Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Overview of the proof of the exterior stability of the $(1+3)$-Minkowski space-time governed by the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that small smooth perturbations of the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge decay to zero outside the future light cone of any compact set, leaving Minkowski spacetime stable there.

desk verdict A readable roadmap for a claimed proof that rests on unproved imports; the overview is useful, but the theorem is not established here. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00071 v1 pith:3TCJXVIJ submitted 2024-12-29 math.AP gr-qcmath.DG

Sari Ghanem This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APgr-qcmath.DG MSC 35Q7535L7283C0535B40
keywords Einstein-Yang-MillssystemexteriorstabilityMinkowskispacetimeLorenzgaugewavecoordinatesnullframedecompositionYang-Millspotentialnonlinearequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims a proof of the exterior stability of Minkowski spacetime — stability in the whole region lying outside the future light cone of any prescribed compact set — for the fully coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge (the divergence condition $\nabla^\alpha A_\alpha = 0$ imposed on the Yang-Mills potential $A$) and in harmonic wave coordinates on the metric, for the potential valued in the Lie algebra of any compact Lie group, without spherical symmetry. The main theorem states that sufficiently small, smooth, asymptotically flat initial data satisfying the Einstein-Yang-Mills constraint equations produce a solution that, in the future causal complement of any compact set, converges to the zero Yang-Mills potential and to Minkowski spacetime, with explicit pointwise decay rates for the fields and curvature and an energy that grows at most like an arbitrarily small power of time. A sympathetic reader should care because this is a matter-coupled stability problem that fails the null condition (the quadratic structure that makes small quasilinear waves disperse cleanly): unlike Einstein-Maxwell, the non-abelian equations cannot be written without the potential, so stability is genuinely gauge-dependent, and new quadratic terms $A_{e_a}\nabla^{(m)} A_{e_a}$ and $A_L \nabla^{(m)} A$ arise that the vacuum and Maxwell analyses never face. The proof's work is to tame these two bad nonlinearities through a null-frame decomposition (splitting the fields into components along the outgoing null cone and the 2-spheres), a dedicated weighted energy estimate for the tangential components $A_{e_a}$, a Hardy-type inequality in the exterior, and a refined commutator estimate that upgrades decay for all Lie derivatives.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the null-frame tetrad $\{L, \underline{L}, e_1, e_2\}$ built from wave coordinates, which decomposes the coupled system into 'good' components ($A_T$, $h^1_{TU}$) controllable through the Lorenz gauge and wave-coordinate conditions, and 'bad' components ($A_L$, $A_{e_a}$) whose products $A_L \cdot \nabla^{(m)} A$ and $A_{e_a} \cdot \nabla^{(m)} A_{e_a}$ appear in the wave equation for $A_L$ in (2.19). The bad term $A_{e_a} \cdot \nabla^{(m)} A_{e_a}$ is controlled by Lemma 2.2, a weighted energy estimate for the tangential components imported from the companion preprint [35]; the bad term $A_L \cdot \nabla^{(m)} A$ is controlled using a strong Lorenz-gauge decay estimate for $A_L$ in (2.26)-(2.27), a Hardy-type inequality in the exterior (Corollary 2.2), and an estimate on $\partial A_L$ in (2.29). Finally, a refined commutator estimate (2.43)-(2.44), inserted into the null-frame Lie-derivative upgrade (2.45) taken from Corollary 7.2 of [52], upgrades the dispersive estimates to all Lie derivatives of the fields, and the energy bootstrap $E_N(t) \leq E(N)\, \epsilon\,(1+t)^\delta$ is closed by a Gronwall argument in Proposition 2.1.

