Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Revealing the intricacies of radio galaxies and filaments in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2255. I. Insights from deep LOFAR-VLBI sub-arcsecond resolution images

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Deep LOFAR-VLBI images of Abell 2255 resolve the tail of the Original Tailed Radio Galaxy into thin, non-thermal filaments 80–110 kpc long and 3–10 kpc wide, a first detection at 144 MHz.

desk verdict Deep, careful LOFAR-VLBI imaging of Abell 2255 with a plausible but unproven filament detection at its core; worth a serious referee, with robustness checks required. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13595 v1 pith:3SEKV45D submitted 2025-05-19 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

E. De Rubeis , M. Bondi , A. Botteon , R. J. van Weeren , J. M. G. H. J. de Jong , L. Rudnick , G. Brunetti , K. Rajpurohit
show 2 more authors
C. Gheller H. J. A. Röttgering
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords radiogalaxiesgalaxyclustersAbell2255non-thermalfilamentsintraclustermediumLOFARverylongbaselineinterferometrysynchrotronemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that deep, sub-arcsecond-resolution LOFAR observations of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2255 resolve the tail of the Original Tailed Radio Galaxy into multiple thin, non-thermal filaments that were previously invisible. These filaments, detected at 144 MHz with projected lengths of 80–110 kpc and widths of 3–10 kpc, are presented as the first such structures observed at this resolution in a cluster radio galaxy tail. If the interpretation holds, the filaments are bundles of magnetized synchrotron plasma shaped by turbulence and shear in the intracluster medium, which would make them direct probes of magnetic-field stretching, plasma resistivity scales, and turbulent driving scales in clusters. The authors frame the result as opening the door to spectral and polarization follow-up that can decide between formation mechanisms.

What carries the argument

Instrumentally, the key is the International LOFAR Telescope's very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) mode, in which stations spread over roughly 2,000 km act as a single telescope and deliver 0.3–0.5 arcsec resolution at 144 MHz. The paper combines 56 hours from seven observing runs, calibrates through an in-field compact source plus nearby cluster sources, and images with multiscale deconvolution and Briggs weighting. Widths are measured by fitting one or more Gaussians to transversal surface-brightness cuts after subtracting the rms noise in quadrature; lengths are measured directly from the map. Dynamical lifetimes are estimated from the turbulent cascade time, $\tau_{\rm dyn} \sim L/(M c_s) \sim L/0.5$ Myr with Mach number $M=1/2$ and sound speed $c_s \sim 10^3$ km/s, giving 160–220 Myr for filaments of 80–110 kpc; that this is comparable to synchrotron radiative lifetimes is what allows the electrons to radiate before the turbulence dissipates the structures.

