REVIEW
Contribution of Majoron to Hubble tension in gauged U(1)$_{L_\mu-L_\tau}$ Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this paper, we analyze parameter regions that can alleviate the Hubble tension in the U(1)$_{L_\mu - L_\tau}$ model with the broken lepton number U(1)$_L$ symmetry. As new particles, this model has a U(1)$_{L_\mu - L_\tau}$ gauge boson $Z'$ and a Majoron $\phi$, which can affect the early universe and the effective number of neutrino species $N_{\rm eff}$. If $Z'$ and $\phi$ simultaneously exist in the early universe, $Z'\,$-$\,\phi$ interaction processes such as $Z'\nu_\alpha \leftrightarrow \phi\bar{\nu}_\beta$ occur. The comparison of $N_{\rm eff}$ between the cases with and without the $Z'\,$-$\,\phi$ interaction processes shows that these processes make a small contribution of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-4})$ to $N_{\rm eff}$, and it does not need to be considered for the alleviation of the Hubble tension. Based on these facts, we calculated $N_{\rm eff}$ for various Majoron parameters without the $Z'\,$-$\,\phi$ interaction processes to search parameters that could alleviate the Hubble tension. As a result, we found that the U(1)$_{L_\mu - L_\tau}$ gauge boson and Majoron can alleviate the Hubble tension in some parameter regions, and there is a non-trivial synergy contribution between $Z'$ and $\phi$. Moreover, the parameter region with a lighter mass $m_\phi \lesssim 2$ MeV and a larger coupling $\lambda \gtrsim 10^{-8}$ is excluded because it predicts too large $N_{\rm eff}$, i.e. $N_{\rm eff} \gtrsim 3.5$. The favored and restricted regions of the Majoron parameters depend on the $Z'$ parameters because of the presence of the $Z'$ contribution and synergy one.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.