Extended Color Twin Higgs

Brian Batell; Christopher B. Verhaaren; Logan Page; Thomas Cochran

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Extended Color Twin Higgs

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that making both sectors of the twin Higgs four-color, but breaking to three colors only in the visible world, spontaneously breaks the mirror symmetry and keeps the Higgs natural—often with less tuning than the original t

desk verdict A genuine new mechanism for spontaneous Z2 breaking in Twin Higgs—visible-sector SU(4)c breaking—but the vacuum that carries the construction is assumed at tree level and not proven stable at one loop. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10102 v1 pith:3SWDA7S3 submitted 2025-08-13 hep-ph

Brian Batell , Thomas Cochran , Logan Page , Christopher B. Verhaaren This is my paper

classification hep-ph

keywords twinHiggsneutralnaturalnessspontaneousZ2breakingSU(4)colorfractionallychargedfermionsbaryondarkmatterDeltaN_efftuning

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twin Higgs models protect the Higgs mass by giving every Standard Model particle a mirror partner, but making the vacuum work requires breaking the mirror Z2 symmetry that relates the two sectors. This paper argues that the symmetry can be broken dynamically: extend color in both sectors to SU(4)_c, then give a vacuum expectation value to a scalar in the visible sector only, so visible color breaks to SU(3)_c while twin color stays SU(4)_c. The same VEV shifts the two Higgs VEVs apart, producing a viable electroweak vacuum. The enlarged top sector that SU(4)_c forces on the visible side might be expected to worsen naturalness, but the paper shows the four-color twin-top loop overcompensates the visible top loop, partially cancelling the tree-level tuning and leaving the model comparably or less tuned than the standard mirror twin Higgs. If right, the model also predicts charged half-integer fermions and vectors visible at the LHC, and a twin sector whose unbroken four-color force gives spin-0 baryons and a smaller contribution to ΔN_eff.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the enlarged Yukawa sector forced by the SU(4)_c structure, analyzed through the one-loop effective potential. Because the twin top comes in four colors while the visible top comes in three, their quadratically divergent loop contributions to the Higgs mass parameter are proportional to $-4\lambda_t^2 \Lambda^2/(8\pi^2)$ and $+3\lambda_t^2 \Lambda^2/(8\pi^2)$, so the twin sector overcompensates and the $\Lambda^2$ sensitivity drops out once the fourth-color partner is included. The remaining logarithmic pieces from the two sectors partially cancel the tree-level $f^2/v^2$ term, and the paper's tuning equations in Appendix D encode this cancellation. The scalar VEV

What would settle it

Compute the full one-loop effective potential for the $\Phi_A$ and $\Phi_B$ fields, including the $\delta_\Phi$ and $\delta_{H\Phi}$ quartics: if the global minimum lies at $\langle\Phi_B\rangle \neq 0$ for the parameters used in the tuning plots, the vacuum alignment—and the tuning and collider predictions built on it—collapse. Experimentally, a search that excludes charge-1/2 states at the predicted Z'-assisted cross sections below about 1 TeV would rule out the optimistic benchmark region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that spontaneously breaking SU(4)_c → SU(3)_c in the visible sector alone is a complete, phenomenologically viable way to break the twin Z2 and preserve neutral naturalness. The heavy top-partner states introduced by the larger color group—the fourth-color partners of quarks, plus the accompanying singlet fermions—do not undermine the Higgs mass protection. The one-loop top-sector contributions to the Higgs mass parameter contain a four-color twin-top term that is larger in magnitude than the three-color visible top term, so the quadratic sensitivity to the cutoff is removed, and the residual logarithmic terms partially cancel the tree-level $f^