What would settle it

Re-image the calibrated visibilities in independent subsets (odd versus even observing runs, different uvmin cuts, uniform versus Briggs weighting, and multiscale deconvolution switched off) and check whether filaments F1, F2, the horizontal filament, and the vertical filament persist at fixed positions with consistent flux. If any filament dissolves, relocates, or changes morphology with the imaging parameters, the detection is an artifact of self-calibration and deconvolution rather than astrophysical structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the tail of the Original Tailed Radio Galaxy in Abell 2255, previously seen as a single continuous radio structure, is resolved by the deepest LOFAR-VLBI cluster observations to date (56 hours, 144 MHz, 0.3–0.5 arcsec) into a set of thin non-thermal filaments: a main tail of about 140 kpc, an east–west horizontal filament of about 110 kpc, a vertical filament of about 105 kpc, and the F1 filament of about 83 kpc, with widths of 3–10 kpc (F1: 3–4.2 kpc; F2: 5 kpc; vertical: about 4.5 kpc; horizontal: 8–10 kpc). The authors report these as the first detections of multiple filamentary structures constituting the tail, and interpret the thin, straight filaments as bundles of magnetized, synchrotron-emitting plasma likely produced by shear stretching of magnetic field lines in the turbulent intracluster medium, with patchy emission indicating that the formation process acts locally. The new images also resolve the core, jets, and inner tails of the Double, Goldfish, Beaver, and Embryo radio galaxies, but the Original TRG filaments carry the paper's main claim.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the detected filaments in the Original TRG tail are real astrophysical emission and not imaging artifacts; the field is crowded with bright, extended radio galaxies, and the images are self-calibrated and deconvolved with a multiscale algorithm without published tests of robustness to different imaging choices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Original TRG tail is not one continuous structure but a set of discrete filaments: F1 (about 83 kpc), the horizontal filament (about 110 kpc), the vertical filament (about 105 kpc), and F2, plus a main tail of about 140 kpc.
  • The measured widths provide the first sub-arcsecond constraints on the transverse sizes of cluster radio filaments at 144 MHz, ranging from 1.8 kpc in the inner main tail to about 10 kpc in the horizontal filament.
  • The estimated dynamical lifetimes of the filaments, 160–220 Myr, are comparable to synchrotron radiative lifetimes, so the radiating electrons can lose their energy before turbulence destroys the filament.
  • The patchy brightness along the filaments indicates that the formation process does not act homogeneously along their length but has local contributions that enhance the radio emission.
  • The thin, straight morphology of the horizontal and vertical filaments points toward a formation scenario like that proposed for similar filaments in Abell 194: shear stretching of magnetic field lines producing low plasma-beta, high magnetic pressure bundles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not state this, but the uniform widths of 3–5 kpc sustained over ~100 kpc lengths suggest a common transverse confinement mechanism; a natural next check is whether those widths track the local magnetic field strength or the resistivity scale across the cluster.
  • A direct test the authors did not run is to re-image the seven observing runs in independent subsets; if the filamentary morphology persists in odd versus even runs or under different uvmin cuts, the artifact explanation would be effectively ruled out.
  • If the straight filaments are genuinely low plasma-beta magnetic bundles, they should show significant fractional polarization at higher frequencies; the planned VLA polarimetry is a testable prediction of the shear-stretching interpretation.
  • Because the dynamical lifetimes exceed synchrotron lifetimes, the paper implicitly requires some in-situ particle re-energization; this predicts spectral flattening or a characteristic cutoff pattern along the filaments that the upcoming 1.5 arcsec spectral-index maps can directly check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents deep LOFAR-VLBI observations of Abell 2255 at 144 MHz, combining 56 hours from seven observing runs to reach 0.3-0.5 arcsec resolution, and describes the calibration and imaging procedure in detail. The authors report sub-arcsecond radio morphology for five cluster radio galaxies (the Double, Original TRG, Goldfish, Beaver, and Embryo), with the main focus on the Original TRG, whose tail is claimed to contain multiple non-thermal filaments detected for the first time. The filaments are reported to have projected lengths of 80-110 kpc and widths of 3-10 kpc, and are interpreted as bundles of magnetized synchrotron-emitting plasma stretched by turbulence and shear in the ICM. The paper also includes a brief dynamical-timescale estimate and a discussion of the shear-stretching origin scenario.