What would settle it

Read Lemma 2.2 in the companion preprint [35] and check whether its hypotheses cover the objects to which it is applied here: the lemma asks for a field decaying sufficiently fast at spatial infinity, while in (2.20) it is applied to Lie derivatives $Z^I A_{e_a}$ whose decay under the bootstrap is only the slow rate of (2.21); if the lemma is false or carries extra hypotheses, the pointwise estimate (2.21) and Theorem 1 collapse. A direct way to look for that failure is to test the inequality (2.20) on a small spherically symmetric SU(2) mode in Minkowski space, where the left-hand side and the $|Z^K H_{LL}|^2/(1+|q|)^{4+2\gamma}$ term can be evaluated explicitly and checked against the claimed weights.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1, is that given smooth, asymptotically flat initial data satisfying the Einstein-Yang-Mills constraint equations with sufficiently small weighted energy norm $E_{N+2}$ and small mass $M$, there exists a solution $(M,A,g)$ of the fully coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge and in wave coordinates, defined in the whole future causal complement of any compact set $K \subset \Sigma$ and converging to the zero Yang-Mills potential and to Minkowski spacetime. More precisely, the perturbation $h^1 = g - m - h^0$ of the metric and the potential $A$ obey the pointwise decay estimates (1.22) and (1.23), the Yang-Mills curvature decays according to (1.24), and the exterior energy satisfies $E_N(K)(t) \leq C(N)\, \epsilon \,(1+t)^\epsilon$ as in (1.26). The proof treats the coupled system as covariant nonlinear wave equations in a null frame, and a recurring structural finding is that the energy estimate must be closed separately for the tangential components $A_{e_a}$ before the full potential can be handled — a distinction that has no analogue in the Einstein vacuum or Einstein-Maxwell cases, and which reflects the failure of the null condition in the Lorenz gauge.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on Lemma 2.2, a weighted energy estimate for the tangential components $A_{e_a}$ of the Yang-Mills potential that is imported from the companion preprint [35] and not proved here; if that lemma carries hidden hypotheses or an error, the controls on the bad product $A_{e_a}\cdot\nabla^{(m)}A_{e_a}$ and the pointwise decay (2.21) — hence the theorem — do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every compact gauge group, small smooth data satisfying the Einstein-Yang-Mills constraints produce a solution in the Lorenz gauge and wave coordinates that converges to the zero Yang-Mills potential and to Minkowski spacetime throughout the exterior region, at the pointwise rates (1.22)-(1.23).
  • The gauge-invariant Yang-Mills curvature decays at the explicit rate (1.24), so the physically meaningful field strength disperses, not merely the gauge-dependent potential.
  • The exterior energy is almost conserved: $E_N(K)(t) \leq C(N) \epsilon (1+t)^\epsilon$ as in (1.26), with the loss confined to an arbitrarily small power of time.
  • Stability in this formulation is genuinely gauge-dependent: because the Yang-Mills equations cannot be expressed without the potential $A$, the statement of the theorem presupposes the Lorenz gauge, in contrast to the abelian Maxwell case where the curvature suffices.
  • Because the system fails the null condition, the proof shows that the failure of null structure is not an obstruction to exterior stability; the offending products $A_{e_a}\nabla^{(m)}A_{e_a}$ and $A_L\nabla^{(m)}A$ are controlled by separate estimates rather than by a null condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exterior stability is correct, the natural next conjecture is full global stability, obtained by covering the interior of the future light cone with a chain of similar exterior-type estimates; the present argument offers no control that crosses the cone $r = t$, so the boundary of the exterior region is where a genuine obstruction could still hide.
  • Because the bootstrap opens through the imported tangential energy estimate (Lemma 2.2), the theorem is currently conditional on that companion preprint; checking that Lemma 2.2 applies to the Lie derivatives $Z^I A_{e_a}$ used in (2.20) is the fastest way to test the whole chain.
  • In the abelian limit (gauge group U(1)), the bad products commute away and the system degenerates toward Einstein-Maxwell, so the present estimates should collapse onto the known Einstein-Maxwell stability statements; reproducing that limit would be a clean consistency check.
  • The decay rates (1.22)-(1.24) are sharp enough to benchmark Lorenz-gauge numerical relativity: a small SU(2) perturbation of flat spacetime simulated in this gauge either exhibits the stated $1/(1+t+|q|)^{1-\epsilon}(1+|q|)^{1+\gamma}$ falloff or exposes a concrete gap in the estimates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper claims an exterior stability theorem for the (1+3)-dimensional Minkowski spacetime solution of the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge, for Yang-Mills fields valued in an arbitrary compact Lie algebra. Theorem 1 asserts that sufficiently small, smooth, asymptotically flat constraint-satisfying initial data admit a solution in the future of the causal complement of any compact set, converging to a null Yang-Mills potential and to Minkowski spacetime, with the pointwise decay estimates (1.22)-(1.24) and the weighted energy bound (1.26). The announced proof proceeds by reducing the system to nonlinear wave equations in a null frame, then controlling the "bad" nonlinearities A_ea·∇A_ea and A_L·∇A by a separate energy estimate for tangential components, refined commutator estimates, and a bootstrap closure.