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the desired vacuum—the color-breaking VEV entirely in the visible-sector field with the twin field at zero—remains the global minimum after one-loop corrections to the Φ-sector quartic terms are included; it verifies only that tree-level parameter ranges exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Z' produced through Drell-Yan decays mainly to quarks, so combined dilepton and dijet searches bound the color-breaking scale to roughly $w \gtrsim 2.5$ TeV, with the high-luminosity LHC projecting sensitivity to Z' masses above about 4 TeV.
The fourth-component quarks appear as charge $\pm 1/2$ fermions with masses set by the color-breaking Yukawa couplings; existing LHC bounds are near 600 GeV, making this model a concrete target for fractionally charged particle searches.
The twin sector confines at $\Lambda_B \approx 15\!-\!25\, \Lambda_A$, shifting the twin QCD transition before decoupling and reducing the natural $\Delta N_\text{eff}$ from about 5.7 to roughly 0.8–1.0 (or 1.7–2.0 under minimal flavor violation).
The unbroken twin SU(4)_c makes the lightest twin baryon a spin-0 four-quark state with electric charge 1/2 and mass in the tens of GeV, which could contribute to dark matter.
For much of the parameter space considered, the extended model's tuning is comparable to or smaller than the original twin Higgs, despite the additional colored top partners.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The tuning calculation includes only top-sector one-loop effects; including one-loop corrections to the $\Phi$-sector quartic couplings could shift the vacuum relation and either improve or undo the claimed cancellation. This is our inference, not the paper's calculation.
Because the model needs a reheating temperature below roughly 100 GeV to avoid overproducing fractionally charged relics, its viable cosmology must couple with existing low-scale baryogenesis mechanisms; the paper notes this need but does not construct a complete baryogenesis model.
The same partial-cancellation mechanism should imprint on loop-level Higgs observables, such as $h\to gg$ and $h\to\gamma\gamma$ rates, where the fourth-color top partners enter; a precise prediction of these rates would provide a test of the naturalness story.
If the stable charge-1/2 twin baryons bind with twin electrons into atom-like dark matter, the dissipative substructure constraints cited in the paper become quantitatively relevant; the paper flags this but does not simulate the bound-state dynamics.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague—

Read the extended-color Twin Higgs (arXiv:2508.10102). My take: this is a real step for the neutral-naturalness program. The core novelty is genuine—extending color to SU(4)c in both sectors and breaking it only in the visible sector, so the mirror Z2 is broken by the vacuum rather than by hand. That single move generates a distinctive spectrum (Z′, charge-1/6 colored vector, charge-1/2 fermions, bosonic twin baryons) and changes the tuning bookkeeping: with four twin top colors instead of three, the twin loop overcompensates the visible top loop and removes the quadratic Λ² sensitivity through a trace identity. That calculation is spelled out in Appendix D and holds together; the cancellation is not hand-waving.

The paper also does honest work translating the gauge structure into concrete collider targets—Z′ branching fractions, LHC bounds on w, fractionally charged fermion cross sections—and into a cosmology section that quantifies ΔNeff reduction and the spin-0 twin baryon mass. The appendices are explicit enough to be checked, which counts.

The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note flags: the vacuum ⟨ΦA⟩=w, ⟨ΦB⟩=0 is assumed at tree level, and the one-loop analysis in App. D only computes top-sector corrections to the Higgs potential, not the one-loop effective potential for Φ. That matters twice. The model’s viability and the Fig. 6 tuning comparison both rest on this vacuum being the global minimum; if gauge or Yukawa loops shift the minimum to ⟨ΦB⟩≠0, the Z2 is restored and the alignment fails. The paper says “there remain parameter ranges” but does not demonstrate them at one loop. That is load-bearing, though not obviously fatal—it is the kind of thing a serious referee should push on, and it may be that the tree-level parameter space survives with modest adjustment. The collider and cosmology estimates are LO and order-one, respectively; fine for a first pass, but should be flagged.

Who gets value: people in neutral naturalness, Twin Higgs model building, and exotic collider searches. It deserves a serious referee; the referee should insist on the Φ-sector stability analysis before publication. Not a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a variant of the mirror Twin Higgs in which both sectors have the gauge structure SU(4)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_X. A scalar doublet Φ = (Φ_A, Φ_B) is introduced, and in the proposed vacuum only the visible-sector component acquires a VEV w, breaking SU(4)_cA → SU(3)_c while leaving the twin SU(4)_cB unbroken, thereby spontaneously breaking the mirror Z_2. The resulting spectrum contains a heavy Z′ , a colored vector ξ with electric charge 1/6, and new fermions with charges ±1/2; in the twin sector the unbroken SU(4) confines at a higher scale and produces spin-0 baryons. The paper computes vector and fermion mass eigenstates, estimates LHC constraints from dilepton/dijet and fractionally charged particle searches, calculates the tree-level and one-loop scalar potential for the top sector, and compares Barbieri–Giudice tunings between the standard and extended twin Higgs models, claiming comparable or reduced tuning.

