should read sum_{j=0}^3.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (20)-(21)] The dissipative Loschmidt echo L(t) = -(1/N) ln Tr[rho(0) rho(t)] is not the mixed-state generalization of the fidelity |<psi(t)|psi(0)>| in Eq. (20); the definition and its relation to the usual Loschmidt echo should be clarified.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The sentence "doesnot destropy DPTs" contains typos and should read "does not destroy DPTs."
  5. [Sec. 4.1 and Fig. 4] The labels of Phase I and Phase II in Sec. 4.1 appear inconsistent with the definitions in Sec. 3.2: Fig. 4(b) at large dissipation is said to mark Phase II with S_z < 0, whereas Sec. 3.2 identifies the dark phase (Phase II) with a finite displacement and later Eq. (14) gives S_z = -1; please reconcile the terminology.
  6. [Sec. 5] The conclusion states that the Liouvillian gap closes with increasing system size, but Fig. 5(a) for the accessible N does not show a systematic gap closure at the mean-field critical point; a finite-size scaling analysis or a clearer statement of what is meant by "closing" is needed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The Rydberg-interaction mean-field phase diagram and tricritical point are presented as new findings but are explicitly summarized from the authors' own Ref. [38]; the independent finite-size numerics keep the paper from being fully circular.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. 3.1 (Eq. 6); Sec. 3.3 (Eqs. 10-12)]
    "Through analyzing the mean-field phase diagram, we find a variety of distinct phases and the emergence of a tricritical point... We briefly summarize the dynamics and nature of the stable solutions associated with each interaction term in the Hamiltonian model (2) which has been analyzed in detail in[38]. ... More details about the dynamics in this case can be found in Ref.[38]."

    The paper's headline mean-field result—the Rydberg-interaction-modified phase diagram with coexistence regions, interaction-induced critical points, and a tricritical point—is not newly derived in this paper. Sec. 3.1 explicitly says the stable-solution analysis 'has been analyzed in detail in [38]', and Sec. 3.3 again defers to '[38]' for more details. Ref. [38] (Gambetta, Lesanovsky, Li) includes present coauthor W. Li, so the abstract's 'we find' presents the authors' own prior result as a new output. The finite-size exact simulations of Sec. 4 are independent numerical computations, so the circularity is confined to the mean-field phase-diagram claim rather than the whole paper.

full rationale

The only concrete circularity I can exhibit is the packaging of the mean-field phase diagram. Section 3.1 states that the stable-solution analysis 'has been analyzed in detail in [38]', and Sec. 3.3 again points to '[38]' for more details; [38] is a prior paper by coauthor W. Li. The abstract nonetheless claims 'we find' the phases and tricritical point. Thus Eqs. (10)-(12) and Fig. 2(c) are effectively imported from the authors' own earlier work rather than independently re-derived here, which is a partial self-citation load-bearing step. The finite-size section, however, is not circular: it solves the Lindblad master equation numerically with QuTiP for finite N, uses no fitted parameters, and does not depend on [38] for its numerical outputs. The slow relaxation, metastability, Loschmidt-echo saturation, and Liouvillian-gap behavior are self-contained computational results. I also note the reader's 'skeptic' observation about sign mismatches between Eq. (2) and Eq. (6); that is a correctness/consistency objection, not a circularity, so it does not affect the circularity score. Overall: one self-citation-bearing component (the MF phase diagram) plus independent finite-size content gives a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The report's central claims rest on a mean-field factorization of correlations, a single COM phonon mode, a uniform Rydberg coupling, and the ad hoc scaling omega = N Omega. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Phonon frequency scaling omega = N Omega = N Omega
    Chosen by hand in Sec. 3.1 to make phase boundaries independent of N; not derived from the trapped-ion setup and affects all critical couplings and the tricritical point.
  • Initial phonon Fock state |n> = unspecified
    Initial state in Eq. (16) depends on the integer n, which is never specified; finite-size dynamics and Loschmidt echo depend on it.
  • Phonon Hilbert-space truncation = unspecified
    Exact master-equation simulations require truncating the infinite phonon space; the truncation dimension is not stated, so the numerical results are not reproducible.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mean-field factorization of spin-spin and spin-phonon correlations
    Sec. 3.1 replaces products of operators by products of averages to obtain Eq. (6); validity requires large N and weak correlations.
  • domain assumption Markovian master equation with only local spontaneous emission
    Eq. (3) assumes a single decay channel and no dephasing or phonon heating; typical for Dicke models but a simplification.
  • domain assumption Single center-of-mass phonon mode
    The Hamiltonian contains one bosonic mode a; a real linear ion chain has N vibrational modes, so this is a strong idealization (Sec. 2).
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform Rydberg coupling V in finite-size simulations
    The paper defines V_jl ~ 1/|r_j-r_l|^3 but uses a single parameter V/Omega in the numerics (Sec. 4); the validity of this replacement is not discussed.
  • ad hoc to paper Scaling omega = N Omega
    Chosen solely to make phase boundaries N-independent; unphysical for a fixed COM trap frequency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical phase transition in generalized Dicke model with strongly interacting trapped Rydberg ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3QRNVEMB