Significance. If true, the theorem would be a substantial advance: it addresses a fully coupled Einstein-matter system whose Lorenz-gauge equations fail the null condition, and it covers arbitrary compact Lie algebras without symmetry assumptions. The proposed strategy is meaningful, singling out a genuinely new difficulty, the tangential component A_ea in the wave equation for A_L, which requires a componentwise energy estimate that is absent in the Einstein-vacuum and Einstein-Maxwell cases. However, the present manuscript does not contain the proof of its central claims. The two main structural inputs, Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2, are imported from same-author preprints [34] and [35] without proof; the bootstrap closure in Proposition 2.1 is only sketched via an unsupported inequality (2.53); and Theorem 1 repeats the statement of [36]. Thus the significance is conditional and cannot be assessed from this text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.2] The single most load-bearing estimate, the exterior energy inequality for the tangential components A_ea, is quoted from [35] with no proof. The lemma is used to control the term |A_ea|·|∇(m)A_ea| in the wave equation (2.19) and to derive (2.20), (2.21), (2.24), and (2.25), all of which feed into Proposition 2.1. The hypotheses on Φ_V, the weight w(q), the domain Σ_ext^t, the null-boundary flux term, the decay of Φ at infinity, and the role of the bootstrap constant E(4) are not checked, or even defined, in the present manuscript. Without this lemma the estimates in Subsection 2.2 are unsupported and Theorem 1 does not follow. This is precisely the point where the analysis departs from the Einstein-vacuum and Einstein-Maxwell cases, so the missing proof is load-bearing.
  2. [Section 2.1, Lemma 2.1] The reduction of the Einstein-Yang-Mills system to the coupled wave equations (2.5)-(2.6), together with the assertion that solutions of these reduced equations satisfy the Lorenz and wave-coordinate gauge conditions, is imported from [34] without proof. Moreover, the text states that (2.15)-(2.18) are not merely estimates but are equalities between tensors, yet it displays only inequalities and provides no derivation. These equalities are the basis for the schematic wave equations (2.19) and for the subsequent good/bad decomposition. A reader therefore cannot verify that the system treated in Sections 2.2-2.5 is equivalent to the original Einstein-Yang-Mills system (1.1) in the claimed gauges.
  3. [Section 2.5, Proposition 2.1] The closure of the bootstrap is not proved. The proof consists of the single estimate (2.53), followed by "This leads to" and "Hence, we get the result." There is no derivation of (2.53) from the preceding estimates (2.20)-(2.25), (2.38)-(2.42), and (2.48)-(2.52); no Gronwall argument is written; and the crucial choice of δ relative to the bootstrap power (1+t)^δ is absent. In particular, since (2.53) contains both a time integral of E_{|K|}(t) with a (1+t)^{-1} factor and one with a (1+t)^{-1+c·ǫ} factor, the closure requires a delicate smallness/δ hierarchy that is not supplied. The term E_{|I|+2}(t1) on the right-hand side also needs an absorption argument using the initial smallness (1.27). This gap is central because Proposition 2.1 is the step that upgrades the a priori bound (2.2) to the theorem's conclusions.
  4. [Section 1, Theorem 1] The statement of Theorem 1 leaves the role of the mass parameter M ambiguous. The initial data are given by (Σ, A, E, g, k), but h^1 in (1.12) is defined by subtracting χ(r) M/r from g_ij for a constant M that is not explicitly identified with the ADM mass of (Σ, g). The smallness of E_{N+2} in (1.17) then depends on this choice of M, and the estimates (1.22)-(1.29) use the same M in the definition of h0. Without a statement that M is determined by g, a given data set may satisfy (1.17) for one choice of M and fail for another. The theorem's hypotheses should be made unambiguous.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase "hyperbolic partial partial differential" and the sentence "in the future causal of the compact K" should be corrected; these appear to be typographical errors.
  2. [Theorem 1 and Section 2] The theorem is labeled "Theorem 1" in Section 1, but Section 2 repeatedly refers to "Theorem 1.2" (e.g., "The goal of this section is to prove Theorem 1.2" and "we proved our Theorem 1.2"). The numbering should be made consistent.
  3. [Section 2.2] The weight w is introduced in (1.25), but the text at the start of Subsection 2.2 refers to "Definition 1.25"; this should be "equation (1.25)".
  4. [Section 2.1, sentence before (2.7)] The constraint equations are cited as "(1.14), (1.16), (1.16)"; the middle reference should be (1.15).
  5. [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.2] Lemma 2.2 is not self-contained: the objects Σ_ext^t, N_{t1}^{t2}, dv^{(m)}_N, T^{(g)}, L_t, and Φ_V are not defined in the lemma statement. Definitions should be supplied even if the proof is in [35].
  6. [Section 1.2, equation (1.13)] The energy norm E_N uses expressions D(D^I A) and D(D^I h^1), but the order and meaning of the derivatives is ambiguous. It should be clarified whether D^I denotes repeated covariant derivatives and how the metric-dependent D interacts with the flat derivatives used elsewhere, e.g., in the energy norm (2.1).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Load-bearing self-citations: the control of A_ea·∇A_ea is imported from the same author's [35] and the 'special integration' from [34]; the central claim itself is not definitionally circular.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.2 (imported from [35])]
    "To control correctly the term |Aea | · |∇ (m)Aea | , we use first an energy estimate that involves only the component Aea , an energy estimate that we established in [35] (see the following Lemma 2.2 from [35])."