Significance. If the vacuum and radiative-stability issues can be established, this is a genuinely novel contribution to neutral-naturalness model building: it obtains a viable twin-Higgs alignment by spontaneous visible color breaking rather than explicit soft Z_2 breaking, and it turns the color partners into concrete collider targets. The paper's strengths are its explicit gauge-boson mass eigenstates and couplings (Apps. A–C), its analytic Coleman–Weinberg treatment of the top sector (App. D), and its concrete predictions for Z′ and fractionally charged fermion searches. The trace structure that removes the quadratic Λ^2 sensitivity in the top sector is also presented cleanly. The main weakness, discussed below, is that the scalar vacuum on which all phenomenological and tuning results rest is asserted rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.1)–(4.5)] The central vacuum ⟨Φ_A⟩ = w, ⟨Φ_B⟩ = 0 is not proved to be a minimum, let alone the global minimum. The text after Eq. (4.2) states that 'there remain parameter ranges that produce the vacuum structure we are interested in,' but no stationary conditions, Hessian positivity, or comparison with alternative minima (e.g. ⟨Φ_B⟩ ≠ 0 or v_A = v_B) are given. This vacuum underpins Eq. (4.10), the relation δ_HΦ = δ_H f^2 cos(2ϑ)/w^2, the Higgs mass formula, and all subsequent tuning and collider conclusions. Because one-loop corrections to the Φ-sector quartics are not computed (see next comment), the word 'remain' is not backed by calculation. This is a load-bearing gap.
[Sec. 4.1 and App. D, Eqs. (D.66)–(D.80)] The tuning analysis includes one-loop corrections only from the top-sector fermions, evaluated along the electroweak-breaking direction h. The one-loop effective potential for the Φ fields—from SU(4) gauge bosons with mass g_s w and from the λ_b Yukawa fermions—is not computed, although Sec. 4 explicitly says one-loop contributions can be important. Gauge loops generically give positive contributions to δ_Φ, which can overwhelm a negative tree-level δ_Φ and move the minimum to ⟨Φ_B⟩ ≠ 0, restoring the Z_2 and destroying the assumed alignment. Since μ^2 in Eq. (D.67) and the BG derivatives in Eqs. (D.74)–(D.80) presuppose the Φ_B = 0 vacuum, the 'even less tuning' claim in the abstract and Sec. 4.1 is conditional on an unverified assumption. The authors should compute or bound these radiative corrections, or show they can be absorbed by counterterms without reintroducing tuning.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 2, after Eq. (2.5)] The statement that the U(1)_X charges 'are those for which all anomalies vanish' is asserted but no anomaly coefficient table is given. Given that the charge assignments are nonstandard, a compact table of all fermion representations and anomaly coefficients would be helpful.
[Sec. 3.1, Fig. 1 and Fig. 2] The branching-fraction labels in Fig. 1 and the notation for λ̂_Q, λ̂_U, λ̂_D are not defined in the caption or in the text immediately preceding the figure. Please define all couplings shown.
[Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 3.3] The collider cross sections are leading order (Eqs. C.8–C.17) and the HL projection uses the naive rescaling in Eq. (3.1). The mass bounds on w are therefore approximate; this does not affect the main naturalness claim, but the approximation should be stated explicitly in the text.
[Sec. 4, text after Eq. (4.15)] Typographical issues: 'spitting' should be 'splitting' in the Fig. 4 caption; in the Fig. 6 caption 'affect' should be 'effect'; in Sec. 6 'lager' should be 'larger'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The extended-color twin Higgs construction is self-contained: vacuum parameters, tuning, and signatures follow from the stated Lagrangian and gauge structure, with self-citations providing motivation rather than load-bearing input.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from the potential Eq. (4.1) through the vacuum condition Eq. (4.10), the derived couplings in Eqs. (4.13)-(4.15), and the Barbieri-Giudice/Coleman-Weinberg tuning analysis of Appendix D (Eqs. D.49-D.52 and D.74-D.80). The central claim that the tuning is often comparable to or lower than the standard mirror twin Higgs follows from an honest one-loop calculation: the N_c=4 factor in Eq. (4.18) and the T_+/T_- spectrum produce the partial cancellations that are highlighted. Those results are arithmetic consequences of the stated Lagrangian parameters, not fitted inputs or renamed outputs. The U(1)_X charges in Sec. 2 are fixed by anomaly cancellation and hypercharge matching, which is a consistency condition rather than a circular step. Collider and cosmological predictions (Z' and xi vectors, fractionally charged fermions, twin confinement scale, baryon spectrum) are computed from the gauge structure and two-loop running; they are not re-statements of assumptions. The self-citations [11-13] motivate the idea of spontaneously breaking Z2 through a gauge symmetry, but the present paper independently analyzes its own potential and does not import a load-bearing uniqueness theorem from those papers. The main caveat, stated in Sec. 4 ('For simplicity, we restrict our analysis to the tree-level potential'), is that the desired vacuum with <Phi_A>=w and <Phi_B>=0 is not shown to be stable against one-loop corrections to the Phi-sector quartics; if those corrections shifted the minimum, the tuning comparison would not apply. That is a correctness/stability gap, not circularity, because the tuning calculation would still be a genuine calculation from the assumed vacuum. Hence no circular step is exhibited, and the paper merits a low score reflecting only the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 5 invented entities