@misc{pith2026260805955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical phase transition in generalized Dicke model with strongly interacting trapped Rydberg ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3QRNVEMB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05955}
}
read the original abstract

We study dynamical phase transitions in the generalized dissipative Dicke model in an array of trapped Rydberg ions, where their density-density interactions compete with the collective spin-phonon coupling, laser driving and dissipation. This setting offers a versatile approach to study equilibrium as well as non-equilibrium many-body phenomena, as parameters, such as the Ising interaction, laser-ion and spin-phonon coupling can be tuned. Through analyzing the mean-field phase diagram, we find a variety of distinct phases and the emergence of a tricritical point that are sensitively dependent of the interaction between Rydberg ions. We then study the quantum dynamics for a finite system size and characterize parameter dependent dynamics using the spin average, entropy, and Loschmidt echo. Distinctive signatures of the dynamical phases, such as slow relaxation and metastability, arise near the phase transition. This analysis predicts rich quantum dynamics of the finite system that link to the non-equilibrium mean-field phases. Our study widens the exploration of collective and non-equilibrium phases in Dicke models, and reveals that the Rydberg ion interaction drastically affects the phase diagram and dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05955 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the system of trapped Rydberg ions: A linear chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dynamical phase diagram for different controlling parameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of quenching on the system dynamics for (a) simplest Dicke model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dynamics of dissipative model (3): (a)-(c) Exact time evolution of the density matrix, spin expectation values (15); (d)-(f) probability of occupancy of the ground and excited states (N = 6 used in (e),(f)) as a function of time t with no dissipation (V = 0,γ = 0), wit…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Liouvillian spectrum: (a),(b) real part of the lowest nonzero Liouvillian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of the Loschmidt echo (21) for different system sizes N: (a) Closed Dicke dynamics (V = 0,γ = 0) showing coherent oscillations and re￾vivals; (b) dissipative Dicke dynamics (V = 0,γ ̸= 0) leading to damped oscilla￾tions and a steady-state plateau; and (c…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time variation of Von Neumann Entropy of (a)-(c) the spins and (d)-(f) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    Photonics , VOLUME =

    Chaudhary, Manish and Nath, Rejish and Li, Weibin , TITLE =. Photonics , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    H. A. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette , Zeit. f \"u r Phys. 71 , 205 (1931), 10.1007\

    1931

  3. [2]

    Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today

    P. Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today... , http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700

    arXiv

  4. [3]

    Euchner, Simon and Svendsen, Mathias B. M. and Lesanovsky, Igor , year = 2026, eprint =. Non-Equilibrium Exciton Dynamics in Tailored Molecular Potentials of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.21250 , archiveprefix =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21250 2026

  5. [4]

    Generalized

    Zhou, Yi-Neng and Liu, Chang , year = 2026, journal =. Generalized

    work page 2026

  6. [5]

    Many-Body Open Quantum Systems , shorttitle =

    Fazio, Rosario and Keeling, Jonathan and Mazza, Leonardo and Schir. Many-Body Open Quantum Systems , shorttitle =. SciPost SciPost Phys Lect Notes , volume =

    work page

  7. [6]

    Entanglement in Many-Body Systems , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =

    work page

  8. [7]

    , year = 2023, journal =

    Schuster, Thomas and Yao, Norman Y. , year = 2023, journal =. Operator

    work page 2023

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    and Hapuarachchi, Harini , year = 2024, journal =

    Campaioli, Francesco and Cole, Jared H. and Hapuarachchi, Harini , year = 2024, journal =. Quantum

    2024

  2. [9]

    Reservoir Engineering and Dynamical Phase Transitions in Optomechanical Arrays , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =

  3. [10]

    Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics , volume =

    Quantum Dynamics of Cold Trapped Ions with Application to Quantum Computation , author =. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics , volume =

  4. [11]

    Universality in Driven Open Quantum Matter , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =

  5. [12]

    Open quantum systems with local and collective incoherent processes: Efficient numerical simulations using permutational invariance , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2018 , month =

    2018

  6. [13]

    Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2018 , month =

    2018

  7. [14]

    Dissipation-Induced Anomalous Multicritical Phenomena , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =

    2018

  8. [15]

    Proposed realization of the Dicke-model quantum phase transition in an optical cavity QED system , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2007 , month =

    2007

  9. [16]

    Entanglement and entropy in a spin-boson quantum phase transition , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2005 , month =

    2005

  10. [17]

    Generalized Dicke Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Trapped Ions , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2014 , month =

    2014

  11. [18]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  12. [19]

    Dissipative phase transition in the open quantum Rabi model , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2018 , month =

    2018

  13. [20]

    Quench Dynamics and Nonequilibrium Phase Diagram of the Bose-Hubbard Model , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2007 , month =

    2007

  14. [21]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Dynamical phase transition in the open Dicke model , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  15. [22]

    Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2013 , month =

    2013

  16. [23]

    Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2011 , month =

    2011

  17. [24]

    Nature , volume=

    Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose--Einstein condensate , author=. Nature , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  18. [25]

    Dynamical Phase Transitions and Instabilities in Open Atomic Many-Body Systems , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2010 , month =