    This is the only estimate used to control the bad term A_ea · ∇(m)A_ea in the A_L wave equation (2.19). It is stated from the same author's preprint [35] and is not proved in this manuscript. The subsequent bounds (2.20)–(2.25), the pointwise decay (2.21), and the bootstrap in Proposition 2.1 all inherit this dependence. The manuscript does not supply the hypotheses of [35] in a checkable way (the weight w, the exterior domain Σ_ext, the decay of Φ_V, the null-boundary flux, and the role of E(4)), so Theorem 1 rests on an unverified self-citation rather than on a derivation contained in this paper.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 2.2, paragraph after (2.23)]
    "This in turn would allow us, by special integration, as we detailed in [34], to translate the pointwise estimate on |∇(m)Aea | into pointwise estimate on |Aea | (see estimate (2.21))."

    The passage from the gradient bound on A_ea to the pointwise bound on A_ea is delegated to another paper by the same author, [34]. This step is needed to estimate |L_ZK A_ea| in (2.24)–(2.25) and to close the bootstrap. As with Lemma 2.2, no proof is given here, so the chain of estimates leading to the theorem depends on a self-citation that the reader cannot verify from the present text.

full rationale

Theorem 1 is not produced by fitting parameters, by renaming a known result, or by defining the conclusion in terms of the hypothesis. The proof is a standard continuity/bootstrap argument with many displayed estimates. The main circularity-type concern is heavy, load-bearing self-citation: Lemma 2.2, the energy estimate for the tangential components A_ea, is quoted from the same author's [35] and is the sole control on the bad term A_ea·∇(m)A_ea in (2.19). Without it, the pointwise estimates feeding Proposition 2.1 do not follow. Similarly, the 'special integration' that turns gradient decay into pointwise decay for A_ea is imported from [34]. These are not reductions by construction, and the paper does contain substantial independent structural work (the null-frame decomposition, the treatment of A_L·∇(m)A, and the upgraded commutator estimates), so the central claim retains independent content. However, the two key imported results are not machine-checked, code-reproduced, or otherwise independently grounded in this manuscript, and they are load-bearing rather than incidental. This is a serious verifiability and self-reliance issue, warranting a score of 4 on the circularity scale rather than a higher score reserved for cases where the central claim itself reduces to a fit or a closed self-citation loop.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on smallness conditions on the data and on two imported lemmas from the author's earlier preprints. There are no fitted numerical constants, but the smallness threshold and decay-rate parameters are chosen by hand. The proof also assumes the standard exterior analytic inequalities and the preservation of gauge conditions.

free parameters (3)
  • smallness threshold epsilon = sufficiently small, depending on q0, gamma, delta, N, and mu
    Chosen small enough in the bootstrap argument; the theorem's smallness condition is E^{N+2} <= c and M <= c, so epsilon is an existence threshold, not a fitted constant.
  • decay-rate parameters gamma and delta = gamma > 0 with gamma >= 3*delta and 0 < delta <= 1/4
    Selected by hand to balance weights; the final decay rates in (1.22)-(1.23) depend on them. They are not determined by data.
  • mass parameter M = 0 < M <= epsilon^2
    The ADM mass of the background Schwarzschildian part of the initial data; bounded by epsilon^2 by hypothesis.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 2.1, the null-frame decomposition of the Einstein-Yang-Mills system into the coupled wave equations (2.5)-(2.6)
    Stated without proof and attributed to the author's [34]; it is the foundation for the wave equations used throughout Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 2.2, the exterior energy estimate for the tangential components A_ea
    Imported from the author's [35] and used to control the bad term A_ea times derivative A_ea; it is not proved in this manuscript.
  • domain assumption Preservation of the Lorenz gauge and wave coordinate conditions along the evolution
    The theorem states convergence in the Lorenz gauge and in wave coordinates, but the propagation of these gauge conditions is assumed through the construction in (2.7)-(2.10) and is not proved here.
  • standard math Exterior weighted Klainerman-Sobolev, Hardy, and Gronwall inequalities
    Corollary 2.2 and the weighted Klainerman-Sobolev estimates are invoked without proof; they are standard, but the exact exterior forms used are not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Overview of the proof of the exterior stability of the $(1+3)$-Minkowski space-time governed by the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3TCJXVIJ