The central physics rests on the SU(4) gauge extension, the scalar sector that selects the vacuum, the assumed top-sector dominance of radiative corrections, and several cosmological scaling relations. Free parameters are the masses and couplings that map the model to collider and cosmology benchmarks.

free parameters (6)

w (color-breaking VEV) = 2.5-5 TeV in benchmarks; 2.5 TeV in Fig. 6
Sets masses of Z', ξ, and BSM fermions; lower bound from Z' searches (~2.5 TeV).
λ_bU, λ_bQ = chosen so m_T- = 0.6, 1, 1.5 TeV
Control masses of the fourth-component top-partner states; free Yukawas.
m_tB (twin top mass) = scanned 500-1000 GeV
Sets Higgs coupling deviation and drives the tuning comparison.
Λ (UV cutoff) = 5 TeV for tuning plots
Scale that terminates the Coleman-Weinberg logarithms; tuning results depend on this choice.
δH, δΦ, δHΦ = determined by vacuum conditions (e.g., δH ≈ 0.064 from Eq. 4.14)
Scalar quartic couplings; smallness required for pNGB Higgs but signs and stability not fully justified.
λ_bD, λ_bQbU, λ_bQbD = benchmarks; e.g., 10 λ_D for cosmology scenario
Additional Yukawas of hatted fermions; affect cosmology and flavor.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Exact Z2 mirror symmetry between A and B sectors at high scale
Defines the model; equates gauge couplings and scalar potential coefficients.
domain assumption Gauge group SU(4)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_X in each sector
Extended color group; U(1)_X charges chosen for anomaly cancellation and SM hypercharge reproduction.
ad hoc to paper The scalar potential Eq. (4.1) with δH>0, δΦ<0, δHΦ>0 has a vacuum with ⟨ΦA⟩=w, ⟨ΦB⟩=0 and vB>vA
Asserted from Ref. [38] behavior; full stability region not demonstrated.
domain assumption One-loop top-sector Coleman-Weinberg corrections dominate the tuning
Used in App. D; other scalar/fermion loops neglected.
ad hoc to paper Hatted fermion Yukawa matrices are diagonal (MFV)
Introduced to suppress flavor violation; not enforced by gauge structure.
domain assumption Twin hadron quantities scale with Λ_B (fπ ∝ Λ, condensate ∝ Λ^3)
Used in Sec. 5 to estimate TcB, pion masses, baryon masses.
domain assumption Reheating temperature below BSM fermion masses
Needed to avoid overproduction of fractionally charged relics; low-T_RH baryogenesis cited.

invented entities (5)