Significance. If the filamentary features in the Original TRG are genuine astrophysical structures rather than imaging artifacts, this is a significant result for studies of radio-galaxy interactions with the ICM: it would extend resolved filament detections at low frequency to a merging cluster and provide new constraints on turbulence and magnetic-field stretching. The manuscript's strengths are its careful calibration description, the external flux-density anchoring of the calibrator model, the detailed treatment of direction-dependent calibration, and the rich morphological inventory of several radio galaxies. The central weakness is that the reality of the features on which the main claims rest is not yet demonstrated by robustness tests; given the standard nature of such tests, this is fixable in revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, §3.2] The central claim that the Original TRG contains newly detected filaments is not yet supported by imaging-robustness tests. The self-calibration for the Original TRG excluded baselines shorter than 10,000 lambda (about 20 arcsec), while the claimed filaments extend over 53-73 arcsec, and the final images were produced with automatic masking and multiscale deconvolution; consequently, the large-scale structure of these features could be strongly influenced by the calibration and deconvolution choices. Please provide control images with different uvmin thresholds, different robust parameters, single-scale versus multiscale cleaning, and independent data subsets, and show directly that F1, F2, the horizontal filament, and the vertical filament persist.
  2. [§4] The quantitative widths quoted in the abstract (3-10 kpc) are not accompanied by uncertainties. The number of Gaussian components in each transverse profile is chosen by visual inspection, the fitted parameters are not reported with errors, the beam-deconvolved FWHM formula is not stated, and the text admits that at the edges the detection is at the noise level. Please add parameter uncertainties, a model-selection or residual criterion for the number of components, and a stability analysis of the deconvolved widths with respect to that choice.
  3. [§2.2] Two of the nine available runs are excluded because their noise with international stations is 30-40% higher, and the remaining seven runs are combined for the final images. The paper should demonstrate that this selection does not bias the detection of faint extended emission, for example by showing that the claimed filaments are present in images made from subsets of the runs and by justifying the noise criterion in a way that is independent of the final morphological results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1] Please correct typographical spacing issues such as 'rms noise43μJy beam−1' in the Introduction.
  2. [§2.3] The abbreviation 'tec' is used without definition; define it at first use.
  3. [Fig. 7] The colored regions and arrows in Fig. 7 are not explained in the caption; add a legend or a description so the reader can connect them to the colored profiles in Fig. 8.
  4. [§4, Eq. (2)] The assumption M=1/2 and c_s=10^3 km/s in Eq. (2) is introduced without a source or a sensitivity estimate; please add a brief justification and an indication of how tau_dyn changes for reasonable parameter ranges.
  5. [§2.2, Eq. (1)] The fitted coefficients in Eq. (1) are given without uncertainties; if they set the absolute flux scale of the calibrator model, report the uncertainties or state the resulting systematic error on the final images.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the filament detection is an observational imaging result, not a derivation from fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the detection and morphological characterization of filaments in the Original TRG from deep LOFAR-VLBI imaging. Nothing in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs: the images are produced by standard calibration and deconvolution, and the filament properties (lengths, widths) are measured directly from the final maps. The in-field calibrator model is built from external flux-density measurements at multiple frequencies and is used only to calibrate the visibilities; it does not define or force the target filaments. The widths are obtained by Gaussian fits to noise-subtracted brightness profiles, and although the number of Gaussians is chosen visually, that is a measurement choice, not a circular input-output equivalence. The dynamical lifetime estimate in Eq. (2) uses the measured filament lengths together with assumed turbulence parameters; it is an interpretive estimate, not a prediction that is equivalent to an input by construction. Self-citations to the LOFAR-VLBI pipeline and to earlier LOFAR images of Abell 2255 provide methods and context, but the filament detection is presented as a new observational result and is not forced by those citations. Any concern that the faint filaments could be deconvolution or calibration artifacts is a robustness/correctness issue, not a circularity issue under the criteria used here. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to circularity, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is observational. The model-dependent inputs are standard calibration assumptions (calibrator sky model, self-cal parameters) and adopted spectral indices/turbulence parameters from the literature. The only 'fit' parameters are the multi-Gaussian components used to measure filament widths; these are descriptive fits, not independent constraints. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of Gaussian components per transverse surface-brightness profile = 1-3 (chosen visually per cut)
    In Sec. 4, the number of components in the multi-Gaussian fits to each cut across the Original TRG is chosen by visual inspection, directly affecting the reported filament widths (3-10 kpc).
  • Gaussian profile parameters (amplitude, standard deviation, center) = Varied freely; initial guesses 1.0 for amplitude and std, equidistant centers
    The beam-deconvolved FWHM of these fitted Gaussians defines the quoted filament widths; the solutions are degenerate in the number of components and are not accompanied by uncertainties.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The in-field calibrator 4C+64.21 is accurately modeled by two Gaussian components with flux ratio from the full-resolution map (Sec. 2.2).
    Calibration of international stations relies on this sky model; an incorrect model would imprint phase and amplitude errors on the targets.
  • domain assumption The spectral index of the Double is alpha=0.65, and that of the Embryo is alpha=0.5 (from Botteon et al. 2020), used to derive luminosity and jet angle constraints.
    These values are adopted from prior work, not measured in this paper, and feed into the physical interpretation in Secs. 3.1 and 3.5.
  • domain assumption The discarded observations L728074 and L746864 have significantly higher noise; the remaining 7 runs (56 hr) are representative and do not bias the morphological results (Sec. 2.2).
    Exclusion of two of nine runs is based on a 30-40% higher image noise, but no test is shown that the excluded runs would not add flux or features.
  • domain assumption The turbulent Mach number M=1/2 and ICM sound speed c_s=10^3 km/s (Porter et al. 2015) are appropriate for the dynamical lifetime estimate (Sec. 4).
    The derived filament lifetime tau_dyn = 160-220 Myr depends on these adopted values; they are order-of-magnitude choices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revealing the intricacies of radio galaxies and filaments in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2255. I. Insights from deep LOFAR-VLBI sub-arcsecond resolution images." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SEKV45D