@misc{pith2026250100071,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Overview of the proof of the exterior stability of the $(1+3)$-Minkowski space-time governed by the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3TCJXVIJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00071}
}
abstract

We study the Einstein-Yang-Mills system in both the Lorenz and harmonic gauges, where the Yang-Mills fields are valued in any arbitrary Lie algebra $\cal G$, associated to any compact Lie group $G$. This gives a system of hyperbolic partial partial differential that does not satisfy the null condition and that has new complications that are not present for the Einstein vacuum equations nor for the Einstein-Maxwell system. We prove the exterior stability of the Minkowski space-time, $\mathbb{R}^{1+3}$, governed by the fully coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills system in the Lorenz gauge, valued in any arbitrary Lie algebra $\cal G$, without any assumption of spherical symmetry. We start with an arbitrary sufficiently small initial data, defined in a suitable energy norm for the perturbations of the Yang-Mills potential and of the Minkowski space-time, and we show the well-posedness of the Cauchy development in the exterior, and we prove that this leads to solutions converging in the Lorenz gauge and in wave coordinates to the zero Yang-Mills fields and to the Minkowski space-time. This provides a first detailed proof of the exterior stability of Minkowski governed by the fully non-linear Einstein-Yang-Mills equations in the Lorenz gauge, by using a null frame decomposition that was first used by H. Lindblad and I. Rodnianski for the case of the Einstein vacuum equations. We note that in contrast to the much simpler case of the Einstein-Maxwell equations where one can omit the potential, in fact in the non-abelian case of the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations, the question of stability, or non-stability, is a purely gauge dependent statement and the partial differential equations depend on the gauge on the Yang-Mills potential that is needed to write up the equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    Ghanem, Exterior stability of the (1 + 3) -dimensional Minkowski space-time solution to the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations , arXiv:2310.08196

    S. Ghanem, Exterior stability of the (1 + 3) -dimensional Minkowski space-time solution to the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations , arXiv:2310.08196

    arXiv

  2. [34]

    Ghanem, The global stability of the Minkowski space-time in higher d imensions, arXiv:2310.07954

    S. Ghanem, The global stability of the Minkowski space-time in higher d imensions, arXiv:2310.07954

    arXiv

  3. [35]

    Energy estimates for the Einstein-Yang-Mills fields and applications

    S. Ghanem, Energy estimates for the Einstein-Yang-Mills fields and app lications, arXiv:2310.08611

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [1]

    Alinhac, The null condition for quasilinear wave equations in two dim ensions I , Invent

    S. Alinhac, The null condition for quasilinear wave equations in two dim ensions I , Invent. Math 145 (2001), 597–618. 26 SARI GHANEM

    work page 2001

  5. [2]

    Alinhac, Remarks on energy inequalities for wave and Maxwell equatio ns on a curved background, Math

    S. Alinhac, Remarks on energy inequalities for wave and Maxwell equatio ns on a curved background, Math. Ann., 329(4):707–722, 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [3]

    Andersson, Cosmological models and stability , Fundam

    L. Andersson, Cosmological models and stability , Fundam. Theor. Phys., 177:277–303, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [4]

    Decay of solutions to the Maxwell equation on the Schwarzschild background

    L. Andersson, T. B¨ ackdahl, P. Blue, Decay of solutions to the Maxwell equation on the Schwarzschild background, arXiv:1501.04641

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [5]

    Andersson, T

    L. Andersson, T. B¨ ackdahl, P. Blue and S. Ma, Stability for linearized gravity on the Kerr spacetime, arXiv:1903.03859

    arXiv 1903

Show all 69 references
  1. [6]

    Andersson, P

    L. Andersson, P. Blue, Hidden symmetries and decay for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime. Ann. of Math. (2) 182 (2015), no. 3, 787-853

    2015

  2. [7]

    Andersson, P

    L. Andersson, P. Blue, Uniform energy bound and asymptotics for the Maxwell field on a slowly rotating Kerr black hole exterior . J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 12 (2015), no. 4, 689-743

    2015

  3. [8]

    Andersson, P

    L. Andersson, P. Blue, Z. Wyatt, and S-T. Yau, Global stability of space-times with super- symmetric compactifications , arXiv 2006.00824, 2020

    2006 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Andersson and D

    L. Andersson and D. Fajman, Nonlinear stability of the Milne model with matter , Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, 2020

    2020

  5. [10]

    Bieri, An Extension of the Stability Theorem of the Minkowski Space in General Relativity , Journal of Differential Geometry 86 no