ΦA, ΦB scalar doublets
purpose: Break SU(4)_c in visible sector and spontaneously break Z2
New scalars; no direct evidence; only indirect constraints via Z' searches.
Hatted fermions bQ, bU, bD (3 generations)
purpose: Give mass to fourth-component quarks and provide electroweak-scale twin fermions
Yukawas are free parameters; no sharp mass predictions.
Fourth-component quarks U4, D4, Q4
purpose: Complete SU(4) multiplets; become charge ±1/2 fermions after color breaking
Masses free (w λ); charge assignments are fixed by U(1)_X.
Z' boson and ξ vector independent evidence
purpose: Heavy gauge bosons from color breaking; distinctive collider signatures
Masses tied to w and gauge couplings; dilepton/dijet and exotic hadron searches provide falsifiable handles.
Twin spin-0 baryon (uudd)
purpose: Stable dark matter candidate with charge 1/2
Mass estimate tens of GeV from scaling; abundance and stability model-dependent.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extended Color Twin Higgs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SWDA7S3

@misc{pith2026250810102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extended Color Twin Higgs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SWDA7S3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10102}
}

abstract

We describe a novel variation of the mirror Twin Higgs model in which the color gauge group in both sectors is extended to SU(4$)_c$ and spontaneously broken to SU(3$)_c$ exclusively in the visible sector. Through this process, the mirror $Z_2$ symmetry is spontaneously broken, allowing for a phenomenologically viable electroweak vacuum alignment. This structure produces interesting collider signatures, including heavy vectors and fermions with fractional electric charges. The twin sector, with unbroken SU(4$)_c$, produces interesting cosmological characteristics, such as the possibility to reduce $\Delta N_\text{eff}$ and stable spin-0 baryons. The enlarged top quark sector required by the extended color gauge symmetry preserves naturalness, with even less tuning than the original twin Higgs in many circumstances.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

Batell, M

B. Batell, M. Low, E. T. Neil and C. B. Verhaaren, Review of Neutral Naturalness , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022, 2203.05531

arXiv 2021
[2]

Chacko, H.-S

Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik, The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 231802 [ hep-ph/0506256]

arXiv 2006
[3]

Craig, A

N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum, Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC , JHEP 07 (2015) 105 [ 1501.05310]

arXiv 2015
[4]

Barbieri, L

R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Minimal Mirror Twin Higgs , JHEP 11 (2016) 172 [1609.05589]

arXiv 2016
[5]

The spontaneous $\mathbb{Z}_2$ breaking Twin Higgs

H. Beauchesne, K. Earl and T. Gr´ egoire,The spontaneous Z2 breaking Twin Higgs, JHEP 01 (2016) 130 [ 1510.06069]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[6]

Tadpole-Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and pNGB Higgs Models

R. Harnik, K. Howe and J. Kearney, Tadpole-Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and pNGB Higgs Models , JHEP 03 (2017) 111 [ 1603.03772]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[7]

The Radiative Z2 Breaking Twin Higgs

J.-H. Yu, Radiative-Z2-breaking twin Higgs model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 111704 [1608.01314]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[8]

A Tale of Two Twin Higgses: Addressing Little Hierarchy in Natural 2HDM Framework

J.-H. Yu, A tale of twin Higgs: natural twin two Higgs doublet models , JHEP 12 (2016) 143 [1608.05713]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 74 references

[9]

T. H. Jung, Spontaneous Twin Symmetry Breaking , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115012 [1902.10978]

2019 arXiv
[10]

Bittar, D

P. Bittar, D. B. Costa and G. Burdman, Neutrino masses in the mirror twin Higgs with spontaneous Z2 breaking, JHEP 09 (2024) 106 [ 2404.11651]

2024 arXiv
[11]

Batell and C

B. Batell and C. B. Verhaaren, Breaking Mirror Twin Hypercharge, JHEP 12 (2019) 010 [1904.10468]

2019 arXiv
[12]

Liu and N

D. Liu and N. Weiner, A Portalino to the Twin Sector , JHEP 03 (2023) 235 [ 1905.00861]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Batell, W

B. Batell, W. Hu and C. B. Verhaaren, Breaking Mirror Twin Color , JHEP 08 (2020) 009 [2004.10761]

2020 arXiv
[14]

Curtin, S

D. Curtin, S. Gryba, D. Hooper, J. Scholtz and J. Setford, Resurrecting the fraternal twin WIMP miracle, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 035033 [ 2106.12578]

2022 arXiv
[15]

Kilic, C

C. Kilic, C. B. Verhaaren and T. Youn, Twin quark dark matter from cogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 116018 [ 2109.03248]