    2010

  19. [26]

    Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  20. [27]

    Electronically Excited Cold Ion Crystals , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  21. [28]

    Highly Polarizable Rydberg Ion in a Paul Trap , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2019 , month =

    2019

  22. [29]

    Pawlak, Mariusz and Sadeghpour, H. R. , journal =. Rydberg spectrum of a single trapped. 2020 , month =

    2020

  23. [30]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Rydberg ions in coherent motional states: A new method for determining the polarizability of Rydberg ions , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  24. [31]

    Nature , volume=

    Submicrosecond entangling gate between trapped ions via Rydberg interaction , author=. Nature , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  25. [32]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Trapped Rydberg ions: from spin chains to fast quantum gates , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  26. [33]

    Spectral Signatures of Vibronic Coupling in Trapped Cold Ionic Rydberg Systems , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2024 , month =

    2024

  27. [34]

    Exploring nonequilibrium phases of the generalized Dicke model with a trapped Rydberg-ion quantum simulator , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2019 , month =

    2019

  28. [35]

    Coherent Control of a Single Trapped Rydberg Ion , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  29. [36]

    Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2003 , month =

    2003

  30. [37]

    Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=

    Trapped Rydberg ions: A new platform for quantum information processing , author=. Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  31. [39]

    Dynamical Phase Transitions in Dissipative Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Optical Realization , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , month =

    2020

  32. [40]

    arxiv-preprint , doi=

    Dissipative State Engineering of Complex Entanglement with Markovian Dynamics , author=. arxiv-preprint , doi=. 2026 , archivePrefix=

    2026

  33. [41]

    Nonequilibrium phonon dynamics in trapped-ion systems , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  34. [42]

    Nonequilibrium Criticality in Quench Dynamics of Long-Range Spin Models , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , month =

    2020

  35. [43]

    doi:10.1209/0295-5075/125/26001 , year =

    Heyl, Markus , title =. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/125/26001 , year =

    doi

  36. [44]

    and Jalabert, R

    Goussev, A. and Jalabert, R. A. and Pastawski, H. M. and Wisniacki, D. Ariel , TITLE =. 2012 , JOURNAL =

    2012

  37. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16995 , doi=

    Probing quantum many-body dynamics using subsystem Loschmidt echos , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16995 , doi=

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Physics Reports , volume=

    Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay , author=. Physics Reports , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  39. [47]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review , author=. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  40. [48]

    Finite-Time Dynamical Phase Transition in Nonequilibrium Relaxation , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  41. [49]

    Quantum information with Rydberg atoms , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2010 , month =

    2010

  42. [50]

    2007 , publisher=

    Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  43. [51]

    Applied Physics Reviews , volume=

    Rydberg superatoms: An artificial quantum system for quantum information processing and quantum optics , author=. Applied Physics Reviews , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  44. [52]

    Single Strontium Rydberg Ion Confined in a Paul Trap , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  45. [53]

    Universal Lindblad equation for open quantum systems , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2020 , month =

    2020

  46. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.23395 , doi=

    Hilbert space fragmentation in driven-dephasing Rydberg atom array , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.23395 , doi=

  47. [55]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies , volume=

    Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa , author=. Advanced Quantum Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  48. [56]

    2024 , publisher=

    Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering , author=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  49. [57]

    Dynamics of nonequilibrium Dicke models , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  50. [58]

    Long-Range Multibody Interactions and Three-Body Antiblockade in a Trapped Rydberg Ion Chain , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , month =

    2020

  51. [59]

    Entanglement and Tunable Spin-Spin Couplings between Trapped Ions Using Multiple Transverse Modes , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2009 , month =

    2009

  52. [60]

    Exploring Symmetry Breaking at the Dicke Quantum Phase Transition , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2011 , month =

    2011

  53. [61]

    Dynamical phases and intermittency of the dissipative quantum Ising model , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  54. [62]

    Quench dynamics of an open quantum system , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2025 , month =

    2025

  55. [63]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Quantum quench dynamics of geometrically frustrated Ising models , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  56. [64]

    Lindblad dissipative dynamics in the presence of phase coexistence , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2019 , month =

    2019

  57. [65]

    Relaxation, thermalization, and Markovian dynamics of two spins coupled to a spin bath , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  58. [66]

    2020 , publisher=

    Mean field theory , author=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  59. [67]

    SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , pages=

    Magnetisation and mean field theory in the Ising model , author=. SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , pages=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  60. [68]

    Phase transitions in generalized spin-boson (Dicke) models , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2004 , month =

    2004

  61. [69]

    Gallagher, Thomas F. , year=. Frontmatter , booktitle=

  62. [70]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Systematic study of tunable laser cooling for trapped-ion experiments , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  63. [71]

    Seidel, D. J. and Maleki, L. , journal =. Efficient quenching of population trapping in excited. 1995 , month =

    1995

  64. [72]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Investigation of dephasing rates in an interacting Rydberg gas , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  65. [73]

    Maximal entanglement versus entropy for mixed quantum states , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2003 , month =

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.