REVIEW 11 cited by
Privacy Issues in Large Language Models: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This is the first survey of the active area of AI research that focuses on privacy issues in Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, we focus on work that red-teams models to highlight privacy risks, attempts to build privacy into the training or inference process, enables efficient data deletion from trained models to comply with existing privacy regulations, and tries to mitigate copyright issues. Our focus is on summarizing technical research that develops algorithms, proves theorems, and runs empirical evaluations. While there is an extensive body of legal and policy work addressing these challenges from a different angle, that is not the focus of our survey. Nevertheless, these works, along with recent legal developments do inform how these technical problems are formalized, and so we discuss them briefly in Section 1. While we have made our best effort to include all the relevant work, due to the fast moving nature of this research we may have missed some recent work. If we have missed some of your work please contact us, as we will attempt to keep this survey relatively up to date. We are maintaining a repository with the list of papers covered in this survey and any relevant code that was publicly available at https://github.com/safr-ml-lab/survey-llm.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systems
A systematic review that categorizes LLM threats, severity scores, and mitigations across development and operation life cycles and multiple deployment scenarios.
-
LLMs for Customized Marketing Content Generation and Evaluation at Scale
MarketingFM generates e-commerce ad copy with RAG and an LLM; AutoEval uses LLM-as-a-Judge plus rule checks and self-refines its prompts, with online tests showing significant clicks and impressions lifts but no signi...
-
CellTypeAgent: Trustworthy cell type annotation with Large Language Models
A hybrid LLM-plus-database pipeline improves automated cell type annotation accuracy in single-cell RNA-seq across nine datasets.
-
Developer Perspectives on Licensing and Copyright Issues Arising from Generative AI for Software Development
A plurality of developers would place AI-generated code in the public domain, most see it as similar to reusing existing code, and few document AI usage or have copyright training.
-
PatientDx: Merging Large Language Models for Protecting Data-Privacy in Healthcare
PatientDx merges a math-specialized LLM with a medical or instruct LLM via SLerp and reports mortality-prediction gains on MIMIC-IV, but the merging weight is tuned on the test set, undermining the claimed improvement.
-
A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment
A large collaborative survey organizes LLM and LLM-agent safety issues into a full-stack lifecycle framework from data preparation to deployment.
-
From Reviews to Dialogues: Active Synthesis for Zero-Shot LLM-based Conversational Recommender System
Active sample selection over review, metadata, and collaborative seed data plus LLM-generated synthetic dialogues improves fine-tuned conversational recommendation on ReDial and INSPIRED, though not uniformly across a...
-
SoK: Semantic Privacy in Large Language Models
A systematization of knowledge arguing that LLM privacy threats extend beyond data leakage to semantically inferred attributes, and that current defenses only partially address them.
-
A Survey on Responsible LLMs: Inherent Risk, Malicious Use, and Mitigation Strategy
A survey that organizes responsible-LLM research into five risk dimensions and four intervention phases, reviewing privacy, hallucination, value, toxicity, and jailbreak mitigation.
-
SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation
A systematization-of-knowledge survey that categorizes LLM privacy risks into training data, prompts, outputs, and agents, and reviews limitations of current mitigations.
-
Challenges in Guardrailing Large Language Models for Science
A position paper proposing a guardrail framework with four dimensions (trustworthiness, ethics & bias, safety, legal) and implementation strategies for scientific LLM use.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.