2021 arXiv
[16]

Foot, Gauge Model for the Strong Interactions , Phys

R. Foot, Gauge Model for the Strong Interactions , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 3136

1989
[17]

Foot and O

R. Foot and O. F. Hernandez, The Color Gauge Group and New Low-energy Phenomena , Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2283

1990
[18]

Foot and O

R. Foot and O. F. Hernandez, CHARGED 1/2 FERMIONS AND THE SU(4) COLOR MODEL, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992) 1315. – 41 –

1992
[19]

Pleitez, SU(n)-c x SU(m)-L x U(1)-N generalizations of the Standard Model , hep-ph/9302287

V. Pleitez, SU(n)-c x SU(m)-L x U(1)-N generalizations of the Standard Model , hep-ph/9302287

arXiv
[20]

Foot, Top quark forward-backward asymmetry from SU( Nc) color, Phys

R. Foot, Top quark forward-backward asymmetry from SU( Nc) color, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114013 [1103.1940]

2011 arXiv
[21]

CMS, CMScollaboration, Search for Fractionally Charged Particles in pp Collisions at√s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 092008 [ 1210.2311]

2013 arXiv
[22]

CMS collaboration, Search for Fractionally Charged Particles in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 131802 [ 2402.09932]

2025 arXiv
[23]

Vannerom, Search for new physics in the dark sector with the CMS detector: From invisible to low charge particles , Ph.D

D. Vannerom, Search for new physics in the dark sector with the CMS detector: From invisible to low charge particles , Ph.D. thesis, Brussels U., 2019

2019
[24]

D’Ambrosio, G

G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach , Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [ hep-ph/0207036]

2002 arXiv
[25]

ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 of pp collision data collected at √s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 68 [1903.06248]

2019 arXiv
[26]

CMS collaboration, Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 07 (2021) 208 [ 2103.02708]

2021 arXiv
[27]

CMS collaboration, Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter mediators and other new particles , JHEP 08 (2018) 130 [ 1806.00843]

2018 arXiv
[28]

CMS collaboration, Search for high mass dijet resonances with a new background prediction method in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2020) 033 [ 1911.03947]

2020 arXiv
[29]

CMS collaboration, Search for resonant tt production in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 04 (2019) 031 [ 1810.05905]

2019 arXiv
[30]

ATLAS collaboration, Search for tt resonances in fully hadronic final states in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10 (2020) 061 [ 2005.05138]

2020 arXiv
[31]

Alonso, D

R. Alonso, D. Dimakou and M. West, Fractional-charge hadrons and leptons to tell the Standard Model group apart , Phys. Lett. B 863 (2025) 139354 [ 2404.03438]

2025 arXiv
[32]

Li and L.-X

H.-L. Li and L.-X. Xu, Understanding the SM gauge group from SMEFT , JHEP 07 (2024) 199 [2404.04229]

2024 arXiv
[33]

Koren and A

S. Koren and A. Martin, Fractionally charged particles at the energy frontier: The SM gauge group and one-form global symmetry , SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 004 [ 2406.17850]

2025 arXiv
[34]

Koren and A

S. Koren and A. Martin, Phenomenology of Fractionally Charged Particles: Two Reps Are Better Than One , 2507.16900

arXiv
[35]

OPAL collaboration, Search for stable and longlived massive charged particles in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 130-GeV to 209-GeV , Phys. Lett. B 572 (2003) 8 [hep-ex/0305031]

2003 arXiv
[36]

Davidson, S

S. Davidson, S. Hannestad and G. Raffelt, Updated bounds on millicharged particles , JHEP 05 (2000) 003 [ hep-ph/0001179]

2000 arXiv
[37]

CMS collaboration, Searches for Long-Lived Charged Particles in pp Collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 07 (2013) 122 [ 1305.0491]. – 42 –

2013 arXiv
[38]

Barbieri, T

R. Barbieri, T. Gregoire and L. J. Hall, Mirror world at the large hadron collider , hep-ph/0509242

arXiv
[39]

Burdman, Z

G. Burdman, Z. Chacko, R. Harnik, L. de Lima and C. B. Verhaaren, Colorless Top Partners, a 125 GeV Higgs, and the Limits on Naturalness , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055007 [1411.3310]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Barbieri and G