@misc{pith2026250513595,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revealing the intricacies of radio galaxies and filaments in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 2255. I. Insights from deep LOFAR-VLBI sub-arcsecond resolution images},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SEKV45D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13595}
}
abstract

High sensitivity of modern interferometers is revealing a plethora of filaments surrounding radio galaxies, especially in galaxy cluster environments. The morphology and spectral characteristics of these thin structures require the combination of high-resolution and low frequency observations, which is best obtained using the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) international stations. In this paper, we aim to detect and characterize non-thermal filaments observed close or as part of the radio galaxies in Abell 2255 using deep, LOFAR-VLBI observations at 144 MHz. These structures can be used to disentangle possible scenarios for the origin of the non-thermal filaments and connection to the motion of the host galaxy within the dense and turbulent intracluster medium (ICM), and consequent interaction between the ICM and radio jets. Combining multiple observations, we produced the deepest images ever obtained with LOFAR-VLBI targeting a galaxy cluster, using 56 hours of observations, reaching $0.3-0.5"$ resolution. We detailed throughout the paper the calibration and imaging strategy for the different targets, as well as the multitude of morphological features discovered. Thanks to the high-sensitivity of LOFAR-VLBI, we revealed unprecedented details for the main cluster radio galaxies, recovering in most cases also their more extended structure observed only at such low frequencies. In particular, we focused on the Original Tailed Radio Galaxy (Original TRG) where we distinguished many filaments constituting its tail with varying lengths ($80-110$ kpc) and widths ($3-10$ kpc). The final radio images showcase the potential of deep, high-resolution observations for galaxy clusters. With such approach, we enabled the study of these thin, elongated radio filaments: after being discovered, these filaments now require spectral studies to determine their formation mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13595 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Zoom-in at Abell 2255’s center at 145 MHz, resolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Self-calibration results on the delay calibrator 4C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Double at 144 MHz; resolution 0.30” × 0.24”, rms noise 18 𝜇Jy beam−1 . This image was obtained using Briggs weighting, robust = −0.5, and multiscale. The restoring beam size is shown in the bottom-left corner. The red cross identifies the optical position of the host galaxy as listed in Tab. 2. 3.2. The Original TRG The Original TRG, also known as 7C 1712+6406 (Hales et al. 2007), is a NAT radio galaxy, classifi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Original Tailed Radio Galaxy (Original TRG) at 144 MHz; resolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Goldfish at 144 MHz; resolution 0.55” × 0.41”, rms noise 29 𝜇Jy beam−1 . This image was obtained using Briggs weighting, robust = −0.5, and multiscale. The restoring beam size is shown in the bottom-left corner. The red cross identifies the optical position of the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: We measured its width in the central brighter part, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: the Beaver at 144 MHz, resolution 0.54” × 0.40”, rms noise 27 𝜇Jy beam−1 . The image was obtained using Briggs weighting, robust = −0.5, and multiscale. Right: the Embryo at 144 MHz, resolution 0.55” × 0.40”, rms noise 40 𝜇Jy beam−1 . The image was obtained using…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same LOFAR-VLBI map for the Original TRG shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spatial trends along the Original TRG and its filaments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-thermal emission in jets and winds: Expected emission and spectral index distributions