    L. Bieri, An Extension of the Stability Theorem of the Minkowski Space in General Relativity , Journal of Differential Geometry 86 no. 1 (2010), 17–70

    2010

  6. [11]

    Bieri, P

    L. Bieri, P. Chen, S-T. Yau, Null Asymptotics of Solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell Equa tions in General Relativity and Gravitational Radiation , Advances in Theoretical and Mathemat- ical Physics, 15, 4, (2011)

    2011

  7. [12]

    Bieri, N

    L. Bieri, N. Zipser, Extensions of the stability theorem of the Minkowski space i n general relativity, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009

    2009

  8. [13]

    Bigorgne, D

    L. Bigorgne, D. Fajman, J. Joudioux, J. Smulevici, M. Th aller, Asymptotic Stability of Minkowski Space-Time with Non-compactly Supported Massle ss Vlasov Matter , Arch. Ra- tional Mech. Anal. 242 (2021), 1–147

    2021

  9. [14]

    Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold , J

    P. Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold , J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 5 (2008), no. 4, 807-856

    2008

  10. [15]

    Choquet-Bruhat, Th´ eor` eme d’Existence pour certains syst` emes d’´ equations aux deriv´ ees partielles nonlin´ eaires, Acta Math

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, Th´ eor` eme d’Existence pour certains syst` emes d’´ equations aux deriv´ ees partielles nonlin´ eaires, Acta Math. 88 (1952), 141-225

    1952

  11. [16]

    Choquet-Bruhat, The null condition and asymptotic expansions for the Einste in ’s equa- tions, Ann

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, The null condition and asymptotic expansions for the Einste in ’s equa- tions, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 9 (2000), 258-266

    2000

  12. [17]

    Choquet-Bruhat and D

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat and D. Christodoulou, Existence of global solutions of the Yang-Mills, Higgs and spinor field equations in 3+1 dimensions , Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 14(4):481–506 (1982), 1981

    1982

  13. [18]

    Choquet-Bruhat and R

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat and R. P. Geroch, Global aspects of the Cauchy problem in General Relativity, CMP 14 (1969), 329-335

    1969

  14. [19]

    Christodoulou, Global solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations for sma ll initial data , Comm

    D. Christodoulou, Global solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations for sma ll initial data , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 39(2):267–282, 1986

    1986

  15. [20]

    Christodoulou, The Global Initial Value Problem in General Relativity , The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting (Rome 2000), V.G

    D. Christodoulou, The Global Initial Value Problem in General Relativity , The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting (Rome 2000), V.G. Gurzadyan, R.T. Jansen , editors, R. Ruffini, editor and series editor, W orld Scientific (2002) 44-54

    2002

  16. [21]

    Christodoulou, S

    D. Christodoulou, S. Klainerman, The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space , Princeton Math. Series 41, 1993

    1993

  17. [22]

    Chru´ sciel, J

    P. Chru´ sciel, J. Shatah, Global existence of solutions of the Yang-Mills equations o n globally hyperbolic four-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds. Asian J. Math. 1 (1997), no. 3, 530-548

    1997

  18. [23]

    Dafermos, On ”time-periodic” black-hole solutions to certain spheri cally symmetric Einstein-matter systems , Commun

    M. Dafermos, On ”time-periodic” black-hole solutions to certain spheri cally symmetric Einstein-matter systems , Commun. Math. Phys. 238:411-427, 2003

    2003

  19. [24]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, The linear stability of the Schwarzschild solution to gravitational perturbations , Acta Math., 222 (2019), 1–214

    2019

  20. [25]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, M. Taylor, Quasilinear wave equations on asymp- totically flat spacetimes with applications to Kerr black ho les, arXiv:2212.14093

    arXiv

  21. [26]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski and M. Taylor, The non-linear stability of the Schwarzschild family of black holes , arXiv:2104.08222

    arXiv

  22. [27]

    Eardley, V

    D. Eardley, V. Moncrief, The global existence of Yang-Mills-Higgs fields in 4-dimens ional Minkowski space. I. Local existence and smoothness propert ies, Comm. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), no. 2, 171-191

    1982

  23. [28]

    Eardley, V

    D. Eardley, V. Moncrief, The global existence of Yang-Mills-Higgs fields in 4-dimens ional Minkowski space. II. Completion of proof , Comm. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), no. 2, 193-212. EINSTEIN-YANG-MILLS IN THE LORENZ GAUGE 27

    1982

  24. [29]

    Fajman, J

    D. Fajman, J. Joudioux, and J. Smulevici, The Stability of the Minkowski space for the Einstein-Vlasov system , Analysis & PDE 14 (2021), 425-531

    2021

  25. [30]