R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses , Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63

1988
[41]

S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888

1973
[42]

M. L. Perl, P. C. Kim, V. Halyo, E. R. Lee, I. T. Lee, D. Loomba et al., The Search for stable, massive, elementary particles , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 2137 [hep-ex/0102033]

2001 arXiv
[43]

Taoso, G

M. Taoso, G. Bertone and A. Masiero, Dark Matter Candidates: A Ten-Point Test , JCAP 03 (2008) 022 [ 0711.4996]

2008 arXiv
[44]

Dunsky, L

D. Dunsky, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya, CHAMP Cosmic Rays , JCAP 07 (2019) 015 [1812.11116]

2019 arXiv
[45]

G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023508 [ hep-ph/0005123]

2001 arXiv
[46]

Batell, Y

B. Batell, Y. Kim, H.-S. Lee and J. Lee, Dark gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking with a massless dark photon , JHEP 05 (2025) 052 [ 2412.17777]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Farina, A

M. Farina, A. Monteux and C. S. Shin, Twin mechanism for baryon and dark matter asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 035017 [ 1604.08211]

2016 arXiv
[48]

K. Earl, C. S. Fong, T. Gregoire and A. Tonero, Mirror Dirac leptogenesis, JCAP 03 (2020) 036 [1903.12192]

2020 arXiv
[49]

Feng and J.-H

W.-Z. Feng and J.-H. Yu, Twin cogenesis, Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 (2023) 045201 [2005.06471]

2023 arXiv
[50]

Beauchesne and Y

H. Beauchesne and Y. Kats, Cosmology of the Twin Higgs without explicit Z2 breaking, JHEP 12 (2021) 160 [ 2109.03279]

2021 arXiv
[51]

Bittar, G

P. Bittar, G. Burdman and L. Kiriliuk, Baryogenesis and dark matter in the mirror twin Higgs, JHEP 11 (2023) 043 [ 2307.04662]

2023 arXiv
[52]

Alonso- ´Alvarez, D

G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, D. Curtin, A. Rasovic and Z. Yuan, Baryogenesis through asymmetric reheating in the mirror twin Higgs , JHEP 05 (2024) 069 [ 2311.06341]

2024 arXiv
[53]

Craig, S

N. Craig, S. Koren and T. Trott, Cosmological Signals of a Mirror Twin Higgs , JHEP 05 (2017) 038 [ 1611.07977]

2017 arXiv
[54]

Chacko, N

Z. Chacko, N. Craig, P. J. Fox and R. Harnik, Cosmology in Mirror Twin Higgs and Neutrino Masses , JHEP 07 (2017) 023 [ 1611.07975]

2017 arXiv
[55]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

2018 arXiv
[56]

Farina, Asymmetric Twin Dark Matter , JCAP 11 (2015) 017 [ 1506.03520]

M. Farina, Asymmetric Twin Dark Matter , JCAP 11 (2015) 017 [ 1506.03520]

2015 arXiv
[57]

Csaki, E

C. Csaki, E. Kuflik and S. Lombardo, Viable Twin Cosmology from Neutrino Mixing , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055013 [ 1703.06884]. – 43 –

2017 arXiv
[58]

Harigaya, R

K. Harigaya, R. Mcgehee, H. Murayama and K. Schutz, A predictive mirror twin Higgs with small Z 2 breaking, JHEP 05 (2020) 155 [ 1905.08798]

2020 arXiv
[59]

M. G. P´ erez, A. Gonz´ alez-Arroyo and M. Okawa,Meson spectrum in the large N limit, JHEP 04 (2021) 230 [ 2011.13061]

2021 arXiv
[60]

HotQCD collaboration, Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials , Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 15 [ 1812.08235]

2019 arXiv
[61]

Gell-Mann, R

M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes and B. Renner, Behavior of current divergences under SU(3) x SU(3), Phys. Rev. 175 (1968) 2195

1968
[62]

LSD collaboration, Composite bosonic baryon dark matter on the lattice: SU(4) baryon spectrum and the effective Higgs interaction , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094508 [ 1402.6656]

2014 arXiv
[63]

J. Fan, A. Katz, L. Randall and M. Reece, Double-Disk Dark Matter , Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 139 [ 1303.1521]