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-consistent CRE evolution in RMHD simulations produces distinct spectral-index gradients that distinguish compact AGN jets from winds even when morphology is ambiguous.

  2. CRESCENDO II: Spectral cosmic rays with improved energy losses and realistic supernova seeding

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CRESCENDO's spectral cosmic-ray solver now includes improved energy-loss processes, non-ultra-relativistic energy/pressure integrals, and supernova-remnant template injection.

  3. The plethora of diffuse emission in Abell 2034 as revealed by MeerKAT polarization observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MeerKAT polarization and spectral-index data reclassify Abell 2034's diffuse radio sources and favor a ~1 μG intracluster magnetic field (B ∝ n_e^0.5, normalized at R500).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2012, ApJS, 203, 21

    2012

  2. [2]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 12

    2015

  3. [3]

    Arras, P., Reinecke, M., Westermann, R., & Enßlin, T. A. 2021, A&A, 646, A58 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    R., Matthews, J

    Bell, A. R., Matthews, J. H., Blundell, K. M., & Araudo, A. T. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 4571

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    2024, A&A, 683, A179

    Bondi, M., Scaramella, R., Zamorani, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A179

    2024

  6. [6]

    J., et al

    Botteon, A., Brunetti, G., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 93

    2020

  7. [7]

    J., Brunetti, G., et al

    Botteon, A., van Weeren, R. J., Brunetti, G., et al. 2022, Science Advances, 8, eabq7623

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Bridle, A. H. & Schwab, F. R. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 180, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, ed. G. B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, & R. A. Perley, 371

    work page 1999

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    2025, A&A, 696, A239

    Brienza, M., Rajpurohit, K., Churazov, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A239

    2025

  2. [10]

    W., de Gasperin, F., et al

    Brienza, M., Shimwell, T. W., de Gasperin, F., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1261 Briggs,D.S.1995,PhDthesis,NewMexicoInstituteofMiningandTechnology Brunetti,G.&Jones,T.W.2014,InternationalJournalofModernPhysicsD,23, 1430007

    2021

  3. [11]

    O., Roettiger, K., Pinkney, J., et al

    Burns, J. O., Roettiger, K., Pinkney, J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 446, 583

    1995

  4. [12]

    2023, A&A, 677, A4

    Candini, S., Brienza, M., Bonafede, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A4

    2023

  5. [13]

    Capetti, A., Massaro, F., & Baldi, R. D. 2017, A&A, 598, A49

    2017

  6. [14]

    S., Lane, W

    Cohen, A. S., Lane, W. M., Cotton, W. D., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 1245

    2007

  7. [15]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693

    1998

  8. [16]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., White, S. V., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 18

    2021

  9. [17]

    M., Timmerman, R., Miley, G

    Cordun, C. M., Timmerman, R., Miley, G. K., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A29 de Gasperin, F., Dijkema, T. J., Drabent, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A5 de Jong, J. M. G. H. J., van Weeren, R. J., Sweijen, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A80 Dijkema,T.J.,Nijhuis,M.,vanDiepen,G.,etal.2023,DP3...