    Friedrich

    H. Friedrich. On the existence of n-geodesically complete or future compl ete solutions of Einstein ’s field equations with smooth asymptotic structur e, Comm. Math. Phys., 107(4):587– 609, 1986

    1986

  26. [31]

    Ghanem, The global non-blow-up of the Yang-Mills curvature on curve d space-times, Jour- nal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Vol

    S. Ghanem, The global non-blow-up of the Yang-Mills curvature on curve d space-times, Jour- nal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Vol. 13, No. 03, 603-631 (2016), arXiv:1312.5476

    2016 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Ghanem, On uniform decay of the Maxwell fields on black hole space-tim es, Reviews in Mathematical Physics Volume No

    S. Ghanem, On uniform decay of the Maxwell fields on black hole space-tim es, Reviews in Mathematical Physics Volume No. 36, Issue No. 06 (2024), arX iv:1409.8040

    2024 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Ghanem, D

    S. Ghanem, D. H¨ afner, The decay of the SU(2) Yang-Mills fields on the Schwarzschild black hole for spherically symmetric small energy initial data , J. Geom. Phys. 123 (2018), 310–342, arXiv:1604.04477

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    H¨ afner, P

    D. H¨ afner, P. Hintz and A. Vasy, Linear stability of slowly rotating Kerr black holes , Invent. Math. 223 (3), 1227–1406, arXiv:1906.00860

    1906 arXiv

  30. [38]

    S. W. Hawking & G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-time , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973

    1973

  31. [39]

    Hintz, Non-linear Stability of the Kerr–Newman–de Sitter Family o f Charged Black Holes , Annals of PDE, 4(1):11, Apr 2018

    P. Hintz, Non-linear Stability of the Kerr–Newman–de Sitter Family o f Charged Black Holes , Annals of PDE, 4(1):11, Apr 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Hintz and A

    P. Hintz and A. Vasy, The global non-linear stability of the Kerr-de Sitter famil y of black holes, Acta Math. 220 (2018), 1–206

    2018

  33. [41]

    L. H¨ ormander, The lifespan of classical solutions of nonlinear hyperboli c equations , Pseudo- differential operators (Oberwolfach, 1986), 214–280, Lect ure Notes in Math., 1256, Springer, Berlin, 1987

    1986

  34. [42]

    H¨ ormander, On the fully nonlinear Cauchy problem with small initial dat a II , Microlocal analysis and nonlinear waves (Minneapolis, MN, 1988–1989) , 51–81, IMA Vol

    L. H¨ ormander, On the fully nonlinear Cauchy problem with small initial dat a II , Microlocal analysis and nonlinear waves (Minneapolis, MN, 1988–1989) , 51–81, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 30, Springer, New York, 1991

    1988

  35. [43]

    H¨ ormander, Lectures on nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    L. H¨ ormander, Lectures on nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

    1997

  36. [44]

    Huneau, Stability of Minkowski Space-Time with a Translation Space -Like Killing Field , Ann

    C. Huneau, Stability of Minkowski Space-Time with a Translation Space -Like Killing Field , Ann. PDE (2018) 4:12

    2018

  37. [45]

    Huneau, Stability in Exponential Time of Minkowski Space–Time with a Translation Space-Like Killing Field , Ann

    C. Huneau, Stability in Exponential Time of Minkowski Space–Time with a Translation Space-Like Killing Field , Ann. PDE (2016) 2:7

    2016

  38. [46]

    John, Blow-up for quasilinear wave equations in three space dimen sions, Comm

    F. John, Blow-up for quasilinear wave equations in three space dimen sions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 34(1):29–51, 1981

    1981

  39. [47]

    Klainerman, Uniform decay estimates and the Lorentz invariance of the cl assical wave equation, Comm

    S. Klainerman, Uniform decay estimates and the Lorentz invariance of the cl assical wave equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 38(3):321–332, 1985

    1985

  40. [48]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, Global nonlinear stability of Schwarzschild spacetime und er polarized perturbations, Annals of Math Studies, 210. Princeton University Press, P rinceton, NJ, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Lindblad, On the asymptotic behavior of solutions to Einstein ’s vacuu m equations in wave coordinates

    H. Lindblad, On the asymptotic behavior of solutions to Einstein ’s vacuu m equations in wave coordinates. Comm. Math. Phys. 353, (2017), No 1, 135–184

    2017

  42. [50]

    Lindblad and I

    H. Lindblad and I. Rodnianski, The weak null condition for Einstein ’s equations, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 336 (2003), no. 11, 901–906

    2003

  43. [51]