2013 arXiv
[64]

Ghalsasi and M

A. Ghalsasi and M. McQuinn, Exploring the astrophysics of dark atoms , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123018 [ 1712.04779]

2018 arXiv
[65]

J. H. Chang, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig and C. Kouvaris, Structure Formation and Exotic Compact Objects in a Dissipative Dark Sector , JCAP 03 (2019) 036 [ 1812.07000]

2019 arXiv
[66]

Huo, H.-B

R. Huo, H.-B. Yu and Y.-M. Zhong, The Structure of Dissipative Dark Matter Halos , JCAP 06 (2020) 051 [ 1912.06757]

2020 arXiv
[67]

X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, L. Necib, F. Jiang, M. Boylan-Kolchin and A. Wetzel, Dissipative dark matter on FIRE – I. Structural and kinematic properties of dwarf galaxies , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506 (2021) 4421 [ 2102.09580]

2021 arXiv
[68]

X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, L. Necib, F. Jiang, M. Boylan-Kolchin and A. Wetzel, Dissipative Dark Matter on FIRE. II. Observational Signatures and Constraints from Local Dwarf Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 131 [ 2206.05327]

2024 arXiv
[69]

S. Roy, X. Shen, M. Lisanti, D. Curtin, N. Murray and P. F. Hopkins, Simulating Atomic Dark Matter in Milky Way Analogs , Astrophys. J. Lett. 954 (2023) L40 [ 2304.09878]

2023 arXiv
[70]

Gemmell, S

C. Gemmell, S. Roy, X. Shen, D. Curtin, M. Lisanti, N. Murray et al., Dissipative Dark Substructure: The Consequences of Atomic Dark Matter on Milky Way Analog Subhalos , Astrophys. J. 967 (2024) 21 [ 2311.02148]

2024 arXiv
[71]

Bansal, J

S. Bansal, J. Barron, D. Curtin and Y. Tsai, Precision cosmological constraints on atomic dark matter , JHEP 10 (2023) 095 [ 2212.02487]

2023 arXiv
[72]

Chacko, D

Z. Chacko, D. Curtin, M. Geller and Y. Tsai, Cosmological Signatures of a Mirror Twin Higgs, JHEP 09 (2018) 163 [ 1803.03263]

2018 arXiv
[73]

Bansal, J

S. Bansal, J. H. Kim, C. Kolda, M. Low and Y. Tsai, Mirror twin Higgs cosmology: constraints and a possible resolution to the H 0 and S 8 tensions, JHEP 05 (2022) 050 [2110.04317]

2022 arXiv
[74]

R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber, QCD and collider physics , vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2011, 10.1017/CBO9780511628788. – 44 –

2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Batell, M

B. Batell, M. Low, E. T. Neil and C. B. Verhaaren, Review of Neutral Naturalness , in Snowmass 2021 , 3, 2022, 2203.05531

arXiv 2021

[2] [2]

Chacko, H.-S

Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik, The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 231802 [ hep-ph/0506256]

arXiv 2006

[3] [3]

Craig, A

N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum, Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC , JHEP 07 (2015) 105 [ 1501.05310]

arXiv 2015

[4] [4]

Barbieri, L

R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya, Minimal Mirror Twin Higgs , JHEP 11 (2016) 172 [1609.05589]

arXiv 2016

[5] [5]

The spontaneous $\mathbb{Z}_2$ breaking Twin Higgs

H. Beauchesne, K. Earl and T. Gr´ egoire,The spontaneous Z2 breaking Twin Higgs, JHEP 01 (2016) 130 [ 1510.06069]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[6] [6]

Tadpole-Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and pNGB Higgs Models

R. Harnik, K. Howe and J. Kearney, Tadpole-Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and pNGB Higgs Models , JHEP 03 (2017) 111 [ 1603.03772]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017

[7] [7]

The Radiative Z2 Breaking Twin Higgs

J.-H. Yu, Radiative-Z2-breaking twin Higgs model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 111704 [1608.01314]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[8] [8]

A Tale of Two Twin Higgses: Addressing Little Hierarchy in Natural 2HDM Framework

J.-H. Yu, A tale of twin Higgs: natural twin two Higgs doublet models , JHEP 12 (2016) 143 [1608.05713]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016