    2023

  10. [18]

    N., Bash, F

    Douglas, J. N., Bash, F. N., Bozyan, F. A., Torrence, G. W., & Wolfe, C. 1996, AJ, 111, 1945

    1996

  11. [19]

    Dreher, J. W. & Feigelson, E. D. 1984, Nature, 308, 43

    1984

  12. [20]

    Fanaroff, B. L. & Riley, J. M. 1974, MNRAS, 167, 31P Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1

    1974

  13. [21]

    Gizani, N. A. B. & Leahy, J. P. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 399

    2003

  14. [22]

    A., Wittman, D

    Golovich, N., Dawson, W. A., Wittman, D. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 69

    2019

  15. [23]

    2005, A&A, 430, L5 Govoni,F.,Murgia,M.,Feretti,L.,etal.2006,AstronomyandAstrophysics,460, 425

    Govoni, F., Murgia, M., Feretti, L., et al. 2005, A&A, 430, L5 Govoni,F.,Murgia,M.,Feretti,L.,etal.2006,AstronomyandAstrophysics,460, 425

    2005

  16. [24]

    C., Scott, W

    Gregory, P. C., Scott, W. K., Douglas, K., & Condon, J. J. 1996, ApJS, 103, 427

    1996

  17. [25]

    Hales, S. E. G., Masson, C. R., Warner, P. J., & Baldwin, J. E. 1990, MNRAS, 246, 256

    1990

  18. [26]

    Hales, S. E. G., Riley, J. M., Waldram, E. M., Warner, P. J., & Baldwin, J. E. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1639

    2007

  19. [27]

    Hales, S. E. G., Waldram, E. M., Rees, N., & Warner, P. J. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 447

    1995

  20. [28]

    J., Alexander, P., Pooley, G

    Hardcastle, M. J., Alexander, P., Pooley, G. G., & Riley, J. M. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 859

    1997

  21. [29]

    Hardcastle, M. J. & Croston, J. H. 2020, New Astronomy Review, 88, 101539

    2020

  22. [30]

    J., Croston, J

    Hardcastle, M. J., Croston, J. H., Shimwell, T. W., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3416

    2019

  23. [31]

    E., Kapahi, V

    Harris, D. E., Kapahi, V. K., & Ekers, R. D. 1980, A&AS, 39, 215

    1980

  24. [32]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  25. [33]

    T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K

    Intema, H. T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K. P., & Frail, D. A. 2017, A&A, 598, A78

    2017

  26. [34]

    2022, A&A, 658, A2

    Jackson, N., Badole, S., Morgan, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A2

    2022

  27. [35]

    2016, A&A, 595, A86

    Jackson, N., Tagore, A., Deller, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A86

    2016

  28. [36]

    S., Duchesne, S

    Koribalski, B. S., Duchesne, S. W., Lenc, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 608

    2024

  29. [37]

    A., Parma, P., de Ruiter, H

    Laing, R. A., Parma, P., de Ruiter, H. R., & Fanti, R. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 513

    1999

  30. [38]

    P., Black, A

    Leahy, J. P., Black, A. R. S., Dennett-Thorpe, J., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 20

    1997

  31. [39]

    Ledlow, M. J. & Owen, F. N. 1996, AJ, 112, 9 Meenakshi,M.,Mukherjee,D.,Bodo,G.,&Rossi,P.2023,MNRAS,526,5418

    1996

  32. [40]

    1980, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

    Miley, G. 1980, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

    1980

  33. [41]

    Miller, N. A. & Owen, F. N. 2002, AJ, 124, 2453

    2002

  34. [42]

    Miller, N. A. & Owen, F. N. 2003, AJ, 125, 2427

    2003

  35. [43]

    H., Hardcastle, M

    Mingo, B., Croston, J. H., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2701

    2019

  36. [44]

    K., Jackson, N

    Morabito, L. K., Jackson, N. J., Mooney, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A1

    2022

  37. [45]

    & Sadun, A

    Morrison, P. & Sadun, A. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 265

    1996

  38. [46]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, 606

    2014

  39. [47]

    Offringa, A. R. & Smirnov, O. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 301

    2017

  40. [48]