    Lindblad, I

    H. Lindblad, I. Rodnianski, Global existence for the Einstein vacuum equations in wave coordinates, Commun. Math. Phys. 256:43-110, 2005

    2005

  44. [52]

    Lindblad, I

    H. Lindblad, I. Rodnianski, The global stability of Minkowski space-time in harmonic ga uge. Ann. of Math. (2) 171 (2010), no. 3, 1401-1477

    2010

  45. [53]

    Lindblad, M

    H. Lindblad, M. Taylor, Global Stability of Minkowski Space for the Einstein–Vlaso v System in the Harmonic Gauge , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 235 (2020) 517–633

    2020

  46. [54]

    Loizelet, Solutions globales des ´ equations d’Einstein-Maxwell , Ann

    J. Loizelet, Solutions globales des ´ equations d’Einstein-Maxwell , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 18(3):565–610, 2009. 28 SARI GHANEM

    2009

  47. [55]

    Loizelet, Probl` emes globaux en relativit´ e g´ en´ erale, Ph.D

    J. Loizelet, Probl` emes globaux en relativit´ e g´ en´ erale, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Francois Ra- belais - Tours, 2008

    2008

  48. [56]

    Ma, Almost Price’s law in Schwarzschild and decay estimates in K err for Maxwell field , Journal of Differential Equations, Volume 339, 5 December 20 22, pages 1-89

    S. Ma, Almost Price’s law in Schwarzschild and decay estimates in K err for Maxwell field , Journal of Differential Equations, Volume 339, 5 December 20 22, pages 1-89

  49. [57]

    Metcalfe, D

    J. Metcalfe, D. Tataru, M. Tohaneanu, Pointwise decay for the Maxwell field on black hole space-times, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 316, Pages 53–93 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Mondal and S-T

    P. Mondal and S-T. Yau, Radiation estimates of the Minkowski space: coupled Einste in- Yang-Mills perturbations, arXiv:2211.03167

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Mondal and S-T

    P. Mondal and S-T. Yau, Einstein-Yang-Mills equations in the double null framewor k, arXiv:2205.01101

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    C. S. Morawetz, The decay of solutions of the exterior initial-boundary val ue problem for the wave equation , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 14:561–568, 1961

    1961

  53. [61]

    Pasqualotto, Nonlinear stability for the Maxwell-Born-Infeld system on a Schwarzschild background, Ann

    F. Pasqualotto, Nonlinear stability for the Maxwell-Born-Infeld system on a Schwarzschild background, Ann. PDE, 5(2):Paper No. 19, 172, 2019

    2019

  54. [62]

    Pasqualotto, The spin ± 1 Teukolsky equations and the Maxwell system on Schwarzschi ld, Ann

    F. Pasqualotto, The spin ± 1 Teukolsky equations and the Maxwell system on Schwarzschi ld, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 20(4):1263–1323, 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    Ringstr¨ om, Future stability of the Einstein-non-linear scalar field sy stem, Invent

    H. Ringstr¨ om, Future stability of the Einstein-non-linear scalar field sy stem, Invent. Math., 173(1):123–208, 2008

    2008

  56. [64]

    Tesfahun, Finite energy local well-posedness for the Yang-Mills-Hig gs equations in Lorenz gauge, Int

    A. Tesfahun, Finite energy local well-posedness for the Yang-Mills-Hig gs equations in Lorenz gauge, Int. Math. Res. Notices (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    Tesfahun, Local well-posedness of the Yang-Mills equations in Lorenz gauge below the energy norm , Nonlinear Differ

    A. Tesfahun, Local well-posedness of the Yang-Mills equations in Lorenz gauge below the energy norm , Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 22 (2015), 849–875

    2015

  58. [66]

    Witten, Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum , Nucl

    E. Witten, Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum , Nucl. Phys., B195:481– 492, 1982

    1982

  59. [67]

    Wyatt, The Weak Null Condition and Kaluza-Klein Spacetimes , Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Vol

    Z. Wyatt, The Weak Null Condition and Kaluza-Klein Spacetimes , Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Vol. 15, No. 02, pages 219-258 (2018 )

    2018

  60. [68]

    Wyatt, The Stability of Hyperbolic PDEs in String Theory, Particle Physics and Cosmol- ogy, Ph.D

    Z. Wyatt, The Stability of Hyperbolic PDEs in String Theory, Particle Physics and Cosmol- ogy, Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, September 2020

    2020

  61. [69]

    Zipser, The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Trivial Solution of th e Einstein-Maxwell Equations, Ph.D

    N. Zipser, The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Trivial Solution of th e Einstein-Maxwell Equations, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 2000. Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Application s (BIMSA) Email address : sarighanem@bimsa.cn

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.