    Owen, F. N. & Ledlow, M. J. 1997, ApJS, 108, 41

    1997

  41. [49]

    H., Brienza, M., et al

    Pasini, T., Mahatma, V. H., Brienza, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A94

    2025

  42. [50]

    A., Bridle, A

    Perley, R. A., Bridle, A. H., Willis, A. G., & Fomalont, E. B. 1980, AJ, 85, 499

    1980

  43. [51]

    Pilkington, J. D. H. & Scott, J. F. 1965, MmRAS, 69, 183

    1965

  44. [52]

    Pizzo, R. F. & de Bruyn, A. G. 2009, A&A, 507, 639 Pizzo,R.F.,deBruyn,A.G.,Bernardi,G.,&Brentjens,M.A.2011,A&A,525, A104

    2009

  45. [53]

    H., Jones, T

    Porter, D. H., Jones, T. W., & Ryu, D. 2015, ApJ, 810, 93

    2015

  46. [54]

    2020, A&A, 636, L1

    Ramatsoku, M., Murgia, M., Vacca, V., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, L1

    2020

  47. [55]

    B., Tang, Y., de Bruyn, A

    Rengelink, R. B., Tang, Y., de Bruyn, A. G., et al. 1997, A&AS, 124, 259

    1997

  48. [56]

    & Bressert, E

    Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in

    2012

  49. [57]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 168

    Rudnick, L., Brüggen, M., Brunetti, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 168

    2022

  50. [58]

    2021, Galaxies, 9, 81

    Rudnick, L., Cotton, W., Knowles, K., & Kolokythas, K. 2021, Galaxies, 9, 81

    2021

  51. [59]

    J., Bicknell, G

    Saxton, C. J., Bicknell, G. V., & Sutherland, R. S. 2002, ApJ, 579, 176

    2002

  52. [60]

    M., et al

    Shim, H., Im, M., Lee, H. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 14

    2011

  53. [61]

    W., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Hardcastle, M. J., Tasse, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A1

    2022

  54. [62]

    W., Röttgering, H

    Shimwell, T. W., Röttgering, H. J. A., Best, P. N., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A104

    2017

  55. [63]

    W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A1

    2019

  56. [64]

    Smirnov, O. M. & Tasse, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2668

    2015

  57. [65]

    2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.8706

    Tasse, C. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.8706

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2018, A&A, 611, A87

    Tasse, C., Hugo, B., Mirmont, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A87

    2018

  59. [67]

    J., et al

    Tasse, C., Shimwell, T., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A1 Terni de Gregory, B., Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A58

    2021

  60. [68]

    J., Botteon, A., et al

    Timmerman, R., van Weeren, R. J., Botteon, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A31 Timmerman,R.,vanWeeren,R.J.,Callingham,J.R.,etal.2022,A&A,658,A5

    2024

  61. [69]

    D., Bai, L., & Rieke, G

    Tyler, K. D., Bai, L., & Rieke, G. H. 2014, ApJ, 794, 31

    2014

  62. [70]

    2024, A&A, 688, A86 van Diepen, G., Dijkema, T

    Ubertosi, F., Giroletti, M., Gitti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A86 van Diepen, G., Dijkema, T. J., & Offringa, A. 2018, DPPP: Default Pre- ProcessingPipeline,AstrophysicsSourceCodeLibrary,recordascl:1804.003 van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556,...

    2024

  63. [71]

    & Botteon, A

    Vazza, F. & Botteon, A. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 19

    2024

  64. [72]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 1672

    Vazza, F., Brunetti, G., Brüggen, M., & Bonafede, A. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 1672

    2018

  65. [73]

    F., Tan, S

    Ye, H., Gull, S. F., Tan, S. M., & Nikolic, B. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 4110

    2022

  66. [74]

    2003, ApJS, 149, 53 Article number, page 11 of 11

    Yuan, Q., Zhou, X., & Jiang, Z. 2003, ApJS, 149, 53 Article number, page 11 of 11

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.